JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print May 23 2006
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985
Received November 10, 2005
Accepted April 18, 2006
Gene Expression and Benefit of Chemotherapy in Women With Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Soonmyung Paik *, Gong Tang , Steven Shak , Chungyeul Kim , Joffre Baker , Wanseop Kim , Maureen Cronin , Frederick L. Baehner , Drew Watson , John Bryant , Joseph P. Costantino , Charles E. Geyer Jr , D. Lawrence Wickerham , and Norman Wolmark
From the Division of Pathology, Operations Center, and Biostatistical Center, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project; Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Human Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA; Genomic Health Inc, Redwood City, CA; and University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: soon.paik{at}nsabp.org
Purpose: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay quantifies the likelihood of distant recurrence in women with estrogen receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen. The relationship between the RS and chemotherapy benefit is not known.
Methods: The RS was measured in tumors from the tamoxifen-treated and tamoxifen plus chemotherapy-treated patients in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B20 trial. Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to test for interaction between chemotherapy treatment and the RS.
Results: A total of 651 patients were assessable (227 randomly assigned to tamoxifen and 424 randomly assigned to tamoxifen plus chemotherapy). The test for interaction between chemotherapy treatment and RS was statistically significant (P = .038). Patients with high-RS ( 31) tumors (ie, high risk of recurrence) had a large benefit from chemotherapy (relative risk, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.53; absolute decrease in 10-year distant recurrence rate: mean, 27.6%; SE, 8.0%). Patients with low-RS (< 18) tumors derived minimal, if any, benefit from chemotherapy treatment (relative risk, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.46 to 3.78; absolute decrease in distant recurrence rate at 10 years: mean, -1.1%; SE, 2.2%). Patients with intermediate-RS tumors did not appear to have a large benefit, but the uncertainty in the estimate can not exclude a clinically important benefit.
Conclusion: The RS assay not only quantifies the likelihood of breast cancer recurrence in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, but also predicts the magnitude of chemotherapy benefit.
Related Editorial
- A Step in the Right Direction
Sandra M. Swain
JCO 2006 24: 3717-3718
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cardoso, M. Saghatchian, A. Thompson, E. Rutgers, and for the TRANSBIG Consortium Steering Committee
Inconsistent Criteria Used in American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2008;
26(12):
2058 - 2059.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. U. Lin and E. P. Winer
Optimizing Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Treating the Right Patients for the Right Length of Time
J. Clin. Oncol.,
April 20, 2008;
26(12):
1919 - 1921.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Del Mastro
The difficult decision-making process for using or not using adjuvant chemotherapy in premenopausal endocrine-responsive breast cancer patients
Ann. Onc.,
April 11, 2008;
(2008)
mdn157v1.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pusztai
Current Status of Prognostic Profiling in Breast Cancer
Oncologist,
April 1, 2008;
13(4):
350 - 360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Chanrion, V. Negre, H. Fontaine, N. Salvetat, F. Bibeau, G. M. Grogan, L. Mauriac, D. Katsaros, F. Molina, C. Theillet, et al.
A Gene Expression Signature that Can Predict the Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated Primary Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 15, 2008;
14(6):
1744 - 1752.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. D. Bear
Measuring Circulating Tumor Cells As a Surrogate End Point for Adjuvant Therapy of Breast Cancer: What Do They Mean and What Should We Do About Them?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 10, 2008;
26(8):
1195 - 1197.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Regan, O. Pagani, B. Walley, R. Torrisi, E. A. Perez, P. Francis, G. F. Fleming, K. N. Price, B. Thurlimann, R. Maibach, et al.
Premenopausal endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: who receives chemotherapy?
Ann. Onc.,
March 5, 2008;
(2008)
mdn037v1.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Marchionni, R. F. Wilson, A. C. Wolff, S. Marinopoulos, G. Parmigiani, E. B. Bass, and S. N. Goodman
Systematic Review: Gene Expression Profiling Assays in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
Ann Intern Med,
March 4, 2008;
148(5):
358 - 369.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. Sparano and S. Paik
Development of the 21-Gene Assay and Its Application in Clinical Practice and Clinical Trials
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
721 - 728.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Ganz and E. E. Hahn
Implementing a Survivorship Care Plan for Patients With Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
759 - 767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wolff, D. Berry, L. A. Carey, M. Colleoni, M. Dowsett, M. Ellis, J. E. Garber, D. Mankoff, S. Paik, L. Pusztai, et al.
Research Issues Affecting Preoperative Systemic Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2008;
26(5):
806 - 813.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Ellis
Improving Outcomes for Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Back to the Drawing Board
J Natl Cancer Inst,
February 6, 2008;
100(3):
159 - 161.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Greene and V. Tsang
Hormonal Therapy for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients
Journal of Pharmacy Practice,
February 1, 2008;
21(1):
36 - 45.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-P. P. Tran and J. L. Grabinski
Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Paradigm in Flux
Journal of Pharmacy Practice,
February 1, 2008;
21(1):
46 - 56.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. K.T. Tan, L. K. Tan, K. Yu, P. H. Tan, M. Lee, L. H. Sii, C. Y. Wong, G. H. Ho, A. W.Y. Yeo, P. K.H. Chow, et al.
