|
|||||
|
|
||||||
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology
Can Endocrine Treatment for Hormone-Positive Premenopausal Women With Early Breast Cancer Replace Adjuvant Chemotherapy?Iran University Medical School, Tehran, Iran To the Editor: In the December 15, 2002 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Jakesz et al1 and Jonat et al2 tried to determine the best postoperative treatment for hormone-receptorpositive premenopausal women with early breast cancer. Jakesz et al showed that a complete endocrine blockade with 3 years of receiving gosorelin and 5 years receiving tamoxifen was more effective than chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF). Relapse-free survival and local recurrence-free survival were significantly in favor of the endocrine therapy, and there was a trend in favor of the endocrine treatment for overall survival, but this was not statistically significant. Jonat et al compared 2 years of receiving gosorelin with adjuvant CMF therapy. Disease-free survival was identical for patients with estrogen-receptorpositive tumors. Both studies were well performed, but neither group mentioned the neu/erbB-2 overexpression in their series. They both used CMF chemotherapy as their control arm. While some studies have shown that neu/erbB-2 overexpression is associated with less benefit from CMF chemotherapy,3,4 the overexpression of neu/erbB-2 has also been shown to be associated with relative resistance to hormone therapies.5,6 There is, however, some discrepancy in other reports on the overexpression of this predictive marker and response to endocrine treatment.7 An uneven distribution of neu/erbB-2 overexpression might have influenced the outcomes of both studies. Predictive markers such as neu/erbB-2 overexpression should be included in the analysis in order to optimize treatment for this group of patients. It can be concluded that optimal postoperative treatment of premenopausal-hormone-receptorpositive patients will remain an open issue, and the treatment of choice is inclusion in large randomized trials. REFERENCES
1. Jakesz R, Hausmaninger H, Kubista E, et al: Randomized adjuvant trial of tamoxifen and goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: Evidence for the superiority of treatment with endocrine blockade in premenopausal patients with hormone-responsive breast cancerAustrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group trial 5. J Clin Oncol 20:46214627, 2002
2. Jonat W, Kaufmann M, Sauerbrei W, et al: Goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil as adjuvant therapy in premenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: The Zoladex Early Breast Cancer Research Association Study. J Clin Oncol 20:46284635, 2002 3. Gusterson BA, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, et al: Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer: International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 10:10491056, 1992[Abstract]
4. Allred DC, Clark GM, Tandon AK, et al: HER-2/neu in node-negative breast cancer: Prognostic significance of overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 10:599605, 1992 5. Leitzel K, Teramoto Y, Konrad K, et al: Elevated serum c-erbB-2 antigen levels and decreased response to hormone therapy of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 13:11291135, 1995[Abstract]
6. Yamauchi H, ONeill A, Gelman R, et al: Prediction of response to antiestrogen therapy in advanced breast cancer patients by pretreatment circulating levels of extracellular domain of the HER-2/c-neu protein. J Clin Oncol 15:25182525, 1997 7. Elledge RM, Green S, Ciocca D, et al: HER-2 expression and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: A Southwest Oncology Group Study. Clin Cancer Res 4:712, 1998[Abstract]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|