|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 22, No 7 (April 1), 2004: pp. 1287-1292 © 2004 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.082 Phase II Study of R115777, a Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitor, in Myelodysplastic SyndromeFrom the Departments of Bioimmunotherapy, Hematopathology, and Leukemia, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Titusville, NJ, and Beerse, Belgium. Address reprint requests to Razelle Kurzrock, MD, FACP, Department of Bioimmunotherapy, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 422, Houston, TX 77030; e-mail: rkurzroc{at}mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: To perform a phase II study of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 (Zarnestra; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Raritan, NJ) in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), using doses recommended in a phase I study in relapsed/refractory leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with MDS were treated with R115777 at doses of 600 mg orally (PO) bid in cycles of 4 weeks of therapy followed by a 2-week rest period. Dose reduction rules for toxicity were applied. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 28 patients treated were assessable. Three patients responded (complete remission, n = 2; partial remission, n = 1). Responders included two patients with refractory anemia with excess blasts and one patient with refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation. Two of the responders had a diploid karyotype and one had multiple cytogenetic abnormalities including monosomy 5 and 7. The starting dose of 600 mg PO bid resulted in side effects (myelosuppression, fatigue, neurotoxicity, rash, or leg pain) necessitating dose reduction (n = 4) or discontinuation of therapy (n = 7) in 11 (41%) of 27 patients during the induction period (12 weeks). Lower doses of 300 mg PO bid were well tolerated. All responses occurred in patients who had been reduced to this dose level during the initial two cycles. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that R115777 has modest activity in MDS patients, but that, in this patient population, 4 weeks of daily doses of 600 mg PO bid is not tolerated. Further exploration of the optimal dose/schedule and correlation with biologic end points are warranted.
Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) is a group of hematologic disorders characterized by peripheral cytopenias and a dysplastic marrow. MDS usually occurs in elderly patients.1-4 The pathophysiology of the disease appears to be an initial increase in apoptosis of the primitive stem cells with compensatory marrow proliferation, and later escape of clonal disease with potential for transformation to acute leukemia.1,3,4 Overall, approximately 30% of patients transform to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), while the others die of complications of cytopenias (infections, bleeding) while in the MDS phase. MDS is divided into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories with median survivals ranging from 3 to 5 years (or more) to less than 12 months.5,6 There is no standard of care in MDS except for supportive care.2 Low-risk MDS is usually observed and later treated, depending on complications, with red cell or platelet transfusions, antibiotics, or growth factors (erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor). High-risk MDS is often treated with cytarabine-based acute leukemia-type regimens, investigational strategies, or allogeneic stem-cell transplant.7-9 Investigational drugs include a wide variety of agents, the only one of which has shown a convincing impact on the course of MDS is azacytidine.10 Farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) are a novel class of compounds that inhibit an enzymatic step (farnesylation) critical to the activation of several cellular proteins. Most extensively studied are the RAS proteins, in particular, those that are the products of mutant ras genes.9,11 The original interest in FTIs as potential anticancer agents was based on several findings: 1) The crucial role played by RAS proteins as molecular switches that regulate a multitude of cellular functions;9,12 2) the fact that transforming ras mutations are frequently found in diverse cancers including MDS;13 and 3) the observation that RAS can be aberrantly activated by other genetic alterations, even in the absence of mutation in the ras gene.14 More recently, it has become apparent that several oncoproteins other than RAS also undergo farnesylation,15-17 suggesting that the mechanism of action of FTIs is significantly more complex than initially presumed. R115777 (Zarnestra; Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Raritan, NJ), a novel, nonpeptidomimetic, competitive FTI has already undergone phase I and II studies in leukemias and phase I, II, and III studies in solid tumors. Myelosuppression defined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), whereas nonhematologic toxicity was limited both in frequency and in severity.18-20 In a phase I study in refractory leukemias, a 30% response rate (complete and partial remission) was observed.18 R115777 doses of 600 mg orally (PO) bid were recommended.18 Herein, we report the results of a phase II study of R115777 (600 mg PO bid for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest) in patients with MDS.
