This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thewes, B. Articles by Friedlander, M.L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thewes, B. Articles by Friedlander, M.L. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Fertility- and Menopause-Related Information Needs of Younger Women With a Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer

From the Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick; Department of Psychology, Macquarie University; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital; Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital; Australia Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney; Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne; and Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia

Address reprint requests to Belinda Thewes, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia; e-mail: b.thewes{at}unsw.edu.au

	ABSTRACT

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
PURPOSE: The use of chemotherapy and endocrine therapies in the treatment of premenopausal women carries with it reproductive and gynecologic implications that young women may find distressing and discordant with plans for childbearing. This multicenter study aimed to investigate fertility- and menopause-related information needs among young women with a diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-eight women with a diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer who were aged 40 years or younger at diagnosis and who were 6 to 60 months after diagnosis were entered onto the trial. Participants completed a mailed self-report questionnaire that included a purposely designed fertility- and menopause-related information needs survey and standardized measures of distress, anxiety, quality of life, menopausal symptoms, and information-seeking style.

RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of participants discussed fertility-related issues with a health professional as part of their breast cancer treatment, and 86% discussed menopause-related issues. Consultation with a fertility or menopause specialist was the most preferred method of obtaining this information. Receiving fertility-related information was rated as being significantly more important than receiving menopause-related information at time of diagnosis (P < .001) and at treatment decision making (P = .058). Receiving menopause-related information was rated as being significantly more important than receiving fertility-related information during adjuvant treatment (P < .05), at completion of adjuvant treatment (P < .001), and during follow-up (P < .001). Common questions, sources of information, and correlates of perceived importance were identified.

CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that younger women have unmet needs for fertility- and menopause-related information and provide preliminary empirical data to guide the development of better fertility- and menopause-related patient education materials for younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer.

	INTRODUCTION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Each year, approximately 10,000 women are diagnosed with breast cancer in Australia. Approximately 27% of these women are premenopausal at diagnosis, and 6% to 7% are less than 40 years of age at the time of their diagnosis.^1,2 In the United States, approximately 12,600 women aged 40 years or younger are diagnosed with breast cancer each year.³

All patients who are faced with decisions about treatment for cancer need to weigh the benefits and side effects of treatment. Compared with postmenopausal women, premenopausal women with breast cancer considering adjuvant therapies may need to consider additional potential side effects. Chemotherapy causes direct toxicity to the ovaries and may cause either temporary amenorrhea or early menopause.^4-8 Rates of amenorrhea for individual chemotherapy regimes vary according to the chemotherapeutic agents used and a woman's age at the time of her treatment.^9,10 Menses and ovulation may continue during treatment with tamoxifen, and ovarian suppression induced by goserelin is potentially reversible. For those who might regain fertility after treatment, there is a need to delay childbearing during treatment with tamoxifen and/or goserelin.^6,11,12 Surgical oophorectomy, which causes a rapid and permanent cessation of menses, is a treatment option for some premenopausal breast cancer patients with hormone receptor–positive disease.¹³

The experience of an early menopause is associated with a loss of childbearing capacity and may be accompanied by hot flashes, vaginal dryness, sexual dysfunction, and prolonged exposure to the risks associated with menopause, including cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, genitourinary problems, weight gain, psychological distress, and possibly cognitive impairment.^6,11,12,14 There is some evidence that the symptoms of a treatment-induced early menopause may be experienced as more debilitating than those associated with a natural menopause because of a more rapid decline in estrogen levels.⁴ Furthermore, some women may experience psychological side effects of an early menopause, which may include a sense of loss and/or isolation from one's peers or feeling cheated by one's body.¹⁵

More women are delaying childbearing for personal, educational, or professional reasons,¹⁶ and breast cancer in women who are childless at diagnosis is becoming more common. Pregnancy after a diagnosis of breast cancer is an option for some women who survive the breast cancer and remain fertile. Currently, the best available evidence suggests that pregnancy after breast cancer does not increase a woman's risk of developing a recurrence following a diagnosis of early breast cancer, and it may even confer a protective effect.^17,18 Recent advances in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) may help women who experience infertility problems as a consequence of their adjuvant treatment to have children after a diagnosis of breast cancer.^7,19,20 However, there is often pressure for patients to make decisions about the use of ARTs quickly to minimize any possible delay to adjuvant therapy. In light of these factors, adequately informing and educating premenopausal breast cancer patients in a timely fashion about the potential of premature menopause and infertility after treatment for breast cancer is becoming increasingly important.

