Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osaki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yasumoto, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osaki, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yasumoto, K.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 20, Issue 13 (July), 2002: 2930-2936
© 2002 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Prognostic Impact of Micrometastatic Tumor Cells in the Lymph Nodes and Bone Marrow of Patients With Completely Resected Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

By Toshihiro Osaki, Tsunehiro Oyama, Chun-Dong Gu, Toshihiro Yamashita, Tomoko So, Mitsuhiro Takenoyama, Kenji Sugio, Kosei Yasumoto

From the Department of Surgery II, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.

Address reprint requests to Toshihiro Osaki, MD, Department of Surgery II, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan; email: t-osaki{at}med.uoeh-u.ac.jp


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: This study was designed to substantiate the prognostic impact of occult micrometastatic tumor cells in the lymph nodes (LNs) and bone marrow (BM) in stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using cytokeratin (CK) as a micrometastatic marker and the relationship between the micrometastases in the LNs and BM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 2,432 hilar and mediastinal LNs were removed during surgery from 115 patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC. The LNs were analyzed for micrometastasis using immunohistochemistry with the biclonal anti-CK antibody AE1/AE3. BM aspirates from 115 patients were immunocytochemically stained with the monoclonal anti-CK antibody CK2.

RESULTS: CK-positive (CK+) cells were detected in 42 (1.7%) of 2,432 LNs, in 32 (27.8%) of 115 patients, and in 32 (27.8%) of 115 BM aspirates. There was no relationship between the frequencies of CK+ cells in the LNs and in the BM. The patients with CK+ cells in the LNs had a poor prognosis by both univariate (P = .008) and multivariate analyses (P = .01), whereas the presence of CK+ cells in the BM did not allow prediction of survival (P = .32). The prognostic impact of LNs micrometastasis was independent even after adjusting for the status of BM micrometastasis.

CONCLUSION: The detection of lymph nodal micrometastatic tumor cells provides an accurate assessment of tumor staging and has powerful prognostic implications for completely resected stage I NSCLC patients.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
LUNG CANCER IS the leading cause of cancer death in North America, and it became the most common cause of cancer death among the Japanese in 1998. Lung cancer is also an aggressive carcinoma with a poor outcome. The tumor-node-metastasis staging system of lung cancer1 is widely used as a guide for predicting the prognosis. The presence of lymph nodal metastases along with the tumor and metastasis status represents the most accurate factor currently available for the prediction of a prognosis in patients who undergo complete surgical resection. However, approximately 30% of patients with pathologic stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have a recurrence of the tumor and die despite complete surgical resection.2,3 This suggests that occult micrometastatic tumor cells, which are not detected by current clinical staging examinations and conventional histopathologic methods such as hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, have already spread to the regional lymph nodes (LNs; lymphatic locoregional metastasis) or the distant mesenchymal organs (hematogenous systemic metastasis) at the time of surgical intervention. Therefore, it may be necessary to assess the LNs and bone marrow (BM) micrometastases to accurately predict a patient’s prognosis.

Many attempts have been made to detect micrometastatic tumor cells in LNs,4-9 BM,10-13 and peripheral blood14,15 by either immunohistochemical (IHC) staining or genetic methods such as a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction with cytokeratin (CK) as a micrometastasis marker, and micrometastases of the LNs and BM are well appreciated in prediction of prognosis. However, there are few studies describing the simultaneous detection of micrometastases in both the BM and LNs of patients with NSCLC and their prognostic implications. This study was designed to detect occult micrometastatic tumor cells in the pathologic negative (pN0) LNs and BM of completely resected stage I NSCLC patients by CK IHC staining and to evaluate the relationship between the micrometastases in the LNs and BM and their prognostic potential.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patients, LNs, and BM Materials, and Follow-Up
Among a total of 405 consecutive patients with NSCLC who underwent radical surgery at the Department of Surgery II, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan, from September 1993 to April 2000, 194 patients had stage I disease identified by routine histopathologic examination. Of these 194 patients, we were able to obtain adequate BM samples and paraffin-embedded pN0 LNs from 115 patients. The pN0 was used throughout this study to denote LNs that were negative for metastasis by routine light microscopic assessment. All patients had undergone standard lobectomy or pneumonectomy with the dissection of the hilar and mediastinal LNs (systematic nodal dissection). The tumor stage was classified according to the "Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer" (1997).1 There were 74 men and 41 women, with a mean age of 67.7 years (range, 49 to 85 years). The histologic types included 78 adenocarcinomas, 29 squamous cell carcinomas, six large-cell carcinomas, and two other types. Sixty-two patients had stage IA (T1N0M0) and 53 had stage IB (T2N0M0) carcinomas. All patients were informed about the study and gave written consent before BM aspiration and surgery.