Eligibility Patients were eligible if they were 12 years or older and had MDS including refractory anemia, refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts, refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB), or RAEB in transformation (RAEBT) with intermediate (INT-1 to INT-2) or high-risk MDS by International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) scores.6 Patients had to have a performance of 2 on the Zubrod scale, and preserved hepatic (bilirubin 2.0 mg/dL) and renal function (creatinine 2.0 mg/dL). Patients with severe heart disease (New York Heart Association Class III or IV) were excluded. All patients signed an informed consent in keeping with the policies of the Surveillance Committee of the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX).
Treatment Plan
Evaluation During Study
Response Definitions
Plasma Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF) Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay
Detection of Mutations in Ras Oncogenes by Fluorescence-Based Automated DNA Sequencing
Patient Characteristics Twenty-eight patients were entered onto the study. All were assessable for toxicity. One patient was not assessable for response because of an accident (fall resulting in hip fracture requiring surgery) necessitating discontinuation of treatment on day 6. Consistent with the demographics of MDS, there were more men than women treated (Table 1). The median age of patients was 66 years. Most patients had IPSS INT-2 disease with an IPSS score of 1.5 to 2.0.6 Fourteen patients had diploid cytogenetics, whereas the others showed a variety of karyotypic abnormalities. Ten patients had no prior therapy, while the others had failed diverse treatments, including chemotherapy, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, amifostine, azacytidine, autologous transplant, retinoids, and others (Table 1).
Responses Three patients responded (CR, n = 2; partial remission [PR], n = 1). The responders included a 63-year-old woman with RAEBT (diploid karyotype) who achieved a 4-month CR, a 76-year-old man with RAEB (diploid karyotype) who achieved an 11-month CR, and a 73 year-old man with RAEB (multiple cytogenetic abnormalities including monosomy 5 and 7) who attained a 2-month PR (there was no change in the karyotype in the latter patient). None of the responders had ras mutations. All three responders had dose reductions to 300 mg PO bid within the first month of therapy because of rash or severe cytopenias. They tolerated the lower dose well. During the induction period (12 weeks), three patients, all with unfavorable initial IPSS scores (2.0 or greater), progressed to AML.6
Toxicity
Feasibility All patients were started at a dose level of R115777 of 600 mg PO bid. However, 11 of 27 assessable patients required withholding the drug (n = 7) or lowering of this dose (n = 4) during the induction period. For those patients who were dose-reduced during induction, the median time to dose reduction was 3 weeks (range, 1 to 12 weeks). The dose was generally decreased to 300 mg PO bid and this dose was tolerated with minimal toxicity. Dose changes were most commonly made because of myelosuppression, rash, or fatigue. An additional seven patients were dose-reduced to 300 mg PO bid after induction. The lower dose was well tolerated.
Angiogenic Factors
R115777 is an orally active heterocyclic agent with an imidazole pharmacophore.21 Approximately 75% of human tumor cell lines tested have proved sensitive to R115777. Antiproliferative, antiangiogenic, or proapoptotic activity are observed in various tumor xenograft models.15 Preclinical growth inhibitory effects have been demonstrated in both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. In this trial, we used the dose of R115777 (600 mg PO bid) recommended in the first phase I study in AML.18 However, a more prolonged administration schedule was utilized, with 4 instead of 3 consecutive weeks of continuous twice-daily treatment, followed by a protracted drug-holiday of 2 weeks instead of 1 week (even so, the total number of weeks of therapy would be 8 during the 12-week induction in the current trial, while the number of weeks of therapy during a 3 week on/1 week off schedule would be 9 during this same time period.) The number of patients in our current study requiring dose reduction or discontinuation of therapy suggests that this dose was too high or that the duration of exposure to this dose was too long for our MDS population. These data are consistent with those from our simultaneously performed phase I study of R115777 in MDS. A major aim of that study was to ascertain the correlation between dose and effect on target molecules. At the time the study was performed, it was believed that an MTD had already been identified, based on the previously published study in acute leukemia.18) Even so, that study, like this one, demonstrated that the MTD for our MDS patient