Many studies have reported that breast cancer patients require more information than their doctors provide²¹ and that information needs are one of the greatest areas of unmet psychosocial need for cancer patients.^22,23 In general, patients who are better informed experience greater emotional, social, and physical well-being.²⁴ They also report greater compliance²⁵ with treatment and better clinical outcomes,²⁶ quality of life,²⁴ and satisfaction with care.²⁷ Compared with older breast cancer patients, younger breast cancer patients have been found to prefer greater involvement in treatment decision making, and their needs for information may differ.²⁸

Although numerous studies have researched the general information needs of cancer patients and survivors, few studies have specifically examined information needs in relation to reproductive issues. Only one previous study has specifically examined the fertility-related information needs of premenopausal women treated for breast cancer. This Web-based survey of 657 survivors of stage 0 to III breast cancer who were members of an internet-based survivors group found that greater concern about fertility issues was related to a desire for children at time of diagnosis, number of prior pregnancies, and prior difficulty conceiving.²⁹ Twenty-nine percent of women in this study said that fertility issues influenced their treatment decision making, and 51% reported that their fertility-related information needs were adequately met. However, this sample included a self-selected group of participants, and the response rate to this survey was low (38%).²⁹ Therefore, it is unclear to what extent their findings are representative of the needs of younger breast cancer patients more generally.

The present study aimed to quantitatively explore fertility- and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer. To provide some exploratory data on these issues, we recently undertook a qualitative study to describe the fertility- and menopause-related information needs of 24 young women with early-stage breast cancer.³⁰ On the basis of the results of the preliminary qualitative study, it was hypothesized that (1) fertility-related information would be rated as more important at the time of treatment decision making, and menopause-related information would be rated as more important at the end of treatment and (2) higher perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information would be associated with younger age at diagnosis, having plans for childbearing at time of diagnosis, no children at diagnosis, better prognosis, higher levels of menopausal symptoms, adjuvant endocrine therapy, lower quality of life, and higher levels of distress.

	PATIENTS AND METHODS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Patients
Participants for this study were recruited through 12 urban and seven rural oncology clinics in three Australian states. Consecutive patients who met the eligibility criteria for this study were identified by searching the institutional databases. Women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer who were aged 18 to 40 years at the time of diagnosis and who had been diagnosed 6 months to a maximum of 5 years previously were invited to participate in the study. To be eligible, participants also needed to have been treated with adjuvant systemic therapies involving either chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapies (plus or minus radiotherapy). For the purposes of this study, endocrine therapy was defined as tamoxifen, goserelin, or surgical oophorectomy. Women were excluded from the study if they had metastatic disease, were unable to give informed consent, or were not literate in English.

Procedure
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the participating hospital and university human ethics review committees. An introductory letter and a detailed information sheet were sent by the treating medical or radiation oncologists to women eligible to participate. Women who did not wish to be telephoned had the option of leaving a message on a free-of-charge telephone number indicating their wish to decline participation. Ten to 14 days after posting invitation letters, women were telephoned by a member of the research team to answer any questions about the study, including issues of informed consent, and to determine their interest in participating. The questionnaire package, consent form, and a reply prepaid envelope were mailed out from a central research office. Reminder calls were made as required.

Measures
Data were collected on age at diagnosis, marital status, parity, attitudes towards childbearing, educational level, current menopausal status, time since diagnosis, and details of treatment. The following clinical information was gathered from participants' medical records: date of diagnosis, nodal status, stage, tumor grade, menopausal status at diagnosis, and type of surgery and/or treatment. On the basis of the results of our qualitative study, the research team developed a questionnaire, which included items in the following domains.

