Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pace, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bove, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pace, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bove, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 5 (March), 2003: 927-931
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Neuroprotective Effect of Vitamin E Supplementation in Patients Treated With Cisplatin Chemotherapy

Andrea Pace, Antonella Savarese, Mauro Picardo, Vittoria Maresca, Umberto Pacetti, Girolamo Del Monte, Annamaria Biroccio, Carlo Leonetti, Bruno Jandolo, Francesco Cognetti, Loredana Bove

From the Neuroscience Department, Oncology Department, Experimental Chemotherapy Laboratory, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute and the Laboratory of Physiopathology–S. Gallicano Institute, Rome, Italy

Address reprint requests to Andrea Pace MD, Service of Neurology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Via Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy; email: pace{at}ifo.it.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of antioxidant supplementation with vitamin E in patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy.

Methods: Between April 1999 and October 2000, forty-seven patients were randomly assigned to either group one, which received vitamin E supplementation during cisplatin chemotherapy, or to group two, which received cisplatin chemotherapy alone. Alpha-tocopherol (vitamin E; 300 mg/d) was administered orally before cisplatin chemotherapy and continued for 3 months after the suspension of treatment. For preclinical studies, nude mice carrying the human melanoma tumor were treated with cisplatin alone or in combination with vitamin E.

Results: Twenty-seven patients completed six cycles of cisplatin chemotherapy: 13 patients in group one and 14 patients in group two. The incidence of neurotoxicity was significantly lower in group one (30.7%) than it was in group two (85.7%; P < .01). The severity of neurotoxicity, measured with a comprehensive neurotoxicity score based on clinical and neurophysiological parameters, was significantly lower in patients who were supplemented with vitamin E than in patients who were not supplemented with vitamin E (2 v 4.7, P < .01). The results of the preclinical studies showed that when cisplatin was combined with vitamin E, no differences were observed in tumor weight inhibition, tumor growth delay, or life span as compared with treatment with cisplatin alone.

Conclusion: Supplementation of patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy with vitamin E decreases the incidence and severity of peripheral neurotoxicity.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CISPLATIN IS one of the most effective anticancer drugs. Renal, gastrointestinal, and neurologic toxicities have posed limits to its use; however, because hyperhydration has significantly reduced the incidence of renal toxicity, neurotoxicity remains the major dose-limiting toxicity.1 Cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity includes peripheral sensory polineuropathy, ototoxicity, and rarely, focal encephalopathy.2 Peripheral neuropathy usually progresses for months after the end of treatment, and clinical signs and symptoms are often not reversible. The incidence of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy is strongly related to the methods used to assess toxicity. Comprehensive neurologic and neurophysiologic examinations have revealed that all patients receiving cisplatin treatment with cumulative doses higher than 300 mg/m2 develop signs of neurotoxicity. The mechanism of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity is not fully understood, but the selective involvement of large myelinated sensory-fibers suggests that it may derive from dorsal-root ganglia injury.3

Neuropathologic examinations in animal models of cisplatin neuropathy have revealed pathologic changes in the dorsal-root ganglia. Similarly, pharmacologic examinations of neural tissue of human patients treated with cisplatin have shown platinum accumulation in the dorsal-root ganglia that are not protected by the blood-brain-barrier.4,5 In recent years, many neuroprotective agents have been investigated with the aim of reducing the negative effect of peripheral neurotoxicity on a patient’s quality of life and to allow an increase in the cumulative doses of cisplatin in the treatment of chemosensitive tumors. In preclinical studies, neurotrophic factors (eg, adrenocorticotropic hormone analogs, ciliary growth factor, and nerve growth factor), oxygen free-radical scavengers, thiols, and other substances have all shown some neuroprotective effects.6,7 Preliminary results obtained in human studies indicate that amifostine, an organic thiophosphate compound that acts as a scavenger of oxygen free-radicals, has some activity against cisplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity and renal toxicity.8

