|
|||||
|
|
||||||
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology Outcome in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Non-Hodgkin's LymphomaFrom the Divisions of Adult Oncology and Biostatistics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Departments of Medicine and Radiation Therapy, Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Departments of Medicine and Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. Address reprint requests to Arnold S. Freedman, MD, Division of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115; email arnold_freedman{at}dfci.harvard.edu
PURPOSE: The absolute risk of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT) for nonHodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) exceeds 5% in several reported series. We report the outcome of a large cohort of patients who developed MDS after ABMT for NHL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1982 and December 1997, 552 patients underwent ABMT for NHL, with a uniform ablative regimen of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation followed by reinfusion of obtained marrow purged with monoclonal antibodies. MDS was strictly defined, using the French-American-British classification system, as requiring bone marrow dysplasia in at least two cell lines, with associated unexplained persistent cytopenias. RESULTS: Forty-one patients developed MDS at a median of 47 months after ABMT. The incidence of MDS was 7.4%, and actuarial incidence at 10 years is 19.8%, without evidence of a plateau. Patients who developed MDS received significantly fewer numbers of cells reinfused per kilogram at ABMT (P = .0003). Karyotypes were performed on bone marrow samples of 33 patients, and 29 patients had either del(7) or complex abnormalities. The median survival from diagnosis of MDS was 9.4 months. The International Prognostic Scoring System for MDS failed to predict outcome in these patients. Thirteen patients underwent allogeneic BMT as treatment for MDS, and all have died of BMT-related complications (11 patients) or relapse (two patients), with a median survival of only 1.8 months. CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up demonstrates a high incidence of MDS after ABMT for NHL. The prognosis for these patients is uniformly poor, and novel treatment strategies are needed for this fatal disorder.
THE USE OF HIGH-DOSE therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to improve both disease-free and overall survival for selected patients with relapsed diffuse aggressive nonHodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).1 Selected patients with indolent lymphoma also experience extended disease-free with high-dose therapy compared with historical controls.2,3 Although the acute treatment-related mortality with autotransplantation is now well below 5% in most series, with longer survival, late complications potentially become more significant causes of morbidity and mortality. Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) have emerged as major late complications of ASCT, particularly in patients with lymphoma, with actuarial risk at 10 years exceeding 10% in several series.4-8 The International Prognostic Scoring System has found the prognosis of patients with primary MDS to depend on several factors, including karyotype, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and number of peripheral cytopenias.9 The only potentially curative therapy for primary MDS is allogeneic transplantation, which, if performed early in selected young patients, may have a favorable impact on overall survival.10,11 MDS and AML that occur after chemotherapy or radiation exposure have a worse prognosis than primary disease.12,13 Although allogeneic transplantation has also been used in patients with treatment-related MDS,higher relapse rates have been observed in this patient population.14,15 The long-term prognosis and outcome of MDS after ASCT for lymphoma is largely unknown. Two forms of the disease have been identified, an "indolent" form manifested by persistent cytopenias years after transplant with or without clonal cytogenetic changes and an "aggressive" form with dysplasia in multiple cell lines, which, in short-term follow-up, behaves like other therapy-related MDS.16 In the present study, we report the follow-up of a large cohort of patients who developed "aggressive" MDS, defined by strict criteria, after autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) for B-cell NHL. The estimated incidence for the development of post-ABMT MDS was 19.8% at 10 years. Risk factors for the development of MDS and prognostic factors for survival were also investigated. Finally, we describe the uniformly poor prognosis for these patients, including the outcome of allogeneic BMT as therapy for MDS after ABMT.
