|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.060 on January 15 2004 © 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology. CEBPA Mutations in Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Normal Cytogenetics: Prognostic Relevance and Analysis of Cooperating MutationsFrom the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm; and Central Unit Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany Address reprint requests to Hartmut Döhner, MD, Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Robert-Koch-Str. 8, 89081 Ulm, Germany; e-mail: hartmut.doehner{at}medizin.uni-ulm.de
PURPOSE: To assess the prognostic relevance of mutations in the CEBPA gene encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBP ) in a large prospective series of younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and normal cytogenetics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The entire CEBPA coding region was sequenced in diagnostic samples from 236 AML patients 16 to 60 years of age with normal cytogenetics who were uniformly treated on two consecutive protocols of the AML Study Group Ulm, and CEBPA mutation status was correlated with clinical outcome.
RESULTS: CEBPA mutations were detected in 36 (15%) of 236 patients. Twenty-one (9%) of 236 patients had mutations predicted to result in loss of C/EBP CONCLUSION: Mutant CEBPA predicts favorable prognosis and may improve risk stratification in AML patients with normal cytogenetics.
Karyotype at diagnosis provides the most important prognostic information in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1-5]. By conventional cytogenetic analysis, approximately 50% of patients lack clonal chromosome aberrations [4], and discriminating between prognostically different subsets of patients within this intermediate-risk group by using molecular genetic approaches is a major challenge [6-11].
CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBP
Like other members of the basic region leucine zipper (bZIP) class of transcription factors, C/EBP
On the basis of the observation that C/EBP To date, two studies focusing on the prognostic impact of CEBPA mutations in AML have been published. Preudhomme et al [31] examined pretreatment samples from 135 adults who had been entered into a treatment trial of the Acute Leukemia French Association. Different types of mutations were identified in 15 (16%) of 91 patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics, as defined according to the criteria proposed by the British Medical Research Council [3], and the presence of a CEBPA mutation was associated with significantly better clinical outcome. In a study from the Netherlands, 277 patients were screened for mutations in the bZIP domain. In-frame insertions were identified in 12 patients (4%; eight patients with normal cytogenetics and four patients with other chromosome abnormalities) and were subsequently shown to coincide with N-terminal mutations on the other allele. Among the 187 patients with intermediate-risk karyotypes, patients with the mutations had significantly increased event-free survival and overall survival (OS) [32]. There is evidence that mutations in hematopoietic transcription factors, resulting in impaired differentiation, cooperate with mutations in hematopoietic tyrosine kinases (TKs), which confer a proliferative or survival advantage, or both, giving rise to the AML phenotype [33]. Studies in mice demonstrated that the AML1-ETO and CBFß-MYH11 fusion genes, resulting from t(8;21) and inv(16), can block myeloid differentiation but are not sufficient to cause overt leukemia [34-37]. These observations led to the assumption that additional genetic events are required for the development of an AML phenotype. In support of this hypothesis, TKs have been found to be mutationally activated in some AML patients with t(8;21) or inv(16) [7-9,38,39]. The most commonly mutated TK is FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3), which is mutationally activated in approximately 30% of adult AML patients. However, although FLT3 mutations may be associated with any of the major classes of cytogenetic abnormalities, including those targeting the core-binding factor transcription-factor complex [ie, t(8;21) and inv(16)], they are most often associated with normal cytogenetics [7-9,40]. Whether in such cases FLT3 mutations are complemented by mutations in transcription-factor genes (for example, CEBPA) not frequently involved in gross cytogenetic changes remains to be determined. The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic relevance of CEBPA mutations in a homogeneous group of young adults with AML and normal cytogenetics who were uniformly treated using two consecutive protocols of the AML Study Group Ulm. In a search for cooperating mutations and to provide a meaningful multivariate analysis, all patients were also analyzed for the presence of activating FLT3 mutations and partial tandem duplications (PTDs) of the mixed-lineage leukemia gene (MLL PTDs).
