Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

JCO Early Release, published online ahead of print Aug 31 2009
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.8721

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cloughesy, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedman, H. S.
Right arrow Articles by Cloughesy, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Received September 8, 2008
Accepted March 19, 2009

Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma

Henry S. Friedman,* Michael D. Prados, Patrick Y. Wen, Tom Mikkelsen, David Schiff, Lauren E. Abrey, W. K. Alfred Yung, Nina Paleologos, Martin K. Nicholas, Randy Jensen, James Vredenburgh, Jane Huang, Maoxia Zheng, and Timothy Cloughesy

From the Brain Tumor Center, Duke University, Durham, NC; Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco; Genetech Inc, South San Francisco; and Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Hermelin Brain Tumor Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI; Department of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA; Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Neuro-Oncology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Division of Neurology, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, Evanston, IL; Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; and University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: fried003{at}mc.duke.edu

Purpose: We evaluated the efficacy of bevacizumab, alone and in combination with irinotecan, in patients with recurrent glioblastoma in a phase II, multicenter, open-label, noncomparative trial.

Patients and Methods: One hundred sixty-seven patients were randomly assigned to receive bevacizumab 10 mg/kg alone or in combination with irinotecan 340 mg/m2 or 125 mg/m2 (with or without concomitant enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs, respectively) once every 2 weeks. Primary end points were 6-month progression-free survival and objective response rate, as determined by independent radiology review. Secondary end points included safety and overall survival.

Results: In the bevacizumab-alone and the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan groups, estimated 6-month progression-free survival rates were 42.6% and 50.3%, respectively; objective response rates were 28.2% and 37.8%, respectively; and median overall survival times were 9.2 months and 8.7 months, respectively. There was a trend for patients who were taking corticosteroids at baseline to take stable or decreasing doses over time. Of the patients treated with bevacizumab alone or bevacizumab plus irinotecan, 46.4% and 65.8%, respectively, experienced grade ≥ 3 adverse events, the most common of which were hypertension (8.3%) and convulsion (6.0%) in the bevacizumab-alone group and convulsion (13.9%), neutropenia (8.9%), and fatigue (8.9%) in the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan group. Intracranial hemorrhage was noted in two patients (2.4%) in the bevacizumab-alone group (grade 1) and in three patients (3.8%) patients in the bevacizumab-plus-irinotecan group (grades 1, 2, and 4, respectively).

Conclusion: Bevacizumab, alone or in combination with irinotecan, was well tolerated and active in recurrent glioblastoma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Besse, S. F. Lasserre, P. Compton, J. Huang, S. Augustus, and U.-P. Rohr
Bevacizumab Safety in Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2010; 16(1): 269 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. H. Sherman, D. G. Aregawi, A. Lai, H. M. Fathallah-Shaykh, P. J. Bierman, K. Linsky, J. M. Larner, S. A. Newman, and D. Schiff
OPTIC NEUROPATHY IN PATIENTS WITH GLIOBLASTOMA RECEIVING BEVACIZUMAB
Neurology, December 1, 2009; 73(22): 1924 - 1926.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R. M. Green, T. F. Cloughesy, R. Stupp, L. M. DeAngelis, E. A. Woyshner, D. E. Ney, and A. B. Lassman
Bevacizumab for recurrent ependymoma
Neurology, November 17, 2009; 73(20): 1677 - 1680.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online