Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.188 on April 25 2005

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ryan, Q. C. Articles by Sausville, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ryan, Q. C. Articles by Sausville, E. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of MS-275, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced and Refractory Solid Tumors or Lymphoma

Qin C. Ryan, Donna Headlee, Milin Acharya, Alex Sparreboom, Jane B. Trepel, Joseph Ye, William D. Figg, Kyunghwa Hwang, Eun Joo Chung, Anthony Murgo, Giovanni Melillo, Yusri Elsayed, Manish Monga, Mikhail Kalnitskiy, James Zwiebel, Edward A. Sausville

From the Clinical Trials Unit, Developmental Therapeutics Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis; Clinical Pharmacology Research Core, Medical Oncology Clinical Research Unit; Center for Cancer Research; Investigational Drug Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; and Developmental Therapeutics Program, SAIC Frederick Inc, National Cancer Institute at Frederick, Frederick, MD

Address reprint requests to Edward Sausville, MD, PhD, FACP, Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland, 22 S. Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201; e-mail: esausville{at}umm.edu.

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended phase II dose, the dose-limiting toxicity, and determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic profiles of MS-275.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma were treated with MS-275 orally initially on a once daily x 28 every 6 weeks (daily) and later on once every-14-days (q14-day) schedules. The starting dose was 2 mg/m² and the dose was escalated in three- to six-patient cohorts based on toxicity assessments.

RESULTS: With the daily schedule, the MTD was exceeded at the first dose level. Preliminary PK analysis suggested the half-life of MS-275 in humans was 39 to 80 hours, substantially longer than predicted by preclinical studies. With the q14-day schedule, 28 patients were treated. The MTD was 10 mg/m² and dose-limiting toxicities were nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue. Exposure to MS-275 was dose dependent, suggesting linear PK. Increased histone H3 acetylation in peripheral-blood mononuclear-cells was apparent at all dose levels by immunofluorescence analysis. Ten of 29 patients remained on treatment for 3 months.

CONCLUSION: The MS-275 oral formulation on the daily schedule was intolerable at a dose and schedule explored. The q14-day schedule is reasonably well tolerated. Histone deacetylase inhibition was observed in peripheral-blood mononuclear-cells. Based on PK data from the q14-day schedule, a more frequent dosing schedule, weekly x 4, repeated every 6 weeks is presently being evaluated.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) regulate gene expression.^1-4 HDAC inhibitors (HDIs) have induced gene activation, cellular differentiation, cell growth arrest, and apoptosis in cancer cells.⁴ MS-275 is an orally active synthetic pyridyl carbamate HDI.⁵ In the National Cancer Institute's (NCI's) 60 cell-line screen, MS-275 displays a unique pattern of cytotoxicity with potent antiproliferative activity.⁶ Microarray analysis suggests MS-275 promotes gene expression favoring growth arrest and differentiation with significantly increased expression of antiproliferation genes such as p21 and transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor, as well as induction of the maturation marker gelsolin.^5-8 In vivo tumor volume reduction was observed in gastric, epidermoid, pancreatic, colon, ovarian, and non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) xenograft models on an oral daily x 28 schedule,⁵ as well as in myeloma, promyelocytic leukemia, and small-cell lung cancer models.⁶

Preclinical pharmacology studies indicated that MS-275 peak plasma concentration (T_max) was 30 to 40 minutes (administered orally) with a half-life (T_1/2) of approximately 1 hour, similar in rats, mice, and dogs. Approximately 85% of the drug was bioavailable with oral administration. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was myelosuppression in all species. In an oral daily x 28-day schedule, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 6 mg/m² for dogs and 18 mg/m² for rats. Adverse events were usually observed during the third and fourth week of dosing. In vitro, human bone marrow sensitivity to MS-275 was similar to rats.⁹

Based on animal data, we conducted a phase I, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study in advanced solid tumor and lymphoma patients, with the primary objectives of defining MTD, DLT, and an optimal dose and schedule for a phase II study. Other objectives were to determine safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, the ability of MS-275 to affect its target in a surrogate tissue, and antitumor activity. The results of the daily schedule and every-14-day (q14-day) schedule are included in this report.

	PATIENTS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Patients
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) pathologically confirmed malignancy that was metastatic or unresectable, and for which standard curative or palliative measures did not exist or would likely not be effective; (2) an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2, with no recent (within 2 months) weight loss of >10% of average body weight; (3) life expectancy greater than 3 months; (4) age 18 years; (5) leukocytes 3,000/µL, absolute neutrophil count 1,500/µL, platelets 100,000/µL, creatinine within normal limits or measured creatinine clearance 60 mL/min/1.73m², total bilirubin 1.5 x upper limit of normal, AST /ALT 2.5 x upper limit of normal, adequate oral intake and serum albumin > 75% of lower limit normal; and (6) able to give written consent, willing to self administer and document the doses of MS 275 as needed, and able to return to NCI for follow-up.

Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) those who had received prior anticancer therapy (chemotherapy, radiotherapy, vaccines, and hormone therapy with the exception of gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone agonists) within 4 weeks of study entry (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C, 8 weeks for UCN-01), or those who have not recovered from adverse events (reduced to grade 2 or less) as a result of agents administered more than 4 weeks earlier; (2) known brain metastases; (3) history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to MS-275; (4) uncontrolled intercurrent illness; (5) pregnant or lactating women; (6) men and women of reproductive potential without adequate contraception; (7) known HIV; (8) gastrointestinal conditions that might predispose for drug intolerability or poor drug absorption; and (9) major surgery within 21 days of study entry, intercurrent radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or hormonal therapy (except for gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone agonists).