Format and sources of fertility- and menopause-related information received. Eight items were included to assess whether participants had received fertility- and menopause-related information, the sources of information, whether the patient or health professional had initiated fertility- and menopause-related discussions, and what format (if any) the information given was provided in.

Perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information. One item each asked participants to rate the current perceived importance of receiving fertility- and menopause-related information on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important).

Fertility- and menopause-related questions. Fourteen common fertility-related and 11 common menopause-related questions were identified based on the results of the preliminary qualitative study. In response to each of these common questions, participants were asked to indicate the following: (1) I never had this question because it was not relevant to my situation; (2) I had this question but it was answered for me; or (3) I still have this question, it has not yet been answered.

Preferred timing of fertility- and menopause-related information. Participants were asked to rate the perceived importance of receiving fertility-related and menopause-related information at five different time points across the treatment continuum (time of diagnosis, time of treatment decision making, during adjuvant treatment, at completion of adjuvant treatment, and during follow-up care) on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all important) to 5 (extremely important).

Preferred format of fertility- and menopause-related information. Participants were presented with nine commonly used patient education materials or communication strategies and a standard definition. Participants were then asked to rank how useful they believed each strategy or education material would be (or would have been) in their situation (1 = most useful, and 9 = least useful).

Preferences for general information and involvement in decision making. The amount of information that participants expected and their preferred level of involvement in treatment decision making was assessed using an item adapted from the Cassileth Information Styles Questionnaire.³¹ In this item, participants were asked to rate the amount of information they preferred on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (as little as possible) to 5 (as much as possible).

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The HADS is a 14-item self-report measure that includes seven items each assessing depression and anxiety symptoms.³² Respondents are asked to rate the presence of symptoms on a 4-point scale. The HADS is widely used and has been found to have stable factor structure,³³ high internal consistency, and good sensitivity and specificity in oncology settings.^34,35

Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory–Short Form. The Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory–Short Form is a brief six-item measure of state or situational anxiety that has demonstrated reliability and validity.³⁶

The Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS). The GCS is a 21-item menopausal symptom rating scale. The GCS is comprised of core menopausal symptoms identified by reviewing the findings of seven factor-analytic studies. The scale has good reliability and validity³⁷ and has been widely used in studies of menopausal women. Participants are asked to indicate the extent to which they are currently bothered by each menopausal symptom. Each symptom is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (extremely).

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast (FACT-B), Version 3. The FACT-B is a 44-item validated and widely used breast cancer–specific multidimensional quality-of-life measure. It includes physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, relationship with doctor, and breast cancer concern subscales. Participants endorse the presence of symptoms using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores indicate better quality of life. The FACT-B has good psychometric properties³⁸ and is widely used in clinical trials.³⁹

Statistical Analyses
The data were initially explored using descriptive statistics and graphs. The distribution of variables relating to the perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information at different time points was skewed. Therefore, Friedman tests were initially used to explore whether there were overall differences between means at the selected time points. This was followed by a series of Wilcoxon tests, which compared perceived importance of fertility- versus menopause-related information at each time point. A second set of Wilcoxon tests compared the highest mean importance rating with all other time points for fertility-related information and menopause-related information. For the analyses of correlates of current perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information, associations between age, time since diagnosis, menopausal symptoms, quality of life, measures of distress, information preference style, stage, nodal status, type of adjuvant therapy, attitudes towards childbearing, number of children at diagnosis, and educational level, on the one hand, and perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information, on the other hand, were explored in two separate sets of bivariate tests. Because of the skewed distribution of the perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information variables, nonparametric tests, including Spearman's correlation coefficients and Mann-Whitney U tests, were used for continuous predictor variables and dichotomous predictor variables, respectively. As anticipated, there were significant correlations between independent variables; therefore, an ordinal logistic regression analysis was carried out to explore whether significant correlates made a unique contribution to the variance of the dependent variable in the presence of all other variables. According to methods described by Hosmer and Lemeshow,⁴⁰ all variables that met a significance criterion of P .25 in bivariate tests were entered into a full ordinal logistic regression model. Parity at diagnosis, stage of disease, and having endocrine therapy were entered as control variables in all full ordinal regression models. Independent variables or control variables with the highest P value (least significance) were then extracted from the model one variable at a time in subsequent models until a final model was constructed that contained only those variables that maintained a P .05 in the presence of other remaining variables. Because this study was exploratory in nature and a priori there were no quantitative data available to support the selection of control variables, the same criteria for removal from ordinal logistic regression models were applied to both control variables and other independent variables entered into the initial model.

