|
|||||
|
|
||||||
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology TrkC Expression Predicts Good Clinical Outcome in Primitive Neuroectodermal Brain TumorsFrom the Division of Oncology, Human Genetics, Biostatistics, and Neurosurgery and Department of Pathology, The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia; and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Address reprint requests to J.Q. Trojanowski, MD, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; email trojanow{at}mail.med upenn.edu.
PURPOSE: To identify biologic prognostic factors in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET), including medulloblastoma, that accurately define patient groups with sufficiently good prognosis to permit a reduction in treatment intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We determined expression levels of the neurotrophin receptor TrkC mRNA in formalin-fixed tumor samples from 87 well characterized PNET patients using in situ hybridization. Comparison of TrkC mRNA expression levels with clinical and other laboratory variables was performed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: High TrkC mRNA expression was found to be associated more with higher 5-year cumulative survival rate than was low TrkC mRNA expression (89% v 46%, respectively). When compared with established clinical prognostic factors and laboratory variables of potential prognostic significance, TrkC mRNA expression, by univariate analysis, was found to be the single most powerful predictor of outcome (hazards ratio, 4.81; P < .00005), exceeding all clinical prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, the hazards ratio remained significant (P < .00005). CONCLUSION: High TrkC mRNA expression in PNET is a powerful independent predictor of favorable clinical outcome. Assessment of TrkC mRNA levels may aid in treatment planning for patients with PNETs and should be incorporated prospectively into PNET clinical trials.
PRIMITIVE neuroectodermal tumors (PNETs) of the cerebellum, also termed medulloblastomas (MBs), and supratentorial PNETs constitute more than 20% of all pediatric brain tumors and are the most common malignant brain tumors in children.1 PNETs are characterized by their aggressive clinical behavior and high risk of leptomeningeal dissemination. Standard postoperative therapy for PNETs includes high-dose craniospinal radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, intensive therapy may cause severe late treatment complications, including second malignancies, endocrine and/or growth dysfunctions, and cognitive impairments, and thereby decrease quality of life for many long-term survivors.2-7 Identification of prognostic factors that distinguish patients at relatively low risk of tumor recurrence from those at high risk have important implications for treatment planning. Accordingly, it is possible that lower risk patients may be treated with less intensive therapies that retain a high level of efficacy but reduce the toxicity caused by the most intensive treatments.8 Single-institution and collaborative group studies have identified clinical factors such as metastatic stage, patient age, tumor location, and extent of tumor resection as characteristics that have independent prognostic significance for PNET/MB survival outcomes.9-20 These factors are currently used to distinguish children with a high risk of PNET/MB recurrence (eg, leptomeningeal metastasis, age < 3 years, or large postoperative residual tumor) from those with a lower risk. In contrast to clinical prognostic factors, most efforts to identify biologic markers or predictors for PNET/MB have been inconclusive.9,21-32 Either the results from these studies are contradictory, or the sample size is too small to establish the independent prognostic significance of the candidate biologic factor. In other childhood malignancies, biologic characteristics of the tumors add to the prognostic power of established clinical factors, identify clinically relevant subsets of high-, intermediate-, or low-risk patients, or may provide insight into patterns of treatment response, resistance, or metastatic potential. For example, N-myc amplification, deletion of chromosome 1p, and TrkA expression have independent prognostic significance for neuroblastomas that equals or exceeds that of any of the clinical prognostic factors for these tumors.33-35 The development and survival of nervous system cells are regulated by various growth factors. Neurotrophins are a family of four related trophic factors that have pleiotropic effects on developing, mature, and injured cells of the central and peripheral nervous system (reviewed in36-39 ). The classic neurotrophin is nerve growth factor (NGF), but three related neurotrophins have been cloned and sequenced and include brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin-3 (NT3), and neurotrophin-4/5. All neurotrophins bind to the low-affinity NGF receptor; however, it is not clear what role the low-affinity NGF receptor plays in signal transduction. In contrast, the better understood functions of neurotrophins seem to be mediated by one or more members of a family of three high-affinity neurotrophin receptor kinases, ie, TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC. Each of the neurotrophins binds preferentially to a specific Trk receptor to initiate signal transduction. NGF binds TrkA, brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-4/5 bind TrkB, and NT3 binds TrkC.40 Segal et al28 reported in 1994 a possible association between TrkC mRNA expression and outcome by Northern blot analysis in 12 PNET/MB samples. This study was recently expanded by the addition of 42 patients.41 However, the sample size was not adequate to permit multivariate analysis. Therefore, it is not known if measurement of TrkC mRNA expression levels adds to the prognostic information provided by clinical variables. To evaluate the potential prognostic significance of TrkC expression in a large, relatively uniformly treated patient population, we studied the expression of TrkC mRNA at a cellular level by in situ hybridization and compared the relative abundance of TrkC mRNA to clinical and biologic variables of known or suggested clinical significance. We found that TrkC mRNA expression is a robust prognostic marker that exceeds the prognostic power of any clinical or biologic factor and that identifies a favorable group of tumors.