Clinical Validation of a Customized Multiple Signature Microarray for Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2008;
14(2):
461 - 469.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. H. Roukos, G. Ferretti, A. Felici, F. Cognetti, R. Mehta, I. Nash, D. F. Hayes, D. Berry, and A. Moore
HER2 and Response to Paclitaxel in Node-Positive Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med.,
January 10, 2008;
358(2):
197 - 199.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Paik, Y. Taniyama, and C. E. Geyer Jr
Anthracyclines in the Treatment of HER2-Negative Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst,
January 2, 2008;
100(1):
2 - 4.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Nordal
Prognostic Factors in Cancer, 3rd ed.
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
January 1, 2008;
190(1):
W84 - W84.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hudis and S. Modi
Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Miracle or Mirage?
JAMA,
December 12, 2007;
298(22):
2665 - 2667.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. E. Schnipper
Update in Oncology
Ann Intern Med,
December 4, 2007;
147(11):
775 - 782.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Harris, H. Fritsche, R. Mennel, L. Norton, P. Ravdin, S. Taube, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr
American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 20, 2007;
25(33):
5287 - 5312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. O'Neill, N. T. Brewer, S. E. Lillie, E. F. Morrill, E. C. Dees, L. A. Carey, and B. K. Rimer
Women's Interest in Gene Expression Analysis for Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 10, 2007;
25(29):
4628 - 4634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D. Minna, L. Girard, and Y. Xie
Tumor mRNA Expression Profiles Predict Responses to Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol.,
October 1, 2007;
25(28):
4329 - 4336.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Marot, I. Bieche, C. Aumas, S. Esselin, C. Bouquet, S. Vacher, G. Lazennec, M. Perricaudet, F. Kuttenn, R. Lidereau, et al.
High tumoral levels of Kiss1 and G-protein-coupled receptor 54 expression are correlated with poor prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2007;
14(3):
691 - 702.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. V. Abruzzo, L. L. Barron, K. Anderson, R. J. Newman, W. G. Wierda, S. O'Brien, A. Ferrajoli, M. Luthra, S. Talwalkar, R. Luthra, et al.
Identification and Validation of Biomarkers of IgVH Mutation Status in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Using Microfluidics Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Technology
J. Mol. Diagn.,
September 1, 2007;
9(4):
546 - 555.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Lonning, S Knappskog, V Staalesen, R Chrisanthar, and J. Lillehaug
Breast cancer prognostication and prediction in the postgenomic era
Ann. Onc.,
August 1, 2007;
18(8):
1293 - 1306.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. H. Lyman
Editorial: Gene Expression Profile Assays As an Aid in Treatment Decision Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
J. Oncol. Pract,
July 1, 2007;
3(4):
187 - 188.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. L. Henry and D. F. Hayes
Can Biology Trump Anatomy? Do All Node-Positive Patients With Breast Cancer Need Chemotherapy?
J. Clin. Oncol.,
June 20, 2007;
25(18):
2501 - 2503.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Cronin, C. Sangli, M.-L. Liu, M. Pho, D. Dutta, A. Nguyen, J. Jeong, J. Wu, K. C. Langone, and D. Watson
Analytical Validation of the Oncotype DX Genomic Diagnostic Test for Recurrence Prognosis and Therapeutic Response Prediction in Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Clin. Chem.,
June 1, 2007;
53(6):
1084 - 1091.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Paik
Development and Clinical Utility of a 21-Gene Recurrence Score Prognostic Assay in Patients with Early Breast Cancer Treated with Tamoxifen
Oncologist,
June 1, 2007;
12(6):
631 - 635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A Di Leo
The state of HER-2 status
Ann. Onc.,
May 1, 2007;
18(5):
813 - 815.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. A. Carey, E. C. Dees, L. Sawyer, L. Gatti, D. T. Moore, F. Collichio, D. W. Ollila, C. I. Sartor, M. L. Graham, and C. M. Perou
The Triple Negative Paradox: Primary Tumor Chemosensitivity of Breast Cancer Subtypes
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2007;
13(8):
2329 - 2334.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Shak, G. Palmer, and J. Baker
Re: Breast Cancer Gene Microarrays Pass Muster
J Natl Cancer Inst,
April 4, 2007;
99(7):
572 - 573.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Andre, C. Hatzis, K. Anderson, C. Sotiriou, C. Mazouni, J. Mejia, B. Wang, G. N. Hortobagyi, W. F. Symmans, and L. Pusztai
Microtubule-Associated Protein-tau is a Bifunctional Predictor of Endocrine Sensitivity and Chemotherapy Resistance in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2007;
13(7):
2061 - 2067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. A. Ioannidis
Is Molecular Profiling Ready for Use in Clinical Decision Making?
Oncologist,
March 1, 2007;
12(3):
301 - 311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. D. True and X. Gao
Quantum Dots for Molecular Pathology: Their Time Has Arrived
J. Mol. Diagn.,
February 1, 2007;
9(1):
7 - 11.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Herbst and S. M. Lippman
Molecular Signatures of Lung Cancer -- Toward Personalized Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med.,
January 4, 2007;
356(1):
76 - 78.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Dowsett
Estrogen Receptor: Methodology Matters
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 20, 2006;
24(36):
5626 - 5628.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Levine and T. Whelan
Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer -- 30 Years Later
N. Engl. J. Med.,
November 2, 2006;
355(18):
1920 - 1922.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Wolff and N. E. Davidson
Still Waiting After 110 Years: The Optimal Use of Ovarian Ablation As Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
November 1, 2006;
24(31):
4949 - 4951.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Swain
A Step in the Right Direction
J. Clin. Oncol.,
August 10, 2006;
24(23):
3717 - 3718.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|