|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 27 (September 20), 2005: pp. 6796 © 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1402
Does Neoadjuvant/Adjuvant Chemotherapy Change the Natural History of Classic Invasive Lobular Carcinoma?Centro Paulista de Oncologia and Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil To the Editor:
In the January 1, 2005 issue of the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cristofanilli et al1 reported on a retrospective analysis of the role of primary chemotherapy in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the classic type (ILC). Based on the presented data, these patients tended to have a statistically significant higher stage and an increased chance of lymph node involvement at diagnosis, as well as a significant higher frequency of hormone-responsive disease and lower nuclear grade. These patients had significant lower rates of pathologic complete response (3% v 15%; P <.001) and a higher incidence of residual lymph node disease ( In fact it may be time for the oncology community to consider a prospective randomized trial to evaluate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy versus hormonal therapy in ILC patients. Author's Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest The author indicated no potential conflicts of interest. REFERENCES
1. Cristofanilli M, Gonzalez-Angulo A, Sneige N, et al: Invasive lobular carcinoma classic type: Response to primary chemotherapy and survival outcomes. J Clin Oncol 23:41-48, 2005
2. Thomas E, Holmes FA, Smith TL, et al: The use of alternate, non-cross-resistant adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of pathologic response to a neoadjuvant doxorubicin-based regimen in women with operable breast cancer: Long-term results from a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 22:2294-2302, 2004
3. Singh G, Binkley SM, Sneige N, et al: Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 17:460-469, 1999
4. McCready DR, Hortobagyi GN, Kau SW, et al: The prognostic significance of lymph node metastases after preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. Arch Surg 124:21-25, 1989 5. Chaturvedi S, Heys SD, Chaturvedi RS, et al: Primary chemotherapy for breast cancers. Does histological type of cancer matter? Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:S106, 2004 (suppl 1; abstr 2089) 6. Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al: Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672-2685, 1998[Abstract]
7. Mauriac L, MacGrogan G, Avril A, et al: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: A unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonie Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS). Ann Oncol 10:47-52, 1999 8. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer, November 1-3, 2000. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:5-15, 2001 9. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for treatment of breast cancer, available online at http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/breast.pdf
10. Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Gelber RC, et al: Meeting highlights: Updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:3357-3365, 2003
Related Reply
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|