Selection of Patients and Treatment Protocol Between 1982 and 1997, 552 patients underwent ABMT for B-cell NHL at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. NHL histologies were defined by the International Working Formulation and the Revised European-American Lymphoma Classification.17,18 Patients were eligible for these ABMT protocols if they were younger than 65 years of age (physiologic) and either relapsed after standard chemotherapeutic regimens or had high-risk primary disease in first remission, as previously described.3,19-24 For all patients, a minimal disease status had to be attained through chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both before entry, as previously defined.20 All protocols were approved by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Institutional Review Board, and informed consent was obtained before therapy. Preparative therapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 60 mg/kg of body weight infused on each of 2 consecutive days before total-body irradiation (TBI). Before 1994, TBI was administered in fractionated doses (2 Gy) twice daily on 3 consecutive days (total of 12 Gy) in all but two patients. After 1994, all patients received seven fractions (14 Gy). Supportive care was provided, as previously described.21
Collection, Processing, and Infusion of Marrow
Follow-Up
Classification of MDS
Evaluation and Statistical Methods
Patient Characteristics Of 552 patients who underwent ABMT for B-cell NHL between 1982 and 1997, 322 were male; the median age was 44 years (range, 19 to 66 years). The histologies of these patients included indolent NHL (311 patients) and aggressive NHL (241 patients). Ninety-six patients underwent transplantation in first remission for indolent lymphoma, and 31 patients underwent transplantation in first remission for aggressive lymphoma after treatment with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) as their only chemotherapy. The remainder of patients had relapsed or had disease that was refractory to initial chemotherapy. One hundred ninety patients were in complete remission (CR) at ABMT; 362 patients were in a minimal disease state. Ninety-nine patients received involved-field radiation therapy to sites of bulk disease before ABMT. Of these 552 patients, 351 remain alive, with a median follow-up time of 75 months. Forty-one patients (27 males and 14 females) subsequently have developed MDS, as defined by strict FAB criteria.25 The characteristics of these patients at the time of ABMT are summarized in Table 1. At the time of ABMT, the median age of these 41 patients was 46 years (range, 23 to 66 years). Histology of NHL at ABMT included 22 patients with follicular lymphoma, 17 patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma, including four patients who presented initially with indolent NHL that had transformed to a more aggressive histology before ABMT, and two patients with mantle-cell lymphoma.
Prior Therapy
Autologous Transplant
Diagnosis of MDS
Outcome
Thirteen patients underwent allogeneic BMT (Table 3). The FAB classification of these patients includes three patients with RA, five with RAEB, one with RAEBT, two with AML, and two with RARS. Six patients received T-celldepleted grafts from HLA-matched siblings,28 whereas five received matched unrelated donor grafts, one of which was T-cell depleted. One patient received a T-celldepleted haplo-mismatched sibling donor graft, and one patient underwent a nonmyeloablative peripheral-blood stem-cell transplant from a matched sibling donor. The ablative regimen in the T-celldepleted, matched related transplants consisted of busulfan (16 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg). Patients who received unmanipulated donor marrow also received busulfan and cyclophosphamide conditioning and a variety of regimens for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. The one patient who received a T-celldepleted haplo-identical transplant was conditioned with busulfan, thiotepa, cyclophosphamide, and high-dose methylprednisolone. The characteristics of the patients who underwent allogeneic BMT were similar to the entire group of MDS patients, with no significant differences in age, histology, or previous therapy. All 13 of these patients died after allogeneic transplant, including 10 within the first 100 days after transplant (Table 3). Causes of death included sepsis in seven patients, hepatic veno-occlusive disease in two patients, and diffuse alveolar hemorrhage syndrome in one patient. Three patients died later, two of relapsed AML and one of chronic graft-versus-host disease. The median survival time from the diagnosis of MDS for the patients who underwent allogeneic BMT was 10.7 months and 1.8 months from the time of allogeneic transplant. There was no statistical difference in survival from ABMT (P = .19) or from diagnosis of MDS (P = .62) between those patients who received an allogeneic BMT and those who did not.
Twenty-eight patients did not undergo allogeneic transplantation for MDS. Detailed follow-up information is available for 23 of these patients. Seven received chemotherapy for MDS, including cytarabine, daunorubicin, or hydroxyurea. The remaining patients were treated with supportive care, including hematopoietic growth factors, transfusions, vitamin supplementation, and antibiotics. Two patients received brief pulses of corticosteroid therapy.
Predictors of MDS A logistic regression model was designed to predict who would develop MDS. Candidate variables were prior radiation therapy, sex, age, race, histology at transplant, and median number of cells per kilogram. Again, median number of cells infused per kilogram and prior radiation therapy were the only significant predictors of subsequent MDS. The incidence of MDS was lower for patients who received 14 Gy of TBI (three of 104 patients) compared with other doses (P = .09). However, follow-up for patients receiving 14 Gy was significantly shorter.
