Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klasa, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klasa, R. J.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 13 (July), 2003: 2626-2627
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology


CORRESPONDENCE

In reply:

Richard J. Klasa

British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

We thank Dr Alliot for her comments. This study1 was designed with a control arm that was arrived at by consensus among a fairly representative sample of hematologists and medical oncologists across Canada. At that time, in the early 1990s, re-treatment with alkylator-based regimens until demonstrated refractoriness was the common practice, as there were few other options. Purine analogs and monoclonal antibodies were still in the investigational phase. The impression of treating physicians was that a majority of patients who responded to one course of alkylating-agent treatment or CHOP (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, vincristine, and prednisone) would respond again the second or third time. There were few data from controlled studies to actually address this, as there was nothing to control with. In fact, our study provides these data, as 52% of patients treated with CVP did respond, with a 9.1-month median progression-free survival for the group. The question that was addressed by the study was whether fludarabine would indeed be superior to re-treatment with an alkylator-based regimen in this setting, in a phase III study. Although many phase II studies using a variety of agents alone and in combination had been reported in the 1980s, none of these were in widespread use within our community. The decline in social functioning scores, as mentioned in our article, was mostly as a result of certain side effects, such as alopecia, with CVP treatments. A more detailed analysis of quality of life for both groups in this study has been completed and will be published in the future. Phase II studies of novel agents alone and in combinations are always being performed concurrently with phase III studies, with each having their own distinct purpose.

Our phase III study1 was designed to determine if there was a role for fludarabine earlier in the treatment of relapsed low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, before outright alkylator refractoriness. Phase II studies had previously demonstrated that fludarabine did indeed have a high level of activity in this particular situation. Similarly, novel combinations of drugs that look promising in phase II studies must now be subjected to the more rigorous test of a phase III comparison against a standard treatment in order to determine their place in clinical practice.

REFERENCE

1. Klasa RJ, Meyer RM, Shustik C, et al: Randomized phase III study of fludarabine phosphate versus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone in patients with recurrent low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma previously treated with an alkylating agent or alkylator-containing regimen. J Clin Oncol 20:4649–4654, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Fludarabine Versus Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone in Recurrent Low-Grade Lymphomas
    Carol Alliot
    JCO 2003 21: 2626 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klasa, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Klasa, R. J.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online