population was below the 600 mg PO bid dose previously recommended. Specifically, the MTD for R115777 was 400 mg PO bid (3 weeks on/1 week off).22 This schedule was used in the AML study as well as in other phase II and phase III studies in solid tumors.18-20 Furthermore, the optimal biologic dose may be lower yet, based on the marked inhibition of farnesyltransferase activity observed. MDS is an umbrella term for a heterogeneous group of hematopoietic stem-cell disorders usually affecting the elderly.23 These disorders have in common an underlying ineffectiveness of hematopoiesis that is reflected by dysplasia of bone marrow precursors, peripheral cytopenias, and a tendency to progress to AML. In most patients with MDS who are not eligible for allogeneic transplantation, the disease is fatal. Approximately two thirds of patients succumb within 3 to 4 years after presentation, and individuals with high-risk MDS generally survive about 1 year. Except for azacytidine (an investigational hypomethylating agent),10 none of the other currently available therapeutic agents for MDS extends survival, and many are highly toxic. In our study, three patients achieved either CR (n = 2) or PR (n = 1). These responders were all dose-reduced to 300 mg PO bid, a dose with mild to no side effects. Therefore, a subset of patients with MDS, even those with advanced disease such as RAEBT, can respond to well-tolerated doses of R115777. The actual mechanism of action of FTIs remains uncertain. Clinical responses in this trial and others18,22,24 have been unrelated to ras mutations. As mentioned earlier, RAS can be activated by other mechanisms and, to date, no trial has measured RAS activation status. Furthermore, farnesylation is not unique to RAS, and RAS-independent mechanisms of cell growth inhibition by FTI such as prenylation of Rhoß and of the mitotic kinasins CENP-E and CENP-F have been reported.16,17 In addition, a recently proposed mechanism of action of FTIs is through inhibition of angiogenesis.25-27 RAS activation upregulates VEGF expression, and suppression of RAS activity through FTI inhibition has led to significant decreases in the expression and secretion of VEGF in preclinical models.16,17 We have previously reported a significant increase in angiogenesis in patients with hematologic disorders,28 and our recent studies suggest that responses to R115777 in myeloproliferative disorders might correlate with higher levels of plasma angiogenic factors at baseline.22,24 Consistent with our previous report,28 plasma concentrations of VEGF and bFGF were elevated at baseline in many patients with MDS treated in the current study. In addition, one of the two responders with available data had dramatically increased baseline plasma levels of bFGF (the highest levels by far in the study), as well as high levels of VEGF (Fig 1; plasma levels of these two cytokines were not elevated in the other responder). The small sample size precludes definite conclusions but, taken together with the results of previous studies,22,24 suggests that assessment of the correlation between response to FTIs and baseline levels of angiogenic factors, as well as changes in levels during treatment, merits a systematic examination in future studies. In conclusion, the FTIs are a targeted therapy that function by modulating tumor signaling cascades via inhibition of farnesyl protein transferase. Both this study and our phase I study of R115777 in MDS22 demonstrate that responses, including CRs and PRs, can be achieved in patients with MDS, including those that have poor prognostic factors, at doses that are tolerable in elderly individuals. However, doses of R115777 of 600 mg PO bid given for 28 consecutive days, as used at the outset in this trial, may be too toxic for many MDS patients. Furthermore, drug-induced myelosuppression with prolonged use of these doses may mask clinically relevant hematologic improvements. The latter may explain why the response rate was higher (30%) in our phase I study.22 Further studies with this FTI and others in this class, either alone or in combination with other available agents, are warranted. Finally, it is important to recognize that MDS is a tremendously heterogenous disease.23 Proteomic and/or genomic analyses are, therefore, needed to answer a fundamental issuethe identification of the molecular subsets most likely to respond.
The following authors or their immediate family members have indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. Acted as a consultant within the last 2 years: Razelle Kurzrock, Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development. Received more than $2,000 a year from a company for either of the last 2 years: Razelle Kurzrock, Johnson and Johnson Pharmacuetical Research and Development.
Supported in part by Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC. Authors disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.
