Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Erratum for Cheng et al., J Clin Oncol 18 (15) 2862-2868.
Erratum for Weaver et al., J Clin Oncol 18 (1) 43.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 20 (October), 2000: 3589
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology


ERRATA

ERRATA

The January 2000 article by Weaver et al, entitled "Randomized Trial of Filgrastim, Sargramostim, or Sequential Sargramostim and Filgrastim After Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy for the Harvesting of Peripheral-Blood Stem Cells" (J Clin Oncol 18:43-53, 2000), contained an error.

The last line of text on page 45 should read: "More patients who received sargramostim alone had a temperature of 38.5°C or higher on 1 or more days, compared with filgrastim-treated patients (P = .001)."

The August 2000 article by Cheng et al, entitled "Preoperative Prediction of Surgical Margin Status in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated by Radical Prostatectomy" (J Clin Oncol 18:2862-2868, 2000), contained several errors.

The correct overall positive margin rate was 40%, not 24% as reported in the article.

In Table 1, the data for high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and perineural invasion were switched. As stated in the text, perineural invasion was present in 130 patients. The corrected sections of Table 1 should read:


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1.
 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online