Prognosis of MDS
MDS and AML are well-recognized long-term complications of chemotherapy, specifically DNA-damaging agents. The peak incidence of MDS occurs 4 to 6 years after the initiation of cytotoxic therapy, although latency periods as short as 12 months and as long as 15 to 20 years have been reported.13 A large body of data supports a positive relationship between the cumulative dose of alkylating agents or topoisomerase II inhibitors and the risk of developing secondary AML.29-32 An increased incidence of leukemia has also been linked to previous radiation exposure.33,34 In one series of patients treated with low-dose TBI for NHL, the 15-year estimated cumulative incidence of MDS was 17%.35 All of these patients were also treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy, suggesting that combined-modality therapy significantly increases the incidence of subsequent stem-cell disorders. Defining MDS after ASCT is complicated because many patients have prolonged cytopenias after transplantation without evidence of subsequent transformation to AML. Traweek et al36 described 10 patients with clonal chromosomal abnormalities that developed after ASCT for Hodgkin's disease and NHL, five of whom did not have a syndrome consistent with clinical MDS. Morphologic analysis and follow-up of these patients has revealed two distinct patterns of MDS after ASCT: an aggressive form, with marrow dysplasia, typical cytogenetic changes, and rapid transformation to leukemia, and a more indolent form associated with transient cytogenetic changes and minimal intermittent marrow dysplasia. Unlike the aggressive form, indolent MDS changes do not necessarily progress to leukemic transformation even after years of follow-up and, in fact, revert to normal in some cases. In the present study, the incidence and median time to develop aggressive MDS were similar to those reported in the other series, with actuarial rates at 10 years of almost 20% without evidence of a plateau with prolonged follow-up. Several studies have reported the development of MDS after ASCT for NHL where the cumulative 5-year incidence ranged from 8% to 14%.5-7 Similar to the present series, the median time from ASCT to a diagnosis of MDS in these reports was approximately 3.5 years. When cytogenetics were performed, virtually all patients had abnormalities of chromosome 5 and/or 7 or complex abnormalities.5,6 Previous cytogenetic studies have also demonstrated more numerous abnormalities in patients with secondary MDS who received radiation compared with those who only received chemotherapy before developing MDS.37 Although the present series only included patients who received TBI-containing ablative regimens, the majority of reported posttransplant MDS patients have also received TBI. This is in contrast to the estimated incidence of MDS in series of patients with breast cancer who underwent ASCT with chemotherapy-only conditioning; the risk was lower, only 3% at 5 years.38-40 Two recently reported series have examined clinical risk factors for subsequent development of MDS after ASCT. Almost 5,000 patients with lymphoma have undergone ASCT in the European Bone Marrow Transplant Registry, and only 68 patients developed MDS.41 This incidence is lower than other series; however, the median follow-up in this registry series was only 3 years. Multivariate analysis revealed age at transplant, TBI conditioning, long interval between diagnosis of lymphoma and transplant, and low-grade histology as independent variables predicting for subsequent MDS. The amount of previous chemotherapy, including alkylating agent exposure, was not found to be a significant factor. In another series from the City of Hope Cancer Center, none of these factors were found to be predictive in 22 patients who developed MDS after ASCT for NHL and Hodgkin's disease.42 In that series, pre-BMT exposure to topoisomerase II inhibitors increased the risk of MDS with chromosomal 11q23 abnormalities. In our series, patients who developed MDS received a significantly lower median number of cells reinfused than the entire group of patients despite the similar total number of cells harvested. Furthermore, involved field radiotherapybefore ABMT increased the risk of MDS. Stem-cell exhaustion and depletion has been elicited in vitro by serial transplantation of bone marrow into lethally irradiated mice and exposure of bone marrow to combinations of cytotoxic drugs and cytokines.43-46 In the setting of low-stem cell number, reconstitution of bone marrow clearly represents a great proliferative stress, which may increase susceptibility to irreversible DNA damage associated with MDS. Alternatively, the lower mononuclear stem-cell number infused may be a surrogate marker for marrow stem-cell damage before ABMT. Prospective studies will be needed to evaluate this issue further, but ensuring adequate numbers of CD34 cells before transplant may decrease subsequent incidence of MDS. Limiting local radiotherapy