After the primary operation, the patients were examined every month within the first year and thereafter at 3-month intervals as a rule. The evaluations included physical examination, chest roentgenography, analysis of blood chemistry, and carcinoembryonic antigen assay. Chest, abdominal, and brain computed tomography scans and a bone scintiscan were performed every 6 months within the third year and each year thereafter. If any symptoms or signs of recurrence appeared in these examinations, further frequent evaluations to detect the recurrent site were performed. Survival data were updated in April 2001. The median observation period was 35.8 months (range, 0.1 to 90.6 months), with no patients lost to the follow-up. Recurrences were classified as locoregional (inside the ipsilateral thorax) or distant (outside the ipsilateral thorax).

CK Staining for LNs
A total of 2,432 hilar and mediastinal LNs (mean, 21.1 per patient) were removed during surgery from these 115 patients and were analyzed for micrometastasis using CK IHC staining. Five 4-µm slices, representing every other slice from 10 slices of each paraffin-embedded LN section, were attached to glass slides. The slides were stained with primary antibodies against the CK by using a labeled streptavidin-biotin method (Dako LSAB kit; Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA). The primary antibodies were the mouse biclonal antibody AE1/AE3 (Progen Biotechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) to the CKs, which recognizes most of the type 1 (acidic type) and the type 2 (basic type) CKs. We used AE1/AE3 for CK IHC staining of the LNs instead of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) CK2, which we used for CK staining of BM described below, because mAb CK2 was not suitable for paraffin-embedded sections. The staining procedures were as follows: (1) deparaffinization with xylene and ethanol, (2) incubation with the primary antibodies (dilutions: AE1/AE3, 1/200), (3) incubation with the secondary antibody (either biotinylated goat antimouse immunoglobulin [Ig] G or goat antirabbit IgG), (4) developing with peroxidase-labeled streptavidin and diaminobenzidine-H2O2, and (5) counterstaining with hematoxylin. The presence of CK-positive (CK+) cells within the whole-body section of the LNs was accepted as evidence of micrometastatic tumor cells, even if only a single CK+ cell was detected.

CK Staining for BM
Under general anesthesia, 5 mL of heparinized BM aspiration were collected from one side of the upper iliac crest through a needle while the patient was in the operating room before their surgery. The fraction of mononuclear cells (MNCs) from each sample was obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque (Dainippon Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) density-gradient centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 30 minutes. The mean yield of MNCs was 6.5 x 106 from each sample. An aliquot of 1 x 106 MNCs was cytocentrifuged at 1,300 rpm for 5 minutes onto five glass slides (2 x 105 cells per slide). After overnight air-drying and 4% paraformaldehyde-acetone fixation, the MNCs (106 cells) were immunocytochemically stained and were analyzed to detect micrometastatic tumor cells. Using the method of Pantel et al11 with slight modifications, the mAb CK2 (IgG; Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), which recognizes the CK component no. 18, was used at 2.5 µg/mL as the primary antibody, and the antibody reaction was developed using the alkaline phosphatase antiphosphatase technique (Dako, Tokyo, Japan).16 Endogenous phosphatase was inhibited by a preincubation with levamisole. The presence of CK+ cells, which stain bright red in the cytoplasm, was accepted as evidence of micrometastatic tumor cells, even if only a single CK+ cell was detected. The suitability of the mAb CK2 for NSCLC cell screening of BM aspirates has been evaluated in detail by Pantel et al.11

The LNs and BM specimens were examined and checked by two of the authors (T.O. and C.D.G.) with no knowledge of the patients’ molecular biologic or clinical data, including the patients’ outcomes.