	RESULTS

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Participation Rate
Three hundred fifteen women met the eligibility criteria. Forty women could not to be contacted because of out of date contact details, 25 women refused participation, and 32 women initially consented to participate but did not return a questionnaire or chose to withdraw from the study. When volunteered by the participant, reasons for nonparticipation were recorded, and the reasons included being too busy, finding fertility too much of an emotional issue to think about, and having experienced other recent cancer-related life events (eg, death of parent from cancer). The final sample consisted of 228 participants. Excluding those women who could not be contacted, a total of 275 women were approached to be in the study, and the overall participation rate was 83%.

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics
Demographic and clinical characteristics data of the sample are listed in Table 1. The mean age of the sample at diagnosis was 35.3 years (range, 20 to 40 years; standard deviation, 4.0 years). Approximately three quarters of the women (78.9%) were married or in de facto relationships at diagnosis. More than half the sample had post–senior high school education (65.8%) compared with 37% of women in the general Australian population.⁴¹ Approximately one third of the patients (31.6%) had no children at the time of their diagnosis. Most participants (57.5%) had node-negative disease, and the majority was treated with chemotherapy (87.7%). More than half of the sample received adjuvant tamoxifen (52.2%), and a small proportion received adjuvant goserelin (16.7%).

View larger version (30K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig 1. Preferences for timing of fertility- and menopause-related information (N = 228). (*) Likert scale: 0 = not at all important to 5 = extremely important. Rx, treatment.

Correlates of Current Perceived Importance of Menopause-Related Information
The results from bivariate analyses in Table 6 show that women who experienced more menopausal symptoms (r = 0.200, P = .003), women with poorer quality of life as assessed by the FACT-B (r = –0.202, P = .002), women with higher levels of psychological distress (r = 0.131, P = .048), women with higher levels of anxiety symptoms (r = 0.138, P = .038), and women who prefer more information (r = 0.138, P = .038) were significantly more likely to rate menopause-related information as extremely important. Having treatment including endocrine therapy (Mann-Whitney U = 2,686.50, z = –3.78, P = .012), having plans for childbearing at diagnosis (U = 2,686.50, z = –3.78, P = .015), having no children at time of diagnosis (U = 4,176.5, z = –3.052, P = .043), and being single (U = 2,686.50, z = –3.78, P = .031) were also variables that were significantly associated with higher perceived importance of menopause-related information in bivariate tests.

	DISCUSSION

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Consistent with the results of other studies of cancer patients' information needs,^21,29,42 our study has shown that younger women want to be well informed about the impact of adjuvant therapy on fertility and menopausal status. Seventy-one percent of women in this sample reported that they had discussed fertility-related information with a health professional as part of their breast cancer treatment. This percentage is similar to the 72% of participants who had discussed fertility issues in a recent Web-based surveyof fertility-related information provision conducted by researchers in the United States.²⁹ Our data also suggest that menopause-related issues are discussed slightly more frequently, with 86% of participants having reported menopause-related discussions as part of their breast cancer treatment. However, the rate at which fertility- and menopause-related issues were discussed in this study may be inflated because the women included in this sample were more educated than the general population.

