Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 21, Issue 9 (May), 2003: 1859-1865
© 2003 American Society for Clinical Oncology

Phase I Study of an Oral Formulation of ZD9331 Administered Daily for 28 Days

Michael B. Sawyer, Mark J. Ratain, Donna Bertucci, Robert P. Smith, Richard L. Schilsky, Nicholas J. Vogelzang, Keith Shulman, Edwin C. Douglass, Gini F. Fleming

From the Committee on Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Cancer Research Center, and Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago; Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Cancer Research Center, Chicago, IL; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, UK, and Wilmington, DE.

Address reprint requests to Mark J Ratain, MD, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637; email: mratain{at}medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: To define the maximum-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of an oral formulation of ZD9331, a novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor that is not a substrate for folylpolyglutamate synthase.

Patients and Methods: Patients had Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status <= 2 and refractory solid tumors. Initially, patients received ZD9331 daily for 2 weeks, with the duration of treatment escalated to a maximum of 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Once the maximum-tolerated duration of treatment was determined, the dose of ZD9331 was increased until DLT occurred.

Results: Fifty-five patients were enrolled at eight dose levels. The DLTs were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. At 3 mg/d, two of 19 patients developed DLT; one patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia, and the other patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia only. Anemia was common, with a median hemoglobin nadir of 75% of baseline, before recovery or transfusion. The apparent oral clearance of ZD9931 was 11.6 ± 6.3 mL/min. Dose-limiting myelosuppression was associated with both an increased 24-hour ZD9931 concentration and blood urea nitrogen.

Conclusion: The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is 3 mg/d for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. ZD9331 seems to have a manageable toxicity profile, although it should be used with caution in patients with renal impairment.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
THYMIDYLATE SYNTHASE catalyzes conversion of deoxyuridine monophosphate to thymidylate and is the only de novo source of thymidylate for DNA synthesis.1 The central role of thymidylate synthase in nucleotide synthesis has led to the development of several folate analogs that inhibit thymidylate synthase. CB3717, the first antifolate to specifically target thymidylate synthase, was abandoned because of its unpredictable nephrotoxicity,2 which was thought to be due to its low water solubility.3 Because CB3717 had significant antitumor activity, the Cancer Research Campaign Center for Cancer Therapeutics developed antifolates with improved water solubility.

This research led to the development of raltitrexed (Tomudex; ZD1694; AstraZeneca, Macclesfield, UK), which had improved water solubility and decreased nephrotoxicity in animal models.3 Subsequent clinical studies demonstrated activity of ZD1694 in colorectal cancer and led to its approval in Australia, Canada, and Europe for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.4 In a later study in the United States, patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to either fluorouracil and leucovorin or ZD1694; a slight survival advantage was found for fluorouracil and leucovorin.5 On the basis of this study, ZD1694 was not developed further in the United States. ZD1694 required polyglutamation by folylpolyglutamate synthase to effectively inhibit thymidylate synthase.6 In vitro studies have shown that resistance to antifolates can occur by cancer cells decreasing accumulation of polyglutamated antifolates.7,8 In addition, variability in polyglutamation may be a factor in the interpatient variability of antifolate pharmacokinetics.

ZD9331 was developed to overcome decreased polyglutamation as a mechanism of resistance to antifolates and have more predictable pharmacokinetics and less interpatient variability than ZD1694. Preclinical studies demonstrated that ZD9331 was active against lymphoid and leukemia cell lines and small-cell lung, gastric, and colorectal cancer xenografts.9 ZD9331 was more active when given by a protracted schedule than an intermittent schedule. In vitro studies using L5178Y TK-/- mouse lymphoma cell lines demonstrated that exposure to 10 µmol/L of ZD9331 for 4 hours inhibited colony formation by 80%, whereas exposure to 0.1 µmol/L of ZD9331 for 24 hours inhibited colony formation by 99.96%. In vivo studies also showed that ZD9331 had superior activity administered on a protracted schedule. Mice were implanted with L5178Y TK -/- cells and treated with ZD9331; nine of 16 mice treated with 100 mg/kg of ZD9331 given by continuous infusion for 7 days were cured, whereas none of the mice treated with 100 mg/kg of ZD9331 given by intraperitoneal injection were cured.10 Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies showed good oral bioavailability: 30% to 60% in rats at 6 mg/m2 and 80% in dogs at 2 mg/m2.

