|
|||||
|
|
||||||
© 2000 American Society for Clinical Oncology Therapy-Related Myelodysplasia and Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia After High-Dose Therapy With Autologous Hematopoietic Progenitor-Cell Support for Lymphoid MalignanciesFrom the Imperial Cancer Research Fund Medical Oncology Unit, Departments of Medical Oncology and Haematology, St Bartholomews Hospital, London; and Imperial Cancer Research Fund Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom. Address reprint requests to Ama Z.S. Rohatiner, MD, Imperial Cancer Research Fund Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomews Hospital, 45 Little Britain, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, United Kingdom; email a.rohatiner@ icrf.icnet.uk.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for therapy-related myelodysplasia (tMDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML), after high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous bone marrow or peripheral-blood progenitor-cell support, in patients with non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1985 and November 1996, 230 patients underwent HDT comprising cyclophosphamide therapy and total-body irradiation, with autologous hematopoietic progenitor-cell support, as consolidation of remission. With a median follow-up of 6 years, 27 (12%) developed tMDS or sAML. RESULTS: Median time to development of tMDS or sAML was 4.4 years (range, 11 months to 8.8 years) after HDT. Karyotyping (performed in 24 cases) at diagnosis of tMDS or sAML revealed complex karyotypes in 18 patients. Seventeen patients had monosomy 5/5q-, 15 had -7/7q-, seven had -18/18q-, seven had -13/13q-, and four had -20/20q-. Twenty-one patients died from complications of tMDS or sAML or treatment for tMDS or sAML, at a median of 10 months (range, 0 to 26 months). Sixteen died without evidence of recurrent lymphoma. Six patients were alive at a median follow-up of 6 months (range, 2 to 22 months) after diagnosis of tMDS or sAML. On multivariate analysis, prior fludarabine therapy (P = .009) and older age (P = .02) were associated with the development of tMDS or sAML. Increased interval from diagnosis to HDT and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis were of borderline significance (P = .05 and .07, respectively). CONCLUSION: tMDS and sAML are serious complications of HDT for NHL and are associated with very poor prognosis. Alternative strategies for reducing their incidence and for treatment are needed.
HIGH-DOSE THERAPY (HDT) with autologous bone marrow or peripheral-blood progenitor-cell (PBPC) support is increasingly being used as consolidation of remission for non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL).1-6 With improved supportive care measures and better patient selection, the early treatmentrelated mortality is now less than 5%, and up to 46% of selected patients can be considered cured.5 Prior chemotherapy is a well-documented risk factor for therapy-related myelodysplasia (tMDS) and secondary acute myelogenous leukemia (sAML) after treatment for lymphoid malignancies.7-10 The incidence and risk vary between studies and different diseases, due in part to cohort differences in terms of age; duration, intensity, and type of therapy; and length of follow-up. The median time to development of tMDS or sAML following therapy is 4 to 5 years, with the highest risk being between 2 and 5 years.11 Since the first report in 1993,12 the development of tMDS or sAML after HDT has become increasingly recognized.13,14 The crude incidence varies from 2% to 8%, with a 5-year actuarial incidence of 4% to 18%.15-21 Although both pretransplantation and transplant-related factors likely contribute to this problem, it remains unclear which, if any, have a more important role.15,16,18,20-25 Therefore, we performed an analysis of the incidence of and risk factors for tMDS and sAML after HDT with autologous bone marrow or PBPC support in 230 patients treated for NHL over a 12-year period at St Bartholomews Hospital (SBH). The clinical course and outcome of the 27 patients who developed tMDS or sAML are presented. Eight of the latter cases were included in a study involving cases drawn from the European Bone Marrow Transplantation Lymphoma Registry.20
Patients The study population comprised 230 patients who underwent cyclophosphamide therapy and total-body irradiation (TBI) as consolidation of remission after chemotherapy for NHL between January 1985 and November 1996.2,26,27 From 1992 on, pre-HDT cytogenetic analysis was performed routinely; patients with abnormal karyotypes at this stage did not proceed to HDT, because of the risk of developing tMDS or sAML.28 Baseline and transplant characteristics for all 230 patients and for those who subsequently developed tMDS or sAML (27 patients) are outlined in Table 1.