Patients Diagnostic bone marrow (BM) or peripheral-blood (PB) samples were available from 236 patients 16 to 60 years of age with AML diagnosed according to FAB Cooperative Group criteria [41] and normal cytogenetics who had been entered onto the multicenter treatment trials AML HD93 (72 patients; August 1993 to January 1998) [42] and AML HD98-A (164 patients; February 1998 to April 2002) of the AML Study Group ULM. AML HD93 enrolled patients with de novo AML and patients with secondary AML after a primary malignancy. The ongoing AML HD98-A trial also includes patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation and patients with AML after myelodysplastic syndrome. For this molecular study, the only criterion used to include patients was the availability of a BM or PB sample from diagnosis for mutation analysis of the CEBPA gene. Approval was obtained from the institutional review boards of the participating institutions. All patients gave informed consent for both treatment and cryopreservation of BM and PB according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Therapy of Patients With Normal Cytogenetics Second consolidation therapy of patients with normal cytogenetics differed between the two trials: in the AML HD93 trial, patients 16 to 54 years of age were assigned to a course according to the sequential HAM protocol (cytarabine 3 g/m2 every 12 hours on days 1, 2, 8, and 9; mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on days 3, 4, 10, and 11); patients 55 to 60 years of age received the less-intensive HAM regimen. In the AML HD98-A trial, patients were randomly assigned to a second course of HAM or myeloablative therapy (total-body irradiation and cyclophosphamide or busulfan plus cyclophosphamide), followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation. In both trials, patients were assigned to receive allogeneic stem-cell transplantation if an HLA-compatible donor was available.
Cytogenetic and Molecular Genetic Analysis
Analysis of CEBPA Coding Region Sequence Variations The total reaction volume of 50 µL contained 500 ng DNA (1 µg for primer pair 3), 10 pmol of each primer, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (10 mmol/L each), 2.5 U Taq polymerase, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) additive facilitating amplification of GC-rich templates, and supplied buffer (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Samples were amplified using the following PCR conditions: 95°C for 15 minutes; 35 cycles of 95°C for 1 minute, 68°C for 3 minutes; and 68°C for 3 minutes. PCR products were sequenced in both directions with primers 1F/1R, 2F/2R, 3F/3R, and 4F/4R using the ABI Ready Reaction Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). In samples with a CEBPA coding region sequence variation, abnormal PCR products were cloned into the pCR4-TOPO vector (Invitrogen, Groningen, the Netherlands). Twelve recombinant colonies were cultured in Luria-Bertani medium, and plasmid DNA was prepared using the Plasmid Mini Kit (Qiagen). Cloned fragments were sequenced with the primers used to amplify the corresponding CEBPA regions from genomic DNA. To determine whether patients with sequence variations in different regions of the CEBPA gene had biallelic changes, the entire coding region was amplified with primers 6F and 6R under the previously described PCR conditions and ligated into the pCR4-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen). The positions of 6F and 6R complementary to the CEBPA cDNA sequence were 6F (573 to 601) 5'-GGAGAACTCTAACTCCCCCATGGAGTCGG-3' and 6R (1651 to 1670) 5'-CCTCACGCGCAGTTGCCCAT-3'. Clones were partly sequenced with the primers used to amplify the CEBPA regions from genomic DNA. All sequencing reactions were analyzed on an ABI 310 Prism Sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Statistical Analyses
Criteria for Treatment Outcomes
CEBPA Coding Region Polymorphisms Six silent nucleotide changes that would not affect the predicted amino acid sequence were identified. These polymorphisms were present in 32% (1281G>T), 3% (1164C>T), 1% (993G>A), 0.4% (630C>T), 0.4% (1284C>G), and 0.4% (1347G>T) of the 236 samples.
CEBPA Coding Region Mutations
Twenty-one patients had N-terminal nonsense mutations. In eight of these 21 patients, the N-terminal nonsense mutation was the sole CEBPA abnormality; in nine patients, the N-terminal nonsense mutation was accompanied by a C-terminal in-frame mutation (substitution, deletion, insertion, or duplication within the basic region, the leucine zipper, or the fork region between these two motifs); in three patients, the N-terminal nonsense mutation coincided with a C-terminal in-frame mutation and another type of CEBPA mutation; and in one patient, the N-terminal nonsense mutation occurred in conjunction with another type of CEBPA mutation. All N-terminal nonsense mutations were predicted to abolish expression of the full-length 42-kd protein and to upregulate formation of an N-terminally truncated 30-kd isoform. The latter has been shown to inhibit wild-type C/EBP DNA binding and transactivation in a dominant-negative fashion [28,29,54,55]. Therefore, all N-terminal nonsense mutations were predicted to result in loss of C/EBP function. Six of the patients with both an N-terminal nonsense mutation and a C-terminal in-frame mutation were tested for the presence of biallelic changes: two patients had the C-terminal mutation on the allele carrying the N-terminal mutation, whereas in four patients the mutations occurred on different alleles. Of the remaining 15 CEBPA-mutated cases, two had a C-terminal in-frame mutation as the sole CEBPA abnormality, and 13 demonstrated other types of CEBPA mutations. There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of FAB subtypes M1 and M2 between patients with N-terminal nonsense mutations (19 of 21 patients; 90%) and patients with other types of CEBPA mutations (four of 15 patients; 27%; P = .0002).