Statistical Analysis
The associations between the clinicopathologic characteristics and the micrometastatic status were analyzed by the use of a contingency table. Statistical significance was evaluated using the {chi}2 test. A univariate survival analysis for each prognostic variable on overall survival was estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method.17 The terminal event was death attributable to cancer or noncancer causes. The statistical significance of the differences in survival distribution among the prognostic groups was evaluated by the log-rank test.18 The Cox proportional hazards model was applied to the multivariate survival analysis.19 The prognostic variables on overall survival included sex, age, histologic types, pathologic T-factor (stage), CK status in the BM, and CK status in the LNs. The statistical difference was considered to be significant if the P value was less than .05. Data were analyzed with the use of the Abacus Concepts Survival Tools for StatView program (Abacus Concepts, Inc, Berkeley, CA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Detection of CK+ Cells in LNs
CK+ cells, either alone or in small clusters, were most often seen in the subcapsular or medullary sinuses and less frequently in the afferent lymphatics of the LN specimens (Fig 1A). The CK+ cells were found in 42 (1.7%) of 2,432 LNs; namely, 32 (27.8%) of 115 patients had CK+ cells in the pN0 LNs. The frequency of CK+ cells in the LNs showed no differences in sex, age, or histologic type; however, the frequency of CK+ cells in the T2 status patients was significantly higher than that in the T1 status patients (P = .03) (Table 1).



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. (A) Three CK+ cells with deep brown-stained cytoplasm are seen in the LN specimen (original magnification: x400). (B) A single CK+ cell with bright red-stained cytoplasm is seen among the MNCs (original magnification: x400).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Table 1. Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Patients and Distribution of CK+ Cells in the LN and in the BM
 
Detection of CK+ Cells in BM
CK+ cells were easy to identify among the MNCs because the cytoplasms of most of the CK+ cells were uniformly stained bright red (Fig 1B). Clusters of CK+ cells were not detected in this study. The mAb CK2 detected CK+ cells in 32 (27.8%) of 115 BM samples. The frequency of CK+ cells in the BM showed no differences in sex, age, histologic type, or tumor status (Table 1).

Relationship Between Micrometastasis in LNs and the BM
Among the 32 patients with CK+ cells in the LNs, nine patients (28.1%) had CK+ cells in the BM, whereas in the 83 patients without CK+ cells in the LNs, CK+ cells in the BM were found in 23 patients (27.7%). There was no relationship between micrometastasis in the LNs and that in the BM (P = .99) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Table 2. Relationship Between CK+ Cells in the LN and the BM
 
Influence of Micrometastasis on Recurrence and Survival
At the last follow-up, 83 patients were alive and free of cancer, 10 patients had died of other causes without evidence of cancer, eight patients were alive with recurrent cancer, and 14 patients had died of cancer. Twenty-two patients (18.8%) had recurrences during this period: 13 distant, two locoregional, and seven patients had both sites of recurrences. The mean duration from the surgery to the recurrence in these 22 patients was 16.9 months (range, 3.5 to 47.6 months). We discriminated these recurrent diseases from second primary malignancies based on the clinical findings, such as the duration from the primary surgery and the number of the second lesion. As shown in Table 3, 11 (34.4%) of the 32 patients with CK+ cells in the LNs had recurrences, whereas 11 (13.3%) of the 83 patients who were free of CK+ cells had recurrences (P = .01). However, the presence of CK+ cells in the BM was not associated with recurrence in patients with stage I NSCLC (P = .95). We also noted that the presence of micrometastasis in the pN0 LNs was predictive of the pattern of recurrence. All 11 patients with CK+ cells in the LNs and recurrent diseases had hematogenous distant recurrences.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Table 3. Survival Status and Recurrence in Patients With or Without CK+ Cells in pN0 LN and BM
 
The overall 5-year survival of the 115 patients in this study was 70.9%. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated that the patients with CK+ cells in the pN0 LNs had significantly shorter survival periods than those without CK+ cells (P = .008) (Fig 2A). Among the patients with stage IA (n = 62) disease, the survival did not significantly differ between patients with and without CK+ cells (P = .40). Among the patients with stage IB (n = 53) disease, the survival of patients with CK+ cells was significantly shorter than the survival of those without CK+ cells (P = .02). The presence of CK+ cells in the BM did not allow the prediction of survival among the patients with stage I (Fig 2B), IA, or IB (P = .32, .45, and .65, respectively) disease. A Cox multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that the LNs micrometastatic status was a significant independent predictor of a poorer prognosis even after adjusting for the tumor status and the BM micrometastatic status in patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC (P = .01; relative risk of death = 2.96) (Table 4).