Some studies have focused on the role of antioxidants in the mechanism of cisplatin toxicities. Recent evidence indicates that cisplatin-induced side effects are, at least in part, the result of the formation of oxygen free-radicals.9,10 In animals, supplementation with antioxidants, such as vitamin E, vitamin C, and selenium, seems to protect against cisplatin-induced renal and ototoxicity.11,12,13 Moreover, data obtained in human studies indicates that cisplatin treatment induces a fall in plasma antioxidant levels because of oxidative stress.10 It is interesting to note that the clinical and neuropathologic features observed in cisplatin-induced neuropathy are similar to those observed in vitamin E deficiency–induced neuropathy. In humans, vitamin E deficiency syndromes (eg, lipid malabsorption, cholestatic liver disease, abetalipoproteinemia, short bowel syndrome, cystic fibrosis, and familial sporadic vitamin E deficiency) are characterized by a peripheral sensory neuropathy with ataxia, paresthesia in a stocking and glove distribution (paresthesias and numbness in feet and hands), and loss of reflexes caused either by the retrograde degeneration of the large caliber axons in peripheral nerves or by degeneration of the posterior columns of the spinal cord.14 Pathologic studies indicate that the dorsal-root ganglia neurons are the primary target of vitamin E deficiency.15

In a recent pilot study, we found a decrease in plasma levels of vitamin E in patients with severe peripheral neurotoxicity after cisplatin treatment,16 indicating that vitamin E deficiency could be involved in the mechanism of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The aim of this study is to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of antioxidant supplementation with vitamin E in patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy. Before carrying out the clinical study, we performed preclinical experiments on immunosuppressed mice, with implanted human melanoma, to assess whether the combination of cisplatin with vitamin E could modify the antitumoral efficacy of cisplatin.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preclinical Study
Male CD-1 nude (nu/nu) mice (6 to 8 weeks old; body weight, 22 to 24 g) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Calco, Italy). All procedures involving the use and care of animals have been described previously17 and were in accordance with institutional guidelines complying with national and international laws and policies. Each experimental group included six mice. A human melanoma cell line (M14), obtained and characterized as previously described,18 was used in this study. Nude mice were injected in the hind leg muscle with an M14 cell suspension of 5 x 106 cells/mouse. A tumor mass was evident in all mice on day 5 after tumor implant. Cisplatin (Cisplatino Teva, Teva Pharma, Ind. LTD, Israel) was injected intraperitoneally at 10 mg/kg (10% of the lethal dose; LD10) in three consecutive daily injections (3.3 mg/kg/d). Previous experiments demonstrated that this dose scheduling was less toxic than a single injection in terms of loss of body weight and drug-related deaths. Vitamin E was administered orally at 4.3 mg/kg/d. Three cycles of vitamin E or cisplatin alone, or a combination of the two, were administered at 7-day intervals, starting from day 2 after tumor implant according to the following schedules: Schedule A: vitamin E on days 2 to 4 and 8 to 11 (first cycle), days 19 to 21 and 25 to 28 (second cycle), days 36 to 38, and days 42 to 45 (third cycle). Schedule B: cisplatin on days 5 to 7 (first cycle), days 22 to 24 (second cycle), and days 39 to 41 (third cycle). Schedule C: schedule A plus schedule B. As a control, an additional group of tumor-bearing nude mice received the same volume of diluents used to dissolve cisplatin and vitamin E for the same period of time as the combined treatment (ie, schedule C).

Clinical Study
Between April 1999 and October 2000, 47 patients with solid malignancies and a Karnofsky Performance Status between 70 to 100 were enrolled in the study. Candidates for cisplatin treatment were randomly assigned after informed consent to either the cisplatin treatment with vitamin E supplementation group (group one) or the cisplatin alone group (group two). No previous chemotherapeutic treatment or regimens including other neurotoxic drugs associated with cisplatin were permitted. Alpha-tocopherol (Ephynal, Roche, Milan, Italy; ie, vitamin E) was administered orally at 300 mg/d after randomization but before chemotherapy in the patients in group one, and was sustained for 3 months after the cessation of cisplatin treatment. The median time between the start of vitamin E supplementation and the beginning of chemotherapy was 4 days (range, 1 to 8 days).

