Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.006 on September 24 2003

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sozzi, G. Articles by Pastorino, U. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sozzi, G. Articles by Pastorino, U. Related Articles Related Correspondence

Quantification of Free Circulating DNA As a Diagnostic Marker in Lung Cancer

Gabriella Sozzi, Davide Conte, MariaElena Leon, Rosalia Cirincione, Luca Roz, Cathy Ratcliffe, Elena Roz, Nicola Cirenei, Massimo Bellomi, Giuseppe Pelosi, Marco A. Pierotti, Ugo Pastorino

From the Departments of Experimental Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori; Divisions of Thoracic Surgery, Anatomical Pathology, Radiology, and Epidemiology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan; and Applera Italia, Monza, Italy.

Address reprint requests to Ugo Pastorino, MD, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy; e-mail: ugo.pastorino{at}istitutotumori.mi.it.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

 
Purpose: Analysis of circulating DNA in plasma can provide a useful marker for earlier lung cancer detection. This study was designed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a quantitative molecular assay of circulating DNA to identify patients with lung cancer and monitor their disease.

Materials and Methods: The amount of plasma DNA was determined through the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) in 100 non–small-cell lung cancer patients and 100 age-, sex-, and smoking-matched controls. Screening performance of the assay was calculated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Odds ratios were calculated using conditional logistic regression analysis.

Results: Median concentration of circulating plasma DNA in patients was almost eight times the value detected incontrols (24.3 v 3.1 ng/mL). The area under the ROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.907 to 0.973). Plasma DNA was a strong risk factor for lung cancer; concentrations in the upper tertile were associated with an 85-fold higher risk than were those in the lowest tertile.

Conclusion: This study shows that higher levels of free circulating DNA can be detected in patients with lung cancer compared with disease-free heavy smokers by a PCR assay, and suggests a new, noninvasive approach for early detection of lung cancer. Levels of plasma DNA could also identify higher-risk individuals for lung cancer screening and chemoprevention trials.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

 
LUNG CANCER is the leading cause of cancer mortality throughout the world and is the cause of more than 1 million annual deaths.¹ In Europe, of the more than 150,000 new patient cases diagnosed every year, only 10% can be cured and can benefit from long-term survival because of the absence of early detection plans, the frequency of metastases at diagnosis, and poor responsiveness to chemotherapy. However, survival of patients undergoing lung resection for small intrapulmonary cancers is greater than 80%.² Despite major potential for prevention, complete eradication of smoking has proven difficult, and the risk of cancer remains high in former smokers. As a consequence, there is a need to develop new tests that may facilitate earlier diagnosis and more effective treatment. Low-dose spiral computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest has been effective in detecting small tumors, with a high proportion of resectable (96%) and stage I (80%) disease.³ Conversely, increased knowledge of molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer offers a basis for the use of molecular markers in biologic fluids for early detection as well as identification of higher-risk smokers.

Common genetic alterations in lung carcinogenesis include allelic loss and instability at loci on 3p (fragile histidine triad [FHIT]), 9p (p16^INK4A), and 17p (p53)^4–7; aberrant promoter methylation of p16^INK4A, APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon), and other tumor suppressor genes^8,9; and Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS)¹⁰ and p53 mutations.^11–13 Detection of these changes in DNA derived from body fluids such as sputum, bronchial brush and lavage, and plasma or serum of lung cancer patients and chronic smokers has been proposed by several authors as a potential diagnostic tool.^14–24 However, the sensitivity and specificity of detection assays in these biologic samples have been limited by the low frequency of alterations of each specific gene, relative low-sensitivity of used methodologies, and choice of appropriate markers.