Patients and Therapy We studied PNET samples from 87 children diagnosed at The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia between January 1981 and December 1996. The selection of tumors for this study was based on the availability of enough tumor tissue to perform in situ hybridization analysis. All diagnoses were confirmed by histologic assessment of tumor specimens obtained at surgery by the same neuropathologist (L.B.R.). Clinical information on the 87 patients, which is summarized in Table 1, included date of birth, date of diagnosis, extent of resection as determined by operative report (gross total resection 90% removal of tumor; partial resection 50%, but < 90% removal of tumor; and biopsy < 50% removal of tumor), metastatic stage,42 therapy received, follow-up, and survival outcomes. The median age at diagnosis for all patients was 6.5 years (range, 0.3 to 21.8 years). The median follow-up period after diagnosis for all patients was 4.7 years (range, 0.1 to 13.8 years). Median follow-up for the 59 patients who were alive and progression-free at the time of this report was 5.7 years (range, 0.1 to 13.8 years).
Postoperative therapy included radiation and/or chemotherapy and was administered according to previously described protocols. Although 53 patients received craniospinal radiation at conventional doses (eg, 36 Gy), craniospinal doses were reduced in 21 younger patients. Chemotherapy was administered to 72 patients (83%): for 55 of these 72, it was administered according to a previously described protocol that included vincristine, lomustine, and cisplatin12; for 11 younger children, according to infant brain tumor protocols43 ; and for six, according to other regimens.
TrkC In Situ Hybridization Antisense and sense RNA probes for TrkC were produced by transcribing linearized cDNA with SP6 and T7 RNA polymerase in the presence of 33P-uridine triphosphate (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA) and purified according to the instructions of the vendor (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI). Paraffin sections cut from formalin-fixed blocks of PNET/MB tumor samples were deparaffinized, rehydrated, digested with proteinase K (5 µg/mL) for 15 minutes at 37°C, treated with glycine (2mg/mL) in one times phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.1 for 5 minutes, with phosphate-buffered saline for 5 minutes, with 0.1 mol/L triethanolamine pH 8.0 for 5 minutes, and with two times standard saline citrate (SSC) for 2 minutes, and then dehydrated and air dried. Sections were then prehybridized at room temperature for 3 hours with 100 µL of hybridization solution (10% dextran sulfate, four times SSC, 50% formamide, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, two times Denhardts solution, and 1 mg/mL denatured salmon sperm DNA). Hybridization was performed in 100 µL of hybridization solution containing 33P-labeled RNA probes. After an overnight incubation at 59°C, sections were washed at 69°C under increasingly stringent conditions with two times SSC/50% formamide up to 0.1 times SSC. Sections were dehydrated, air dried, and exposed for 3 days for autoradiography. Then, sections were processed for autoradiography using NTB-2 liquid photographic emulsion (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) and were exposed for 14 days. Autoradiograms were developed, counterstained with hematoxylin and eosin, and coverslipped with cytoseal. As positive controls for TrkC mRNA expression and to control for variance in the specific activity of probes, variability of the efficiency of hybridization, variability of washing, and variability of exposure to emulsion, formalin-fixed serial sections of adult human dorsal root ganglion were included in each batch of slides as a reference standard. To control for the specificity of the hybridization signal, sections adjacent to those hybridized with the antisense RNA probes were incubated with an equal amount of sense RNA probes.
