Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print May 12 2008
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.2108

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Houssami, N.
Right arrow Articles by Irwig, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Houssami, N.
Right arrow Articles by Irwig, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Received November 26, 2007
Accepted March 14, 2008

Accuracy and Surgical Impact of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Staging: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Detection of Multifocal and Multicentric Cancer

Nehmat Houssami,* Stefano Ciatto, Petra Macaskill, Sarah J. Lord, Ruth M. Warren, J. Michael Dixon, and Les Irwig

From the Screening and Test Evaluation Program, School of Public Health, National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Centro per lo Studio e la Prevenzione Oncologica, Istituto Scientifico della Regione Toscana, Florence, Italy; Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and the Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nehmath{at}med.usyd.edu.au

Purpose: We review the evidence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging the affected breast to determine its accuracy and impact on treatment.

Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI in detection of multifocal (MF) and/or multicentric (MC) cancer not identified on conventional imaging. We estimated summary receiver operating characteristic curves, positive predictive value (PPV), true-positive (TP) to false positive (FP) ratio, and examined their variability according to quality criteria. Pooled estimates of the proportion of women whose surgery was altered were calculated.

Results: Data from 19 studies showed MRI detects additional disease in 16% of women with breast cancer (N = 2,610). MRI incremental accuracy differed according to the reference standard (RS; P = .016) decreasing from 99% to 86% as the quality of the RS increased. Summary PPV was 66% (95% CI, 52% to 77%) and TP:FP ratio was 1.91 (95% CI, 1.09 to 3.34). Conversion from wide local excision (WLE) to mastectomy was 8.1% (95% CI, 5.9 to 11.3), from WLE to more extensive surgery was 11.3% in MF/MC disease (95% CI, 6.8 to 18.3). Due to MRI-detected lesions (in women who did not have additional malignancy on histology) conversion from WLE to mastectomy was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.3 to 3.6) and from WLE to more extensive surgery was 5.5% (95% CI, 3.1 to 9.5).

Conclusion: MRI staging causes more extensive breast surgery in an important proportion of women by identifying additional cancer, however there is a need to reduce FP MRI detection. Randomized trials are needed to determine the clinical value of detecting additional disease which changes surgical treatment in women with apparently localized breast cancer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Morrow and J. R. Harris
More Mastectomies: Is This What Patients Really Want?
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2009; 27(25): 4038 - 4040.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. A. Jansen, A. Shimauchi, L. Zak, X. Fan, A. M. Wood, G. S. Karczmar, and G. M. Newstead
Kinetic Curves of Malignant Lesions Are Not Consistent Across MRI Systems: Need for Improved Standardization of Breast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Acquisition
Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2009; 193(3): 832 - 839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
N. Houssami and D. F. Hayes
Review of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Breast Cancer: Should MRI Be Performed on All Women with Newly Diagnosed, Early Stage Breast Cancer?
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2009; 59(5): 290 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
N. Houssami
Overview of the Evidence on MRI-guided Local Staging of Breast Cancer and Effect on Treatment
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 45 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
L. J. Solin
The Effect of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Long-term Outcome after Breast Conservation Treatment with Radiation
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 51 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online