Analysis of circulating DNA in plasma is a promising noninvasive diagnostic tool, requiring only a limited blood sample. The intent of this study was to set up a relatively simple blood test on the basis of a single marker, to be potentially applicable to large-scale trials for early lung cancer detection. In a previous report, using a DNA colorimetric assay, we have shown a higher plasma DNA concentration in 84 lung cancer patients than in 43 controls, regardless of tumor stage, suggesting that plasma DNA was an early event in lung carcinogenesis.²⁵ In addition, changes in DNA level and in the presence of allelic imbalances at 3p loci correlated with the clinical status of patients during follow-up. These results were recently confirmed in a group of 54 patients with ovarian cancer and 31 controls, for whom plasma DNA concentrations and digital single-nucleotide polymorphism analysis of allelic imbalances were proposed as screening tools for ovarian cancer.²⁶

To measure with greater accuracy the amount of free circulating DNA, a quantification approach based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed. Using Epstein-Barr virus DNA as the target genome, real-time PCR has proven effective to monitor the progress of nasopharyngeal cancer and assess the effects of treatment.²⁷ A single copy gene, the amplification of which is specific and robust, represents the ideal target for DNA-based quantitative real-time PCR assay. For this study, we selected an assay designed for the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) genomic sequence that performed consistently in preliminary experiments. Amplification of hTERT was therefore used as a marker of the total amount of DNA present in plasma samples. We considered that hTERT expression and telomerase activity have been reported as prognostic factors in stage I non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.²⁸ However, our working hypothesis was not based on the evaluation of hTERT expression at the transcriptional level as a tumor-associated marker, but was based instead on the use of a single copy gene such as hTERT as an indicator of the global amount of circulating DNA.

The sensitivity and the specificity of the test were validated in a large case-control study of 200 individuals and in a group of age-matched individuals who had never smoked.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

 
Patients and Control Series
We evaluated 100 consecutive patients with NSCLC, 81 men and 19 women, who were not previously treated with chemoradiotherapy and were included in the European Institute of Oncology tissue bank from 2000 to 2001. All patients had primary cancers and were receiving first treatment; no patients with disease relapse or follow-up were included.

One control was selected for each patient, matched by sex, age, and smoking habits. Mean age ± standard deviation was 65.1 ± 8.9 years in patients and 64.1 ± 8.2 years in controls; average smoking duration was 40.5 ± 10.9 years in patients and 41.7 ± 9.5 years in controls. The population included seven case-control pairs of never smokers. The 93 heavy-smoker controls were selected among the participants of the European Institute of Oncology early detection program, whose chest spiral CT scans were negative. This prospective study accrued 1,035 volunteers aged 50 years or older who were current or former smokers with a minimum pack/yr index of 20, to be investigated with low-dose spiral CT every year for 5 years. Nonsmoking controls were recruited from healthy blood donors at the immunohematology unit of the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy). The number of former smokers differed slightly between patients and controls (28 patients and 11 controls). One light and occasional smoker (< 5 cigarettes/d) was matched to a never smoker. A mean within-pair difference of 1 year in age was statistically significant (P < .02), suggesting the need to adjust for age in the analysis of plasma DNA as a risk factor.

Sample Collection and DNA Isolation
A 7.5-mL sample of peripheral blood was collected in tubes containing EDTA, from patients before surgery and from controls at the time of spiral CT examination, and stored at -140°. Plasma separation and DNA extraction were performed as previously reported.²⁵ The DNA purified from 1 mL of plasma was eluted in a final volume of 50 mL of water. Testing of plasma DNA was performed by technicians with no knowledge of the patient or control status.

DNA Quantification in Plasma
To quantify the circulating DNA in plasma, we used a real-time quantitative PCR approach based on the 5' nucleotide method. This methodology is based on continuous monitoring of a progressive fluorogenic PCR by an optical system.^29,30 The PCR system uses two amplification primers and an additional amplicon-specific and fluorogenic hybridization probe, the target sequence of which is located within the amplicon. The probe is labeled with two fluorescent dyes. One serves as a reporter on the 5' end (VIC dye; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The emission spectrum of the dye is quenched by a second fluorescent dye at the 3' end (TAMRA; Applied Biosystems). If amplification occurs, the 5' to 3' exonuclease activity of the AmpliTaq (Applied Biosystems) DNA polymerase cleaves the reporter from the probe during the extension phase, thus releasing it from the quencher.³¹ The resulting increase in fluorescent emission of the reporter dye is monitored during the PCR process.