Of concern is that almost a quarter of the women in this sample who were aged 40 years or less at diagnosis reported no discussion of fertility issues. Although this figure may have been influenced by recall, it points to unmet needs for fertility-related information among this age group. This study has also identified the most common fertility- and menopause-related questions among young women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer. A more thorough appreciation of questions about these topics will assist clinicians to better meet their patients' information needs. However, the next vital step is the development of better information tools about these issues. In Australia, there is currently a dearth of comprehensive written information tools about the impact of adjuvant treatment on fertility and menopausal status for young women with breast cancer. However, internationally, there have been some recent efforts to improve information provision about these issues, as well as an increase in the amount of Web-based information available about these matters, and several projects to develop information tools are ongoing. In the United States, an advocacy group, Fertile Hope, has been established to help people facing infertility as a consequence of cancer treatment. Interested readers should consult the Appendix for examples of fertility- and menopause-related information Web sites.

Our data suggests that the majority of patients receive verbal information only about fertility- and menopause-related issues, despite tools such as a decision aid or question prompt sheets being highly ranked options. Although there was strong interest in an information video, given the rapidly evolving science in these areas, audio-visual tools may not prove to be cost-effective measures because of the cost of updating them. Interestingly, receiving fertility- and menopause-related information in a support group was the least preferred format, perhaps reflecting the highly individual nature of these issues.

Women in this sample consulted a variety of health professionals to gather fertility- and menopause-related information; they most commonly consulted medical oncologists and surgeons for fertility-related information and medical oncologists and general practitioners for menopause-related information. Better patient education strategies about these issues should be coupled with professional development opportunities targeted at these groups. One interesting finding was participants' interest in receiving fertility- and menopause-related information from a fertility specialist or gynecologist, despite only 24% to 29% of women in our sample accessing these professionals. In Australia, it is not currently routine practice for a multidisciplinary breast clinic to include a fertility specialist or gynecologist; however, this model of care is currently under investigation at one Australian hospital (C. Saunders, personal communication, June 2004). Our results suggest that, from the patient's perspective, there may be an interest in such multidisciplinary approaches. However, barriers to widespread adoption of a multidisciplinary approach that includes gynecology experts include the following: the lack of knowledge that both medical oncologists and fertility specialists/gynecologists have in each other's discipline, the often pressing need to commence adjuvant treatment as soon as possible after surgery, and the limited access that women outside metropolitan cities have to fertility/gynecology specialists. If a more collaborative approach between fertility/gynecology services and oncology were offered to women in cities, then advances in telemedicine may be able to improve access for women in regional areas to these services.

Our results also suggest that the needs of women with breast cancer for fertility- and menopause-related information may change over time, which is consistent with other studies that have examined timing of cancer patients' information needs.^43,44 Women in the present sample rated fertility- and menopause-related information as important across the treatment continuum. However, the need for fertility-related information significantly increased at time of treatment decision making and again in follow-up, and the need for menopause-related information increased in the later phases of treatment and follow-up care. Our clinical experience suggests that many patients currently only receive fertility-related information when they are choosing between adjuvant treatments. It is not common for this issue to be revisited after completion of therapy. Clinicians should provide information about the impact of adjuvant treatment on fertility status in a timely fashion before treatment begins, so that women can explore fertility-preserving options. However, our data suggest that clinicians should be prepared to actively revisit fertility issues at the end of treatment and during follow-up care. Menopause-related information should mainly be explored after completion of treatment.

This study also identified correlates of current perceived importance of fertility- and menopause-related information. Understanding which groups of patients think fertility- and menopause-related information is important is critical because it will enable clinicians to educate those most in need of the information. Correlates of perceived importance of fertility-related information were being childless at diagnosis, having plans for children at diagnosis, and having a tendency to prefer more information. Correlates of perceived importance of menopause-related information were having plans for children at diagnosis, having a poor quality of life, and having received endocrine therapy. These findings suggest that doctors should routinely ask women of this age group about plans for childbearing and their preferred amount of information when discussing fertility. Women treated with endocrine therapy and those with poorer quality-of-life outcomes may require more information about menopausal issues. Interestingly, there were no significant associations in multivariate models between other variables that were hypothesized to influence perceived importance of receiving fertility- and menopause-related information including prognostic indicators, age, or psychological distress. Clinicians should not assume that women who are younger or have better prognoses are more interested in exploring fertility issues.