To provide a semiquantitative assessment of in situ hybridization studies, we counted silver grains overlying 50 PNET cells in randomly chosen fields of each section at x1000 magnification by use of a Nikon light microscope equipped with a video screen (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). After log transformation of this data, we found that one group of tumors showed an antisense-to-sense signal ratio of
Immunohistochemistry of NFP and GFAP and Evaluation of Chromosome 17p Deletion
Statistical Analysis
Expression of TrkC mRNA High expression of TrkC mRNA in neoplastic cells was identified by in situ hybridization in 53 of the 87 PNETs (61%). Fifty of 81 posterior fossa PNETs/MBs and three of six supratentorial PNETs had high TrkC mRNA expression. The distribution of TrkC mRNA was homogeneous throughout the PNET samples (Fig 1) without evidence of specific patterns of expression within areas of neoplastic cells (Fig 2). In PNETs with high TrkC mRNA expression, tumor cells had markedly higher signal intensities than did stromal cells. The median value for antisense-to-sense signal ratio in PNETs with high TrkC mRNA expression was 3.9 (range, 2.1 to 13.0) and, for the PNETs with no or low TrkC mRNA expression, 1.1 (range, 0.7 to 1.6). Using quantitative duplex reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction techniques with primers to the extracellular domain of TrkC, we studied 20 frozen PNET samples and found the reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction results to be consistent with the in situ results (data not shown).
TrkC mRNA Expression and Survival Five-year overall and progression-free survival of the 87 patients are summarized in Table 2. Cox regression analysis revealed significantly greater risks of progression and death associated with metastatic stages M1 to 3 and expression of glial differentiation marker. To correct for the impact of the most important clinical variables on outcome, M stage and location were included in all statistical models of subsequent regression analysis. Age at diagnosis, sex, and extent of surgical resection did not have significant prognostic value when individually added to the Cox regression model.
The cumulative-survival curves in the groups with high and low levels of TrkC mRNA expression are shown in Fig 3. The expression of TrkC mRNA correlated strongly with survival and progression-free survival (P < .00005): the 5-year cumulative-survival rate of the group with a high level of TrkC mRNA expression was 89%, whereas that of the group with a low level of TrkC mRNA expression was 46%.
In children younger than 3 years at diagnosis (n = 23), the expression of TrkC mRNA correlated with survival outcome (P = .0003): the 5-year cumulative-survival rate of the group with high level of TrkC mRNA expression was 93%, whereas that of the group with low level of TrkC mRNA expression was 0% (Fig 4).
We analyzed survival according to the pattern of expression of TrkC mRNA and metastatic stage (Fig 5). The group with high levels of expression of TrkC mRNA had the best 5-year survival rate (89%), and the group with low expression of TrkC mRNA and M stage 1 had the worst (12%). The group with low levels of TrkC mRNA expression and M stage 0 had a survival rate of 59%. Within the group with high levels of expression of TrkC mRNA, there was no significant difference in 5-year survival between those with M stage 0 and those with M stage 1 (data not shown).
We analyzed the effect on survival of the expression of TrkC mRNA, as compared with the effect of metastatic stage, expression of GFAP, primary tumor site, extent of tumor resection, patient age at diagnosis, therapy, and chromosome 17p status (Table 3). On the basis of this univariate analysis, TrkC mRNA expression (hazards ratio, 4.81; P < .00005), metastatic stage (hazards ratio, 2.6; P = .017), and GFAP expression (hazards ratio, 2.25; P = .037) were significant factors. The hazards ratio remained significant in the multivariate analysis for TrkC mRNA expression (hazards ratio, 4.91; P < .00005) and metastatic stage (hazards ratio, 2.36; P = .037).
Coexpression of TrkC mRNA With Immunohistochemically Determined Neuronal and Glial Differentiation Markers High expression of TrkC mRNA was detected in 24 of 34 PNETs with NFP-positive tumors cells (71%) and in 28 of 53 PNETs without NFP expression (53%; P = .12, Fishers exact test). Eighteen of 24 PNETs with NFP expression and no GFAP expression had high TrkC mRNA expression (75%), whereas 34 of the other 63 PNETs (54%) had high TrkC mRNA expression. The tendency of PNETs with NFP-positive tumor cells and no GFAP-positive tumor cells to have high TrkC mRNA expression was not significant (P = .09, Fishers exact test). There was no correlation between GFAP expression and TrkC mRNA expression (data not shown).