Neurologic and Electrophysiologic Examination
Before treatment, all patients were evaluated by two neurologists (AP and LB), with a neurologic examination consisting of a standardized history for detection of neuropathic symptoms, with an assessment of pinprick and vibratory sensations and strength and deep tendon reflexes. A follow-up neurologic examination was performed by the same neurologists, who were not blinded to treatment status, after the three cycles of cisplatin treatment and after the cessation of chemotherapy. Neuropathic signs and symptoms were scored using a questionnaire designed for the detection of sensory disturbances (eg, paresthesia, pain, and burning in feet or fingers) experienced by the patients. We adopted a modified version of the neurological symptom score (NSS) of Dick et al,19 grading the severity of symptoms as mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = more than 2. Before treatment, an electrophysiologic examination of all patients was carried out according to previously published methods.20 Briefly, each patient was examined by surface electrodes to assess nerve conduction velocity and the amplitude of potentials of the sensory median and sural nerves. A follow-up electrophysiologic examination was performed after the end of treatment with vitamin E. The pretreatment and posttreatment values were compared. A decrease in median or sural sensory amplitude of greater than 25% (with respect to basal values) was considered abnormal. A cumulative neurotoxicity score was assigned for each patient on the basis of neuropathic signs and symptoms and on electrophysiologic changes (modified from Chaudry et al;21 Table 1Go). Severity of neurotoxicity was graded on the basis of obtained total scores as mild = 1 to 4, moderate = 5 to 8, and severe = more than 8, which corresponds to World Health Organization (WHO) neurotoxicity grades 1, 2 and 3–4, respectively. This detailed neurotoxicity scoring system allowed an objective assessment of neuropathic signs and symptoms and has been used in previous studies.20,22


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Neurotoxicity Score Based on Subjective Clinical Symptoms, Clinical Signs, and Electrophysiological Findings*
 
Analysis of Vitamin E
Plasma levels of vitamin E were measured in all patients before cisplatin chemotherapy. Alpha-tocopherol was analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on a capillary column (RTX1 Restex 30 µm x 0.20 µm [Restek, Bellefonte, PA]; internal diameter, 0.25 mm) by a selected ion monitoring technique as previously described.23 Values obtained from the patients’ serum samples were compared with normal values obtained from 50 healthy control subjects (30 males and 20 females; age range, 20 to 60 years) whose plasma levels of vitamin E were a mean value of 11± 2.1 mg/mL. Statistical analysis was carried out using the {chi}2 test and the Student’s t test (paired or not, as appropriate).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Preclinical Study
We first evaluated the antitumoral effect of cisplatin and vitamin E in a human-melanoma xenografted, immunosuppressed mouse model. As shown in Table 2Go, the results of the preclinical studies showed that when cisplatin was combined with vitamin E, no differences were observed in terms of tumor weight inhibition, tumor growth delay, or increase in life span of the mice compared with treatment with cisplatin alone. In particular, in the cisplatin alone group, tumor weight inhibition (39%) and tumor growth delay (11 days) were superimposable to those observed in the cisplatin plus vitamin E group (38% and 11 days, respectively). A similar behavior of the two groups of animals was confirmed by the survival data. An increase in life span of 28 and 30 days was observed in the cisplatin alone and the cisplatin plus vitamin E groups, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Antitumoral Effect of CDDP and Vitamin E in a Human Melanoma Xenografted in Immunosuppressed Mice
 