ARTs are a rapidly evolving science. A case study of the first live birth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue has recently been published,⁴⁵ suggesting that cryopreservation may be a more widely available fertility preservation method for young women undergoing treatment for cancer in the future. There are some examples of innovative interventions to preserve fertility in young women treated for cancer currently underway; for example, a randomized controlled trial aims to explore whether concurrent chemotherapy and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment preserves ovarian function compared with standard chemotherapy.⁴⁶ Although there is currently only limited level 1 evidence to guide the management of menopausal symptoms in breast cancer patients, this body of research is growing. Breast cancer patients are making decisions about strategies to manage menopausal symptoms every day and often in the absence of sufficient evidence regarding efficacy. It is imperative that patients understand the issues and make informed choices based on the best available evidence and that the information is given when it is most needed.

Further prospective research is needed to explore the association between providing fertility- and menopause-related information and psychological adjustment. It is possible that some women are willing to trade-off survival with the ability to maintain fertility; however, we are unable to ascertain this with the present data because all women in the current sample had participated in adjuvant therapy. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between fertility- and menopause-related information provision and patients' choice of adjuvant therapy.

It should be acknowledged in considering these findings that participants in this study were reporting retrospectively about their needs and experiences on a number of items, and thus, their responses may have been influenced by recall bias. Given that this study was the first of its kind, we had concerns that surveying women about these issues prospectively in the absence of providing information might elicit distress or influence treatment decision making. The present sample only included women who were experienced with treatments. It is unlikely that the present findings reflect the attitudes of women who refuse treatments because of the potential impact of treatment on their fertility. Further research of this group, even though they may comprise only a small minority of patients, is warranted. Our findings support the need for better patient education materials about the impact of adjuvant treatment on fertility and menopausal status and for more widelyavailable multidisciplinary approaches to education that include fertility or menopause specialists.

	Appendix

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Examples of Web-based resources for fertility- and menopause-related information for young women with breast cancer: (1) Fertile Hope is a United States–based organization dedicated to helping cancer patients faced with infertility, www.fertilehope.org/; (2) National Breast Cancer Centre (Australia) has prepared "Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management and Support of Younger Women with Breast Cancer," which includes sections pertaining to fertility and menopause issues, http://www.nbcc.org.au/bestpractice/youngerwomen/index.html; (3) BreastCancer.Org provides information to women with breast cancer and their families and has pages dedicated to fertility, pregnancy, and adoption issues and coping with menopausal symptoms, http://www.breastcancer.org/fertility_pregnancy_adoption.html and http://www.breastcancer.org/bey_cope_meno_nTherap.html; (4) The Lavender Trust (United Kingdom) provides information and support to women with breast cancer; its Web site has pages dedicated to young women and fertility issues, http://www.breastcancercare.org.uk/Breastcancer/Youngerwomenandbreastcancer/Fertilityissues; and (5) the Fertility and Cancer Project is a research project funded by the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation, which aims to determine the impact of providing Web-based educational information and online resources for young women with breast cancer who have fertility concerns; all of the educational materials are available online at http://www.fertilityandcancerproject.org/.

	Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
Althoguh all authors have completed the disclosure declaration, the following authors or their immediate family members have indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.

Authors Employment Leadership Consultant Stock Honoraria Research Funds Testimony Other B. Thewes AstraZeneca (B) B. Meiser AstraZeneca (B) R. Baber Pfizer (A); Organo (A); Wyeth-Ayerst (A) M. L. Friedlander AstraZeneca (B)

Dollar Amount Codes (A) < $10,000 (B) $10,000-99,999 (C) $100,000 (N/R) Not Required

	NOTES

 
Supported by a National Breast Cancer Foundation "National Association of Women in Superannuation Post-Graduate Scholarship" (B.T.), a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Public Health Fellowship (B.M.), and an unrestricted educational grant-in-aid from AstraZeneca.