Dosage and Dose Escalation Scheme
The initial human dosing schedule was daily oral administration for 28 days and 14-day recovery period, constituting a 42-day cycle. MS-275 was administered with food, owing to evidence of enhanced bioavailability from animal studies in the fed state. A starting dose of 2 mg/m² (1/10th rat MTD) with an accelerated dose escalation at increments of 100% and single patient per dose level was planned.

Due to unexpected toxicities, the subsequent dosing schedule was changed to once orally every 14 days. Administered in the fed state, the starting dose level was again 2 mg/m², using a modified Fibonacci dose escalation scheme (three to six patient cohorts) with a dose escalation increment of 2 mg/m² without intrapatient dose escalation.

DLT was defined as first course adverse events grade 3 nonhematologic or grade 4 hematologic toxicity. The MTD was defined as one dose level below the dose at which two of six patients experience DLT.

Dose reduction by one level was applied for the occurrence of either grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, grade 4 hematologic toxicity, persistent ( 2 weeks) grade 2 nonhematologic toxicity, or per the investigator's assessment. For dose level 1, 25%, 50%, and 75% decrease in starting dose was the order of dose reduction. No limitation for the number of dose reductions was chosen.

Safety and Efficacy Measures
At study entry, history, physical examination, laboratory studies (CBC, electrolytes, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, total and direct bilirubin, ALT, AST, alkaline phosphotase, uric acid, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and urinalysis), computed tomography scan, and chest x-ray and ECG were performed. Clinical assessments, including a physical examination and adverse event evaluation, were conducted at each follow-up. Adverse events were graded by the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (version 2.0). Computed tomography scans and staging was performed every 6 weeks for the q14-day schedule. Disease-specific staging techniques, such as bone marrow aspirate and biopsy, flow cytometry, cutaneous lesion photography, or bone scan were used as indicated. Response evaluations used the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors¹⁰ and the Cheson criteria¹¹ for lymphoma. Multiple-gated acquisition (MUGA) scans were obtained on the q14-day schedule at base line, before course 2, and at each restaging. Laboratory studies (CBC with differential, chemistry 20, prothrombin time, and partial thromboplastin time) were performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 and repeated weekly. Twenty-four-hour urine clearance, albumin, protein, uric acid, and electrolytes were performed at baseline, and on days 3 and 13.

Pharmacokinetic Studies
Blood samples (6 mL) were collected in sodium heparin tubes at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, and 96 hours after the first dose. Following initial pharmacokinetic evaluation of data obtained from the first two dose levels, the sampling also included 30 minutes and 1 hour. Samples were immediately centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C and then plasma was divided into two aliquots of at least 1 mL and frozen at –70°C until the time of analysis. Plasma samples were assayed by a specific and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay with mass-spectrometric detection.¹² The lower limit of quantitation of this assay is 0.50 ng/mL, with values for precision and accuracy of 5.58 and 11.4% relative error, respectively.¹²

Estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters for MS-275 were derived from individual concentration-time data sets by noncompartmental analysis using the software package WinNonlin version 4.0 (Pharsight Corporation, Mountain View, CA). The peak plasma concentrations and the time to peak concentrations were the observed values. The area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal method from time zero to the time of the final quantifiable concentration (AUC_tf). The AUC was then extrapolated to infinity (AUC_inf) by dividing the last measured concentration by the rate constant of the terminal phase (k), which was determined by linear-regression analysis of the final three or four time points of the log-linear concentration-time plot. The apparent oral clearance of MS-275 (CL/F) was calculated by dividing the administered dose by the observed AUC_inf and the T_1/2 was calculated by dividing 0.693 by k.

Statistical Analysis
Dose proportionality for MS-275 was assessed using a power model (ie, AUC = x dose^ß) where an ideal proportional model corresponds to ß = 1 (ie, to a model of the form AUC = x dose) and with the proportionality constant . Deviations of ß from 1 correspond to deviations from ideal dose proportionality. Interindividual differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed by the coefficient of variation (CV), expressed as the ratio of the standard deviation to the observed mean (SD/M). All pharmacokinetic data are presented as mean ± SD except where otherwise indicated. The apparent CL/F and the T_1/2 were analyzed as a function of the MS-275 dose level using the Kruskal-Wallis' one-way analysis of ranks followed by the Dunn's multiple comparison test for identifying statistically significantly different groups. Variability in parameter estimates for MS-275 between cohorts of patients that did or did not experience DLT was evaluated by a one-sided Mann-Whitney U test for differences in medians after testing for normality and heteroscedasticity. One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare mean values using a two-sided Dunnett's test. Statistical calculations were performed using the Number Cruncher Statistical System 2001 series (J. L. Hintze, Kaysville, UT). The cut-off for statistical significance was considered at P < .05.