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. (A) Survival of stage I patients with or without CK+ cells in the LNs (P = .008). (B) Survival of stage I patients with or without CK+ cells in the BM (P = .32).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Table 4. Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis of Overall Survival Including Micrometastatic Status in the LN and the BM
 
Restaging of Nodal Status Based on CK Staining
Among the patients with pN0 disease identified by a conventional HE histopathologic study, 19 patients (16.5%) were restaged as N1 status (CK-N1) and 13 patients (11.3%) were restaged as N2 status (CK-N2) based on the CK IHC staining. Figure 3A shows the survival curves according to the nodal factor restaged by the CK staining. The survival of patients with CK-N2 was significantly shorter than the survival of those with CK-N0 (P < .001). There were no significant differences between the survivals of the other groups (CK-N0 v CK-N1, P = .29; CK-N1 v CK-N2, P = .08). For comparison with a pathologic nodal (pN) factor, we used a control group of patients with completely resected pathologic T1/2N1M0 (n = 29) and T1/2N2M0 (n = 54) NSCLC assessed by conventional HE staining during the same period. Figure 3B shows the survival curves according to the restaged nodal (CK-N) status and the conventional pN status. There were no differences in the survival between the patients with CK-N1 and pN1 (P = .46) and those with CK-N2 and pN2 (P = .92).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. (A) Survival of stage I patients according to the nodal factor restaged by the CK staining (CK-N0 v N1, P = .29; CK-N0 v N2, P < .001; CK-N1 v N2, P = .08). (B) Survival according to restaged nodal and pathologic nodal factors (CK-N1 v pN1, P = .46; CK-N2 v pN2, P = .92).

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Micrometastases to BM and regional LNs can now be identified by IHC or genetic methods using several markers for epithelial cells, such as CK and Ber-EP4, and oncogenes/oncoproteins, such as K-ras and p53. This information is useful for the assessment of the postoperative survival in patients with NSCLC.4-12,20 However, there have been few studies of the simultaneous detection of micrometastases in both the BM and LNs of patients with early-stage NSCLC and their prognostic implications.

In this study, CK+ cells in the LNs and the BM of patients with completely resected stage I NSCLC were detected with the same frequency (27.8%), and there was no relationship between micrometastases in the LNs and in the BM. This finding suggests that different regulations or mechanisms may exist in micrometastasis to the LNs and to the BM and that micrometastases to the LNs and the BM may occur independently. The analysis of the tumor relapse pattern in patients with LNs micrometastasis revealed that it was hematogenous. All 11 patients with LNs micrometastasis and recurrent diseases had hematogenous distant recurrences. LN micrometastasis, as well as overt LN metastasis, does not only reflect lymphogenous spread but it may also signal the early phase of hematogenous systemic tumor cell dissemination. Furthermore, the presence of even an isolated CK+ cell in the LNs had a significant impact on survival in patients with early-stage NSCLC, and the survival impact was independent even after adjusting for the BM micrometastatic status and other covariates. In addition, survival differences were observed with restaged nodal status by CK staining, and no survival differences were observed between restaged nodal status and pathologic nodal status (CK-N1 v pN1 and CK-N2 v pN2), suggesting that the detection of LN micrometastasis provides an accurate assessment of tumor staging as well as the pathologic overt LN metastases. On the other hand, the presence of an isolated CK+ cell in the BM was not associated with survival. However, there is a possibility that the presence of CK+ cell in the BM, which may be one of the strong predictable factors for poor survival, had no survival impact because the number of patients included in this study was relatively small for providing the BM micrometastatic status with statistical significance. Concerning this important issue, definitive conclusions await further study maturation.

