Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, V. A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 19 (October), 2003: 3709-3710
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology


CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply:

Vicki A. Morrison

Veterans Administration Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN

As noted by Dr Astrow,1 we are reminded of the significance of therapy-related dysplasias in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. Last year, we reported the occurrence of therapy-related myelodysplastic disorders (t-MDS) and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) in a series of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), who received initial cytotoxic therapy on an intergroup trial.2 In this series, five of six cases of t-MDS or t-AML occurred in patients treated with concomitant fludarabine and chlorambucil. The remaining case occurred in a patient who received single-agent fludarabine therapy, followed by chlorambucil with prednisone. These findings raised the possibility that combination purine analog-alkylator therapy may increase the risk of therapy-related dysplasias. However, similar findings of t-MDS or t-AML have not yet been forthcoming from either large single-institution, or cooperative group trials of therapy with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide for CLL. Ideally, longer periods of follow-up are warranted in these trials to observe patients for this complication.

For more than two decades, fludarabine has been used for the therapy of patients with a variety of lymphoproliferative disorders. However, reports of second malignancies have generally not included therapy-related dysplasias.3 In the case of t-AML reported by Astrow, the patient developed this disorder after therapy with fludarabine followed by rituximab for a nodular mixed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Similar to some cases that we reported, cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow was not performed initially at the diagnosis of lymphoma, though cytogenetics at the time of transformation to t-AML revealed an abnormality on chromosome 7, typical of a therapy-related dysplasia. Since our initial report, anecdotal cases of t-MDS and t-AML following fludarabine therapy have been reported. A case of a probable fludarabine-induced t-MDS in a patient with low-grade NHL was described by Misgeld et al.4 In this patient, marrow findings compatible with t-MDS were found approximately 18 months after initiation of fludarabine therapy. Cytogenetic findings at this time revealed deletions in chromosomes 5 and 7. Two cases of t-MDS have also been reported from England, occurring approximately 9 months after therapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (S. Basu, personal communication, September 2002). Among 492 patients with NHL who underwent high-dose therapy followed by autologous bone marrow transplantation from a single-institution series, 22 cases of t-MDS or t-AML were reported.5 In this report, prior fludarabine therapy was found to be a significant risk factor for the development of this complication in a univariate analysis. Finally, in our recent report of 104 patients with CLL receiving initial therapy with either concurrent or sequential fludarabine-rituximab therapy, to date, no cases of t-MDS or t-AML have been reported.6

Several cases of lymphomatous transformation following fludarabine therapy have also been reported recently. Cohen et al7 noted the occurrence of large-cell transformation of CLL or follicular NHL in nine patients either during or shortly after therapy with fludarabine + rituximab–containing regimens. Likewise, Abruzzo et al8 reported five cases of Epstein-Barr virus–positive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders arising in patients with either CLL or splenic marginal zone lymphoma who received fludarabine therapy; three of these patients also received campath-1H. These disorders were diagnosed from 2 to 12 months after completion of fludarabine therapy, and were morphologically like lymphoproliferative disorders occurring in the posttransplant setting. In addition, two cases of aggressive epithelial carcinomas following treatment with either fludarabine or 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine for CLL and hairy cell leukemia, respectively, were reported by Larsen et al.9 The authors postulated that the T-cell depletion caused by these agents accounted for the aggressive clinical course of these epithelial malignancies.

These reports underscore the importance of evaluating various aspects of outcome when new therapies for lymphoproliferative disorders are examined. The traditional outcome parameters of response rate, remission duration, and survival will remain of primary importance in future therapeutic trials. However, infectious complications have certainly been demonstrated to be of significance in the utilization of purine analogs or agents such as alemtuzumab. Lastly, as shown by Astrow and others, the impact of late effects, particularly second malignancies such as t-MDS and t-AML, must also be considered in the more widespread use of agents such as fludarabine, either as a single agent or as part of a combination regimen, in the therapy of lymphoproliferative disorders.

AUTHOR’S DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Astrow AB: Fludarabine-related myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 21: 3709, 2003[Free Full Text]

2. Morrison VA, Rai KR, Peterson BL, et al: Therapy-related myeloid leukemias are observed in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia after treatment with fludarabine and chlorambucil: Results of an intergroup study — Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9011. J Clin Oncol 20:3878–3884, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Keating MJ, O’Brien S, Lerner S, et al: Long-term follow-up of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving fludarabine regimens as initial therapy. Blood 92:1165–1171, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Misgeld E, Germing U, Aul C, et al: Secondary myelodysplastic syndrome after fludarabine therapy of a low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Res 25:95–98, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Hosing C, Munsell M, Yazji S, et al: Risk of therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/acute leukemia following high-dose therapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 13:450–459, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Byrd JC, Peterson BL, Morrison VA, et al: Randomized phase 2 study of fludarabine with concurrent versus sequential treatment with rituximab in symptomatic, untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9712 (CALGB 9712). Blood 101:6–14, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Cohen Y, Da’as N, Libster D, et al: Large-cell transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma during or soon after treatment with fludarabine-rituximab-containing regimens: Natural history- or therapy-related complication? Eur J Hematol 68:80–83, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Abruzzo LV, Rosales CM, Medeiros LJ, et al: Epstein-Barr virus-positive B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders arising in immunodeficient patients previously treated with fludarabine for low-grade B-cell neoplasms. Am J Surg Pathol 26:630–636, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Larsen CR, Hansen PB, Clausen NT: Aggressive growth of epithelial carcinomas following treatment with nuceloside analogues. Am J Hematol 70:48–50, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

  • Fludarabine-Related Myeloid Leukemia
    Alan B. Astrow
    JCO 2003 21: 3709 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, V. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morrison, V. A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online