Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print Jan 22 2007
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.2305

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Juweid, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cheson, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Juweid, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Cheson, B. D.

Received July 13, 2006
Accepted November 22, 2006

Use of Positron Emission Tomography for Response Assessment of Lymphoma: Consensus of the Imaging Subcommittee of International Harmonization Project in Lymphoma

Malik E. Juweid,* Sigrid Stroobants, Otto S. Hoekstra, Felix M. Mottaghy, Markus Dietlein, Ali Guermazi, Gregory A. Wiseman, Lale Kostakoglu, Klemens Scheidhauer, Andreas Buck, Ralph Naumann, Karoline Spaepen, Rodney J. Hicks, Wolfgang A. Weber, Sven N. Reske, Markus Schwaiger, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Josee M. Zijlstra, Barry A. Siegel, and Bruce D. Cheson

From the Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; Departments of Hematology and Nuclear Medicine and PET Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Ulm, Ulm; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universitat Munchen, Munich; Department of Medicine, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Department of Oncology Services, Synarc Inc, San Francisco, CA; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Centre for Molecular Imaging, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Australia; Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; and the Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: malik-juweid{at}uiowa.edu

Purpose: To develop guidelines for performing and interpreting positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for treatment assessment in patients with lymphoma both in clinical practice and in clinical trials.

Methods: An International Harmonization Project (IHP) was convened to discuss standardization of clinical trial parameters in lymphoma. An imaging subcommittee developed consensus recommendations based on published PET literature and the collective expertise of its members in the use of PET in lymphoma. Only recommendations subsequently endorsed by all IHP subcommittees were adopted.