Bone Marrow and PBPC Collection and In Vitro Manipulation In the case of patients who received autologous bone marrow, at least 1 L of marrow was obtained under general anesthesia. PBPCs were collected either after chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor priming29 or after treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone (16 µg/kg/d x 4 to 6 days).30 The bone marrow mononuclear cell fraction from selected patients was treated in vitro with anti-CD20 and complement (123 patients) or with multiple antibodies (anti-CD10, anti-CD19, anti-CD20, and anti-B5) and complement (42 patients). CD34-positive selection of PBPCs was used in nine patients.2,27,31,32
HDT and Follow-Up
Diagnosis of tMDS and sAML
Statistical Analysis
Univariate analysis on categoric predictors was performed using the
Patients Who Developed tMDS or sAML At a median follow-up of 6 years (range, 10 days to 13 years; one patient died 10 days after reinfusion of bone marrow), 27 patients had developed tMDS or sAML: 16 had MDS, 10 had MDS evolving into AML, and one had sAML. Crude incidence was 12%; actuarial risk at 5 and 10 years was 14.2% (95% confidence interval, 7.6% to 20.4%) and 36.5% (95% confidence interval, 20.6% to 50.1%), respectively (Fig 1). Baseline clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The median time to development of MDS was 9.1 years (range, 2.7 to 21.6 years) after diagnosis of NHL and 4.4 years (range, 0.9 to 8.8 years) after HDT. Most patients presented with cytopenia; 15 patients had anemia, 12 had neutropenia, and 20 had thrombocytopenia. For the purpose of this analysis, anemia was defined as a hemoglobin level 10 g/dL, neutropenia as an absolute neutrophil count 1.0 x 109/L, and thrombocytopenia as a platelet count 100 x 109/L. The diagnoses are listed in Table 2.
Cytogenetic Analysis at Diagnosis of tMDS or sAML Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 24 of 27 patients and showed clonal abnormalities typical of secondary disease (Table 3). Eighteen patients had complex karyotypes (> four abnormalities), 17 patients had complete or partial loss of chromosome 5/5q-, 15 patients showed -7/7q-, seven patients showed -18/18q-, seven patients showed -13/13q-, and four patients showed -20/20q-. Clonal evolution was noted in nine patients in a subsequent bone marrow analysis. Fourteen of the 27 patients (after 1992) underwent pre-HDT cytogenetic analysis; all had normal karyotypes at that time.
Risk Factors for tMDS or sAML On univariate analysis, the following factors were significantly associated with the development of tMDS or sAML: lower logarithm of the mononuclear cell count (P = .02), histologic diagnosis of B-cell low-grade lymphoma (P = .03), in vitro treatment (P = .04), longer interval from diagnosis to HDT (P = .04), and longer time to achieve a platelet count of 50 x 109/L (P = .04). Bone marrow involvement at diagnosis, prior fludarabine therapy, older age, recurrence after HDT, and longer time from HDT to recurrence were of borderline significance (P = .06, .06, .06, .07, and .07, respectively). These factors were then analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model, and on multivariate analysis, prior fludarabine therapy (P = .009) and older age (P = .02) were associated with the development of tMDS or sAML. Increased interval from diagnosis to HDT (P = .05) and bone marrow involvement at diagnosis (P = .07) were of borderline significance (Table 4).
A subset analysis was performed on data relating only to patients with low-grade B-cell lymphoma; on multivariate analysis, the same factors as just described were associated with the development of tMDS or sAML, but bone marrow involvement at diagnosis was also significant (P = .04).
Outcome
Treatment for tMDS or sAML was supportive, with transfusions and antibiotics given as required for neutropenic infection in 15 patients. In three patients (one with refractory anemia with excess blasts and two with AML), a second HDT (with busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning agents) was performed; autologous PBPCs collected at the time of the first HDT were used in two patients, and the third patient received a sibling allogeneic transplant. All three patients died from transplant-related toxicity early after transplantation. Two patients received chemotherapy for AML; one patient received vitamin D. Six patients remained alive at a median follow-up of 6.2 months (range, 2 to 22 months) after diagnosis of MDS. Two patients (one of whom had concomitant prostate cancer with bone marrow involvement) were receiving transfusion support. Three patients, two with refractory anemia and one with AML, were recently treated with antilymphocyte globulin.39 The remaining patient underwent nonmyeloablative allogeneic sibling bone marrow transplantation (BMT).