These preclinical studies demonstrating increased activity with prolonged exposure to ZD9331 and good oral bioavailability prompted this phase I study of oral ZD9331 with prolonged administration. Because the intravenous formulation of ZD9331 had demonstrated that clearance was independent of body-surface area,11 this oral formulation study used fixed dosing rather than dosing that was based on body-surface area.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient enrollment began in April 1998, and the study was closed in February 2000. Eligible patients had a solid tumor that was refractory to standard therapies or for which no standard therapy existed; Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status <= 2; age >= 18 years; a life expectancy >= 12 weeks; a baseline platelet count >= 100 x 109/L; a total WBC count >= 3.5 x 109/L or an absolute neutrophil count >= 2 x 109/L; serum bilirubin concentration <= 1.25 times the upper limit of normal; ALT and AST <= 2.5 times the upper limit of normal in the absence of liver metastases and <= 5 times the upper limit of normal if liver metastases were present; serum creatinine <= 1.25 times the upper limit of normal; no severe or uncontrolled systemic disease, such as uncompensated respiratory or cardiac conditions; no use of folate-containing vitamin supplements; and no chlorambucil, mitomycin, or nitrosoureas for more than 6 months total duration.

Treatment Plan
Patients took ZD9331 as a single daily dose, between 8 and 10 AM (either 30 minutes before food or 2 hours after). The initial patient was treated with ZD9331 0.5 mg/d given for 14 days, followed by a 14-day rest period. Because no toxicity was observed, the next patient was treated for 21 days, followed by a 2-week rest period. The treatment period was increased to 28 days followed by a 2-week rest period for the next patient. The treatment period then remained at 28 days for the duration of the study. The dose of ZD9331 was doubled until the development of any grade of drug-related toxicity, with a minimum of one patient per dose level. Subsequent dose escalations followed a modified Fibonacci scheme starting at the 67% dose-escalation level, with a minimum of three patients enrolled per dose level. If any patient developed dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), three additional patients were enrolled at that dose level. At least 12 patients were to be enrolled at the recommended phase II dose, which was anticipated to be the dose at which less than one third of patients experienced DLT in the first cycle.

DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia of any duration with fever, grade 4 neutropenia without fever for at least 7 days, or grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Patients stopped treatment if they developed grade 2 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia while still taking ZD9331, and this was considered a DLT. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity that was not ameliorated by symptomatic directed therapy (with the exception of reversible elevations of AST or ALT) was also considered a DLT.

Chemistry and hematologic measurements were repeated weekly during the first two cycles and within 3 days of starting the next cycle. Tumor measurements were repeated every two cycles.

Patients remained on study until there was evidence of tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until the patient or investigator felt continuing treatment with ZD9331 was not in the patient’s interest. Patients who experienced DLT but who were clinically benefiting from ZD9331 could continue to receive treatment at the investigator’s discretion at a reduced dose. The University of Chicago institutional review board approved the protocol and the consent form. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Pharmacokinetics
Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected on day 1 pretreatment and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after starting treatment. Samples were also taken at predose and 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours postdose 1 week before the end of dosing, although these results are not presented here. The AstraZeneca Safety of Medicines Laboratory determined the plasma levels of ZD9331 (AstraZeneca) using a high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry–mass spectrometry assay as previously described.8

A noncompartmental approach was used to characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters of ZD9331. The pharmacokinetic software used to analyze the plasma concentrations was WinNonlin (version 2.1; Pharsight Corp, Cary, NC). The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated to the 24-hour sampling point (after the first dose) using the linear trapezoidal rule. The terminal half-life was estimated from the terminal part of the log concentration-time curve. The apparent oral clearance (Cl/F) was calculated as dose divided by AUC. Creatinine clearance was estimated using the formula of Cockcroft and Gault.12

Statistics
Stata 6 (version 6.0; Stata Corp, College Station, TX) was used to perform the statistical analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were examined for possible relationships with the development of myelosuppression using the Student’s t test. Exploratory analyses (using univariate and multivariate regression) were conducted to assess the possible relationship of various patient characteristics (eg, age, renal function) to ZD9331 clearance. In addition, an exploratory pharmacodynamic analysis was conducted after log transformation of the hematologic parameters. This analysis included an assessment of the relative contributions of variability in peak (maximum concentration; Cmax) and trough concentrations (24-hour minimum concentration; Cmin) and the AUC.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Demographics
A total of 55 patients were enrolled, from April 1998 to February 2000. Patient characteristics are outlined in Table 1Go. Patients were assessable for toxicity if they were able to complete cycle 1 of treatment. Forty-five patients were assessable for toxicity. One patient who developed suspected cellulitis during cycle 1 was withdrawn and therefore was not assessable for toxicity. Two patients died while on study, but the deaths were not considered to be related to ZD9331. One patient presented to her local hospital in the third week of treatment with acute shortness of breath; at presentation her WBC count was 9.6 x 109/L, creatinine was 0.5 times the upper limit of normal, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was 9 mg/dL. Her respiratory status deteriorated, and she died from a presumed pulmonary embolus. At enrollment, she had a creatinine clearance of 81 mL/min and BUN of 13.5 mg/dL. The other patient had a history of recurrent urinary tract infections and was taking nitrofurantoin to prevent recurrent infections. At enrollment, she had a calculated creatinine clearance of 151 mL/min and a BUN of 9 mg/dL. She developed urosepsis in the fifth week of treatment and presented to her local hospital. She progressed to septic shock and her advance directive precluded inotropic support. She died despite maximal support outside of the intensive care unit. The remaining patients not assessable for toxicity either withdrew consent or developed progressive disease, preventing completion of one cycle.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics
 
Dose Escalation
A total of 128 cycles were administered, and the median number of cycles completed by each patient was two (range, one to seven cycles). The treatment duration was escalated to 28 days (at a dose of 0.5 mg/d) without the occurrence of DLT. The dose of ZD9331 was then escalated from 0.5 to 5 mg/d. No DLTs occurred until the 5 mg/d dose level, at which two patients developed DLTs. At the prior dose level of 3 mg/d, no significant drug-related toxicity was observed, which led us to examine 4 mg/d. The three initial patients evaluated at 4 mg/d experienced more severe toxicity than patients treated at 5 mg/d. A preliminary analysis suggested that patients who experienced DLT at the 4 and 5 mg/d dose levels had decreased drug clearance and that this was correlated with an elevated BUN. Seven additional patients were enrolled at the 4-mg level to test this hypothesis; three patients had a high BUN, >= 20 mg/dL (4.0H), and four patients had a low BUN, less than 20 mg/dL (4.0L). An additional 16 patients were subsequently enrolled at the recommended phase II dose of 3 mg/d to better define the toxicity and pharmacodynamics at this dosage level.

Hematologic Toxicity
The DLT of ZD9331 was myelosuppression, both thrombocytopenia and neutropenia (Table 2Go). Patients developed thrombocytopenia at a median of 14 days after starting therapy (range, 11 to 14 days). Platelet counts returned to baseline at a median of 10 days (range, 7 to 14 days). Neutropenia occurred at a median of 21 days (range, 11 to 21 days), with a median duration of 7 days before recovery (range, 7 to 11 days). At 3 mg/d, the recommended phase II dose, two of 19 patients developed DLTs; one patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 neutropenia, and the other patient had grade 3 thrombocytopenia only.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Hematologic Toxicity by Dose Level (fully assessable patients only)
 
Anemia was a common toxicity at doses >= 3 mg/d (Fig 1Go), but was not dose-limiting. This was managed with erythropoietin and RBC transfusions. Midway through the study, one patient developed anemia associated with a low haptoglobin, elevated bilirubin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and a negative Coombs test. After this index case, all subsequent patients had haptoglobin levels measured along with routine biochemistry. At the 3-mg dose level, five of 16 patients had anemia with undetectable haptoglobin levels. As Fig 2Go demonstrates, the decrease in hemoglobin was gradual over several weeks. There was no significant difference in nadir hemoglobin, bilirubin, or LDH between patients with or without low haptoglobin levels.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Relationship between dose and development of anemia. Symbols differentiate dose levels.

 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Time course of the development of anemia. Symbols differentiate time points.

 
Nonhematologic Toxicity
The most frequent toxicities encountered at the 3-mg dose level are listed in Table 3Go. The most common toxicity was fatigue, which occurred in almost all patients. Nausea was a frequent side effect but was not dose-limiting. Four patients developed an erythematous maculopapular rash, which preceded the development of myelosuppression. Six patients developed elevated AST and ALT while receiving therapy, but the ALT and AST levels returned to baseline during the rest period and did not exceed grade 2 toxicity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Common Toxicities at the 3 mg/d Dose Level (n = 19)
 
Tumor Response
Patients were evaluated after the first two cycles and every two cycles thereafter. There were no objective minor or major responses observed, but 14 patients had prolonged stabilization of disease. The median duration of stable disease was 12 weeks (range, 12 to 48 weeks). At the 3-mg dose level, five of 19 patients achieved stable disease, including two patients who had prolonged stable disease (36 and 48 weeks). The majority of patients with stable disease had colorectal cancer (n = 10), but two patients with ovarian cancer also had disease stabilization.

Pharmacokinetics
None of the patients with DLT reached the day 21 sampling time. Therefore, to avoid biasing the pharmacokinetic analysis, the pharmacokinetic analysis is limited to the day 1 pharmacokinetic samples that are available for all patients. ZD9331 concentrations were measured in 51 patients on day 1 (Table 4Go). A sample concentration-time profile of a patient at the 3-mg dose level is shown in Fig 3Go. Peak concentrations occurred within the first 2 hours, followed by a rapid decline. Some patients who had decreased Cl/F reached a plateau in the terminal part of the concentration-time curve. There was a rebound in concentrations seen at 6 to 8 hours, which may represent enterohepatic circulation. The mean terminal half-life at 3 mg/d was 25 ± 22 hours (range, 9 to 109 hours). The mean half-life is likely an underestimate of the true half-life; only 24-hour data were available on all patients because patients with an estimated long half-life came off study early, before the late pharmacokinetic sample times.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters
 


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Typical concentration profile of ZD9331.

 
As the dose of ZD9331 increased from 3 to 5 mg (a 67% increase in dose), the mean AUC increased from 2,839 to 3,431 ng/mL • h (a 21% increase), and the mean peak concentrations were 206 ng/mL and 298 ng/mL, respectively (a 45% increase).

The Cl/F, AUC, Cmax, and Cmin for each dose level are listed in Table 4Go. At doses of >= 3 mg/d, there was no relationship between dose and the pharmacokinetic parameter AUC or Cmin. Thus data for the 3-, 4-, and 5-mg dose levels were combined for the purpose of analysis of the determinants of pharmacokinetic variability. At doses >= 3 mg/d, there was no significant correlation between AUC and creatinine clearance (r = 0.14) but BUN was correlated with AUC (r = 0.42; P = .007). At doses >= 3 mg/d, Cmin was significantly related to BUN (r = 0.49; P < .001) but not to creatinine clearance (r = 0.20).

Pharmacodynamics
In phase I studies, the large number of dose levels studied can confound analysis of determinants of pharmacodynamic variability.13 Toxicity is usually correlated with dose administered and therefore dose level. The relationship between dose and AUC will lead to a false-positive association between AUC and toxicity unless the confounding issue of dose is removed. At the 3-, 4-, and 5-mg dose levels, there was no correlation between dose and AUC. The pharmacodynamic analysis was therefore confined to the 3-, 4-, and 5-mg dose levels to eliminate potential confounding by dose level.

Demographic characteristics, pharmacokinetic parameters, and organ function were examined for possible relationships with thrombocytopenia and anemia. In the univariate analysis, significant predictors of log platelet nadir were RBC folate, dose, Cmin, half-life, AUC, clearance, bilirubin, BUN, and log Cmin (Table 5Go). Serum folate, Cmax, performance status, albumin creatinine clearance, BUN/creatinine ratio, age, and log baseline platelet count were not associated with log platelet nadir. In the multivariate analysis, only log Cmin and BUN were correlated with log platelet nadir (r2 = 0.44; P < .001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Univariate Analysis
 
In univariate analysis, significant predictors of log hemoglobin nadir were baseline hemoglobin, dose, Cmin, bilirubin, albumin, creatinine clearance, and log Cmin. Serum folate, Cmax clearance, AUC, performance status, BUN, and BUN/creatinine ratio did not reach statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, significant predictors of log nadir hemoglobin were log baseline hemoglobin, albumin, and log Cmin (r2 = 0.61; P < .001).

AUC (during the first 24 hours), Cmin, creatinine clearance, and BUN were examined as predictors for dose-limiting myelosuppression (Table 6Go). BUN levels were significantly higher in patients who developed dose-limiting myelosuppression compared with patients who did not (Student’s t test, P = .04). In addition, Cmin was higher in patients who developed dose-limiting myelosuppression than in patients who did not (Student’s t test, P = .03).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Parameters Examined for Relationship to Dose-Limiting Myelosuppression (fully assessable patients only)
 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The recommended phase II dose for ZD9331 is 3 mg/d for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest period. Some patients were able to tolerate ZD9331 doses of 4 and 5 mg/d without toxicity. Because preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis suggested that elevated BUN predisposed patients to develop ZD9331 toxicity, we therefore re-examined the 4 mg/d dose level, enrolling patients on the basis of BUN levels. However, even in the group with low BUN, we could not safely administer ZD9331 at 4 mg/d and could not recommend 4 mg/d as the initial phase II dose. Given that only two of 19 patients at 3 mg/d had DLT, patients who tolerate ZD9331 3 mg/d might be considered for escalation to a dose of 4 mg/d.

The DLT of ZD9331 on this oral schedule was neutropenia and thrombocytopenia; this contrasts with other studies in which cutaneous toxicity and myelosuppression were found to be the DLTs.11,14 In the study by de Jonge et al,14 dose-limiting cutaneous toxicity occurred at 10 mg twice a day given for 5 days. In the study by Goh et al,11 dose-limiting skin toxicity occurred at 12 mg/m2 and 25 mg/d given daily for 5 days. In this study, the daily administration of ZD9331 was more prolonged at 4 weeks, and the highest daily dose administered was 5 mg/d. The total dose of ZD9331 administered per cycle in the three studies was not substantially different (100 v 125 v 84 mg/cycle). ZD9331 was administered four times more rapidly in the two schedules associated with skin toxicity than in this study. This indicates that skin toxicities may be related to peak concentrations and the rate at which thymidylate synthase was inhibited.

Anemia was a common toxicity at or above the 3-mg dose level, but was not dose-limiting and was easily managed with erythropoietin and RBC transfusions. Midway through the study, one patient developed anemia associated with a low haptoglobin level. The decrease in hemoglobin was gradual over several weeks, which is more likely secondary to decreased production than hemolysis.

Three studies have implicated methotrexate (in combination with other agents) with elevations of LDH or anemia associated with a low haptoglobin level. Klimo and Connors15 first reported elevation of LDH levels in the majority of patients treated with a regimen consisting of methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin. The patients with elevated LDH were in complete or partial remission and had no elevations in other hepatic enzymes. In another study of methotrexate, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin, McAdam et al16 noted an increase in LDH during treatment that returned to baseline before the next cycle. In a study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, ifosfamide, and prednisolone, Maruyama et al17 observed an elevation of LDH isoenzymes 1 and 2. In addition, six patients had undetectable haptoglobin levels. We speculate that anemia with elevation of LDH and suppressed haptoglobin may be an unappreciated side effect of the antifolate class of chemotherapeutic agents as a result of ineffective erythropoiesis.

Given orally, ZD9331 showed a less than dose-proportional increase of AUC at doses >= 3 mg/d. Potential explanations are solubility-limited absorption (discounted because of the known physiochemical properties of the compound), saturable gastrointestinal absorption, nonlinear protein-binding, or saturable renal tubular reabsorption. Although interpretation is difficult because of the variability of the data and low numbers of subjects at lower doses, the increase of Cmax with dose could suggest that saturable gastrointestinal absorption is not the entire explanation. Because preclinical studies did not demonstrate saturable protein-binding, it is possible that the nonlinearity may be secondary to saturation of the extensive renal reabsorption of this folate analog.

The dominant role of reabsorption in the renal handling of ZD9331 may explain the relationship between Cmin and BUN of ZD9331 and the poor correlation between Cmin and calculated creatinine clearance; the latter is an estimation of the amount of blood that is filtered at the glomerulus and enters the proximal tubule. Creatinine clearance is a useful surrogate for predicting the clearance of drugs that are predominantly filtered, such as carboplatin, but may not be well correlated with the ability of the proximal tubule to reabsorb solutes and electrolytes. BUN is a better surrogate for tubular function because urea is reabsorbed. The parallels between urea reabsorption and ZD9331 reabsorption may be the basis for the apparent relationship between Cmin and BUN. Thus ZD9331, like other renally excreted drugs, should be used with caution in patients with renal insufficiency or in combination with drugs that affect proximal tubular reabsorption.

Plasma 2'-deoxyuridine (dUrd) is the substrate of thymidylate synthase that is elevated when thymidylate synthase is inhibited. Jackman et al18 and Mitchell et al19 have shown that plasma levels of dUrd are correlated with the degree of thymidylate synthase inhibition. We had planned to measure dUrd levels in this study as a measure of thymidylate synthase inhibition; unfortunately, plasma interference prevented analysis of dUrd in samples obtained.

In this study, we observed disease stabilization of colorectal and ovarian cancers at a dose of 3 mg/d given for 28 days followed by a 2-week rest period. The results from this study indicate that phase II studies of ZD9331 are warranted in metastatic colorectal and ovarian cancer.


    NOTES
 
Supported in part by AstraZeneca and grant no. CA 14599 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Michael B. Sawyer was the Gordon E. Richards Fellow of the Canadian Cancer Society.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Hillman RS: Hematopoietic agents: Growth factors, minerals and vitamins, in Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Molinoff PB, et al (eds): Goodman and Gilman’s Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (ed 9). New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 1996, pp 1311–1340

2. Vest S, Bork E, Hansen HH: A phase I evaluation of N10-propargyl-5,8-dideazafolic acid. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 24:201–204, 1988[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Jodrell DI, Newell DR, Morgan SE, et al: The renal effects of N10-propargyl-5,8-dideazafolic acid (CB3717) and a non-nephrotoxic analogue ICI D1694, in mice. Br J Cancer 64:833–838, 1991[Medline]

4. Clarke SJ, Hanwell J, de Boer M, et al: Phase I trial of ZD1694, a new folate-based thymidylate synthase inhibitor, in patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 14:1495–1503, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Blackledge G: New developments in cancer treatment with the novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor raltitrexed (Tomudex). Br J Cancer 77:29–37, 1998 (suppl)

6. Jackman AL, Boyle FT, Harrap KR: Tomudex (ZD1694): From concept to care, a programme in rational drug discovery. Invest New Drugs 14:305–316, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Pizzorno G, Mini E, Coronnello M, et al: Impaired polyglutamylation of methotrexate as a cause of resistance in CCRF-CEM cells after short-term, high-dose treatment with this drug. Cancer Res 48:2149–2155, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Rhee MS, Wang Y, Nair MG, et al: Acquisition of resistance to antifolates caused by enhanced gamma-glutamyl hydrolase activity. Cancer Res 53:2227–2230, 1993 (suppl)[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Jackman AL, Kimbell R, Brown M, et al: The antitumour activity of ZD9331, a non-polyglutamatable quinazoline thymidylate synthase inhibitor. Adv Exp Med Biol 370:185–188, 1994[Medline]

10. Jackman AL, Kimbell R, Aherne GW, et al: Cellular pharmacology and in vivo activity of a new anticancer agent, ZD9331: A water-soluble, nonpolyglutamatable, quinazoline-based inhibitor of thymidylate synthase. Clin Cancer Res 3:911–921, 1997[Abstract]

11. Goh BC, Ratain MJ, Bertucci D, et al: Phase I study of ZD9331 on short daily intravenous bolus infusion for 5 days every 3 weeks with fixed dosing recommendations. J Clin Oncol 19:1476–1484, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Cockcroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16:31–41, 1976[Medline]

13. Mick R, Ratain MJ: Statistical approaches to pharmacodynamic modeling: Motivations, methods, and misperceptions. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 33:1–9, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]

14. de Jonge MJ, Punt CJ, Sparreboom A, et al: Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral ZD9331, a novel nonpolyglutamated thymidylate synthase inhibitor, in adult patients with solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 20:1923–1931, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Klimo P, Connors JM: MACOP-B chemotherapy for the treatment of diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Ann Intern Med 102:596–602, 1985[Medline]

16. McAdam B, Smith T, Love WC, et al: Lactate dehydrogenase levels during MACOP-B chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother 10:95–101, 1993[Medline]

17. Maruyama F, Ezaki K, Okamoto M, et al: Increased blood cell destruction during vigorous regeneration of bone marrow after intensive chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Eur J Cancer 29A:1499, 1993[Medline]

18. Jackman AL, Mitchell F, Lynn S, et al: Plasma 2-'deoxyuridine (dUrd) as a surrogate market of thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibition in patients treated with ZD9331. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 18:171a, 1999 (abstr 654)

19. Mitchell F, Lynn S, Jackman AL: Modified high-performance liquid chromatography assay for the measurement of 2'-deoxyuridine in human plasma and its application to pharmacodynamic studies of antimetabolite drugs. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl 744:351–358, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted January 30, 2002; accepted February 13, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
V. L. Damaraju, K. F. Hamilton, M. L. Seth-Smith, C. E. Cass, and M. B. Sawyer
Characterization of Binding of Folates and Antifolates to Brush-Border Membrane Vesicles Isolated from Human Kidney
Mol. Pharmacol., February 1, 2005; 67(2): 453 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fleming, G. F.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online