CK, which forms the intermediate filaments of the cytoskeleton within both normal and malignant epithelial cells,21 is widely used as a marker of epithelial cells. The wide distribution of CKs in all epithelial tumors means that antibodies to CK can detect occult metastases from different kinds of cancers.22-25 However, CKs are not only specific to tumor cells but also are present in normal epithelial cells, suggesting that a false-positive reaction may also be seen within nontumor cells in the LNs.8,26 Hashimoto et al8 reported that the detection of LN micrometastasis using a mutant allele-specific amplification method with a carcinoma-specific marker, p53 or K-ras, can reduce the false-positive rates as compared with the methods using anti-CK reagents. We previously reported the use of p53 IHC staining in the detection of occult tumor cells in the LNs of NSCLC patients, and p53-positive cells were identified in 45.2% of this population.20 The p53 tumor suppressor gene is altered in a high proportion of human neoplasms27; however, it is mutated in approximately half of the various types of malignant diseases, including NSCLC.28,29 Thus, p53, as a micrometastatic marker, is available for about half of patients with malignancies. This means that using oncogenes and oncoproteins, such as p53 and K-ras, as micrometastatic markers is disadvantageous for the detection of occult tumor cells. Recently, we reported the simultaneous detection of LNs micrometastases by combining the CK and p53 protein IHC stainings.30 Seventeen (35%) of the 49 patients had micrometastatic tumor cells using the CK IHC staining alone, whereas we were able to identify micrometastasis in the pN0 LNs in 22 patients (45%) by adding the p53 IHC staining to that of the CK. Although performing both IHC stainings increases the cost and the time of the analyses, it may be necessary to increase the diagnostic efficiency for micrometastasis.

In conclusion, the detection of LN occult micrometastatic tumor cells provides an accurate assessment of tumor staging and has powerful prognostic implications for completely resected stage I NSCLC patients, especially in stage IB disease. At present, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is not a routine standard therapy for completely resected NSCLC patients because of its unreliable results for the improvement of the patients’ prognosis. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be useful for patients with occult micrometastasis in the LNs because patients with a minimal amount of residual tumor may respond better to chemotherapy. On the other hand, numerous trials, including two randomized trials31,32 of induction chemotherapy for stage IIIA NSCLC, have shown that it was feasible and provided higher response rates and a survival advantage. When we consider the application of induction chemotherapy, the detection of micrometastasis in the mediastinal LNs, preoperatively sampled by mediastinoscopy, may also be useful to identify patients with occult N2 disease.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
Supported in part by a grant-in-aid no. 09771021 for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan (to T.O.).

We are grateful to Yoshihisa Fujino, MD (Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Sciences, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan), for his statistical advice during the preparation of the article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Mountain CF: Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest 111: 1710-1717, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Martini N, Bains MS, Burt ME, et al: Incidence of local recurrence and second primary tumors in resected stage I lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 109: 120-129, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Nesbitt JC, Putnam JB, Walsh GL, et al: Survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 60: 466-472, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Chen ZL, Perez S, Holmes EC, et al: Frequency and distribution of occult micrometastases in lymph nodes of patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 493-498, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Passlick B, Izbicki JR, Kubuschok B, et al: Detection of disseminated lung cancer cells in lymph nodes: Impact on staging and prognosis. Ann Thorac Surg 61: 177-183, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Izbicki JR, Passlick B, Hosch SB, et al: Mode of spread in the early phase of lymphatic metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer: Significance of nodal micrometastasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112: 623-630, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Maruyama R, Sugio K, Mitsudomi T, et al: Relationship between early recurrence and micrometastases in the lymph nodes of patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114: 535-543, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Hashimoto T, Kobayashi Y, Ishikawa Y, et al: Prognostic value of genetically diagnosed lymph node micrometastasis in non-small cell lung carcinoma cases. Cancer Res 60: 6472-6478, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Wu J, Ohta Y, Minato H, et al: Nodal occult metastasis in patients with peripheral lung adenocarcinoma of 2.0 cm or less in diameter. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 1772-1778, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Ohgami A, Mitsudomi T, Sugio K, et al: Micrometastatic tumor cells in the bone marrow of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 64: 363-367, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Pantel K, Izbicki JR, Angstwurm M, et al: Immunocytological detection of bone marrow micrometastasis in operable non-small cell cancer. Cancer Res 53: 1027-1031, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Panel K, Izbicki J, Passlick B, et al: Frequency and prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells in bone marrow of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer without overt metastases. Lancet 347: 649-653, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Cote RJ, Beattie EJ, Chaiwun B, et al: Detection of occult bone marrow micrometastases in patients with operable lung carcinoma. Ann Surg 222: 415-425, 1995[Medline]