Primers and probes were designed to specifically amplify the ubiquitous gene of interest, the hTERT single copy gene mapped on 5p15.33. The amplicon size of the hTERT gene was 98 bp (position 13059 to 13156, GenBank accession number AF128893). The sequences of the primers and of the probe were the following: primer forward, 5'-GGC ACA CGT GGC TTT TCG-3'; primer reverse, 5'-GGT GAA CCT CGT AAG TTT ATG CAA-3'; probe, VIC5'-TCA GGA CGT CGA GTG GAC ACG GTG-3' TAMRA.

Fluorogenic PCRs were carried out in a reaction volume of 50 mL on a GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Fluorogenic probe and primers were custom synthesized by Applied Biosystems. Each PCR reaction mixture consisted of 25 µL of TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.67 µL of probe (15 mmol/L), 0.45 µL of primer forward (10 mmol/L), 0.45 µL of primer reverse (10 mmol/L), and 18.43 µL of sterile water. DNA solution (5 µL) was used in each real-time PCR reaction. Thermal cycling was initiated with a first denaturation step of 50°C for 2 minutes and then 95°C for 10 minutes. The thermal profile for the PCR was 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 1 minute. Data obtained during 50 cycles of amplification were analyzed.

Amplifications were carried out in 96-well plates in a GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System. Each plate consisted of patient samples in triplicates and multiple water blanks as negative control. For construction of the calibration curve on each plate, we used a standard TaqMan Control Human Genomic DNA (Applied Biosystems) at 10 ng/µL with appropriate serial dilutions at 50, 5, 2.5, and 0.5 ng, and 250, 50, and 10 pg. Linear amplification down to the last dilution point representing 10 pg of target DNA was obtained in each experiment (correlation coefficient, 0.999 to 0.995; slope, 3.25 to 3.35).

All of the data were analyzed using the Sequence Detection System software (Applied Biosystems) to interpolate the standard amplification curve of DNA at a known quantity with amplification cycle threshold of the unknown target sample, thus obtaining the relative amount of DNA in the experimental sample.

For the follow-up study, all of the consecutive plasma samples for each patient were simultaneously analyzed in the same real-time PCR experiment to allow comparative quantification of samples along the observation time.

Pathologic and Immunohistochemical Methods
Clinicopathologic data were available for all patients. There were 58 adenocarcinomas, 34 squamous cell carcinomas, three large-cell carcinomas, three pleomorphic carcinomas, and two adenosquamous carcinomas. According to the WHO classification of lung adenocarcinoma,³² 19 (32.6%) showed an acinar growth pattern, 19 were papillary, 17 (29.3%) were solid, and three (5.2%) were bronchioloalveolar. According to the revised lung cancer staging system,³³ tumor stage was pT1 in 18%, pT2 in 55%, pT3 in 21%, and pT4 in 6% of patients; 47% of patients were pN0, 20% were pN1, and 33% were pN2 or N3. Pathologic stage distribution was IA in 16, IB in 18, IIB in 25, IIIA in 33, IIIB in five, and IV in three patients. In three patients, the analysis was performed only on mediastinal node metastases.

In every patient, the occurrence of either tumor necrosis or lymphoid infiltrate was evaluated semiquantitatively on a scale from absent to 2+ (1+ if 50% and 2+ if > 50% of the whole tumor). For immunohistochemical analysis, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples obtained during surgery were investigated for cell apoptosis-related (p53) and tumor growth (CD117, Ki67, and microvessel density) markers, according to previously refined methods.³⁴ All patients were evaluated blindly without knowledge of the patients’ identity, pathologic diagnosis, clinical outcome, or plasma DNA status. The percentage of p53-, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-, CD117-, and Ki67-immunoreactive tumor cells was evaluated by scoring a minimum of 1,000 tumor cells in representative fields of immunostaining. Tumor neoangiogenesis was inferred by CD34 immunostaining of endothelial cells as previously described.³⁵

Statistical Methods
The distribution of DNA values revealed a departure from normality that was mitigated using a logarithmic transformation. The log of the concentration was used for testing purposes; however, untransformed values were used for reporting results.

Odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% CIs were calculated using conditional logistic regression in SAS software (SAS Inc, Cary, NC) to assess plasma DNA as a risk factor for NSCLC. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was developed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of plasma DNA concentrations. Each unique DNA value was used as a cutpoint to calculate sensitivity and specificity values defining the curve and the area under the curve (AUC). SEs were estimated separately as described in van der Schouw³⁶ to provide a 95% CI for the area.

The potential association between the logarithm of plasma DNA and demographic, clinical, and immunohistochemical variables in lung cancer patients was explored by running linear regression models using SAS. First, the logarithm of the plasma DNA was regressed on single independent variables by running nine different models (data not shown). Those variables with a coefficient-associated P value .2 in simple regression were selected to be included in the multiple regression model. Comparison of median DNA plasma concentrations in patients with follow-up data was done using the Kruskal-Wallis test.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

 
Quantitative Analysis of Circulating Plasma DNA in Cancer Patients and Controls
Figure 1 shows amplification plots of fluorescence intensity against the PCR cycle from plasma samples of cancer patients and matched controls. Each plot corresponds to the initial target DNA quantity present in the sample. Calculation of the amounts of plasma DNA is based on the cycle number, where fluorescence of each reaction passes the cycle threshold, which is set to the geometric phase of the amplification above the background. The x-axis denotes the cycle number of a quantitative PCR reaction. The y-axis denotes the log of fluorescence intensity over the background (Rn). The relative amount of plasma DNA is much higher in patient samples (left plots) compared with those of controls (right plots). The amplification curves that are shifted to the right, representing reduced target DNA quantity, clearly discriminate controls from cancer patients. In Figure 2, the distribution of plasma DNA concentration in patients and matched controls describes two distinct populations of values, despite some overlap. The box is bounded below and above by the 25% and 75% percentiles, the median is the solid line in the box, and the lower and upper error bars indicate 90% of values. Median concentration in patients (24.3 ng/mL) was almost eight times the value detected in controls (3.1 ng/mL). High concentrations were observed only in patients, whereas at the other end of the distribution there were few patients with low concentrations of DNA (ie, 0.5 ng/mL). A greater variability of circulating DNA was observed in patients than in controls (Fig 2).

View larger version (111K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Amplification plots of the real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for hTERT in plasma DNA from (A) non–small-cell lung cancer patients (B) and control samples. The relative amount of plasma DNA is much higher in patient samples (A) compared with controls (B). Rn, level of fluorescence detected.

View larger version (29K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Box-plots of plasma DNA concentration in non–small-cell lung cancer patients and matched controls, according to smoking status. Mini, minimum value detected; max, maximum value detected; sd, standard deviation.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Receiver-operating characteristic curves for the diagnosis of non–small-cell lung cancer using plasma DNA values. Curve and area under the curve (AUC) estimated using the logistic procedure in SAS software (Cary, NC). Rn, level of fluorescence detected; ROC, receiver operating characteristic curve.