may also decrease the risk of development of MDS. Allogeneic BMT is the only potentially curative therapy for patients with primary MDS.10,11,47 Cytogenetics, according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, have been found to strongly predict outcome of allogeneic BMT in patients with primary MDS.48 In a series from Vancouver, Canada only 6% of patients with primary MDS and poor-risk cytogenetics were alive and in remission 7 years after allogeneic BMT.48 Data on allogeneic BMT for patients with secondary AML from previous chemotherapy exposure are limited, but in the largest series from Seattle, WA, the 5-year disease-free survival was only 7.8%.14 The current series is the only published experience of allogeneic BMT for MDS after ASCT for NHL. All 13 patients died, the majority as a complication of transplant and only two of relapsed AML. Clearly, allogeneic BMT, even with selective T-cell depletion, does not represent a viable salvage option for MDS after ASCT because of conditioning-related mortality. These patients may be good candidates for nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens and subsequent donor lymphocyte infusions to immunologically ablate residual dysplastic clones.49 The lack of effective therapy for this fatal syndrome emphasizes the importance of further investigation into the pathogenesis of MDS after ASCT and the need to identify features that predict patients at risk. It remains unknown whether MDS arises from reinfused damaged stem cells or is a direct result of conditioning therapy. Clonal hematopoiesis detected by X-linked clonality analysis after ABMT has been shown to predict the development of MDS, although a significant proportion of NHL patients have clonal hematopoiesis at the time of transplant.50,51 Telomere length in stem cells has been shown to be abnormal in primary MDS and after ASCT in a variety of settings.52,53 Critically shortened telomeres result in an increased incidence of cellular cytogenetic abnormalities and have been hypothesized to contribute to leukemic transformation.54 Patients with abnormally shortened telomeres from cytotoxic chemotherapy, before ASCT or as a result of ASCT, need to be evaluated prospectively to determine a potentially increased risk of subsequent MDS. In conclusion, long-term follow-up of a large group of patients confirms the preliminary reports of a high incidence of MDS as a late complication of ASCT for NHL. The prognosis of these patients is uniformly poor, and allogeneic BMT, as presently performed, is not a salvage treatment option because of excessive toxicity in this patient population. TBI combined with cytotoxic therapy as conditioning seems to increase the risk of MDS. These sobering results mandate investigation into alternative conditioning regimens, as well as the molecular genetics of these disorders, in an attempt to prevent this devastating complication.
Supported by National Institutes of Health grant no. CA66996 We thank the nurses, adult oncology fellows, and social workers of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and the medical housestaff of the Brigham and Women's Hospital and Beth Israel Hospital for their excellent care of these patients. The hematopathology section at the Brigham and Women's Hospital reviewed every bone marrow biopsy specimen. Aspirate smears were reviewed by Pearl Leavitt at Dana-Farber. We particularly thank Ramana Tantravahi, MD, and his staff at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute cytogenetics laboratory for processing the specimens and collating the reports. We also thank the technicians of the Connell-O'Reilly Cell Manipulation Laboratory and the Blood Component Laboratory of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute for processing the bone marrows.
1. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med333:1540-1545, 1995
2.
Rohatiner A, Johnson P, Price C, et al: Myeloablative therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation therapy for recurrent follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol12:1177-1124, 1994 3. Freedman A, Neuberg D, Mauch P, et al: Long term followup of autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma. Blood (in press)
4.
Stone R, Neuberg D, Soiffer R, et al: Myelodysplastic syndrome as a late complication following autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol12:2535-2542, 1994
5.
Miller J, Arthur D, Litz C, et al: Myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous bone marrow transplantation: An additional late complication of curative cancer therapy. Blood83:3780-3786, 1994
6.
Darrington D, Vose J, Anderson J, et al: Incidence and characterization of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome following high-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol12:2527-2534, 1994
7.
Anderson J, Vose J, Kessinger A: Myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous transplant for lymphoma. Blood84:3988-3989, 1994
8.