TrkC Expression and Metastatic Stage, Tumor Location, Age, Sex, and Chromosome 17p Deletion
Neurotrophins activate Trk receptors to regulate cell proliferation, differentiation, and death in the developing and mature nervous system. PNETs are composed of morphologically undifferentiated cells that resemble neuroectodermal progenitor cells of the developing CNS,46 and subsets of these tumors express neuronal and/or glial markers.47 Studies of peripheral neuroblastomas and PNETs demonstrate that these tumors express one or more neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors.28,41,48-50 It is possible that the expression of TrkC serves as a marker for the cell of origin, but the receptor itself has no significant role in dictating tumor behavior. Alternatively, activation of TrkC through its ligand NT3 may activate pathways leading to differentiation, and decrease tumor growth. Although the role neurotrophins may play in the induction and progression of tumors remains speculative, it is conceivable that at least some of these tumors respond to endogenous neurotrophins. Muragaki et al45 have reported that TrkA transfected PNET cell lines undergo differentiation and apoptosis in response to TrkA activation. Kim et al41 recently reported that TrkC activation induces apoptosis in the DAOY PNET cell line. They also reported that overexpression of TrkC inhibits the growth of intracerebral DAOY xenografts and that the rate of apoptosis is significantly increased in these xenografts compared to DAOY wildtype xenografts. In the present study, we found at a cellular level that TrkC mRNA expression is high in the majority of PNETs, particularly in PNETs with neuronal differentiation, although this observation did not reach statistical significance in this relatively small subgroup analysis. In addition, a high level of TrkC mRNA expression correlates strongly with a favorable outcome, independent of clinical factors. A variety of clinical and biologic variables have been proposed as prognostic factors for PNETs. The established clinical prognostic factors alone are not sufficient to reliably define high- and low-risk groups of PNET patients. The likelihood of finding additional clinical prognostic factors is small, which thus encourages endeavors to find biologic prognostic factors. Chromosome 17p has been evaluated as one putative biologic factor of suggested prognostic significance. However, this could not been substantiated in a study of 56 PNET/MB patients.30
Our studies indicate that the level of TrkC mRNA expression is the most robust single prognostic factor yet identified, that TrkC mRNA expression is an independent prognostic factor, and that the combined evaluation for TrkC mRNA expression and M stage clearly defines a high risk group (TrkC mRNA low; M stage The tendency of M0 tumors to have high TrkC mRNA expression was not significant. Three of six supratentorial PNETs had high expression of TrkC mRNA. There was no correlation of TrkC mRNA expression and age, sex, or chromosome 17p deletion. Radiation-related treatment complications, including growth dysfunctions, and cognitive impairments decrease substantially the quality of life for many long-term survivors. In PNETs with high TrkC mRNA expression and no evidence of leptomeningeal tumor dissemination, therapy with reduced craniospinal radiation might retain the efficacy but reduce the toxicity and, therefore, improve the quality of life for the survivors. As shown by a pilot study by Goldwein et al,8 therapy with reduced craniospinal radiation is feasible. With the addition of TrkC mRNA expression to clinical factors, the accuracy in defining this low-risk group increases substantially. We conclude that TrkC mRNA expression is, at present, the most powerful predictor of a favorable clinical outcome in patients with PNET and that PNETs that express functional TrkC may be susceptible to programmed cell death or to terminal neuronal differentiation. We strongly recommend assessing prospectively TrkC mRNA levels and incorporating TrkC mRNA expression into future PNET/MB clinical trials.
Supported by grant no. NS34514 from the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, and by grants from Stiftung zur Unterstützung des akademischen Nachwuchses of the University of Zurich and Zürcher Elternvereinigung für Krebskranke Kinder, Zurich, Switzerland (to M.A.G.), and Jeffrey Miller Neuro-Oncology Research Fund. We are indebted to Dr David Shelton for supplying the cDNA for the TrkC Riboprobe (Promega Corporation), to Dr G. Brodeur for supplying the TrkB transfected SYS5 cell line, to Dr Vanessa Vogelsberg-Ragaglia and Dr C.D. Reddy for valuable suggestions, to Kathleen Gibbs for data management, and to Mary Quigley for aid in preparing the article.
1. Packer RJ, Siegel KR, Sutton LN, et al: Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with poor-risk medulloblastoma: A preliminary report. Ann Neurol 24:503-508, 1988[Medline] 2. Olshan JS, Gubernick J, Packer R, et al: The effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on growth in children with medulloblastoma. Cancer 70:2013-2017, 1992[Medline] 3. Radcliffe J, Packer RJ, Atkins TE, et al: Three- and four-year cognitive outcome in children with noncortical brain tumors treated with whole-brain radiotherapy. Ann Neurol 32:551-554, 1992[Medline]
4.
Silber JH, Radcliffe J, Peckham V, et al: Whole-brain irradiation and decline in intelligence: The influence of dose and age on IQ score. J Clin Oncol 10:1390-1396, 1992 5. Dennis M, Spiegler BJ, Hetherington CR, et al: Neuropsychological sequelae of the treatment of children with medulloblastoma. Neurooncol 29:91-101, 1996 6. Chapman CA, Waber DP, Bernstein JH, et al: Neurobehavioral and neurologic outcome in long term survivors of posterior fossa brain tumors: Role of age and perioperative factors. J Child Neurol 10:209-212, 1996 7. Silverman CL, Palkes H, Talent B, et al: Late effects of radiotherapy of patients with cerebellar medulloblastoma. Cancer 54:825-829, 1984[Medline] 8. Goldwein JW, Radcliffe J, Johnson J, et al: Updated results of a pilot study of low dose craniospinal irradiation plus chemotherapy for children under five with cerebellar primitive neuroectodermal tumors (medulloblastoma). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 34:899-904, 1996[Medline] 9. Janss AJ, Yachnis AT, Silber JH, et al: Glial differentiation predicts poor clinical outcome in primitive neuroectodermal brain tumors. Ann Neurol 39:481-489, 1996[Medline] 10. Evans AE, Jenkin DT, Sposto R, et al: The treatment of medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg 72:572-582, 1990[Medline] 11. Garton GR, Schomberg PJ, Scheithauer BW, et al: Medulloblastoma: Prognostic factors and outcome of treatmentReview of the Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 65:1077-1086, 1990[Medline] 12. Packer RJ, Sutton LN, Elterman R, et al: Outcome for children with medulloblastoma treated with radiation and cisplatin, CCNU, and vincristine chemotherapy. J Neurosurg 81:690-698, 1994[Medline] 13. Weil MD, Lamborn K, Edwards MS, et al: Influence of a childs sex on medulloblastoma outcome. JAMA 13:1474-1476, 1998 14. Albright AL, Wisoff JH, Zeltzer PM, et al: Effects of medulloblastoma resections on outcome in children: A report from the Childrens Cancer Group. Neurosurgery 38:265-271, 1996[Medline] 15. Cohen BH, Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM: Prognostic factors and treatment results for supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors in children using radiation and chemotherapy: A Childrens Cancer Group randomized trial. Clin Oncol 13:1687-1696, 1995 16. Berry MP, Jenkin RDT, Keen CW, et al: Radiation treatment for medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg 55:43-51, 1981[Medline] 17. Merchant TE, Wang M-H, Haida T, et al: Medulloblastoma: Long-term results for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy during the computed tomography era. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:29-35, 1996[Medline] 18. Pezzotta S, Cordero di Montezemolo L, Knerich R, et al: CNS-85 trial: A cooperative pediatric CNS tumor studyResults of treatment of medulloblastoma patients. Childs Nerv Syst 12:87-96, 1996[Medline] 19. Sure U, Berghorn WJ, Bertalanffy H, et al: Staging, scoring and grading of medulloblastoma: A postoperative prognosis predicting system based on the cases of a single institute. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 132:59-65, 1995[Medline] 20. Tait DM, Thornton-Jones H, Bloom HJG, et al: Adjuvant chemotherapy for medulloblastoma: The first multi-centre control trial of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP I). Eur J Cancer 26:464-469, 1990 21. Caputy AJ, McCullough DC, Manz HJ, et al: A review of the factors influencing the prognosis of medulloblastoma. J Neurosurg 66:80-87, 1987[Medline] 22. Tomita T, Yasue M, Engelhard HH, et al: Flow cytometric DNA analysis of medulloblastoma. Cancer 61:744-749, 1988[Medline] 23. Czerwionka M, Korf H-W, Hoffmann O, et al: Differentiation in medulloblastomas: Correlation between the immunocytochemical demonstration of photoreceptor markers (S-antigen, rod-opsin) and the survival rate in 66 patients. (Berl) 78:629-636, 1989 24. Goldberg-Stern H, Gadoth N, Stern S, et al: The prognostic significance of glial fibrillary acidic protein staining in medulloblastoma. Cancer 68:568-573, 1991[Medline] 25. Schofield DE, Yunis EJ, Geyer R, et al: DNA content and other prognostic features in childhood medulloblastoma: Proposal of a scoring system. Cancer 69:1307-1314, 1992[Medline] 26. Maraziotis T, Perentes E, Karamitopoulou E, et al: Neuron-associated class III beta-tubulin isotype, retinal S-antigen, synaptophysin, and glial fibrillary acidic protein in human medulloblastomas: A clinicopathological analysis of 36 cases. (Berl) 84:355-363, 1992 27. Zerbini C, Gelber RD, Weinberg D, et al: Prognostic factors in medulloblastoma, including DNA ploidy. J Clin Oncol 11:616-622, 1993[Abstract]
28.
Segal RA, Goumnerova LC, Kwon YK, et al: Expression of the neurotrophin receptor TrkC is linked to a favorable outcome in medulloblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:12867-12871, 1994 29. Cogen PH, McDonald JD: Tumor suppressor genes and medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol 29:103-112, 1996[Medline] 30. Biegel JA, Janss AJ, Raffel C, et al: Prognostic significance of chromosome 17p deletions in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors (medulloblastomas) of the central nervous system. Clin Cancer Res 3:473-478, 1997[Abstract]
31.
Gilbertson RJ, Perry RH, Kelly PJ, et al: Prognostic significance of HER2 and HER4 coexpression in childhood medulloblastoma. Cancer Res 57:3272-3280, 1997 32. Scheurlen WG, Schwabe GC, Joos S, et al: Molecular analysis of childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors defines markers associated with poor outcome. J Clin Oncol 16:2478-2485, 1998[Abstract]
33.
Brodeur GM, Seeger RC, Schwab M, et al: Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastoma correlates with advanced disease stage. Science 224:1121-1124, 1984
34.
Nakagawara A, Arima-Nakagawara M, Scavarda NJ, et al: Association between high levels of expression of the TRK gene and favorable outcome in human neuroblastoma. N Engl J Med 328:847-854, 1993
35.
Maris JM, White PS, Beltinger CP, et al: Significance of chromosome 1p loss of heterozygosity in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 55:4664-4669, 1995 36. Lindsay RM, Wiegand SJ, Altar CA, et al: Neurotrophic factors: From molecule to man. Trends Neurosci 17:182-190, 1994[Medline] 37. Chao MV: Neurotrophin receptors: A window into neuronal differentiation. Neuron 9:583-593, 1992[Medline] 38. Barbacid M: Nerve growth factor: A tale of two receptors. Oncogene 8:2033-2042, 1993[Medline] 39. Korsching S: The neurotrophic factor concept: A reexamination. J Neurosci 13:2739-2748, 1993[Abstract] 40. Barbacid M: The Trk family of neurotrophin receptors. J Neurobiol 25:1386-1403, 1994[Medline] 41. Kim JY, Sutton ME, Lu DJ, et al: Activation of neurotrophin-3 receptor TrkC induces apoptosis in medulloblastomas. Res 59:711-719, 1999 42. Chang CH, Housepian EM, Herbert C: An operative staging system and a megavoltage radiotherapeutic technique for cerebellar medulloblastomas. Radiology 93:1351-1359, 1969[Medline]
43.
Duffner PK, Horowitz ME, Krischer JP, et al: Postoperative chemotherapy and delayed radiation in children less than three years of age with malignant brain tumors. N Engl J Med 328:1725-1731, 1993 44. Shelton DL, Sutherland J, Gripp J, et al: Human trks: Molecular cloning, tissue distribution, and expression of extracellular domain immunoadhesins. J Neurosci 15:477-491, 1995 (1 pt 2)[Abstract]
45.
Muragaki Y, Chou TT, Kaplan DR, et al: Nerve growth factor induces apoptosis in human medulloblastoma cell lines that express TrkA receptor. J Neurosci 17:530-542, 1997 46. Rorke LB: The cerebellar medulloblastoma and its relationship to primitive neuroectodermal tumors. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 42:1-15, 1983[Medline] 47. Rorke LB, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM, et al: Primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the central nervous system. Brain Pathol 7:765-784, 1997[Medline] 48. Tajima Y, Molina RP, Rorke LB, et al: Neurotrophins and neuronal versus glial differentiation in medulloblastomas and other pediatric brain tumors. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 95:325-332, 1998[Medline] 49. Washiyama K, Muragaki Y, Rorke LB, et al: Neurotrophin and neurotrophin receptor proteins in medulloblastomas and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors of the pediatric central nervous system. Am J Pathol 148:929-940, 1996[Abstract] 50. Brodeur GM, Nakagawara A, Yamashiro DJ, et al: Expression of TrkA, TrkB, and TrkC in human neuroblastomas. J Neurooncol 31:49-55, 1997[Medline] Submitted June 23, 1999; accepted October 5, 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|