14. Dingemans AM, Brakenhoff RH, Postmus PE, et al: Detection of cytokeratin-19 transcripts by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in lung cancer cell lines and blood of lung cancer. Lab Invest 77: 213-220, 1997[Medline]

15. Krismann M, Todt B, Schroder J, et al: Low specificity of cytokeratin 19 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analyses for detection of hematogenous lung cancer dissemination. J Clin Oncol 13: 2769-2775, 1995[Abstract]

16. Cordell JL, Falini B, Erber WN, et al: Immunoenzymatic labeling of monoclonal antibodies using immune complexes of alkaline phosphatase and monoclonal antialkaline phosphatase (APAAP complexes). J Histochem Cytochem 32: 219-229, 1984[Abstract]

17. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457-481, 1958[CrossRef]

18. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, et al: Design and analysis of randomised clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. Br J Cancer 35: 1-39, 1977[Medline]

19. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 34: 187-220, 1972

20. Dobashi K, Sugio K, Osaki T, et al: Micrometastatic p53-positive cells in the lymph nodes of non-small-cell lung cancer: Prognostic significance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 114: 339-346, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller DL, et al: The catalog of human cytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia. Cell 31: 11-24, 1982[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Braun S, Pantel K, Muller P, et al: Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and survival of patients with stage I, II, or III breast cancer. N Engl J Med 342: 525-533, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Lindemann F, Schlimok G, Dirschedl P, et al: Prognostic significance of micrometastatic tumour cells in bone marrow of colorectal cancer patients. Lancet 340: 685-689, 1992[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Thorban S, Roder JD, Nekarda H, et al: Immunocytochemical detection of disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow of patients with esophageal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1222-1227, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Yokoyama N, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K: Immunohistochemical detection of lymph node micrometastases from gallbladder carcinoma using monoclonal anticytokeratin antibody. Cancer 85: 1465-1469, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Traweek ST, Liu J, Battifora H: Keratin gene expression in nonepithelial tissues: Detection with polymerase chain reaction. Am J Pathol 142: 1111-1118, 1993[Abstract]

27. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, et al: Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: Clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 54: 4855-4878, 1994[Free Full Text]

28. Soussi T, Legros Y, Lubin R, et al: Multifactorial analysis of p53 alteration in human cancer: A review. Int J Cancer 57: 1-9, 1994[Medline]

29. Brambilla E, Guzzeri S, Brambilla C, et al: Immunohistochemical study of p53 in human lung carcinomas. Am J Pathol 143: 199-210, 1993[Abstract]