Although the major cause of failure of HDT is recurrent lymphoma, in this series tMDS or sAML occurred in 21 of 27 patients in whom there was no evidence of recurrence. At a median follow-up of 6 years after HDT, 106 of 230 patients had died; 21 (20%) of these deaths were due to tMDS or sAML. Thus tMDS or sAML is an important cause of death after HDT and a major cause for concern. The 12% incidence of tMDS or sAML (27 of 230 patients) and the 5-year cumulative incidence of 14.2% in our study are similar to those in previous reports.15,16,18,19,40-42 In some reports, the incidence among patients with Hodgkins disease was equal to that among patients with NHL.15,18 Only patients with NHL were enrolled onto our study; none of the 36 patients at SBH who underwent HDT for Hodgkins disease during this same period developed tMDS or sAML (J. Shamash, personal communication, July 1999). The major question concerning the development of tMDS or sAML is the following: Which factors play an etiologic roleprior alkylator therapy and the cumulative damage to bone marrow stem cells, the HDT itself, or a combination of both? Although prior treatment was heterogeneous, all patients had received alkylating agents before HDT. The 5-year estimated risk of tMDS or sAML after long-term alkylator therapy or low-dose radiation is 7%.43,44 Alkylating agents are typically associated with complete or partial loss of chromosomes 5 and/or 7 and have a latency period of approximately 5 years.45,46 The majority of patients with secondary disease in this study fit into this cytogenetic category, but at SBH, the incidence of tMDS or sAML in patients with follicular lymphoma who have not received HDT is extremely low.47,48 In a report from the University of Arkansas on patients with multiple myeloma who were undergoing HDT, patients who developed MDS had received extensive therapy before HDT.49 Both this group of patients and the group that underwent only one cycle of standard chemotherapy before proceeding to HDT received a non-TBI conditioning regimen. However, prior therapy is not the only factor involved in the development of tMDS or sAML. At the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, patients undergoing HDT as consolidation of first remission of follicular lymphoma with minimal prior therapy still had a significant incidence of MDS (6.5%).3 It remains unclear why the combination of prior therapy and HDT in patients with follicular lymphoma increases the risk of tMDS or sAML. If the HDT itself is causing (or at least contributing to) the development of tMDS or sAML, is it the residual cells that have survived the myeloablative therapy or the reinfused stem cells that give rise to the clonal abnormality? Gene-marking studies have shown that reinfused bone marrow cells contribute to relapse in patients with acute leukemia after autografting50; it should therefore be possible to identify which cells give rise to a secondary leukemic clone. However, no study to date has demonstrated that reinfused progenitor cells contribute to tMDS or sAML. It has been postulated that the bone marrow microenvironment after HDT, together with re-engraftment stress, results in growth of stem cells (within the reinfused marrow) that have sustained chemotherapy-induced mutations that are not detectable by standard G-banding analysis before HDT. Alternatively, the damaged stem cells may be at risk for mutations because of the altered bone marrow milieu after HDT. In this analysis, older age, prior fludarabine therapy, and longer interval from diagnosis to HDT were associated with development of tMDS or sAML. In vitro treatment per se was statistically significant on univariate analysis but was not significant when compared between groups (anti-CD20 and complement v multiple antibodies and complement v CD34-positive selection). This is probably due to the fact that the majority of patients in whom the mononuclear cell fraction was treated in vitro had an underlying diagnosis of follicular lymphoma; thus these factors were linked. All patients underwent cyclophosphamide therapy and TBI (the myeloablative regimen used); therefore, a conclusion cannot be drawn about whether the choice of agents is an important factor. In two studies, TBI was found to play a significant role in the development of MDS.15,25 After the publication of these reports, and when the emerging problems of tMDS and sAML were recognized at SBH, the HDT conditioning regimen for NHL was changed in December 1996 from cyclophosphamide therapy plus TBI to chemotherapy with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan. Since that time, no patient treated with this regimen has developed tMDS or sAML. Whether this is simply a function of the latency period or is a true decrease in incidence remains to be seen with longer follow-up.51 Other factors previously reported as being associated with the development of tMDS or sAML are lower platelet counts at the time of HDT, older age,16 and HDT using PBPCs rather than bone marrow progenitor cells.18,21 In a recent study involving cases drawn from the European Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry, older age at transplantation, TBI