Stone R: Myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous transplantation for lymphoma: The price of progress? Blood83:3437-3440, 1994
9.
Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau M, et al: International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood89:2079-2088, 1997
10.
Sutton L, Chastang C, Ribaud P, et al: Factors influencing outcome in de novo myelodysplastic syndromes treated by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: A long-term study of 71 patients. Blood88:358-365, 1996 11. Runde V, de Witte T, Arnold R, et al: Bone marrow transplantation from HLA-identical siblings as first-line treatment in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Early transplantation is associated with improved outcome. Bone Marrow Transplant21:255-261, 1998[Medline] 12. Levine E, Bloomfield C: Leukemias and myelodyplastic syndromes secondary to drug, radiation, and environmental exposures. Semin Oncol19:47-84, 1992[Medline] 13. Karp J, Smith M: The molecular pathogenesis of treatment-induced (secondary) leukemias: Foundations for treatment and prevention. Semin Oncol24:103-113, 1997[Medline]
14.
Anderson J, Gooley T, Schoch G, et al: Stem cell transplantation for secondary acute myeloid leukemia: Evaluation of transplantation as initial therapy or following induction chemotherapy. Blood89:2578-2585, 1997 15. Ballen K, Gilliland D, Guinan E, et al: Bone marrow transplantation for therapy-related myelodysplasia: Comparison with primary myelodysplasia. Bone Marrow Transplant20:737-743, 1997[Medline] 16. Wilson C, Traweek S, Slovak M, et al: Myelodysplastic syndrome occurring after autologous bone marrow transplantation for lymphoma: Morphologic features. Am J Clin Pathol108:369-377, 1997[Medline] 17. National Cancer Institute sponsored study of classification of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usageThe non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classification project. Cancer49:2112-2135, 1982[Medline]
18.
Harris N, Jaffe E, Stein H, et al: Perspective: A revised European American classification of lymphoid neoplasmA proposal from the International Lymphoma Study Group. Blood84:1361-1392, 1994 19. Takvorian T, Canellos GP, Ritz J, et al: Prolonged disease-free survival after autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with poor prognosis. N Engl J Med316:1499-1505, 1987[Abstract]
20.
Freedman AS, Takvorian T, Anderson KC, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Very low treatment-related mortality in 100 patients in sensitive relapse. J Clin Oncol8:1-8, 1990
21.
Freedman AS, Ritz J, Neuberg D, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation in 69 patients with a history of low grade B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood77:2524-2529, 1991
22.
Freedman A, Takvorian T, Neuberg D, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation in poor-prognosis intermediate-grade and high-grade B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in first remission: A pilot study. J Clin Oncol11:931-936, 1993
23.
Freedman A, Gribben J, Neuberg D, et al: High dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma during first remission. Blood88:2780-2786, 1996
24.
Freedman A, Neuberg D, Mauch P, et al: Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone dose intensification with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor markedly depletes stem cell reserve for autologous bone marrow transplantation. Blood90:4996-5001, 1997 25. Bennett J, Catovsky D, Daniel M, et al: Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol51:189-199, 1982[Medline] 26. Kaplan E, Maier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc53:457-481, 1958 27. Mantel N: Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep50:163-170, 1966[Medline] 28. Soiffer R, Murray C, Mauch P, et al: Prevention of graft-versus-host-disease by selective depletion of CD6 positive T lymphocytes from donor bone marrow. J Clin Oncol7:1191-1200, 1992 29. Tucker M, Meadows A, Boice J: Leukemia after therapy with alkylating agents for childhood cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst78:459-464, 1987 30. Kaldor J, Day N, Clarke E: Leukemia following Hodgkin's disease. N Engl J Med322:7-13, 1990[Abstract] 31. Kaldor J, Day N, Pettersson F: Leukemia following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med322:1-6, 1990[Abstract]
32.
Ratain M, Rowley J: Therapy related acute myeloid leukemia secondary to inhibitors of topoisomerase II: From the bedside to target genes. Ann Oncol3:107-111, 1992 33. Kodama K, Mabuchi K, Shigematsu I: A long-term cohort study of the atomic bomb survivors. J Epidemiol6:95-105, 1996 34. Greaver M: Aetiology of acute leukemia. Lancet349:344-349, 1997[Medline]
35.