Pharmacodynamic Analysis
Immunocytochemical analysis of acetylated histone H3 was performed on peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), which were isolated from whole blood by centrifugation on Ficoll-Paque Plus (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom), pelleted onto glass slides by cytocentrifugation, fixed in 95% ethanol/5% glacial EDTA for 1 minute and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes at room temperature, then nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubating the cells with 1% bovine serum albumin in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 1 hour at 4°C. Slides were incubated with polyclonal antiacetylated histone H3 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) for 1 hour at 4°C, washed two times for 2 minutes with PBS, then incubated at 4°C for 1 hour with Cy3-conjugated goat antirabbit immunoglobulin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and washed again with PBS. Finally, slides were incubated with 4,6-diamidoino-2-phenylindole (Sigma, St Louis, MO) for 10 minutes at room temperature, rinsed quickly with water, air-dried, mounted using SlowFade (Molecular Probes), and imaged using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope interfaced with a CCD camera (Optronics Engineering, Goleta, CA). Positive controls were prepared by exposing healthy donor PBMCs to MS-275 in vitro. Buffy coats, provided anonymously as a byproduct of whole-blood donations from paid healthy volunteer donors through an international review board–approved protocol, were centrifuged on Ficoll-Paque Plus. Mononuclear cells were depleted of monocytes by adherence to plastic for 2 hours at 37°C and incubated with MS-275 in vitro for various times and at varying drug concentrations. Cells were processed for histone hyperacetylation in the same manner as patient samples. Images of PBMCs stained for acetylated histone H3 were imported into the Openlab image analysis program (Improvision, Coventry, United Kingdom) and histone acetylation levels were assessed using the Openlab quantification software.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
General
Between April 5, 2001 and July 29, 2003, 31 patients have enrolled on the study (two on daily and 29 on the q14-day schedule). Thirty of them received MS-275 and were assessable. One patient with melanoma withdrew before receiving treatment owing to a disease complication. All patients (demographics in Table 1) had received prior therapy (median No. of prior treatments = 3): surgery (90%), prior chemotherapy (97%), radiotherapy (50%), and immunotherapy (50%).

q14-day schedule A total of 28 patients have been treated on the q14-day schedule. The DLTs of MS-275 on a q14-day schedule were anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. The MTD and recommended phase II dose of MS-275 for a q14-day schedule was 10 mg/m². As summarized in Table 2, the first patients with first course DLTs were observed at dose level 3 (6 mg/m²). After five patients tolerated dose level 4 without DLT, dose escalation continued to level 5 (10 mg/m²). One patient experienced similar DLTs at level 5 as had been seen at level 3. At dose level 6 (12 mg/ m²), two patients experienced similar DLTs.

First course adverse events observed, either probably or possibly related to MS-275, are summarized in Table 3. There were no MS-275-related first course grade 4 adverse events There was only first course grade 4 adverse event (dyspnea) observed during the study, which occurred at dose level 6 (12 mg/m²), was considered unrelated to the MS-275, and likely due to progression of metastatic mesothelioma. MS-275-induced fatigue, anorexia, nausea, and vomiting were observed as early as dose level 1 (2 mg/m²), and all were mild. With dose escalation, intensity of these toxicities gradually increased. Other less frequent drug-related toxicities included taste change, headache, diarrhea, flatulence, bloating, and reflux symptoms. Hematologic toxicities, such as thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, became more apparent at the higher dose levels (Table 3). Anemia was frequently noticed during the first course due to frequent pharmacokinetic and laboratory sampling, not related to MS-275.

Symptomatic cardiac adverse events were not observed in patients who received q14-day MS-275. In 184 ECGs performed among 28 patients, there were no statistical or clinical adverse ECG interval (HR, PR, QRS, and QTc) effects observed. There were no ST–T wave changes from the baseline. Ninety-one MUGA scans were performed. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 58.2% ± 1.62 (n = 28) at baseline and 58.7% ± 1.08 (n = 26) at follow-up. Twenty-six of 28 patients had both baseline MUGA and at least one follow-up MUGA. There were no statistically significant LVEF changes detected by the paired t test in these 26 patients (P = .526) or per individual dose level (P = .106 for 2 mg/m²; P = .350 for 4 mg/m²; P = .133 for 6 mg/m²; P = .951 for 8 mg/m²; P = .201 for 10 mg/m²; and P = .834 for 12 mg/m²).

A total of 157 courses of MS-275 were administered on the q14-day schedule (Table 2). Some cumulative adverse events caused treatment interruption with repeated MS-275 dosing. For example, grade 1 to 2 adverse events that occurred during early courses may progress to higher grades during later courses, requiring reduction in dose or dosing frequency. The dose reductions were frequent on dose levels higher than 8 mg/m², as noted in Figure 1 and Table 4. Frequent cumulative drug-related adverse events observed at or beyond course 2 were: anorexia, nausea, hypoalbuminemia, fatigue, headache, diarrhea, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and hypophosphatemia. Table 5 summarizes all drug-related occurring and grade 3 and grade 4 adverse events, occurring with a frequency of > 10% during the second course and beyond. Incidences of dose reduction after the second and subsequent courses of MS-275 are shown in Figure 1 and Table 4. On a q14-day schedule, the lowest doses (2 to 4 mg/m²) are well tolerated, with 33% of patients going on to dose reduction, while in the 6 to 10 mg/m² dose range, 50% of patients ultimately required dose reduction. One patient with metastatic NSCLC, who had stable disease at the first restaging, withdrew himself from the study on the seventh day of course 4 and elected to receive standard chemotherapy (docetaxel 50 mg/m² every 3weeks). This patient developed a grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia 8 days after receiving docetaxel, which was 16 days after the course 4 MS-275 dose. Taken together, the data of Tables 4 and 5 and Figure 1 suggest that while 10 mg/m² every 14 days was the formal MTD according to the definition of the protocol, in practice, titration of the tolerated dose to lower doses may be necessary during chronic or more frequent dosing.

