Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdonck, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shipp, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdonck, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shipp, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 17, Issue 9 (September), 1999: 3002
© 1999 American Society for Clinical Oncology


SPECIAL DEPARTMENTS

High-Dose Therapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Leo F. Verdonck

University Hospital, Utrecht, the Netherlands

To the Editor: The report of the jury evaluating the available data on high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) at the international consensus conference held in Lyon, France, in April 1998, and published in the January issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology1 made some false statements about the Dutch cooperative group trial.2 In that study, patients with aggressive NHL that responded slowly to three courses of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) were randomized to receive either early ASCT or continuation of CHOP (a total of eight courses).

First, the response definition of complete remission with residual masses from partial remission with persistent viable tumor does not apply in our study because response was evaluated after three courses of CHOP and not at the completion of chemotherapy. It is very unlikely that patients with aggressive NHL are already disease-free after three courses of CHOP.

Second, the statement that the treatment arms were imbalanced with regard to clinical prognostic factors is incorrect. Both treatment arms were very well balanced.2

Third, not few patients but approximately half of the patients (44%) were in the high/intermediate-risk or high-risk (International Prognostic Index) groups.

Of course, the number of patients who were randomized was rather small, but the results were such (and still are) that a substantial benefit from ASCT was extremely unlikely. Our study was probably the first that questioned the value of ASCT; ever since, other reports of randomized trials for various malignancies have also failed to show a benefit for ASCT.3-7

A decade ago, the general feeling was that ASCT was an important step forward in the treatment of various malignancies. Regrettably, it probably is not better than intensive chemotherapy for the vast majority of patients.

REFERENCES

1. Shipp MA, Abeloff MD, Antman KH, et al: International consensus conference on high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Report of the jury. J Clin Oncol 17:423-429, 1999[Free Full Text]

2. Verdonck LF, van Putten WL, Hagenbeek A, et al: Comparison of CHOP chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for slowly responding patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 332:1045-1051, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Ravindranath Y, Yeager AM, Chang MN, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation versus intensive consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in childhood. N Engl J Med 334:1428-1434, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Santini G, Salvagno L, Leoni P, et al: VACOP-B versus VACOP-B plus autologous bone marrow transplantation for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cooperative study group. J Clin Oncol 16:2796-2802, 1998[Abstract]

5. Gherlinzoni F: Early autologous stem cell transplantation versus conventional first-line chemotherapy in high-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL): An Italian multicenter randomized trial. Blood 92:726a, 1998 (abstr 2980)

6. Rodenhuis S, Richel DJ, Elsken van der Wall et al: Randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy and haemopoietic progenitor-cell support in operable breast cancer with extensive axillary lymph-node involvement. Lancet 352:515-521, 1998[Medline]

7. Cassileth PA, Harrington DP, Appelbaum FR, et al: Chemotherapy compared with autologous or allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukemia in first remission. N Engl J Med 339:1649-1656, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]


 

High-Dose Therapy With Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

M. A. Shipp

For the Jury, International Consensus Conference on High Dose Therapy With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas

In Reply: The authors of a Dutch cooperative group trial1 comparing the efficacy of CHOP chemotherapy to that of autologous bone marrow transplantation in slowly responding patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma express concern regarding the review of their study in the recent international consensus conference jury report.2 Jury members noted that it was not possible to distinguish complete responders with residual masses from partial responders with persistent viable tumor using only standard radiographic criteria in this study.2 In addition, they noted that the majority (56%) of randomized patients on this trial had only low or low/intermediate-risk disease as assessed by the International Prognostic Index.2 They also noted that the sample size was too small (69 randomized patients) and that the randomized groups included different percentages of patients with specific subtypes of aggressive NHL.2 These methodologic issues led the jury to conclude that additional studies were needed on the role of high-dose therapy with stem-cell support in patients with slow or incomplete responses to induction therapy.2

REFERENCES

1. Verdonck LF, van Putten WL, Hagenbeek A, et al: Comparison of CHOP chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation for slowly responding patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 332:1045-1051, 1995

2. Shipp MA, Abeloff MD, Antman KH, et al: International consensus conference on high-dose therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: Report of the jury. J Clin Oncol 17:423-429, 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verdonck, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shipp, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Verdonck, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Shipp, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online