conditioning, greater number of transplantations, longer interval between diagnosis and transplantation, and histologic diagnosis of low-grade lymphoma were found to be significant predictors for tMDS and sAML.20 It was also suggested recently that purine analogs are associated with the development of tMDS and sAML.22-25 All of the patients in our series had cytopenia or dysplastic morphologic changes characteristic of MDS; 24 of 27 patients for whom cytogenetic data were available had typical poor-risk karyotypic abnormalities, including complete or partial monosomy 5 or 7 and complex clones. Although the majority of patients showed global genomic instability, with the presence of complex rearrangements that could not be fully characterized on G-banding, a few patients had simple karyotypes. The latter patients showed either complete loss of chromosome 7 or partial deletion of chromosome 5, which implies that these represent one of the initiating events. In fact, 23 of 24 patients karyotyped showed one of these chromosomal abnormalities, suggesting that these genetic alterations play a critical role in the development of secondary disease. Precisely which gene or genes are involved remains to be elucidated, and with the advent of more advanced techniques (eg, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization), recurrent structural abnormalities may also be shown to exist in this patient subset. Five additional patients, not included in this series, had abnormal cytogenetic findings after HDT but morphologically normal bone marrow. None of these patients had the typical complex karyotype seen in the other 24 patients. Five patients have previously been reported to have cytogenetic abnormalities without hematologic evidence of MDS; during follow-up, only two became cytopenic.19 It has also been reported that 50% of sporadically tested patients may have karyotypic abnormalities after BMT, despite normal hematologic parameters.13 The significance of such clonal abnormalities after HDT, in the setting of a normal blood count, is thus unclear. Treatment of tMDS and sAML remains unsatisfactory, with the majority of patients dying less than 2 years after diagnosis.52 The present study, in which median survival after diagnosis of tMDS or sAML was 10 months, confirms this. Although allogeneic BMT remains the only curative therapy for primary MDS,53 the treatment results for secondary MDS are conflicting.54,55 In a recent study by Friedberg et al,56 11 of 34 patients who developed tMDS or sAML after autologous BMT for NHL underwent allogeneic BMT as treatment for the tMDS or sAML. All died, 10 from treatment-related toxicity and one from recurrent lymphoma. It remains to be seen whether nonmyeloablative allogeneic BMT57-59 can produce a graft-versus-leukemia/lymphoma effect without the high treatment-related mortality of conventional allogeneic transplantation. tMDS and sAML are serious consequences after HDT as consolidation of remission of NHL. Because no effective treatment presently exists, strategies to minimize the risk of development of tMDS and sAML should be sought. These findings should be taken into account in future studies of the role of HDT for NHL.
We thank the nurses and doctors of the Bodley Scott Unit and Paget Day Ward for caring for these patients, Andrew Norton, MD, for review of the pathology, and Margaret Cresswell for preparing the manuscript.
1. Freedman AS, Ritz J, Neuberg D, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation in 69 patients with a history of low-grade B-cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Blood 77:2524-2529, 1991
2.
Rohatiner AZS, Johnson PWM, Price CGA, et al: Myeloablative therapy with autologous bone marrow transplantation as consolidation therapy for recurrent follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 12:1177-1184, 1994
3.
Freedman AS, Gribben JG, Neuberg D, et al: High-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation in patients with follicular lymphoma during first remission. Blood 88:2780-2786, 1996
4.
Bierman PJ, Vose JM, Anderson JR, et al: High-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic rescue for follicular low-grade non-Hodgkins lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 15:445-450, 1997
5.
Philip T, Gugliemi C, Hagenbeek A, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared to salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkins lymphoma. N Engl J Med 333:1540-1545, 1995
6.
Gianni AM, Bregni M, Siena S, et al: High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation compared with MACOP-B in aggressive B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 336:1290-1297, 1997 7. Zulian GB, Mirimanoff RO: Ten-year nodular sclerosing Hodgkins disease and second malignancies. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25:659-665, 1989[Medline] 8. Travis LB, Curtis RE, Boice JD, et al: Second cancers following non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Cancer 67:2002-2009, 1991[Medline] 9. Sont JK, van Stiphout WA, Noordijk EM, et al: Increased risk of second cancers in managing Hodgkins disease: The 20-year Leiden experience. Ann Hematol 65:213-218, 1992[Medline]
10.