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 1. Patient dose reduction on an every-14-day schedule at each dose level. Each line represents a single patient started at their enrolled dose level and all subsequent dose modifications.

View this table: [in this window] [in a new window]   Table 5. Frequent ( 10%) Adverse Events Observed During or After Course 2, Probably or Possibly Related to MS-275 (N = 23)

Responses
The treatment duration for each patient on the q14-day schedule is depicted in Figure 2. No complete or partial response was observed on the q14-day schedule. Fifteen cases of stable disease were observed with durations of 62 to 309 days. One cervical cancer patient, initially treated at 12 mg/m² had dose reduction thrice, continued on 6 mg/m² every 3 weeks after the fourth course, and sustained a 10-month period of stable disease. One NSCLC patient initially treated at 10 mg/m² also had dose reduction twice, with stable disease for 9 months. Two melanoma patients initially treated at 8 mg/m² and reduced to 6 mg/m² had stable disease for 4 and 5 months, respectively.

View larger version (11K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 2. MS-275 treatment duration for patients on an every-14-day schedule. Treatment length ranged from 11 to 309 days. Although no complete response or partial response was observed on this regimen, 15 (52%) of 27 patients had stable disease ranging from 62 to 309 days.

View larger version (18K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 3. Concentration-time profiles of oral MS-275 at dose levels ranging from 2 to 12 mg/m2 (n = 27). Data from the same dose levels were grouped and are presented as mean values (symbol) ± SE (error bar). The legend indicates each of the dose levels used.

The peak plasma concentrations, as well as the AUCs, increased in near proportion with increasing doses of MS-275 (Fig 4). The power model analysis indicated that the model poorly described the data, which estimates the parameter ß was 0.517 ± 0.172 (R² = 0.323), while linear-regression analysis indicated near dose proportionality (R² = 0.556). The mean apparent CL/F of MS-275 was not significantly dependent on drug dose (P = .071) and the estimated T_1/2 was dose independent (P = .652). A preliminary analysis of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for MS-275 suggests that drug exposure is significantly higher in patients experiencing DLTs (mean AUC, 517 ± 276 ng·h/mL, n = 4) compared with patients that had no DLT (280 ± 121 ng·h/mL, n = 23; P = .0477; Fig 5).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 4. Effect of MS-275 dose on the area under the curve (AUC) at dose levels ranging from 2 to 12 mg/m2 (n = 27). Each symbol represents data from an individual patient. Horizontal lines indicate the mean value for each dose group.

View larger version (9K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 5. Comparative MS-275 area under the curve (AUC) from patients with and without a dose-limiting toxicity. Each symbol represents data from an individual patient.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 6. MS-275 induced histone H3 hyperacetylation. (A) Upper panel: healthy donor peripheral-blood mononuclear cells ( PBMCs) incubated in vitro with MS-275 for 20 hours. Middle and lower panels: PBMCs from two patients treated with 10 mg/m2 MS-275. (B) Mean fluorescence intensity of histone H3 acetylation in patients treated with 2 mg/m2 MS-275; and (C) with 10 mg/m2 MS-275.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

Several classes of HDIs have been identified: (1) short-chain fatty acids—butyrates^33,34; (2) hydroxamic acids—trichostatin A,^34,35 suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA),² and oxamflatin³⁶; (3) cyclic tetrapeptides containing a 2-amino-8-oxo-9, 10-epoxy-decanoyl (AOE) moiety—trapoxin A³⁷; (4) cyclic peptides not containing the AOE moiety—depsipeptide and apicidin^38,39; and (5) pyridyl carbamates—MS-275.⁵ A number of HDIs induce differentiation, growth arrest, and/or apoptosis of tumor cells in vitro.^5,30-41 Some were able to inhibit growth of cancer cells in animal models.^5,42-46 A smaller number of these may be less toxic to the host and able to target tumors selectively.^5,47,48 Different HDIs appear to inhibit different HDAC subgroups. MS-275 inhibits HDAC 1, 3, 4, and 10.⁴⁹ None of the HDIs recognized to date are known to inhibit class III HDACs.⁴⁹

Our data indicate that MS-275 can be given safely on a q14-day schedule, but not on a daily schedule in the dose range explored. Most frequent toxicities, including DLTs, were fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia for the q14-day schedule. Myelosuppression became apparent among cumulative adverse events related to MS-275. Unlike the daily schedule, the q14-day schedule had neither symptomatic nor diagnostic cardiac adverse events observed. It is clear that for MS-275 used on a q14-day schedule, the low to median dose range of 2 to 4 mg/m² is well tolerated among patients. MTD of 10 mg/m² provided peak plasma concentrations on average exceeding 75 ng/mL. This is above concentrations required in vitro and in vivo to induce significant growth inhibition in many models for various primary human tumors.^5,50 Although objective responses were not observed, 15 patients had stable disease while on a q14-day schedule.

Compared with the published data of other HDIs, neither grade 4 nonhematologic toxicities nor grade 2 or higher cardiac toxicities was observed on the q14-day schedule. Similarly, frequent nausea, vomiting, and dyspepsia were complications reported for sodium butyrate,^40,52 phenylbutyrate,^33,34,53 SAHA,⁵⁴ depsipeptide,⁵⁵ and tributyrin,^56,57 suggesting that the development of an oral HDAC inhibitor may be a challenge. The tolerable and reversible adverse event profile observed on a q14-day schedule does suggest that MS-275 might be a potentially well-tolerated chemotherapeutic agent. However, the q14-day schedule may not maintain a constant inhibition of HDAC activity. Presently, a weekly dosing schedule is being studied for tolerability and tumor response.