This work was undertaken as part of a conjoint appointment (M.L.F. and B.M.) at the Prince of Wales Hospital Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.

	REFERENCES

TOP ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION PATIENTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Appendix Authors' Disclosures of... REFERENCES

 
1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Cancer Data Registry. Canberra, Australia, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2003

2. National Health and Medical Research Council National Breast Cancer Centre: Breast Cancer in Australian Women 1921-1994. Canberra, Australia, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 1997

3. American Cancer Society: Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2003-2004. Atlanta, Georgia, American Cancer Society, Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance Research, 2004

4. Burnstein H, Winer E: Primary care: Primary care for survivors of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 343: 1086-1094, 2000[Free Full Text]

5. Lin E, Aikin J, Good B: Premature menopause after cancer treatment. Cancer Pract 7: 114-121, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Goodwin P, Ennis M, Pritchard K, et al: Risk of menopause during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 17: 2365-2370, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Garcia J: Fertility after cancer treatment, in Trimble E, Trimble CL (eds): Cancer Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1999

8. Saunders C, Baum M: Breast cancer and pregnancy: A review. J R Soc Med 86: 162-165, 1993[Medline]

9. Bines J, Oleseke D, Cobleigh M: Ovarian function in pre-menopausal women treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 14: 1718-1729, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Burnstein H, Winer E: Reproductive issues, in Harris H (ed): Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, 2000, pp 1051-1059

11. Moore H: Managing menopause after breast cancer: Balancing risks and benefits. Cleve Clin J Med 68: 243-248, 2001[Medline]

12. Bender C, Paraska K, Sereika S, et al: Cognitive function and reproductive hormones in adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: A critical review. J Pain Symptom Manage 21: 407-424, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Rebbeck T, Lynch H, Narod SL, et al: Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of the BRCA1 and BRCA 2 mutation. N Engl J Med 346: 1616-1622, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Ganz P, Rowland J, Desmond K, et al: Life after breast cancer: Understanding women's health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 16: 501-514, 1998[Abstract]

15. Abernethy K: Dealing with the devastating effects of early menopause. Community Nurse 3: 48-49, 1997

16. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Births, Australia 1999. Canberra, Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2000

17. Gelber S, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, et al: Effect of pregnancy on overall survival after the diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19: 1671-1675, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Kroman N, Jensen MB, Melbye M, et al: Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment? Lancet 350: 319-322, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Abir R, Fisch B, Raz A, et al: Preservation of fertility in women undergoing chemotherapy: Current approach and future perspectives. J Assist Reprod Genet 15: 469-477, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Blumenfeld Z, Avivi I, Ritter M, et al: Preservation of fertility in and ovarian function and minimising chemotherapy-induced gonadotoxicity in young women. J Soc Gynaecol Invest 6: 229-239, 1999

21. Jefford M, Tattersall M: Informing and involving patients in their own care. Lancet Oncol 3: 629-637, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Foot G, Sanson-Fisher R: Measuring unmet needs of people living with cancer. Cancer Forum 19: 131-135, 1995

23. Whelan T, Mohide E, Willan A, et al: The supportive care needs of newly diagnosed cancer patients attending a regional centre. Cancer 80: 1518-1524, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P, et al: Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ 309: 448, 1994[Free Full Text]

25. Haynes RB, McKibbon K, Kannani R: Systematic review of randomised interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet 348: 383-386, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J, et al: Expanding patient involvement in care: Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med 102: 520-528, 1985

27. Weiss SM, Wengert PA Jr, Martinez EM, et al: Patient satisfaction with decision-making for breast cancer therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 3: 285-289, 1996[Abstract]

