|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 13 (May 1), 2005: pp. 3160 © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.176
Mammaglobin Remains a Useful Marker for the Detection of Breast Cancer Cells in Peripheral BloodElisabethinen Hospital, 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Linz, Austria To the Editor: Recently, Span et al1 reported results concerning quantification of mammaglobin expression in tumor tissues from breast cancer patients, finding an association of high expression with low-grade, steroid receptorpositive tumors from postmenopausal patients. However, tumors from 19 of 280 patients (6.8%) were mammaglobin negative after 40 rounds of amplification by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Due to the differences of mammaglobin expression in tumor tissues from various breast cancer patients it was argued that mammaglobin is not a useful marker for the detection of circulating tumor cells. In 1999, we published a nested RT-PCR assay for the detection of tumor cells in peripheral blood of breast cancer patients using mammaglobin as a marker.2 In addition, we established a quantitative RT-PCR assay and measured the amount of mammaglobin mRNA molecules in tumor tissues from 52 breast cancer patients (unpublished data). According to Span et al, we found a wide range in the amount of mammaglobin expression after normalization for ß-actin expression, but 2 of 52 tumor samples (3.8%) were mammaglobin negative in quantitative RT-PCR. However, by applying the nested RT-PCR assay, we were able to detect mammaglobin mRNA molecules in both negative samples, too. The nested RT-PCR assay is capable of detecting mammaglobin mRNA molecules even in samples with very low expression levels3; hence, negative results using other detection methods might be caused by lower sensitivity compared with nested RT-PCR. The correlation of high mammaglobin expression in tumor tissues with favorable clinicopathologic features described by Span et al does not imply that this molecule is unsuitable as a marker for circulating tumor cells. A good tumor-cell marker should exhibit high specificity for a certain cell or tumortype; this criterion is fulfilled by mammaglobin for cells derived from breast tissue. Certainly, circulating tumor cells can exhibit different gene-expression profiles compared with the primary tumorsingle tumor cells might have lost the ability to express mammaglobin mRNAbut this can also be true for other marker genes. The crucial point is that all 52 tumor samples from breast cancer patients tested so far were mammaglobin positive when using nested RT-PCR. Considering the absence of mammaglobin expression in blood cells, we conclude that this molecule still remains a suitable marker for the detection of circulating tumor cells, independent of its expression amount in individual breast cancer cells. Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest. REFERENCES
1. Span PN, Waanders E, Manders P, et al: Mammaglobin is associated with low-grade, steroid receptor-positive breast tumors from postmenopausal patients, and has independent prognostic value for relapse-free survival. J Clin Oncol 22:691-698, 2004
2. Zach O, Kasparu H, Krieger O, et al: Detection of circulating mammary carcinoma cells in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients via a nested reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay for mammaglobin mRNA. J Clin Oncol 17:2015-2019, 1999 3. Zach O, Wagner H, Kasparu H, et al: Statistical validation of the mammaglobin-nested RT-PCR assay for tumor cell detection in blood of breast cancer patients. BioTechniques 31:1358-1362, 2001[Medline]
Related Reply
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|