MS-275 displays a linear, dose-independent, pharmacokinetic behavior within the dose range studied (2 to 12 mg/m²). Overall, drug absorption was rapid, and in some patients, the T_max was observed as early as 30 minutes, suggesting MS-275 might undergo rapid gastric absorption before reaching the small intestine. The disappearance of MS-275 was characterized by an apparent bi-exponential decline with a T_1/2 in plasma of approximately 50 hours, substantially longer than observed for MS-275 in laboratory animals (Schering AG, unpublished results). The basis for this long half-life in humans is possibly related to enterohepatic recirculation processes, suggested by the appearance of a second MS-275 peak around 24 to 48 hours after initial drug intake in several patients. Furthermore, the T_max observed at 24, 48, and 60 hours suggests a substantially longer normal gastrointestinal transit time. Any hypothetical recirculation is thus likely to mask the true disposition half-life of the free drug, as has been observed previously with many other agents.⁵⁸ Although other factors, including binding of the compound to plasma proteins such as human serum albumin and ₁-acid glycoprotein, may also influence the prolonged circulation of MS-275. We found that MS-275 is only 80% protein bound, and we did not find any greater binding affinity to albumin than to other proteins. Therefore, no significant clinical impact of protein binding on clearance is expected.

The observed variability in the pharmacokinetic behavior of MS-275, with an interpatient variability in the apparent CL/F of about 40%, is typical for cancer drugs administered orally.⁵⁹ Over the dose range studied, the MS-275 AUC demonstrated an apparent dose-independent behavior. Body-surface area correction did not account for the interpatient variability in clearance (38.8% v 39.5%), suggesting that body-surface area is not a significant predictor of oral MS-275 pharmacokinetics and that flat-dosing regimens might be applied without compromising overall safety profiles.

H3 acetylation in PBMCs provided a surrogate measure of HDAC inhibition after MS-275 administration. Our data demonstrate interpatient variability in the magnitude and kinetics of histone H3 hyperacetylation. Although MS-275 can induce histone H3 hyperacetylation in PBMCs in vivo, it is not clear whether histone H3 hyperacetylation is the most biologically relevant end point, nor is it known to what extent PBMCs reflect the MS-275 response in tumor cells in vivo. These should continue to be examined in relation to MS-275 and other clinically-relevant HCIs.

	Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
The following authors or their immediate family members have indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. Consultant: Edward A. Sausville, Schering AG; Research Funding: Jane B. Trepel, Schering AG. For a detailed description of these categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section of Information for Contributors found in the front of every issue.

	Acknowledgment

 
We thank our CRADA partner, Nihon-Schering, and all NCI colleagues involved with the MS-275 solid tumor trial or who supported this study. We are grateful to Dr Susan Leitman and the Department of Transfusion Medicine of the Clinical Center, NIH, for their help in obtaining and processing peripheral blood leukocytes from healthy donors. We also wish to thank Dr Robert Ryan of RFR Consulting for his critique of this manuscript.

	NOTES

 
Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this issue and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
1. Imhof A, Wolffe AP: Transcription: Gene control by targeted histone acetylation. Curr Biol 8:R422-R424, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Richon VM, Emiliani S, Verdin E, et al: A class of hybrid polar inducers of transformed cell differentiation inhibits histone deacetylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3003-3007, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Kouzarides T: Histone acetylase and deacetylase in cell proliferation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9:40-48, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Marks P, Rifkind RA, Richon VM, et al: Histone deacetylases and cancer: Causes and therapies. Nat Rev Cancer 1:194-202, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Saito A, Yamashita T, Mariko Y, et al: A synthetic inhibitor of histone deacetylase, MS-27-275, with marked in vivo anti tumor activity against human tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:4592-4597, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Sausville EA, Alley MC, Pacula-Cox CM et al: Pharmacologic evaluations of MS-275 (NSC706995), a novel benzamide structure with a unique spectrum of antitumor activity. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 42:927, 2001 (abstr 4976)

7. Park SH, Lee SR, Kim BC, et al: Transcriptional regulation of the transforming growth factor beta type II receptor gene by histone acetyltransferase and deacetylase is mediated by NF-Y in human breast cancer cells. J Biol Chem 277:5168-5174, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Lee BI, Park SH, Kim JW, et al: MS-275, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, selectively induces transforming growth factor beta type II receptor expression in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 61:931-934, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. MS-275 (NSC-706995) preclinical toxicity summary, July 3, 2000, NCI Drug Development Group

10. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, et al: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205-216, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B, et al: Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 17:1244, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Hwang K, Acharya MR, Sausville EA, et al: Determination of MS-275, a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor, in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 804:289-294, 2004[Medline]

13. Taunton J, Hassig CA, Schreiber SL: A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p. Science 272:408-411, 1996[Abstract]

14. Emiliani S, Fischle W, Van Lint C, et al: Characterization of a human RPD3 ortholog, HDAC3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:2795-2800, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Grozinger CM, Hassig CA, Schreiber SL: Three proteins define a class of human histone deacetylase related to yeast HDA1p. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:4868-4873, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Verdel A, Khochbin S: Identification of a new family of higher eukaryotic histone deacetylase. Coordinate expression of differentiation-dependent chromatin modifiers. J Biol Chem 274:2240-2245, 1999