Clinical Study
Out of 47 patients enrolled in the study, 20 patients dropped out, 18 patients interrupted treatment after two or three cycles because of disease progression, and two patients out of group one suspended vitamin E supplementation after 1 month. Table 3Go shows the characteristics of patients, cumulative dose of cisplatin administered, and clinical data. Twenty-seven patients (seven women; 20 men) were assessable for analysis because they received a cumulative dose of cisplatin higher than 300 mg/m2 (13 in group one; 14 in group two). Distribution of age (median age, 57 years; range, 28 to 74 years) and pathology were similar in the two groups. Fifteen patients were affected by lung cancer, three by ovarian cancer, two by rhinopharinx cancer, two by uretheral cancer, and one each by gastric, testicular, esophageal, ethmoidal, and tongue cancer. Cisplatin was administered in combination regimens on the basis of the specific tumor site as follows: lung and uretheral cancer were treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks; ovarian cancer was treated with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and endoxan 600 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks; head and neck cancer was treated with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2 on day 1 to 4 every 3 to 4 weeks; ethmoidal cancer, which has a small cell histologic feature, was treated with cisplatin 25 mg/m2 and etoposide 80 mg/m2 on day 1 to 3 every 3 weeks; gastric cancer was treated with PELF regimen (cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and epirubicine 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 5 plus fluorouracil 300 mg/m2 and folinic acid 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 every 3 weeks). Testicular cancer was treated with PEB regimen (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5 plus bleomicine 30 mg on days 2, 9, and 16 every 3 weeks). The median cumulative cisplatin dose was similar between the two groups (median dose, 420 mg/m2; range, 330 to 550 mg/m2 in group one and 225 to 600 mg/m2 in group two). After cisplatin treatment, 18 out of 27 patients showed a clinical response (complete response + partial response), six patients showed stable disease, and three patients showed disease progression during chemotherapy. No significant difference between the two groups was observed in either clinical response or in systemic toxicities (no renal toxicity in either group; neutrophil counts < 1,000/mL in 38.4% of patients in group one and 50% in group two; thrombocitopenia < 50,000/mL in 7.6% in group one and 7.1% in group two). Two patients in group two developed ototoxicity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Characteristics of Patients
 
Neurotoxicity Assessment
Before cisplatin treatment, neurologic examination was normal in all patients. The basal median value of vitamin E in the plasma was in the normal range and not significantly different between the two groups (8.06 and 7.17 mg/mL, respectively).

Group One. Neurologic examination after six cycles of cisplatin and vitamin E supplementation revealed mild signs and symptoms of peripheral neurotoxicity; four out of 13 patients (30.7%) complained of distal paresthesia and presented with a reduction in deep tendon reflexes. On electrophysiologic examination, performed after the end of chemotherapy and compared with the baseline examination, four patients had at least one abnormal finding in the median and/or sural sensory amplitude, one patient showed a decrease in both nerves (25% decrease in sural sensory amplitude and 50% decrease in median sensory amplitude), two patients had a decrease in median sensory amplitude (50% and 25%, respectively), and one patient had a decrease in sural sensory amplitude (25%). Mean neurotoxicity score in patients of group one was 2.1± 2.1; neurotoxicity was scored as mild in two patients and moderate in two patients.