Abrahamsen JF, Andersen A, Hannisdal E, et al: Second malignancies after treatment of Hodgkins disease: The influence of treatment, follow-up and age. J Clin Oncol 11:255-261, 1993 11. Park DJ, Koeffler HP: Therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes. Semin Hematol 33:256-273, 1996[Medline]
12.
Marolleau JP, Brice P, Morel P, et al: Secondary acute myeloid leukemia after autologous bone marrow transplantation for malignant lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 11:590-591, 1993
13.
Stone RM: Myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous transplantation for lymphoma: The price of progress? Blood 83:3437-3440, 1994 (editorial)
14.
Deeg HJ, Socie G: Malignancies after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Many questions, some answers. Blood 91:1833-1844, 1998
15.
Darrington DL, Vose JM, Anderson JR, et al: Incidence and characterization of secondary myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myelogenous leukemia following high-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for lymphoid malignancies. J Clin Oncol 12:2527-2534, 1994
16.
Stone RM, Neuberg D, Soiffer R, et al: Myelodysplastic syndrome as a late complication following autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkins lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 12:2535-2542, 1994
17.
Rohatiner A: Myelodysplasia and acute myelogenous leukemia after myeloablative therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol 12:2521-2523, 1994 (editorial)
18.
Miller JS, Arthur DC, Litz CE, et al: Myelodysplastic syndrome after autologous bone marrow transplantation: An additional late complication of curative cancer therapy. Blood 83:3780-3786, 1994
19.
Traweek ST, Slovak ML, Nademanee AP, et al: Clonal karyotypic hematopoietic cell abnormalities occurring after autologous bone marrow transplantation for Hodgkins disease and non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Blood 84:957-963, 1994 20. Milligan DW, Ruiz de Elvira C, Goldstone AH, et al: Secondary leukemia and myelodysplasia after autografting for lymphoma: Results from the EBMT. Blood 92:493a, 1998 (abstr) 21. Krishnan A, Bhatia S, Bhatia R, et al: Risk factors for development of therapy-related leukemia (t-MDS/t-AML) following autologous transplantation (ABMT) for lymphoma. Blood 92:493a, 1998 (abstr) 22. Orchard JA, Bolam S, Oscier DG: Association of myelodysplastic changes with purine analogues. Br J Haematol 100:677-679, 1998[Medline] 23. Frewin RJ, Provan D, Smith AG: Myelodysplasia occurring after fludarabine treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Lab Haematol 19:151-152, 1997[Medline] 24. Kroft SH, Tallman MS, Shaw JM, et al: Myelodysplasia following treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA). Leukemia 11:170, 1997 (letter) 25. Ketterer N, Salles G, Dumontet C, et al: Fludarabine may increase the toxicity of peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 102:204, 1998 (abstr)
26.
Foran JM, Apostolidis J, Papamichael D, et al: High-dose therapy with autologous hematopoietic support in patients with transformed follicular lymphoma: A study of 27 patients from a single centre. Ann Oncol 9:865-869, 1998
27.
Apostolidis J, Gupta RK, Grenzelias D, et al: High-dose therapy with autologous bone marrow support as consolidation of remission in follicular lymphoma: Long-term clinical and molecular follow-up. J Clin Oncol 18:527-536, 2000 28. Chao NJ, Nademanee AP, Long GD, et al: Importance of bone marrow cytogenetic evaluation before autologous bone marrow transplantation for Hodgkins disease. J Clin Oncol 9:1575-1579, 1991[Abstract]
29.