17. Fischle W, Emiliani S, Hendzel MJ, et al: A new family of human histone deacetylase related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae HDA1p. J Biol Chem 274:11713-11720, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Miska EA, Karlson C, Langley E, et al: HDAC4 deacetylase associates with and represses the MEF2 transcription factor. EMBO J 18:5099-5107, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Kao HY, Downes M, Ordentlich P, et al: Isolation of a novel deacetylase reveals that class I and class II deacetylase promote SMRT-mediated repression. Genes Dev 14:55-66, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Hu E, Chen Z, Frederickson T, et al: Cloning and characterization of a novel human class I histone deacetylase that functions as a transcription repressor. J Biol Chem 275:15254-15264, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Verdin E, Dequiedt F, Kasler HG: Class II histone deacetylase: Versatile regulators. Trends Genet 19:286-293, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Laherty CD, Yang WM, Sun JM, et al: Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate MAD transcriptional repression. Cell 89:349-356, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Xue Y, Wong J, Moreno GT, et al: NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol Cell 2:851-861, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Zhang Y, LeRoy G, Seelig HP, et al: The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 95:279-289, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Ryan RF, Singh PB, Schultz DC, et al: KAP-1 corepressor protein interacts and colocalizes with heterochromatic and euchromatic HP1 proteins: a potential role for Kruppel-associated box-zinc finger protien in heterochromatin-mediated gene silencing. Mol Cell Biol 19:4366-4378, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Gu W, Roeder RG: Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by acetylation of the p53 C-terminal domain. Cell 90:595-606, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Boyes J, Byfield P, Nakatani Y, et al: Regulation of activity of the transcription factor GATA-1 by acetylation. Nature 396:594-598, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

28. Imhof A, Yang XJ, Ogryzko VV, et al: Acetylation of general transcription factors by histone acetyltransferases. Curr Biol 7:689-692, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

29. George P, Bali R, Annavarapu S, et al: Combination of histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 and the hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG is highly active against human CML-BC cells and AML cells with activating mutation of FLT-3. Blood 105:1768-1776, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Luo RX, Postigo AA, Dean DC: Rb interacts with histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Cell 92:463-473, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Brehm A, Miska EA, McCance DJ, et al: Retinoblastoma protein recruits histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature 391:597-601, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Plumb JA, Steele N, Finn PW, et al: Epigenetic approaches to cancer therapy. Biochem Soc Trans 32:1095-1097, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Carducci MA, Gilbert J, Bowling MK, et al: Phase I clinical and pharmacological evaluation of sodium phenylbutyrate on an 120-h infusion schedule. Clin Cancer Res 7:3047-3055, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Gilbert J, Baker SD, Bowling MK, et al: A phase I dose escalation and bioavailability study of oral sodium phenylbutyrate in patients with refractory solid tumor malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 7:2292-2300, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Tsuji N, Kobayashi M, Nagashima K, et al: A new antifungal antibiotic, trichostatin. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 29:1-6, 1976[Medline]

36. Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, et al: Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J Biol Chem 265:17174-17179, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Kim YB, Lee KH, Sugita K, et al: Oxamflatin is a novel antitumor compound that inhibits mammalian histone deacetylase. Oncogene 18:2461-2470, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

38. Kijima M, Yoshida M, Sugita K, et al: Trapoxin, an antitumor cyclic tetrapeptide, is an irreversible inhibitor of mammalian histone deacetylase. J Biol Chem 268:22429-22435, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Nakajima H, Kim YB, Terano H, et al: FR901228, a potent antitumor antibiotic, is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor. Exp Cell Res 241:126-133, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

40. Darkin-Rattray SJ, Gurnett AM, Myers RW, et al: The LAZ3 (BCL-6) oncoprotein recruits a SMRT/mSIN3A/histone deacetylase containing complex to mediate transcriptional repression. Nucleic Acids Res 26:4645-4651, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Yoshida M, Horinouchi S, Beppu T: Trichostatin and trapoxin: Novel chemical probes for the role of histone acetylation in chromatin structure and function. Bioessays 17:423-430, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]

42. Kwon HJ, Owa T, Hassing CA, et al: Depudecin induces morphological reversion of transformed fibroblasts via the inhibition of histone deacetylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:3356-3361, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Glick RD, Swendeman SL, Coffey DC, et al: Hybrid polar histone deacetylase inhibitor induces apoptosis and CD95/CD95 ligand expression in human neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 59:4392-4399, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Cohen LA, Amin S, Marks PA, et al: Chemoprevention of carcinogen-induced mammary tumorigenesis by the hybrid polar cytodifferentiation agent, suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA). Anticancer Res 19:4999-5005, 1999[Medline]

45. Butler LM, Higgins B, Fox WD, et al: Hybrid polar inhibitors of histone deacetylase suppress the growth of the CWR22 human prostate cancer xenograft. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 41: 2000 (abstr 289)

46. Desai D, El-Bayoumy K, Amin S: Chemopreventive efficacy of suberanilohydroxamic acid (SAHA), a cytodifferentiating agent, against tobacco-specific nitrosamine 4-(methylnitros-amino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1butanone (NNK)-induced lung tumorigenesis. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 40: 1999 (abstr 2396)

47. Qui L, Kelso MJ, Hansen C, et al: Anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo of selective differentiating agents containing hydroxamate. Br J Cancer 80:1252-1258, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