Group Two. After six cycles of cisplatin, 12 out of 14 patients showed clinical signs and symptoms of neurotoxicity with the absence of deep tendon reflexes, distal paresthesia in feet and fingers, and a reduction in malleolar vibratory sensation. On electrophysiologic examination, performed after the end of chemotherapy and compared with basal values, 11 patients had a decrease in the amplitude of median and/or sural sensory nerves, three patients had a decrease of 50% in both nerves, five patients had a decrease in median sensory amplitude (three patients with 50% and two patients with 25%), and three patients had a decrease in sural sensory amplitude (two patients with 50% and one patient with 25%). Mean neurotoxicity score of group two was 4.7 (± 2.9); neurotoxicity was scored as mild in six patients, moderate in four patients, and severe in two patients. Neurotoxicity scores were significantly higher in group one than they were in group two (P < .01; Table 4Go). The incidence of neurotoxicity differed significantly between the groups (group one, 30.7%; group two, 85.7%; paired t-test and Wilcoxon sign-rank test: P < .01). The relative risk (RR) of developing signs or symptoms of neurotoxicity was significantly lower in group one than it was in group two (RR = 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15 to 0.83; P < .001). The intention to treat analysis of the entire study population could not be achieved because the 20 patients who dropped out of the study (nine in group one; 11 in group two) did not stay in the study long enough to reach a cumulative neurotoxic dose of cisplatin. However, the neurologic and neurophysiologic examinations in the patients who dropped out (performed before chemotherapy) were normal. A follow-up assessment of neurotoxicity after three cycles of chemotherapy was only possible in 11 patients (five patients in group one; six patients in group two), and no subjective symptoms or neurologica and electrophysiologic signs of neurotoxicity were detected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Clinical and Neurophysiological Data Assessed Before Treatment (Basal) and After Six Cycles of CDDP
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Increasing interest in the oxidative damage induced by anticancer drugs and its role in the mechanism of adverse effects has recently been addressed.24–26 Cisplatin and other chemotherapeutic agents are known to generate oxygen free-radicals that induce membrane lipid peroxidation with subsequent extensive tissues damage.10 Recent studies have demonstrated a reduction in ototoxicity, renal toxicity, and hematologic toxicity in animals treated with cisplatin plus supplementation with high doses of antioxidants.9,11,13 In this study, we investigated the role of the antioxidant defense mechanism in peripheral neurotoxicity induced by cisplatin chemotherapy. Our in vivo experiment showed that administration of vitamin E does not impair the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin.

On the basis of this finding, we proceeded to supplement cancer patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy with vitamin E. This study showed that vitamin E supplementation reduces the incidence of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity. Indeed, whereas 85.7% (12 of 14) of the patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy alone developed signs or symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, only 30.7% (4 of 13) of the patients who received cisplatin chemotherapy and vitamin E experienced mild distal paresthesia and presented with abnormal changes in electrophysiologic examinations. The incidence of neurotoxicity at cisplatin doses of more than 300 mg/m2 is reported to be 85%.2 Given that both groups in this study received a median cisplatin cumulative dose of 420 mg/m2, the reduction of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity that we observed was remarkable. Moreover, the severity of neurotoxicity, measured with a score assigned on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms and abnormal changes in electrophysiologic parameters, was significantly higher in patients who did not receive vitamin E supplementation. The neurotoxicity score used in this study is a detailed and comprehensive method of assessing neuropathic signs and symptoms on the basis of objective findings and is minimally, if at all, influenced by interpretation of the assessor. The response rate to cisplatin chemotherapy was not significantly different in the two groups. Therefore, our clinical study confirmed the findings of our in vivo study that vitamin E supplementation does not influence cisplatin antitumor activity.

Dorsal-root ganglia are thought to be the target of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity because this neural tissue has the highest degree of platinum accumulation.4 Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that dorsal-root ganglia are also the most vulnerable neural structure in vitamin E deficiency neuropathies.14 This observation could explain why the peripheral neuropathy induced by cisplatin treatment is a sensory neuropathy that cannot be clinically or neurophysiologically distinguished from vitamin E deficiency neuropathy. Oxidative stress, with a reduction in plasma levels of antioxidants,24 has also been demonstrated during treatment with other neurotoxic chemotherapeutic agents (eg, taxanes and vinca alcaloyds); however, the mechanism of peripheral neurotoxicity induced by these drugs is quite different from that induced by cisplatin. Peripheral neurotoxicity, induced by taxanes and vinca alcaloyds, is the result of an axonal sensory-motor distal polyneuropathy, which is related to a reversible alteration of axonal transport and does not involve dorsal-root ganglia. Our hypothesis, therefore, is that the peculiar ability of cisplatin to concentrate in the dorsal-root ganglia induces a depletion of vitamin E and renders the neuron bodies more susceptible to oxidative stress.

In conclusion, the results of our study indicate that vitamin E supplementation significantly protects against cisplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity and reduces the incidence and intensity of neuropathic signs and symptoms. Nonetheless, the efficacy of neuroprotection with vitamin E supplementation has to be assessed in larger studies.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Hamers FPT, Gispen WH, Neijt JP: Neurotoxic side effects of cisplatin. Eur J Cancer 27(3):372–376, 1991[Medline]

2. Alberts DS, Noel JK: Cisplatin-associated neurotoxicity: Can it be prevented? Anticancer Drugs 6:369–383, 1995[Medline]

3. Cavaletti G, Tredici G, Marmiroli P: Morphometric study of the sensory neuron and peripheral nerve changes induced by chronic cisplatin (CDDP) administration in rats. Acta Neuropathol 84:364–371, 1992[Medline]

4. Gregg RW, Matshela MJ, Monpetit VJA, et al.: Cisplatin Neurotoxicity: The relationship between dosage, time, and platinum concentration in neurological tissue and morphological evidence of toxicity. J Clin Oncol 10:795–803, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Krarup-Hansen A, Rietz B, Krarup C, et al: Histology and platinum content of sensory ganglia and sural nerves in patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin: An autopsy study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 25(1):29–40, 1999[Medline]

6. Windebank AJ, Gordon Smith A, Russel JW: The effect of nerve growth factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, and ACTH analogs on cisplatin neurotoxicity in vitro. Neurology 44:488–494, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Cascinu S, Cordella L, Del Ferro E, et al: Neuroprotective effect of reduced glutathione on cisplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 13(1):26–32, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Di Paola RS, Schuchter L.: Neurologic protection by Amifostine. Semin Oncol 26(suppl 7):82–88, 1999[Medline]

9. Smoorenburg GF, De Groot JC, Hamers FP, et al: Protection and spontaneous recovery from cisplatin-induced hearing loss. Ann N Y Acad Sci 28,884:192–210, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Weijl NI, Hopman GD, Wipkink-Bakker A, et al: Cisplatin combination chemotherapy induces a fall in plasma antioxidants of cancer patients. Ann Oncol 9(12):1331–1337, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Sugihara K, Gemba M: Modification of cisplatin toxicity by antioxidants. Jpn J Pharmacol 40(2):353–355, 1986[Medline]

12. Appenroth D, et al: Protective effects of vitamin E and C on cisplatin nephrotoxicity in developing rats. Arch Toxicol 71:677, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Rybak LP, Husain K, Morris C, et al: Effect of protective agents against cisplatin ototoxicity. Am J Otol 21(4):513–520, 2000[Medline]

14. Traber MG, Sokol RJ, Ringel SP, et al: Lack of {alpha}-tocopherol in peripheral nerves of vitamin E deficient patients with peripheral neuropathy. N Engl J Med 317:262–265, 1987[Abstract]

15. Muller DPR, Lloid JK, Wolff OH: Vitamin E and neurological function. Lancet 29: 225–228, 1983

16. Bove L, Picardo M, Maresca V, et al.: A Pilot study on the relationship between cisplatin neuropathy and Vitamin. E. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 20(2):277–280, 2001

17. Citro G, D’Agnano I, Leonetti C, et al: c-myc antisense oligodeoxynucleotides enhance the efficacy of cisplatin in melanoma chemotherapy in vitro and in nude mice. Cancer Res 58(2):283–289, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Greco C, Zupi G: Biological features and in vitro chemosensitivity of a new model of human melanoma. Anticancer Res 7:839–844, 1987[Medline]

19. Windebank AJ: Polineuropathy due to nutritional deficiency and alcoholism; in Dick PJ and Thomas PK (eds): Peripheral Neuropathy (ed 3). Vol 2. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 1993, pp 1310–1317

20. Pace A, Bove L, Aloe A, et al.: Paclitaxel neurotoxicity: Clinical and neurophysiological study in 23 patients. It J Neurol Sci 18:73–79, 1996

21. Chaudry V, Rowinsky EK, Sartorius et al.: Peripheral neuropathy from taxol and cisplatin combination chemotherapy: Clinical and electrophysiological studies. Ann Neurol 35:304–311, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Pace A, Bove L, Nisticò C, et al: Vinorelbine neurotoxicity: Clinical and neurophysiological findings in 23 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 61:409–411, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Passi S, Morrone A, Picardo M, et al: Blood level of vitamin E, polyunsaturated fatty acids of phospholipids, lipoperoxides, and glutathione peroxidase activity in patients with seborrheic dermatitis. J Dermatol Sci 2:171–178, 1991[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Vasigara Singh W, Subramaniam S, Shyama Subramaniam, et al: Levels of antioxidants in haemolysates from breast cancer patients after chemo- and radiotherapy. Med Sci Res 24:195–197, 1996

25. el Daly ES: Protective effect of cisteine and vitamin E, crocus sativa and Nigella sativa extracts on cisplatin-induced toxicity in rats. J Pharm Belg 53(2):87–93, 1998[Medline]

26. Teranishi M, Nakashima T, Wakabayashi T: Effects of alfa-tocopherol on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity in guinea pigs. Hear Res 151(1–2):61–70, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted May 5, 2002; accepted November 13, 2002.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
B. MELICHAR, H. KALABOVA, L. KRCMOVA, L. URBANEK, R. HYSPLER, D. SOLICHOVA, K. MELICHAROVA, M. PECKA, and Z. ZADAK
Effect of Aromatase Inhibitors on Lipid Metabolism, Inflammatory Response and Antioxidant Balance in Patients with Breast Carcinoma
Anticancer Res, August 1, 2009; 29(8): 3337 - 3346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. D. Lawenda, K. M. Kelly, E. J. Ladas, S. M. Sagar, A. Vickers, and J. B. Blumberg
Should Supplemental Antioxidant Administration Be Avoided During Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy?
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 4, 2008; 100(11): 773 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
L. B. Michaud, J. P. Karpinski, K. L. Jones, and J. Espirito
Dietary supplements in patients with cancer: Risks and key concepts, part 1
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., February 15, 2007; 64(4): 369 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
R. W. Moss
Should Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Be Prescribed Antioxidants?
Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2006; 5(1): 63 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. A. Meyerhardt, D. Heseltine, H. Campos, M. D. Holmes, W. C. Willett, E. P. Winer, P. C. Enzinger, C. A. Bunnell, M. H. Kulke, and C. S. Fuchs
Assessment of a Dietary Questionnaire in Cancer Patients Receiving Cytotoxic Chemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2005; 23(33): 8453 - 8460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
G. M. D'Andrea
Use of Antioxidants During Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy Should Be Avoided
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2005; 55(5): 319 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
I. Bairati, F. Meyer, M. Gelinas, A. Fortin, A. Nabid, F. Brochet, J.-P. Mercier, B. Tetu, F. Harel, B. Abdous, et al.
Randomized Trial of Antioxidant Vitamins to Prevent Acute Adverse Effects of Radiation Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5805 - 5813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
G. Deng and B. R. Cassileth
Integrative Oncology: Complementary Therapies for Pain, Anxiety, and Mood Disturbance
CA Cancer J Clin, March 1, 2005; 55(2): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Y. Wen
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial of Recombinant Human Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (rhuLIF, emfilermin, AM424) to Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1685 - 1686.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. J. van den Bent
Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: Leukemia Inhibitory Factor
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1691 - 1693.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
J. Boullata
Natural Health Product Interactions with Medication
Nutr Clin Pract, February 1, 2005; 20(1): 33 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
January 11 Highlight and Commentary
Neurology, January 11, 2005; 64(1): 1 - 1.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. A. Argyriou, E. Chroni, A. Koutras, J. Ellul, S. Papapetropoulos, G. Katsoulas, G. Iconomou, and H. P. Kalofonos
Vitamin E for prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: A randomized controlled trial
Neurology, January 11, 2005; 64(1): 26 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pace, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bove, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pace, A.
Right arrow Articles by Bove, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online