Cooperating Mutations
Patient Characteristics As indicated in Table 3, patients with CEBPA mutations had higher hemoglobin levels, lower platelet counts, and higher PB blast counts, and were less likely to present with lymphadenopathy or extramedullary leukemia. There were no significant differences with regard to other presenting clinical features between patients with mutated and unmutated status.
Response to Double-Induction Therapy Rates of CR, resistant disease, and early or hypoplastic death were not significantly different between patients with and without CEBPA mutations (P = .17).
Remission Duration
To investigate whether the favorable prognosis of the group with CEBPA mutations was related to loss of C/EBP function, outcome of the 21 patients with N-terminal nonsense mutations was analyzed. Median remission duration was not reached in this group, whereas it was 52 months for patients with other mutation types and 26 months for patients without mutations (P = .04 for comparison across the three groups). However, pair-wise comparisons showed no significant differences between patients with loss-of-function mutations and patients with other mutation types (P = .21) or between patients with other mutation types and patients without mutations (P = .13), supposedly reflecting the limited number of patients in the two subgroups of patients with CEBPA mutations.
OS
Multivariate Analysis Cox regression analysis identified resistant disease after the first course of induction therapy (hazard ratio, 3.16; P = .003), wild-type CEBPA (hazard ratio, 2.85; P = .01), presence of an FLT3 ITD (hazard ratio, 2.25; P = .001), presence of an MLL PTD (hazard ratio, 2.10; P = .04), and age (hazard ratio for a 10-year increment, 1.28; P = .04) as the most significant markers affecting remission duration (Table 4).
The strongest prognostic factors for OS were presence of an FLT3 ITD (hazard ratio, 2.03; P = .0005), wild-type CEBPA (hazard ratio, 1.87; P = .04), age (hazard ratio for a 10-year increment, 1.33; P = .004), and diagnostic WBC count (hazard ratio for an increment of 50 x 109/L, 1.48; P = .004; Table 5).
We evaluated the prognostic impact of CEBPA coding region mutations in a well-defined cohort of 236 uniformly treated AML patients with normal cytogenetics. CEBPA mutations were detected in 36 (15%) of the patients, and multivariate analysis identified CEBPA mutation status as an independent prognostic marker affecting remission duration and OS. In contrast to previous investigations [31,32], our study was based on a cytogenetically homogeneous patient population and was the first to combine sequencing of the entire CEBPA gene and evaluation of the significance of different mutation types. In addition, a comprehensive analysis of other relevant molecular markers allowed us to provide a meaningful multivariate analysis of prognostic factors and to address the issue of cooperating molecular events. Our findings confirm and extend those of the two previous studies on the prognostic relevance of CEBPA mutations in AML. Preudhomme et al [31] reported CEBPA mutations in 15 (11%) of 135 patients from the French Acute Leukemia French Association 9000 trial. All patients with mutations fell into the intermediate cytogenetic risk group according to British Medical Research Council criteria [3], which included a total of 91 patients. Individual karyotypes were not reported. Investigators of the Dutch-Belgian Hematology-Oncology Cooperative Group identified 12 patients with C-terminal CEBPA mutations [32]. Four of these 12 patients had clonal chromosome aberrations [del(9q), n = 2; del(11q), n = 1; del(12p), n = 1]. In a recent cytogenetic study, clinical outcome of patients with del(9q) as the sole abnormality was significantly better than that of patients with normal karyotypes, whereas abn(12p) was associated with poor prognosis [2]. To avoid confounding effects of additional chromosome aberrations, we determined the prognostic value of CEBPA mutations in a large prospective series of patients with normal cytogenetics. In our study as well as in previous investigations [28,29,31,32], patients with N-terminal nonsense mutations in combination with C-terminal in-frame mutations in the bZIP domain have been observed, and the data from the Dutch-Belgian Hematology-Oncology Cooperative Group study indicate that this pattern is associated with favorable clinical outcome [32]. However, in that study, mutation analysis was restricted to screening for bZIP-domain mutations, complemented by a search for N-terminal mutations only in patients with mutations. In contrast, we have sequenced the entire gene in all of our patients and identified eight additional patients with N-terminal nonsense mutations lacking sequence variations in the bZIP domain.
N-terminal nonsense mutations result in premature termination of the full-length 42-kd protein, formation of a truncated 20-kd protein deficient in DNA binding, and upregulation of the 30-kd C/EBP
To test the hypothesis that the biology of certain AML patients is related to loss of C/EBP
Considering recent data showing that C/EBP The perception that the outcomes of AML patients with normal cytogenetics vary considerably has incited the search for novel prognostic markers to discriminate favorable-risk from unfavorable-risk patients within this heterogeneous group [6-11,40]. By far, the most common molecular abnormality that has been detected in adult AML with normal cytogenetics is FLT3 ITD, and the presence of this mutation has been associated with poor outcome despite intensive treatment [7-9,11,40]. Given the apparent prognostic value of mutant CEBPA, analysis of a possible interaction between FLT3 ITDs and CEBPA mutations is of particular interest. In the French study, FLT3-ITD positivity, which was present in five (33%) of 15 patients, significantly worsened OS in the group with CEBPA mutations, and the authors proposed to classify patients with CEBPA mutations as having intermediate risk or favorable risk, depending on the presence or absence of an FLT3 ITD [31]. We looked at both types of activating FLT3 mutations (ITDs and D835 mutations) and found no negative prognostic influence among patients with CEBPA mutations. In fact, all remitting patients harboring both a CEBPA mutation and an FLT3 mutation remain in continuous CR. Obviously, larger studies are necessary to determine the relationship between these molecular markers within a hierarchical model. In summary, we demonstrate that mutant CEBPA predicts favorable prognosis in AML with normal cytogenetics. Our results emphasize further the value of molecular techniques for the dissection of this heterogeneous subgroup of patients, which may ultimately lead to improved risk stratification. Furthermore, we describe a novel subclass of AML with normal cytogenetics characterized by CEBPA loss-of-function mutations. The mechanisms by which mutant CEBPA increases the sensitivity of AML to antileukemic treatment, thereby improving clinical outcome, as well as cooperating molecular events in leukemogenesis [58], remain to be determined in future studies.
The following AMLSG ULM institutions and investigators participated in this study: Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Germany, A. Glasmacher; Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Germany, U. Germing; Universitätsklinikum Giessen, Germany, H. Pralle; Universitätsklinikum Göttingen, Germany, D. Haase; Allgemeines Krankenhaus Altona, Hamburg, Germany, H. Salwender; Universitätskliniken des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany, F. Hartmann; Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck, Austria, G. Gastl; Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Germany, J. T. Fischer; Universitätsklinikum Kiel, Germany, M. Kneba; Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Germany, K. Götze; Städtisches Krankenhaus München-Schwabing, Germany, C. Waterhouse; Städtische Kliniken Oldenburg, Germany, F. del Valle; Caritasklinik St. Theresia Saarbrücken, Germany, J. Preiß; Bürgerhospital, Stuttgart, Germany, W. Grimminger; Katharinenhospital Stuttgart, Germany, H. G. Mergenthaler; Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Trier, Germany, W. Weber; and Hanusch-Krankenhaus, Wien, Austria, E. Koller.
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
We thank the members of the AML Study Group Ulm for providing leukemia specimens.
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article. Supported by grants P.671 and P.726 from the Medical Faculty of the University of Ulm, Germany, and by grant 01GI9981 from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Kompetenznetz, "Akute und chronische Leukämien"), Germany.
1. Bloomfield CD, Lawrence D, Byrd JC, et al: Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subgroup. Cancer Res 58:41734179, 1998
2. Byrd JC, Mrózek K, Dodge RK, et al: Pretreatment cytogenetic abnormalities are predictive of induction success, cumulative incidence of relapse, and overall survival in adult patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: Results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 8461). Blood 100:43254336, 2002
3. Grimwade D, Walker H, Oliver F, et al: The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: Analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. Blood 92:23222333, 1998 4. Mrózek K, Heinonen K, Bloomfield CD: Clinical importance of cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukaemia. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 14:1947, 2001
5. Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Cassileth PA, et al: Karyotypic analysis predicts outcome of preremission and postremission therapy in adult acute myeloid leukemia: A Southwest Oncology Group/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Blood 96:40754083, 2000
6. Döhner K, Tobis K, Ulrich R, et al: Prognostic significance of partial tandem duplications of the MLL gene in adult patients 16 to 60 years old with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: A study of the Acute Myeloid Leukemia Study Group Ulm. J Clin Oncol 20:32543261, 2002
7. Fröhling S, Schlenk RF, Breitruck J, et al: Prognostic significance of activating FLT3 mutations in younger adults (16 to 60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: A study of the AML Study Group Ulm. Blood 100:43724380, 2002
8. Kottaridis PD, Gale RE, Frew ME, et al: The presence of a FLT3 internal tandem duplication in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) adds important prognostic information to cytogenetic risk group and response to the first cycle of chemotherapy: Analysis of 854 patients from the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML 10 and 12 trials. Blood 98:17521759, 2001
9. Thiede C, Steudel C, Mohr B, et al: Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: Association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis. Blood 99:43264335, 2002
10. van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani SB, Erpelinck C, van Putten WL, et al: High EVI1 expression predicts poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia: A study of 319 de novo AML patients. Blood 101:837845, 2003
11. Whitman SP, Archer KJ, Feng L, et al: Absence of the wild-type allele predicts poor prognosis in adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics and the internal tandem duplication of FLT3: A Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Cancer Res 61:72337239, 2001 12. Tenen DG: Disruption of differentiation in human cancer: AML shows the way. Nat Rev Cancer 3:89101, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Tenen DG, Hromas R, Licht JD, et al: Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia. Blood 90:489519, 1997 14. Ward AC, Loeb DM, Soede-Bobok AA, et al: Regulation of granulopoiesis by transcription factors and cytokine signals. Leukemia 14:973990, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Radomska HS, Huettner CS, Zhang P, et al: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is a regulatory switch sufficient for induction of granulocytic development from bipotential myeloid progenitors. Mol Cell Biol 18:43014314, 1998
16. Scott LM, Civin CI, Rorth P, et al: A novel temporal expression pattern of three C/EBP family members in differentiating myelomonocytic cells. Blood 80:17251735, 1992
17. Wang X, Scott E, Sawyers CL, et al: C/EBP
18. Smith LT, Hohaus S, Gonzalez DA, et al: PU.1 (Spi-1) and C/EBP alpha regulate the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor promoter in myeloid cells. Blood 88:12341247, 1996 19. Hohaus S, Petrovick MS, Voso MT, et al: PU.1 (Spi-1) and C/EBP alpha regulate expression of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor alpha gene. Mol Cell Biol 15:58305845, 1995[Abstract] 20. Oelgeschlager M, Nuchprayoon I, Luscher B, et al: C/EBP, c-Myb, and PU.1 cooperate to regulate the neutrophil elastase promoter. Mol Cell Biol 16:47174725, 1996[Abstract]
21. Ford AM, Bennett CA, Healy LE, et al: Regulation of the myeloperoxidase enhancer binding proteins Pu1, C-EBP alpha, -beta, and -delta during granulocyte-lineage specification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:1083810843, 1996
22. Khanna-Gupta A, Zibello T, Simkevich C, et al: Sp1 and C/EBP are necessary to activate the lactoferrin gene promoter during myeloid differentiation. Blood 95:37343741, 2000
23. Behre G, Singh SM, Liu H, et al: Ras signaling enhances the activity of C/EBP alpha to induce granulocytic differentiation by phosphorylation of serine 248. J Biol Chem 277:2629326299, 2002
24. Friedman AD, McKnight SL: Identification of two polypeptide segments of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein required for transcriptional activation of the serum albumin gene. Genes Dev 4:14161426, 1990
25. Lekstrom-Himes J, Xanthopoulos KG: Biological role of the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein family of transcription factors. J Biol Chem 273:2854528548, 1998 26. Antonson P, Xanthopoulos KG: Molecular cloning, sequence, and expression patterns of the human gene encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBP alpha). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 215:106113, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
27. Zhang DE, Zhang P, Wang ND, et al: Absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor signaling and neutrophil development in CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:569574, 1997
28. Gombart AF, Hofmann WK, Kawano S, et al: Mutations in the gene encoding the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias. Blood 99:13321340, 2002 29. Pabst T, Mueller BU, Zhang P, et al: Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBP alpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet 27:263270, 2001[CrossRef][Medline] 30. Pabst T, Mueller BU, Harakawa N, et al: AML1-ETO downregulates the granulocytic differentiation factor C/EBP alpha in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia. Nat Med 7:444451, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
31. Preudhomme C, Sagot C, Boissel N, et al: Favorable prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: A study from the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA). Blood 100:27172723, 2002 32. van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosravani SB, Erpelinck C, Meijer J, et al: Biallelic mutations in the CEBPA gene and low CEBPA expression levels as prognostic markers in intermediate-risk AML. Hematol J 4:3140, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Gilliland DG, Griffin JD: The roles of FLT3 in hematopoiesis and leukemia. Blood 100:15321542, 2002 34. Castilla LH, Garrett L, Adya N, et al: The fusion gene Cbfb-MYH11 blocks myeloid differentiation and predisposes mice to acute myelomonocytic leukaemia. Nat Genet 23:144146, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Okuda T, Cai Z, Yang S, et al: Expression of a knocked-in AML1-ETO leukemia gene inhibits the establishment of normal definitive hematopoiesis and directly generates dysplastic hematopoietic progenitors. Blood 91:31343143, 1998 36. Yergeau DA, Hetherington CJ, Wang Q, et al: Embryonic lethality and impairment of haematopoiesis in mice heterozygous for an AML1-ETO fusion gene. Nat Genet 15:303306, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Yuan Y, Zhou L, Miyamoto T, et al: AML1-ETO expression is directly involved in the development of acute myeloid leukemia in the presence of additional mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:1039810403, 2001
38. Beghini A, Peterlongo P, Ripamonti CB, et al: C-kit mutations in core binding factor leukemias. Blood 95:726727, 2000 39. Gari M, Goodeve A, Wilson G, et al: C-kit proto-oncogene exon 8 in-frame deletion plus insertion mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 105:894900, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
40. Kiyoi H, Naoe T, Nakano Y, et al: Prognostic implication of FLT3 and N-RAS gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 93:30743080, 1999 41. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al: Proposed revised criteria of the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Intern Med 103:620625, 1985 42. Schlenk RF, Benner A, Hartmann F, et al: Risk-adapted postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the German multicenter AML HD93 treatment trial. Leukemia 17:15211528, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 43. Mitelman F: ISCN (1995): An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland, S. Karger, 1995
44. Fischer K, Scholl C, Sàlat J, et al: Design and validation of DNA probe sets for a comprehensive interphase cytogenetic analysis of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 88:39623971, 1996
45. Fröhling S, Skelin S, Liebisch C, et al: Comparison of cytogenetic and molecular cytogenetic detection of chromosome abnormalities in 240 consecutive adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 20:24802485, 2002 46. Korn EL: Censoring distributions as a measure of follow-up in survival analysis. Stat Med 5:255260, 1986[Medline] 47. Kaplan E, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457481, 1958[CrossRef] 48. Mantel N, Haenszel W: Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719748, 1959 49. Holm S: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:6570, 1979 50. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc 34:187220, 1972 51. Ihaka R, Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299314, 1996[CrossRef] 52. Cheson BD, Cassileth PA, Head DR, et al: Report of the National Cancer Institute-sponsored workshop on definitions of diagnosis and response in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 8:813819, 1990[Abstract]
53. Vinson CR, Sigler PB, McKnight SL: Scissors-grip model for DNA recognition by a family of leucine zipper proteins. Science 246:911916, 1989
54. Calkhoven CF, Muller C, Leutz A: Translational control of C/EBP alpha and C/EBP beta isoform expression. Genes Dev 14:19201932, 2000
55. Ossipow V, Descombes P, Schibler U: CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein mRNA is translated into multiple proteins with different transcription activation potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:82198223, 1993 56. Lodie TA, Radomska HS, Donato LD, et al: PML/RARa induces ATRA-sensitive delocalization of the critical granulocytic differentiation factor C/EBP alpha to a microspeckled nuclear pattern in t(15;17) APL. Blood 94:692a, 1999 (abstr)
57. Truong BT, Lee YJ, Lodie TA, et al: CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins repress the leukemic phenotype of acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 101:11411148, 2003 58. Iwasaki-Arai J, Zhang P, Huettner CS, et al: C/EBP alpha deficiency in hematopoiesis induces accumulation of non-malignant myeloblasts mimicking acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood 100:61a, 2002 (abstr) Submitted June 16, 2003; accepted October 29, 2003.
Related Editorial
Related Correspondence
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|