48. Marks PA, Richon VM, Rifkind RA: Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Inducers of differentiation or apoptosis of transformed cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1210-1216, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Tatamiya T, Saito A, Sugawara T et al., Isozyme-selective activity of the HDAC inhibitor MS-275. Proc Am Assoc Caner Res: 2004 (abstr 2451)

50. Jaboin J, Wild J, Hamidi H, et al: MS-27-275, an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, has marked in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity against pediatric solid tumors. Cancer Res 62:6108-6115, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Novogrodsky A, Dvir A, Ravid A, et al: Effect of polar organic compounds on leukemic cells. Butyrate-induced partial remission of acute myelogenous leukemia in a child. Cancer 51:9-14, 1983[CrossRef][Medline]

52. Miller AA, Kurschel E, Osieka R, et al: Clinical pharmacology of sodium butyrate in patients with acute leukemia. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23:1283-1287, 1987[CrossRef][Medline]

53. Burlina AB, Ogier H, Korall H, et al: Long-term treatment with sodium phenylbutyrate in ornithine transcarbamylase-deficient patients. Mol Genet Metab 72:351-355, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

54. Kelly WK, Richon VM, O'Connor O, et al: Phase I clinical trial of histone deacetylase inhibitor: suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid administered intravenously. Clin Cancer Res 9:3578-3588, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Sandor V, Bakke S, Robey RW, et al: Phase I trial of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, depsipeptide (FR901228, NSC 630176), in patients with refractory neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res 8:718-728, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Conley BA, Egorin MJ, Tait N, et al: Phase I study of the orally administered butyrate prodrug, tributyrin, in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 4:629-634, 1998[Abstract]

57. Edelman MJ, Bauer K, Khanwani S, et al: Clinical and pharmacologic study of tributyrin: An oral butyrate prodrug. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 51:439-444, 2003[Medline]

58. Sparreboom A, Loos WJ: Protein binding of anticancer drugs, in Figg WD, McLeod HL (eds): Handbook of Anticancer Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics. Totawa, NJ, Humana Press, 2004, pp 169-188

59. Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowinsky EK, et al: Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1883-1888, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Submitted October 8, 2004; accepted February 25, 2005.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Lane and B. A. Chabner Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy J. Clin. Oncol., November 10, 2009; 27(32): 5459 - 5468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Konsoula, H. Cao, A. Velena, and M. Jung Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics and antitumor activity of mercaptoacetamide-based histone deacetylase inhibitors Mol. Cancer Ther., October 1, 2009; 8(10): 2844 - 2851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-N. Kim, N. H. Kim, W. Lee, D.-W. Seo, and Y. K. Kim Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Induction of P-Glycoprotein Transcription Requires Both Histone Deacetylase 1 Dissociation and Recruitment of CAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein {beta} and pCAF to the Promoter Region Mol. Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 7(5): 735 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Munster, D. Marchion, E. Bicaku, M. Lacevic, J. Kim, B. Centeno, A. Daud, A. Neuger, S. Minton, and D. Sullivan Clinical and Biological Effects of Valproic Acid as a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor on Tumor and Surrogate Tissues: Phase I/II Trial of Valproic acid and Epirubicin/FEC Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 15(7): 2488 - 2496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. L.-A. Nguyen, H. Abdelbary, M. Arguello, C. Breitbach, S. Leveille, J.-S. Diallo, A. Yasmeen, T. A. Bismar, D. Kirn, T. Falls, et al. Chemical targeting of the innate antiviral response by histone deacetylase inhibitors renders refractory cancers sensitive to viral oncolysis PNAS, September 30, 2008; 105(39): 14981 - 14986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Garcia-Manero, S. Assouline, J. Cortes, Z. Estrov, H. Kantarjian, H. Yang, W. M. Newsome, W. H. Miller Jr, C. Rousseau, A. Kalita, et al. Phase 1 study of the oral isotype specific histone deacetylase inhibitor MGCD0103 in leukemia Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 981 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Gore, M. L. Rothenberg, C. L. O'Bryant, M. K. Schultz, A. B. Sandler, D. Coffin, C. McCoy, A. Schott, C. Scholz, and S. G. Eckhardt A Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of the Oral Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, MS-275, in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphomas Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4517 - 4525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Liu, H. Cheng, W. Kwan, J. M. Lubieniecka, and T. O. Nielsen Histone deacetylase inhibitors induce growth arrest, apoptosis, and differentiation in clear cell sarcoma models Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2008; 7(6): 1751 - 1761. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Bonfils, A. Kalita, M. Dubay, L. L. Siu, M. A. Carducci, G. Reid, R. E. Martell, J. M. Besterman, and Z. Li Evaluation of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of MGCD0103 from Preclinical Models to Human Using a Novel HDAC Enzyme Assay Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3441 - 3449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. L. Siu, R. Pili, I. Duran, W. A. Messersmith, E. X. Chen, R. Sullivan, M. MacLean, S. King, S. Brown, G. K. Reid, et al. Phase I Study of MGCD0103 Given As a Three-Times-Per-Week Oral Dose in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., April 20, 2008; 26(12): 1940 - 1947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Nakamura, I. Matsushita, E. Kosaka, T. Kondo, and T. Kimura Anti-arthritic effects of combined treatment with histone deacetylase inhibitor and low-intensity ultrasound in the presence of microbubbles in human rheumatoid synovial cells Rheumatology, April 1, 2008; 47(4): 418 - 424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. L. Steele, J. A. Plumb, L. Vidal, J. Tjornelund, P. Knoblauch, A. Rasmussen, C. E. Ooi, P. Buhl-Jensen, R. Brown, T.R. J. Evans, et al. A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Belinostat in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 804 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Schrump, M. R. Fischette, D. M. Nguyen, M. Zhao, X. Li, T. F. Kunst, A. Hancox, J. A. Hong, G. A. Chen, E. Kruchin, et al. Clinical and Molecular Responses in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Romidepsin Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 188 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kummar, M. Gutierrez, E. R. Gardner, E. Donovan, K. Hwang, E. J. Chung, M.-J. Lee, K. Maynard, M. Kalnitskiy, A. Chen, et al. Phase I Trial of MS-275, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Administered Weekly in Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphoid Malignancies Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5411 - 5417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Camphausen and P. J. Tofilon Inhibition of Histone Deacetylation: A Strategy for Tumor Radiosensitization J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4051 - 4056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. L. Strevel, D. J. Ing, and L. L. Siu Molecularly Targeted Oncology Therapeutics and Prolongation of the QT Interval J. Clin. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 25(22): 3362 - 3371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Di Renzo, M. L. Broccia, E. Giavini, and E. Menegola Relationship between Embryonic Histonic Hyperacetylation and Axial Skeletal Defects in Mouse Exposed to the Three HDAC Inhibitors Apicidin, MS-275, and Sodium Butyrate Toxicol. Sci., August 1, 2007; 98(2): 582 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Kato, K. Yoshimura, T. Shin, H. Verheul, H. Hammers, T. B. Sanni, B. C. Salumbides, K. Van Erp, R. Schulick, and R. Pili Synergistic In vivo Antitumor Effect of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor MS-275 in Combination with Interleukin 2 in a Murine Model of Renal Cell Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 13(15): 4538 - 4546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Keshelava, E. Davicioni, Z. Wan, L. Ji, R. Sposto, T. J. Triche, and C. P. Reynolds Histone Deacetylase 1 Gene Expression and Sensitization of Multidrug-Resistant Neuroblastoma Cell Lines to Cytotoxic Agents by Depsipeptide J Natl Cancer Inst, July 18, 2007; 99(14): 1107 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Nencioni, J. Beck, D. Werth, F. Grunebach, F. Patrone, A. Ballestrero, and P. Brossart Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Affect Dendritic Cell Differentiation and Immunogenicity Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 3933 - 3941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Munster, D. Marchion, E. Bicaku, M. Schmitt, J. H. Lee, R. DeConti, G. Simon, M. Fishman, S. Minton, C. Garrett, et al. Phase I Trial of Histone Deacetylase Inhibition by Valproic Acid Followed by the Topoisomerase II Inhibitor Epirubicin in Advanced Solid Tumors: A Clinical and Translational Study J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2007; 25(15): 1979 - 1985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Gojo, A. Jiemjit, J. B. Trepel, A. Sparreboom, W. D. Figg, S. Rollins, M. L. Tidwell, J. Greer, E. J. Chung, M.-J. Lee, et al. Phase 1 and pharmacologic study of MS-275, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, in adults with refractory and relapsed acute leukemias Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2781 - 2790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Kato, B. C. Salumbides, X.-F. Wang, D. Z. Qian, S. Williams, Y. Wei, T. B. Sanni, P. Atadja, and R. Pili Antitumor effect of the histone deacetylase inhibitor LAQ824 in combination with 13-cis-retinoic acid in human malignant melanoma Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2007; 6(1): 70 - 81. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-H. Lee, J.-H. Park, Y. Jung, J.-H. Kim, H.-S. Jong, T.-Y. Kim, and Y.-J. Bang Histone deacetylase inhibitor enhances 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity by down-regulating thymidylate synthase in human cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 3085 - 3095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Saunders and E. Verdin Ornithine decarboxylase activity in tumor cell lines correlates with sensitivity to cell death induced by histone deacetylase inhibitors. Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2006; 5(11): 2777 - 2785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Schrump, M. R. Fischette, D. M. Nguyen, M. Zhao, X. Li, T. F. Kunst, A. Hancox, J. A. Hong, G. A. Chen, V. Pishchik, et al. Phase I Study of Decitabine-Mediated Gene Expression in Patients with Cancers Involving the Lungs, Esophagus, or Pleura. Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 12(19): 5777 - 5785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Jacobsen Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma, T-/Null-Cell Type Oncologist, July 1, 2006; 11(7): 831 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Piekarz, A. R. Frye, J. J. Wright, S. M. Steinberg, D. J. Liewehr, D. R. Rosing, V. Sachdev, T. Fojo, and S. E. Bates Cardiac Studies in Patients Treated with Depsipeptide, FK228, in a Phase II Trial for T-Cell Lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 12(12): 3762 - 3773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. W. Robey, Z. Zhan, R. L. Piekarz, G. L. Kayastha, T. Fojo, and S. E. Bates Increased MDR1 Expression in Normal and Malignant Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells Obtained from Patients Receiving Depsipeptide (FR901228, FK228, NSC630176) Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1547 - 1555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. V. Simonini, L. M. Camargo, E. Dong, E. Maloku, M. Veldic, E. Costa, and A. Guidotti From The Cover: The benzamide MS-275 is a potent, long-lasting brain region-selective inhibitor of histone deacetylases PNAS, January 31, 2006; 103(5): 1587 - 1592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ryan, Q. C. Articles by Sausville, E. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ryan, Q. C. Articles by Sausville, E. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?