Change in Plasma DNA Levels During Follow-Up
In 35 cancer patients, a second plasma sample was collected, 3 to 15 months after surgery (median elapsed time, 8 months), and analyzed to monitor changes in DNA levels during clinical follow-up. The overall median DNA concentration in follow-up plasma samples was 8.4 ng/mL, showing a clear trend toward reduction, compared with median baseline levels of 24.5 ng/mL (P < .0001). When these patients were tested according to their clinical status, median DNA concentration at follow-up was significantly lower in 30 disease-free individuals as compared with the five cancer patients with proven cancer relapse (7.1 v 24.7 ng/mL; P = .002). Figure 4 shows the reduction in DNA levels of each patient, stratified by relapse status.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Reduction in DNA level at patient follow-up according to relapse status.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

We report here the results of a large case-control study, the first to our knowledge, for validation of free circulating DNA in plasma as a potential lung cancer diagnostic marker. Our results show that real-time quantitative PCR assay, using the hTERT gene as a target sequence for quantification of circulating DNA in plasma, has high sensitivity and specificity, as estimated by AUC ROC curves, by analyzing values either as continuous distribution or as selected cutpoints. Furthermore, median concentration in patients (24.3 ng/mL) was almost 8 x the concentration detected in controls (3.1 ng/mL). Although the highest sum of sensitivity (90%), specificity (86%), positive predictive value (90%), and negative predictive value (90%) was obtained with a DNA concentration value of 9 ng/mL (not shown), the CIs around these diagnostic indicators overlap with those of adjacent concentrations. The selection of the optimal cutpoint will therefore have to acknowledge this variability. The value of 25 ng/mL is the only cutpoint shown with sensitivity that does not overlap with that of other cutpoints, although it shows the lowest sensitivity (46%; 95% CI, 36% to 56%). The magnitude of reported ORs proves the strong association between plasma DNA concentration and NSCLC risk, despite wide confidence limits. To our knowledge, similar OR values never were reported previously for any biologic marker and could be of substantial benefit in clinical practice.

We found increased amounts of circulating plasma DNA in samples from any stage and tumor size. This is particularly relevant for small lesions, the systematic detection of which could help reduce lung cancer morbidity and mortality.

One important aspect of our quantitative analysis was the ability to follow longitudinal changes after cancer resection. The data available on 35 cancer patients showed a rapid decrease of circulating DNA values after lung resection. Conversely, no decreasing or increasing levels of plasma DNA identified individuals with recurrence of their disease (24.7 v 7.1 ng/mL in cancer-free patients; P = .002), suggesting that quantification of plasma DNA might represent a novel approach to monitor surgical patients or assess treatment efficacy after chemoradiotherapy.

To explore the possible modulation of free DNA release by smoking exposure, we analyzed 20 never smokers older than 55 years of age: their median DNA value was 0.61 ng/mL, indicating low amounts of free circulating DNA in unexposed groups.

The origin and mechanism of circulating DNA are not fully understood. In addition to cell lysis, apoptosis, necrosis, and active DNA release have been advanced as possible sources of circulating DNA.³⁹ To explore the potential mechanisms of tumor DNA release into the bloodstream, we evaluated necrosis, angiogenesis, and proliferation features in all primary tumor samples. Plasma DNA levels in patients were not associated with necrosis, lymphoid infiltration, or growth patterns; or Ki67 or EGFR expression. These data suggest that the mechanism of release of tumor DNA into the bloodstream is not related to the necrotic rate or tumor cell proliferation. Of interest, a significant association with microvessel density suggests a link with tumor angiogenetic status. Because angiogenesis appears to be an early event in lung carcinogenesis,^40,41 plasma DNA quantitative assay could be effective in identifying early but nevertheless angiogenic lung cancers.

In summary, these results highlight a potential value of this DNA-based plasma test for early detection of lung cancer in high-risk individuals, and particularly former heavy smokers. A large study is currently under way with more than 1,000 smoking volunteers to determine whether quantitative detection of plasma DNA might increase the accuracy of spiral CT scan for early detection of lung cancer. Moreover, levels of plasma DNA could help identify high-risk individuals for chemoprevention trials, and could be tested as a potential intermediate biomarker of the efficacy of intervention.

	AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

 
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

	ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

 
We thank Nicola Marziano, PhD, of Applera Italia, for his technical support.

	NOTES

 
Supported by a Research Grant from the Italian Ministry of Health (Ricerca Finalizzata) and the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC/FIRC).

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF... REFERENCES

 
1. Peto R, Lopez AD, Boreham J, et al: Mortality from smoking worldwide. Br Med Bull 52:12–21, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Patz E JR, Rossi S, Harpole DH Jr, et al: Correlation of tumor size and survival in patients with stage IA non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 117:1568–1571, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al: Early lung cancer action project: Overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Hibi K, Takahashi T, Yamakawa K, et al: Three distinct regions involved in 3p deletion in human lung cancer. Oncogene 7:445–449, 1992[Medline]

5. Sozzi G, Veronese ML, Negrini M, et al: The FHIT gene at 3p14.2 is abnormal in lung cancer. Cell 85:17–26, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Mao L, Lee JS, Kurie JM, et al: Clonal genetic alterations in the lungs of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:857–862, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Wistuba II, Lam S, Behrens C, et al: Molecular damage in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:1366–1373, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, et al: 5' CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumor suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med 1:686–692, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Zochbauer-Muller S, Fong KM, Maitra A, et al: 5' CpG island methylation of the FHIT gene is correlated with loss of gene expression in lung and breast cancer. Cancer Res 61:3581–3585, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Mao L, Hruban RH, Boyle JO, et al: Detection of oncogene mutations in sputum precedes diagnosis of lung cancer. Cancer Res 54:1634–1637, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M et al: Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: Clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 54:4855–4878, 1994[Free Full Text]

12. Sundaresan V, Ganly P, Haselton P, et al: p53 and chromosome 3 abnormalities, characteristic of malignant lung tumours, are detectable in preinvasive lesions of the bronchus. Oncogene 7:1989–1997, 1992[Medline]

13. Sozzi G, Miozzo M, Donghi R, et al: Deletions of 17p and p53 mutations in preneoplastic lesions of the lung. Cancer Res 52:6079–6082, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Mao L, Lee DJ, Tockman MS, et al: Microsatellite alterations as clonal markers for the detection of human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:9871–9875, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Chen XQ, Stroun M, Magnenat JL, et al: Microsatellite alterations in plasma DNA of small cell lung cancer patients. Nat Med 2:1033–1034, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Ahrendt SA, Chow JT, Xu L, et al: Molecular detection of tumor cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with early stage lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:332–339, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Sozzi G, Musso K, Ratcliffe C, et al: Detection of microsatellite alterations in plasma DNA of non-small cell lung cancer patients: A prospect for early diagnosis. Clin Cancer Res 5:2689–2692, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Esteller M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Rosell R, et al: Detection of aberrant promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum DNA from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Res 59:67–70, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Field JK, Liloglou T, Xinarianos G, et al: Genetic alterations in bronchial lavage as a potential marker for individuals with a high risk of developing lung cancer. Cancer Res 59:2690–2695, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Palmisano WA, Divine KK, Saccomanno G, et al: Predicting lung cancer by detecting aberrant promoter methylation in sputum. Cancer Res 60:5954–5958, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Kersting M, Friedl C, Kraus A, et al: Differential frequencies of p16(INK4a) promoter hypermethylation, p53 mutation, and K-ras mutation in exfoliate material mark the development lung cancer in symptomatic chronic smokers. J Clin Oncol 18:3221–3229, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Allan JM, Hardie LJ, Briggs J, et al: Genetic alterations in bronchial mucosa and plasma DNA from individuals at high risk of lung cancer. Int J Cancer 91:359–365, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Usadel H, Brabender J, Danenberg KD, et al: Quantitative adenomatous polyposis coli promoter methylation analysis in tumor tissue, serum, and plasma DNA of patients with lung cancer. Cancer Res 62:371–375, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Soria JC, Rodriguez M, Liu DD, et al: Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in bronchial brush samples from former cigarette smokers. Cancer Res 62:351–355, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Sozzi G, Conte D, Mariani L, et al: Analysis of circulating tumor DNA in plasma at diagnosis and during follow-up of lung cancer patients. Cancer Res 61:4675–4678, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Chang HW, Lee SM, Goodman SN, et al: Assessment of plasma DNA levels, allelic imbalance, and CA 125 as diagnostic tests for cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1697–1703, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Lo YM, Chan LY, Chan AT, et al: Quantitative and temporal correlation between circulating cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA and tumor recurrence in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Res 59:5452–5455, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Wang L, Soria JC, Kemp BL, et al: hTERT expression is a prognostic factor of survival in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 8:2883–2889, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak K, et al: Real time quantitative PCR. Genome Res 6:986–994, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Lo YM, Tein MS, Lau TK, et al: Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: Implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Am J Hum Genet 62:768–775, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Holland PM, Abramson RD, Watson R, et al: Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5'—3' exonuclease activity of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:7276–7280, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Travis WD, Colby, TV, Corrin, B, et al: Histological typing of lung and pleural tumours, in World Health Organization—International Histological Classification of Tumours. New York, NY, Springer Verlag, 1999

33. Mountain CF: Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. Chest 111:1710–1717, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Pelosi G, Pasini F, Olsen Stenholm C, et al: p63 immunoreactivity in lung cancer: Yet another player in the development of squamous cell carcinomas? J Pathol 198:100–109, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

35. Pelosi G, Fraggetta F, Pasini F, et al: Immunoreactivity for thyroid transcription factor-1 in stage I non-small cell carcinomas of the lung. Am J Surg Pathol 25:363–372, 2001[Medline]

36. Van der Schouw YT, Straatman H, Verbeck ALM: ROC curves and the areas under them for dichotomized tests: Empirical findings for logistically and normally distributed diagnostic test results. Med Decis Making 14:374–381, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Leon SA, Shapiro B, Sklaroff DM, et al: Free DNA in the serum of cancer patients and the effect of therapy. Cancer Res 37:646–650, 1977[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Shapiro B, Chakrabarty M, Cohn EM: Determination of circulating DNA levels in patients with benign or malignant gastrointestinal disease. Cancer 51:2116–2120, 1983[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Stroun M, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, et al: About the possible origin and mechanism of circulating DNA apoptosis and active DNA release. Clin Chim Acta 313:139–142, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

40. Pastorino U, Andreola S, Tagliabue E, et al: Immunocytochemical markers in stage I lung cancer: Relevance to prognosis. J Clin Oncol 15:2858–2865, 1997[Abstract]

41. Keith RL, Miller YE, Gemmill RM, et al: Angiogenic squamous dysplasia in bronchi of individuals at high risk for lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:1611–1612, 2000[Free Full Text]

Submitted February 3, 2003; accepted June 9, 2003.

Related Correspondence

• Free Circulating DNA: Good As a Diagnostic Marker in Lung Cancer?
  Ozden Altundag, Kadri Altundag, and Muzaffer Altundag
  JCO 2004 22: 3201-3202 [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H Zhang, Q Zhao, Y Chen, Y Wang, S Gao, Y Mao, M Li, A Peng, D He, and X Xiao Selective expression of S100A7 in lung squamous cell carcinomas and large cell carcinomas but not in adenocarcinomas and small cell carcinomas Thorax, April 1, 2008; 63(4): 352 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Korshunova, R. K. Maloney, N. Lakey, R. W. Citek, B. Bacher, A. Budiman, J. M. Ordway, W. R. McCombie, J. Leon, J. A. Jeddeloh, et al. Massively parallel bisulphite pyrosequencing reveals the molecular complexity of breast cancer-associated cytosine-methylation patterns obtained from tissue and serum DNA Genome Res., January 1, 2008; 18(1): 19 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Bastian, G. S. Palapattu, S. Yegnasubramanian, X. Lin, C. G. Rogers, L. A. Mangold, B. Trock, M. Eisenberger, A. W. Partin, and W. G. Nelson Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum Cell-Free Circulating DNA in Men with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5361 - 5367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z.-J. Cheng, L.-H. Hu, W.-R. Fu, and Y.-R. Li Rapid quantification of hepatitis B virus DNA by direct real-time PCR from serum without DNA extraction J. Med. Microbiol., June 1, 2007; 56(6): 766 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Banki, R. J. Mason, D. Oh, J. A. Hagen, S. R. DeMeester, J. C. Lipham, K. Tanaka, K. D. Danenberg, W. N. Yacoub, P. V. Danenberg, et al. Plasma DNA as a Molecular Marker for Completeness of Resection and Recurrent Disease in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Arch Surg, June 1, 2007; 142(6): 533 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Mehra, M. Penning, J. Maas, N. van Daal, R. H. Giles, and E. E. Voest Circulating Mitochondrial Nucleic Acids Have Prognostic Value for Survival in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2007; 13(2): 421 - 426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Flamini, L. Mercatali, O. Nanni, D. Calistri, R. Nunziatini, W. Zoli, P. Rosetti, N. Gardini, A. Lattuneddu, G. M. Verdecchia, et al. Free DNA and Carcinoembryonic Antigen Serum Levels: An Important Combination for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 12(23): 6985 - 6988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Pathak, M. Bhutani, S. Kumar, A. Mohan, and R. Guleria Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Plasma/Serum of Lung Cancer Patients as a Potential Screening and Prognostic Tool Clin. Chem., October 1, 2006; 52(10): 1833 - 1842. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				X. XUE, Y. M ZHU, and P. J WOLL Circulating DNA and Lung Cancer. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2006; 1075: 154 - 164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. PAPADOPOULOU, E. DAVILAS, V. SOTIRIOU, E. GEORGAKOPOULOS, S. GEORGAKOPOULOU, A. KOLIOPANOS, F. AGGELAKIS, K. DARDOUFAS, N. J AGNANTI, I. KARYDAS, et al. Cell-free DNA and RNA in Plasma as a New Molecular Marker for Prostate and Breast Cancer. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., September 1, 2006; 1075: 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. R. Santoni de Sio, P. Cascio, A. Zingale, M. Gasparini, and L. Naldini Proteasome activity restricts lentiviral gene transfer into hematopoietic stem cells and is down-regulated by cytokines that enhance transduction Blood, June 1, 2006; 107(11): 4257 - 4265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. K. Ganti and J. L. Mulshine Lung cancer screening. Oncologist, May 1, 2006; 11(5): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sozzi, L. Roz, D. Conte, L. Mariani, F. Andriani, P. Verderio, and U. Pastorino Effects of Prolonged Storage of Whole Plasma or Isolated Plasma DNA on the Results of Circulating DNA Quantification Assays J Natl Cancer Inst, December 21, 2005; 97(24): 1848 - 1850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Liu, S. T. Chen, and H. P. Liu Choice of endogenous control for gene expression in nonsmall cell lung cancer Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2005; 26(6): 1002 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Gotoh, H. Hosoi, T. Iehara, Y. Kuwahara, S. Osone, K. Tsuchiya, M. Ohira, A. Nakagawara, H. Kuroda, and T. Sugimoto Prediction of MYCN Amplification in Neuroblastoma Using Serum DNA and Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2005; 23(22): 5205 - 5210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Holdenrieder, P. Stieber, L. Y.S. Chan, S. Geiger, A. Kremer, D. Nagel, and Y.M. D. Lo Cell-Free DNA in Serum and Plasma: Comparison of ELISA and Quantitative PCR Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1544 - 1546. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Schmidt, S. Weickmann, C. Witt, and M. Fleischhacker Improved Method for Isolating Cell-Free DNA Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1561 - 1563. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Frattini, D. Balestra, P. Verderio, G. Gallino, E. Leo, G. Sozzi, M. A. Pierotti, and M. G. Daidone Reproducibility of a Semiquantitative Measurement of Circulating DNA in Plasma From Neoplastic Patients J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 3163 - 3164. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sozzi, D. Conte, and L. Roz In Reply: J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 3164 - 3165. [Full Text] [PDF]

</