Pigaditou A, Marini G, Johnson PWM, et al: Myelo-ablative therapy with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in patients with haematological malignancy. Ann Oncol 6:53-58, 1995 30. Weaver CH, Birch R, Greco FA, et al: Mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells: Randomized evaluations of different doses of filgrastim. Haematol 100:338-347, 1998 31. Nadler LM, Botnick L, Finberg R, et al: Anti-B1 monoclonal antibody and complement treatment in autologous bone marrow transplantation for relapsed B cell non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Lancet 2:427-431, 1984[Medline] 32. Pappa VI, Wilkes S, Salam A, et al: Use of the polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing analysis to detect cells with the t(14;18) in autologous bone marrow from patients with follicular lymphoma, before and after in vitro treatment. Bone Marrow Transplant 22:553-558, 1998[Medline] 33. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al: Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 51:189-199, 1982[Medline] 34. Rooney DE, Czepulkdowski BH (eds): Human Cytogenetics, Vol II: Malignancy and Acquired Abnormalities: A Practical Approach. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1992 35. Mitelman F (ed): ISCN: An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland, Karger, 1995 36. Stansfeld AG, Diebold J, Noel H, et al: Updated Kiel classification for lymphomas. Lancet 1:292-293, 1988[Medline] 37. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J Royal Stat Soc B 34:187-220, 1972 38. Kaplan FL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 52:457-481, 1958 39. Molldrem JJ, Caples M, Mavroudis D, et al: Antithymocyte globulin for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol 99:699-705, 1997[Medline] 40. Taylor P, Jackson GH, Lennard A, et al: Low frequency of myelodysplasia after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Lancet 345:1248-1249, 1995 (letter)[Medline] 41. Taylor PR, Jackson GH, Lennard AL, et al: Low incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome following transplantation using autologous non-cryopreserved bone marrow. Leukemia 11:1650-1653, 1997[Medline] 42. Kumar L: Secondary leukaemia after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Lancet 345:810, 1995[Medline]
43.
Greene MH, Young RC, Merrill JM, et al: Evidence of a treatment dose response in acute nonlymphocytic leukemias which occur after therapy of non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Cancer Res 43:1891-1898, 1983 44. Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Ersboll J, Sorensen HM, et al: Risk of acute non lymphocytic leukemia and pre leukemia in patients treated with cyclophosphamide for non-Hodgkins lymphoma: Comparison with results obtained in patients treated for Hodgkins disease and ovarian carcinoma with other alkylating agents. Ann Intern Med 103:195-200, 1985 45. Thirman M, Larson RA: Therapy-related myeloid leukemia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 10:293-320, 1996[Medline]
46.
Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Rowley JD: The balanced and unbalanced chromosome aberrations of acute myeloid leukemia may develop in different ways and may contribute differently to malignant transformation. Blood 83:2780-2786, 1994
47.
Gallagher CJ, Gregory WM, Jones AE, et al: Follicular lymphoma: Prognostic factors for response and survival. J Clin Oncol 4:1470-1480, 1986
48.
Johnson PWM, Rohatiner AZS, Whelan JS, et al: Patterns of survival in patients with recurrent follicular lymphoma: A 20-year study from a single center. J Clin Oncol 13:140-147, 1995 49. Govindarajan R, Jagannath S, Flick JT, et al: Preceding standard therapy is the likely cause of MDS after autotransplants for multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 95:349-353, 1996[Medline] 50. Brenner MK, Rill DR, Moen RC, et al: Gene-marking to trace origin of relapse after autologous bone-marrow transplantation. Lancet 341:85-86, 1993[Medline] 51. Pedersen-Bjergaard J, Pedersen M, Myhre J, et al: High risk of therapy-related leukemia after BEAM chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for previously treated lymphomas is mainly related to primary chemotherapy and not to the BEAM-transplantation procedure. Leukemia 11:1654-1660, 1997[Medline]
52.
Estey EH: Prognosis and therapy of secondary myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica 83:543-549, 1998
53.
Nevill TJ, Fung HC, Shepherd JD, et al: Cytogenetic abnormalities in primary myelodysplastic syndrome are highly predictive of outcome after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 92:1910-1917, 1998 54. Longmore G, Guinan EC, Weinstein HJ, et al: Bone marrow transplantation for myelodysplasia and secondary acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 8:1707-1714, 1990[Abstract] 55. Ballen KK, Gilliland DG, Guinan EC, et al: Bone marrow transplantation for therapy-related myelodysplasia: Comparison with primary myelodysplasia. Transplant 20:737-743, 1997 56. Friedberg J, Neuberg D, Stone D, et al: Outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with myelodysplasia following autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkins lymphoma. Blood 92:455a, 1998 (abstr)
57.
Giralt S, Estey E, Albitar M, et al: Engraftment of allogeneic hematopoietic progenitor cells with purine analog-containing chemotherapy: Harnessing graft-versus-leukemia without myeloablative therapy. Blood 89:4531-4536, 1997
58.
Slavin S, Nagler A, Naparstek E, et al: Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases. Blood 91:756-763, 1998 59. Nagler A, Or R, Naparstek E, et al: Secondary allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo SCT) using a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for patients with hematological malignancies. Blood 92:137a, 1998 (abstr) Submitted July 14, 1999; accepted October 19, 1999.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|