30. Gu CD, Osaki T, Oyama T, et al: Detection of micrometastatic tumor cells in pN0 lymph nodes of patients with completely resected nonsmall cell lung cancer: Impact on recurrence and survival. Ann Surg 235: 133-139, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Roth JA, Fossella F, Komaki R, et al: A randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 86: 673-680, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Rosell R, Gomez-Codina J, Camps C, et al: A randomized trial comparing preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery with surgery alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 330: 153-158, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Submitted October 31, 2001; accepted March 26, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Riquet, P. Bagan, F. Le Pimpec Barthes, E. Banu, F. Scotte, C. Foucault, A. Dujon, and C. Danel
Completely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Reconsidering Prognostic Value and Significance of N2 Metastases
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2007; 84(6): 1818 - 1824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
J. E. Gervasoni Jr., S. Sbayi, and B. Cady
Role of lymphadenectomy in surgical treatment of solid tumors: an update on the clinical data.
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2443 - 2462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. M. Schwartz and D. E. Henson
Diagnostic Surgical Pathology in Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 78S - 93S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. A. Silvestri, M. K. Gould, M. L. Margolis, L. T. Tanoue, D. McCrory, E. Toloza, and F. Detterbeck
Noninvasive Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidenced-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 178S - 201S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
C. Coutant, O. Morel, Y. Delpech, S. Uzan, E. Darai, and E. Barranger
Laparoscopic Sentinel Node Biopsy in Cervical Cancer Using a Combined Detection: 5 Years Experience
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 2392 - 2399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. Sienel, I. Mecklenburg, S. Dango, P. Ehrhardt, A. Kirschbaum, B. Passlick, and K. Pantel
Detection of MAGE-A Transcripts in Bone Marrow Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Operable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 3840 - 3847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Lardinois, P. De Leyn, P. Van Schil, R. R. Porta, D. Waller, B. Passlick, M. Zielinski, K. Junker, E. A. Rendina, H.-B. Ris, et al.
ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 30(5): 787 - 792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
S. L. Chen, D. M. Iddings, R. P. Scheri, and A. J. Bilchik
Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Analysis: Current Concepts and Applications
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2006; 56(5): 292 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
V. Pagliarulo, D. Hawes, F. H. Brands, S. Groshen, J. Cai, J. P. Stein, G. Lieskovsky, D. G. Skinner, and R. J. Cote
Detection of Occult Lymph Node Metastases in Locally Advanced Node-Negative Prostate Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 20, 2006; 24(18): 2735 - 2742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Xi, M. C. Coello, V. R. Litle, S. Raja, W. E. Gooding, S. A. Yousem, T. El-Hefnawy, R. J. Landreneau, J. D. Luketich, and T. E. Godfrey
A Combination of Molecular Markers Accurately Detects Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 12(8): 2484 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
S. Prevost, L. Boucher, P. Larivee, R. Boileau, and F. Benard
Bone Marrow Hypermetabolism on 18F-FDG PET as a Survival Prognostic Factor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
J. Nucl. Med., April 1, 2006; 47(4): 559 - 565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. C. Mineo, G. Guggino, D. Mineo, G. Vanni, and V. Ambrogi
Relevance of Lymph Node Micrometastases in Radically Resected Endobronchial Carcinoid Tumors
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 80(2): 428 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. Doddoli, A. Aragon, F. Barlesi, B. Chetaille, S. Robitail, R. Giudicelli, P. Fuentes, and P. Thomas
Does the extent of lymph node dissection influence outcome in patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 680 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Xi, J. D. Luketich, S. Raja, W. E. Gooding, V. R. Litle, M. C. Coello, S. D. Finkelstein, M. L. Chestney, R. J. Landreneau, S. J. Hughes, et al.
Molecular Staging of Lymph Nodes from Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 11(3): 1099 - 1109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Uramoto, K. Sugio, T. Oyama, S. Nakata, K. Ono, M. Morita, K. Funa, and K. Yasumoto
Expression of {Delta}Np73 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 10(20): 6905 - 6911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
C. G. Shores, X. Yin, W. Funkhouser, and W. Yarbrough
Clinical Evaluation of a New Molecular Method for Detection of Micrometastases in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, August 1, 2004; 130(8): 937 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. J. Liptay
Sentinel Node Mapping in Lung Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., March 1, 2004; 11(3_suppl): 271S - 274S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y.-C. Wu, C.-F. J. Lin, W.-H. Hsu, B.-S. Huang, M.-H. Huang, and L.-S. Wang
Long-term results of pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer: validation of using the number of totally removed lymph nodes as a staging control
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2003; 24(6): 994 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
K. Yasumoto, T. Osaki, Y. Watanabe, H. Kato, and T. Yoshimura
Prognostic value of cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow and lymph nodes of patients with resected nonsmall cell lung cancer: a multicenter prospective study
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 194 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
P. P. Massion and D. P. Carbone
From Clinical and Pathologic to Molecular Staging of Lung Cancer
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2003; 167(12): 1587 - 1588.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
R. Danesi, F. De Braud, S. Fogli, T. M. De Pas, A. Di Paolo, G. Curigliano, and M. Del Tacca
Pharmacogenetics of Anticancer Drug Sensitivity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Pharmacol. Rev., March 1, 2003; 55(1): 57 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire