Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Erratum for Ladewski et al., J Clin Oncol 21 (20) 3859-3866.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 6 (March 15), 2004: pp. 1169
© 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.914

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

ERRATUM

ERRATUM

The October 15, 2003, article by Ladewski et al entitled, "Dissemination of Information on Potentially Fatal Adverse Drug Reactions for Cancer Drugs From 2000 to 2002: First Results From the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports Project" (J Clin Oncol 21:3859-3866, 2003) contained two errors.

The Demetri report of the GIST trial (reference 37) reported an incidence of gastrointestinal or intraabdominal hemorrhage of 5% for Imatinib, which was incorrectly placed in table 1 as 1 in 5 or 20%.

In addition, the placement of the reference for epoetin alpha in the second full paragraph on page 3862 may be misleading. As located, readers may believe that all eight warnings are located in this reference, while it only refers to the warning for epoetin alpha. This reference should be located in the fourth full paragraph on page 3862, so that the paragraph reads as follows:

In the United States, pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors mailed Dear Doctor letters to physicians describing 12 serious ADRs, which occurred within 2 years of FDA approval (four ADRs), more than 2 years and less than 6 years after FDA approval (three ADRs), and between 6 and 25 years after FDA approval (five ADRs).41-51 Seven of the 11 ADRs (64%) described in black box warnings or contraindications are described in Dear Doctor letters. One ADR, erythropoietin-associated pure red cell aplasia, was described in Dear Doctor letters and PI revisions if Europe, Canada, and Australia in 2001, but not until 2002 in the United States (Procrit [epoetin alfa; package insert], Bridgewater, NJ; Ortho Biotech LP, 2002). One ADR, oprelvekin-associated papilledema in children, was described in a Dear Doctor letter, but not in the PI nor in a peer-reviewed journal article.45




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
I. A. Olivotto, V. Bernstein, P. T. Truong, and J. S. Kelly
In Reply:
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2005; 23(4): 932 - 933.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online