1. Heaney ML, Golde DW: Myelodysplasia. N Engl J Med 340:1649-1660, 1999 2. Ganser A, Hoelzer D: Clinical use of hematopoietic growth factor in the myelodysplastic syndromes. Semin Hematol 33:186-195, 1996[Medline]
3. Rajapaksa R, Ginzton N, Rott LS, et al: Altered oncoprotein expression and apoptosis in myelodysplastic syndrome marrow cells. Blood 88:4275-4287, 1996 4. Vergilio JA, Bagg A: Myelodysplastic syndromes. Contemporary biologic concepts and emerging diagnostic approaches. Am J Clin Pathol 119:S58-S77, 2003 (suppl) 5. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al: Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol 51:189-199, 1982[Medline]
6. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al: International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 89:2079-2088, 1997
7. Beran M, Estey E, O'Brien S, et al: Topotecan and cytarabine is an active combination regimen in myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 17:2819-2830, 1999 8. Anderson JE, Appelbaum FR, Schoch G, et al: Allogeneic marrow transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome with advance disease morphology: A phase II study of busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and total-body irradation and analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol 14:220-226, 1996[Abstract]
9. Beaupre DM, Kurzrock R: RAS and leukemia: From basic mechanisms to gene-directed therapy. J Clin Oncol 17:1071-1079, 1999
10. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, et al: Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: A study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol 20:2429-2440, 2002 11. Tamanoi F: Inhibitors of Ras farnesyltransferase. Trends Biochem Sci 18:349-353, 1993[CrossRef][Medline] 12. Bokoch GM, Der CJ: Emerging concepts in the Ras superfamily of GTP-binding proteins. FASEB J 7:750-759, 1993[Abstract] 13. Rodenhuis S: ras and human tumors. Semin Cancer Biol 3:241-247, 1992[Medline]
14. Skorski T, Kanakaraj P, Ku DH, et al: Negative regulation of p120GAP GTPase promoting activity by p210bcr/abl: Implication of RAS-dependent Philadelphia chromosome positive cell growth. J Exp Med 179:1855-1865, 1994
15. End DW, Smets G, Todd AV, et al: Characterization of the antitumor effects of the selective farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in vivo and in vitro. Cancer Res 61:131-137, 2001
16. Ashar HR, James L, Gray K, et al: Farnesyl transferase inhibitors block the farnesylation of CENP-E and CENP-F and alter the association of CENP-E with the microtubules. J Biol Chem 275:30451-30457, 2000
17. Crespo NC, Ohkanda J, Yen TJ, et al: The farnesyltransferase inhibitor, FTI-2153, blocks bipolar spindle formation and chromosome alignment and causes prometaphase accumulation during mitosis of human lung cancer cells. J Biol Chem 276:16161-16167, 2001
18. Karp JE, Lancet JE, Kaufmann SH, et al: Clinical and biologic activity of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias: A phase I clinical-laboratory correlative trial. Blood 97:3361-3369, 2001 19. Cunningham D, De Gramont A, Schiethaurer W, et al: Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor R115777 (ZarnestraTM) in advanced colorectal cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:126a, 2002 (abstr 502) 20. Van Cutsem E, Karasek P, Oettle H, et al: Phase III trial comparing gemcitabine + R115777 (Zarnestra) versus gemcitabine + placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:130a, 2002 (abstr 517)
21. Rowinsky EK, Windle JJ, Von Hoff DD: Ras protein farnesyltransferase: A strategic target for anticancer therapeutic development. J Clin Oncol 17:3631-3652, 1999
22. Kurzrock R, Sebti SM, Kantarjian HM, et al: Phase I study of a farnesyl transferase inhibitor, R115777, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 102:4527-4534, 2003
23. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, et al: World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meetingAirlie House, Virginia November 1997. J Clin Oncol 17:3835-3849, 1999
24. Cortes J, Albitar M, Thomas D, et al: Efficacy of the farnesyl transferase inhibitor R115777 in chronic myeloid leukemia and other hematologic malignancies. Blood 101:1692-1697, 2003 25. Charvat S, Duchesne M, Parvaz P, et al: The up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in mutated Ha-ras HaCaT cell lines is reduced by a farnesyl transferase inhibitor. Anticancer Res 19:557-561, 1999[Medline]
26. Rak J, Mitsuhashi Y, Bayko K, et al: Mutant ras oncogenes upregulate VEGF/VPF expression: Implications for induction and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res 55:4575-4580, 1995 27. Feldkamp MM, Lau N, Rak J, et al: Normoxic and hypoxic regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) by astrocytoma cells is mediated by Ras. Int J Cancer 81:118-124, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
28. Aguayo A, Kantarjian H, Manshouri T, et al: Angiogenesis in acute and chronic leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 96:2240-2245, 2000 Submitted August 12, 2003; accepted January 12, 2004. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X |