Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Erratum for Brizel et al., J Clin Oncol 18 (19) 3339-3345.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 18, Issue 24 (December), 2000: 4110-4111
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology


ERRATUM

Two appendices were omitted from the October 1, 2000, article by Brizel et al, entitled "Phase III Randomized Trial of Amifostine as a Radioprotector in Head and Neck Cancer" (J Clin Oncol 18:3339-3345, 2000). The appendices are reprinted below in their entirity.Go Go


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. APPENDIX A Participating Institutions and Principal Investigators
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1A. APPENDIX B Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Toxicity Scales
 
The November 1, 2000, Supplement article by Shepherd, entitled "Chemotherapy for Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Modest Progress, Many Choices" (J Clin Oncol 18:35s-38s, 2000 [suppl]), contained errors in the doses and results of Table 2. The correct dosage is 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel, not 100 mg/m2. The correct response rate is 17.3% for the docetaxel arm, not 7.3%. Table 2 is reprinted below in its entirety.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Efficacy Summary of ECOG 1594
 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online