28. Degner L, Kristjanson L, Bowman D, et al: Information needs and decisional preferences in women diagnosed with breast cancer. JAMA 277: 1485-1492, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, et al: Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22: 4174-4183, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Thewes B, Meiser B, Rickard J, et al: The fertility- and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of breast cancer: A qualitative study. Psychooncology 12: 500-511, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Cassileth B, Zupkis R, Sutton-Smith K, et al: Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 92: 832-836, 1980

32. Zigmond A, Snaith R: The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67: 361-370, 1983[Medline]

33. Moorey S, Greer S, Watson M, et al: The factor structure and factor stability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with cancer. Br J Psychiatry 158: 255-259, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Zabora J: Screening procedures for psychological distress, in Holland JC, Breitbart W, Jacobsen PB, et al (eds): Psycho-Oncology. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1998

35. Ibbotson T, Maguire P, Selby P, et al: Screening for anxiety and depression in cancer patients: The effects of disease and treatment. Eur J Cancer 30A: 37-40, 1994

36. Marteau TM, Bekker H: The development of a six item short form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol 31: 301-306, 1992

37. Greene J: Constructing a standard climacteric scale. Maturitas 29: 25-31, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

38. Brady MJ, Cella D, Fei M, et al: Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality of life instrument. J Clin Oncol 15: 974-986, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Fallowfield LJ, Leaity S, Howell A, et al: Assessment of quality of life in women undergoing hormonal therapy for breast cancer: Validation of an endocrine symptom subscale for the FACT B. Breast Cancer Res Treat 55: 189-199, 1999[Medline]

40. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S: Applied Logistic Regression (ed 2). Toronto, Ontario, Canada, John Wiley and Sons, 2000

41. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Women's Year Book. Canberra, Australia, Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1997

42. Jenkins V, Fallowfield LJ, Saul J: Information needs of cancer patients from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer 84: 48-51, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

43. Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al: Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA 277: 1485-1493, 1997

44. Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, et al: The dynamics of change: Cancer patients' preferences for information involvement and support. Ann Oncol 8: 857-863, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Dannez J, Dolmans M, Demylle D, et al: Livebirth after orthotopic transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue. Lancet 364: 1405-1410, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

46. South Western Oncology Group: Phase III randomized study of goserelin for the reduction of premature ovarian failure in women with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-negative breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy SWOG S0230. www.ncinihgov/clinicaltrials

Submitted November 30, 2004; accepted April 7, 2005.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Demeestere, P. Simon, S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, and Y. Englert Orthotopic and heterotopic ovarian tissue transplantation Hum. Reprod. Update, May 27, 2009; (2009) dmp021v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Tschudin and J. Bitzer Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases Hum. Reprod. Update, May 10, 2009; (2009) dmp015v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Hickey, M. Peate, C.M. Saunders, and M. Friedlander Breast cancer in young women and its impact on reproductive function Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2009; 15(3): 323 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Partridge Fertility Preservation: A Vital Survivorship Issue for Young Women With Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., June 1, 2008; 26(16): 2612 - 2613. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Pant, M. B. Landon, M. Blumenfeld, W. Farrar, and C. L. Shapiro Treatment of Breast Cancer With Trastuzumab During Pregnancy J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2008; 26(9): 1567 - 1569. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Schover Premature Ovarian Failure and Its Consequences: Vasomotor Symptoms, Sexuality, and Fertility J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2008; 26(5): 753 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. H. Partridge Fertility Preservation Considerations in Young Women with Breast Cancer ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2008; 2008(1): 36 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Demeestere, P. Simon, S. Emiliani, A. Delbaere, and Y. Englert Fertility Preservation: Successful Transplantation of Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue in a Young Patient Previously Treated for Hodgkin's Disease Oncologist, December 1, 2007; 12(12): 1437 - 1442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Nakayama and N. T. Ueno American Society of Clinical Oncology Recommendations on Fertility Preservation Should Be Implemented Regardless of Disease Status or Previous Treatments J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5334 - 5335. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay Fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer therapy. Oncologist, May 1, 2006; 11(5): 422 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thewes, B. Articles by Friedlander, M.L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thewes, B. Articles by Friedlander, M.L. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?