Recommendations: PET after completion of therapy should be performed at least 3 weeks, and preferably at 6 to 8 weeks, after chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy, and 8 to 12 weeks after radiation or chemoradiotherapy. Visual assessment alone is adequate for interpreting PET findings as positive or negative when assessing response after completion of therapy. Mediastinal blood pool activity is recommended as the reference background activity to define PET positivity for a residual mass ≥ 2 cm in greatest transverse diameter, regardless of its location. A smaller residual mass or a normal sized lymph node (ie, ≤ 1 x 1 cm in diameter) should be considered positive if its activity is above that of the surrounding background. Specific criteria for defining PET positivity in the liver, spleen, lung, and bone marrow are also proposed. Use of attenuation-corrected PET is strongly encouraged. Use of PET for treatment monitoring during a course of therapy should only be done in a clinical trial or as part of a prospective registry.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
haematolHome page
M. J. Bishton, R. J. Hicks, D. A. Westerman, M. H. Prince, M. Wolf, and J. F. Seymour
A prospective study of the separate predictive capabilities of 18[F]-FDG-PET and molecular response in patients with relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma following treatment with iodine-131-rituximab radio-immunotherapy
Haematologica, May 1, 2008; 93(5): 789 - 790.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Crump, B. Coiffier, E. D. Jacobsen, L. Sun, J. L. Ricker, H. Xie, S. R. Frankel, S. S. Randolph, and B. D. Cheson
Phase II trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) in relapsed diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma
Ann. Onc., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 964 - 969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
N. A. Mohile, L. M. DeAngelis, and L. E. Abrey
The utility of body FDG PET in staging primary central nervous system lymphoma
Neuro-oncol, April 1, 2008; 10(2): 223 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Mahner, S. Schirrmacher, W. Brenner, L. Jenicke, C. R. Habermann, N. Avril, and J. Dose-Schwarz
Comparison between positron emission tomography using 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, conventional imaging and computed tomography for staging of breast cancer
Ann. Onc., March 19, 2008; (2008) mdn057v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Dooms, E. Verbeken, S. Stroobants, K. Nackaerts, P. De Leyn, and J. Vansteenkiste
Prognostic Stratification of Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Induction Chemotherapy: A Model Based on the Combination of Morphometric-Pathologic Response in Mediastinal Nodes and Primary Tumor Response on Serial 18-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1128 - 1134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
C. Bodet-Milin, F. Kraeber-Bodere, P. Moreau, L. Campion, B. Dupas, and S. Le Gouill
Investigation of FDG-PET/CT imaging to guide biopsies in the detection of histological transformation of indolent lymphoma
Haematologica, March 1, 2008; 93(3): 471 - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
C. Bodet-Milin, F. Kraeber-Bodere, B. Dupas, F. Morschhauser, T. Gastinne, S. Le Gouill, L. Campion, J.-L. Harousseau, W. A. Wegener, D. M. Goldenberg, et al.
Evaluation of response to fractionated radioimmunotherapy with 90Y-epratuzumab in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography
Haematologica, March 1, 2008; 93(3): 390 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. A. Ulaner, P. M. Colletti, and P. S. Conti
B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: PET/CT Evaluation after 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan Radioimmunotherapy--Initial Experience
Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 895 - 902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. C. Kwee, R. M. Kwee, and R. A. J. Nievelstein
Imaging in staging of malignant lymphoma: a systematic review
Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 504 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
S. Sasaki, N. Shikama, K. Koiwai, and M. Kadoya
Relationship Between the Response to Treatment and the Prognosis of Patients with Aggressive Lymphomas Treated with Chemotherapy Followed by Involved-field Radiotherapy: Radiographic Assessment
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2008; 38(1): 43 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. E. Juweid
18F-FDG PET as a Routine Test for Posttherapy Assessment of Hodgkin's Disease and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Where Is the Evidence?
J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 9 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
C. Ansquer, T. Hervouet, A. Devillers, S. de Guibert, T. Gastinne, S. Le Gouill, E. Garin, A. Moreau, F. Kraeber-Bodere, and T. Lamy
18-F FDG-PET in the staging of lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin's disease
Haematologica, January 1, 2008; 93(1): 128 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M. Tatsumi, J. H. Miller, and R. L. Wahl
18F-FDG PET/CT in Evaluating Non-CNS Pediatric Malignancies
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2007; 48(12): 1923 - 1931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. K. Schwarz, B. A. Siegel, F. Dehdashti, and P. W. Grigsby
Association of Posttherapy Positron Emission Tomography With Tumor Response and Survival in Cervical Carcinoma
JAMA, November 21, 2007; 298(19): 2289 - 2295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Seam, M. E. Juweid, and B. D. Cheson
The role of FDG-PET scans in patients with lymphoma
Blood, November 15, 2007; 110(10): 3507 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
H. A. Jacene, R. Filice, W. Kasecamp, and R. L. Wahl
Comparison of 90Y-Ibritumomab Tiuxetan and 131I-Tositumomab in Clinical Practice
J. Nucl. Med., November 1, 2007; 48(11): 1767 - 1776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
W. A. Weber
18F-FDG PET in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Qualitative or Quantitative?
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1580 - 1582.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
S. Kako, K. Izutsu, Y. Ota, Y. Minatani, M. Sugaya, T. Momose, K. Ohtomo, Y. Kanda, S. Chiba, T. Motokura, et al.
FDG-PET in T-cell and NK-cell neoplasms
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1685 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Lin, E. Itti, C. Haioun, Y. Petegnief, A. Luciani, J. Dupuis, G. Paone, J.-N. Talbot, A. Rahmouni, and M. Meignan
Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis
J. Nucl. Med., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 1626 - 1632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Gallamini, M. Hutchings, L. Rigacci, L. Specht, F. Merli, M. Hansen, C. Patti, A. Loft, F. Di Raimondo, F. D'Amore, et al.
Early Interim 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Is Prognostically Superior to International Prognostic Score in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Report From a Joint Italian-Danish Study
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2007; 25(24): 3746 - 3752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. A. Mankoff, J. F. Eary, J. M. Link, M. Muzi, J. G. Rajendran, A. M. Spence, and K. A. Krohn
Tumor-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Imaging in Patients: [18F] Fluorodeoxyglucose and Beyond
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3460 - 3469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. Herrmann, H. A. Wieder, A. K. Buck, M. Schoffel, B.-J. Krause, F. Fend, T. Schuster, C. Meyer zum Buschenfelde, H.-J. Wester, J. Duyster, et al.
Early Response Assessment Using 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine-Positron Emission Tomography in High-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3552 - 3558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Oncology and HematologyHome page
Revised Lymphoma Response Criteria
Journal Watch Oncology and Hematology, February 16, 2007; 2007(216): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online