Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 12 (April 20), 2005: pp. 2872-2873
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.310

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jatoi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dakhil, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jatoi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dakhil, S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply:

Aminah Jatoi, Charles Loprinzi

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Kendrith Rowland

Carle Cancer Center, Urbana, IL

Shaker Dakhil

Cancer Center of Kansas, Wichita, KS

We thank Drs Dahele and Wall for their comments and are pleased to respond.

The North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) recently reported a three-arm trial that compared a fish oil–derived eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) nutritional supplement with megesterol acetate.1 This 421-patient trial concluded that EPA adds little to current treatments of the cancer anorexia/weight-loss syndrome.

We share the disappointment of Drs Dahele and Wall. We, too, had hoped that EPA would help patients with cancer. This disappointment should not, however, detract from the inevitable conclusion of this large comparative trial and of the two others that preceded it2,3: EPA did not work. It did not fulfill the promise generated by earlier pilot studies.

There is a dearth of phase III data that support the use of EPA in the treatment of the cancer anorexia/weight-loss syndrome. Drs Dahele and Wall provide insight into some of the challenges of research on the cancer anorexia/weight-loss syndrome by commenting on the importance of clinically relevant end points, the need for compliance assessment, and the potential of early intervention. These are important points, and we acknowledge that each of these three "negative" trials may have limitations. However, any such limitations in their own right do not justify the use of EPA.

After three large "negative" studies, the onus of demonstrating benefit now rests in the hands of proponents of EPA. These proponents must put forth critical new evidence to convince cancer patients, their families, and oncologists that this agent continues to be worthy of clinical investigation. For others of us who continue to observe the devastating decline of weight-losing cancer patients on a daily basis—despite their ingestion of EPA-containing supplements—we think it time to move on and study other agents.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgment

The authors whish to acknowledge Dr Gabriel N. Hortobagyi for reviewing this letter.

REFERENCES

1. Jatoi A, Rowland K, Loprinzi CL, et al: An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort. J Clin Oncol 22:2469-2476, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Bruera E, Strasser F, Palmer JL, et al: Effect of fish oil on appetite and other symptoms in patients with advanced cancer and anorexia/cachexia: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol 21:129-134, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Fearon KC, Von Meyenfeldt MF, Moses AG, et al: Effect of a protein and energy dense N-3 fatty acid enriched oral supplement on loss of weight and lean tissue in cancer cachexia: A randomised double blind trial. Gut 52:1479-1486, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Optimizing End Points and Outcomes in Cancer-Associated Wasting
    M. Dahele and L. Wall
    JCO 2005 23: 2871-2872 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jatoi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dakhil, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jatoi, A.
Right arrow Articles by Dakhil, S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online