Travis L, Weeks J, Curtis R, et al: Leukemia following low-dose total body irradiation and chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol14:565-571, 1996
36.
Traweek S, Slovak M, Nadamanee A, et al: Clonal karyotypic hematopoietic cell abnormalities occurring after autologous bone marrow transplantation for Hodgkin's disease and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Blood84:957-963, 1994
37.
Whang-Peng J, Young R, Lee E, et al: Cytogenetic studies in patients with secondary leukemia/dysmyelopoietic syndrome after different treatment modalities. Blood71:403-414, 1988 38. Wheeler C, Khurshid A, Ibrahim J, et al: Low incidence of post-transplant myelodysplasia/acute leukemia in NHL patients autotransplanted after cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and etoposide. Blood 90:385b, 1997 (abstr) 39. Laughlin M, McGaughey D, Crews J, et al: Secondary myelodysplasia and acute leukemia in breast cancer patients after autologous bone marrow transplant. J Clin Oncol16:1008-1012, 1998[Abstract] 40. Roman-Unfer R, Bitran J, Hanauer S, et al: Acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplasia following intensive chemotherapy for breast cancer. Bone Marrow Transplant16:163-168, 1995[Medline] 41. Milligan D, Ruiz de Elvira M, Goldstone A, et al: Secondary leukemia and myelodysplasia after auto-grafting for lymphoma: Results from the EBMT. Blood 92:439a, 1998 (abstr) 42. Krishnan AS, Bhatia R, Slovak M, et al: Risk factors for development of therapy-related leukemia (t-MDS/t-AML) following autologous transplantation (ABMT) for lymphoma. Blood 92:493a, 1998 (abstr) 43. Siminovitch L, Till J, McCulloch E: Decline in colony-forming ability of marrow cells subjected to serial transplantation into irradiated mice. J Cell Comp Physiol64:23-32, 1964
44.
Mauch P, Rosenblatt M, Hellman S: Permanent loss in stem cell self renewal capacity following stress to the marrow. Blood72:1193-1196, 1988
45.
Mauch P, Hellman S: Loss of hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal after bone marrow transplantation. Blood74:872-875, 1989
46.
Hornung R, Longo DL: Hematopoietic stem cell depletion by restorative growth factor regimens during repeated high-dose cyclophosphamide therapy. Blood80:77-83, 1992 47. Arnold R, de Witte T, van Biezen A, et al: Unrelated bone marrow transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and secondary acute myeloid leukemia: An EBMT survey. Bone Marrow Transplant21:1213-1216, 1998[Medline]
48.
Nevill T, Fung H, Shepherd J, et al: Cytogenetic abnormalities in primary myelodysplastic syndrome are highly predictive of outcome after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood92:1910-1917, 1998 49. Khouri I, Keating M, Korbling M, et al: Transplant-lite: Induction of graft-versus-malignancy using fludarabine-based nonablative chemotherapy and allogeneic blood progenitor-cell transplantation as treatment for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol16:2817-2824, 1998[Abstract] 50. Legare R, Gribben J, Maragh M, et al: Prediction of therapy-related acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) after autologous bone marrow transplant (ABMT) for lymphoma. Am J Hematol56:45-51, 1997[Medline]
51.
Mach-Pascual S, Legare R, Lu D, et al: Predictive value of clonality assays in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing autologous bone marrow transplant: A single institution study. Blood91:4496-4503, 1998 52. Boultwood J, Fidler C, Kusec R, et al: Telomere length in myelodysplastic syndromes. Am J Hematol56:266-271, 1997[Medline] 53. Engelhardt M, Ozkaynak M, Drullinsky P, et al: Telomerase activity and telomere length in pediatric patients with malignancies undergoing chemotherapy. Leukemia12:13-24, 1998[Medline]
54.
Ball S, Gibson F, Rizzo S, et al: Progressive telomere shortening in aplastic anemia. Blood91:3582-3592, 1998 Submitted April 14, 1999; accepted July 22, 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|