Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 3 (January 20), 2005: pp. 502-509
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.082

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taïeb, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Gramont, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taïeb, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Gramont, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Intensive Systemic Chemotherapy Combined With Surgery for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Phase II Study

Julien Taïeb, Pascal Artru, François Paye, Christophe Louvet, Nathalie Perez, Thierry André, Brice Gayet, Mohamed Hebbar, Frédérique Maindrault Goebel, Christophe Tournigand, Rolland Parc, Aimery de Gramont

From the Oncologie Médicale, Chirurgie Générale et Digestive, Hôpital St-Antoine; Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Tenon; Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris; and Oncologie Médicale, CHRU de Lille, Lille, France

Address reprint requests to J. Taïeb, MD, Service d'hépatogastroentérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière, 47-83 Bd de l'hôpital, 75013 Paris, France; e-mail: jtaieb{at}club-internet.fr


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the metastatic irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (MIROX) strategy (adjuvant FOLFOX-7 followed by FOLFIRI), in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with resectable metastases of colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled onto this study. Treatment consisted of six cycles of leucovorin 400 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in a 120-minute infusion, and fluorouracil (FU) 2,400 mg/m2 in a 46-hour infusion, every 2 weeks (FOLFOX-7), followed by six cycles of leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 in a 90-minute infusion, bolus FU 400 mg/m2, and FU 2,400 mg/m2 as a 46-hour infusion, every 2 weeks (FOLFIRI). Surgery was performed before chemotherapy in 25 patients and after six cycles of FOLFOX-7 in 22 patients (six cycles of FOLFIRI were administered after surgery).

RESULTS: All but one of the patients underwent curative surgery. Two patients refused postoperative chemotherapy. Tolerability was generally good. The main toxicities were grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (13%) and thrombocytopenia (11%); no febrile neutropenia or bleeding occurred, and there were no deaths caused by toxicity. Two pathologically confirmed complete responses and 15 partial responses were obtained with FOLFOX-7 in the 22 patients who received this regimen before surgery (overall response rate, 77%; 95% CI, 68 to 86). The median disease-free survival time was 21 months; the median overall survival has not yet been reached. The 2-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 89% and 47%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The MIROX strategy is feasible and well tolerated by patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Progression-free and overall survival rates are promising, with a median of 38 months of follow-up. This strategy currently is being compared with the leucovorin and FU regimen in a phase III trial.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
More than 300,000 new cases of colorectal cancer occur each year in Europe and the United States.1,2 More than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop metastasis, and 15% to 25% of patients have liver metastases at diagnosis.3,4 Surgery is currently the only curative treatment for metastases from colorectal cancer,5,6 but only 10% to 25% of patients are suitable for resection. Even after curative surgery, 5-year survival rates are only 25% to 50% in the most recent reports.7-9 There is no standard therapeutic approach after resection of metastases, and new strategies are needed to improve patient outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy is a logical treatment for suspected micrometastases. Many previous studies have focused on intra-arterial chemotherapy, with or without systemic chemotherapy.10-12 This approach showed a 2-year survival benefit in only one randomized trial, in which intra-arterial and systemic chemotherapy was combined.10 Intra-arterial chemotherapy requires highly trained surgical and medical oncologists, limiting its use in many centers.

Recent schedules combining fluorouracil (FU) and oxaliplatin or irinotecan have considerably improved the results of systemic chemotherapy in the palliative treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, in terms of the response rate, progression-free survival,13-17 and overall survival.14,15,17 The use of new schedules, such as oxaliplatin, leucovorin (LV), and FU (FOLFOX), and irinotecan, LV, and FU (FOLFIRI), in addition to surgery, is thus a promising approach for resectable metastatic colorectal cancer. We tested a new approach: the metastatic irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (MIROX) strategy, which is based on sequential FOLFOX/FOLFIRI before and/or after surgical resection. The rationale is to limit oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy by administering only six cycles of FOLFOX, and to bypass tumor cell resistance by administering both oxaliplatin and irinotecan over a short period. Here we report the feasibility and initial results of this original strategy.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
Eligibility Criteria
Patients were eligible for this study if they had pathologically proven colorectal carcinoma with fully resectable metastasis at the time of enrollment, as assessed by a multidisciplinary team including experienced medical and surgical oncologists and radiologists. Patients were eligible regardless of the metastatic site, provided R0 resection was considered possible. Other inclusion criteria were WHO performance status 0 to 2, age 18 to 80 years, no previous malignancies, and adequate marrow function (neutrophils > 1.5 x 109/L, hematocrit > 30%, and platelets > 100 x 109/L) and liver function (bilirubin < 1.5x the upper limit of normal). Patients having previously received FU-LV adjuvant chemotherapy for a stage III primary tumor were eligible if this treatment had ended more than 1 year before enrollment onto this study. Written informed consent was required. The MIROX strategy was approved by our Institutional Ethics Review Board. Between September 1999 and October 2001, all patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer referred to our institution for treatment were prospectively considered for this study.

Pretreatment evaluation included a physical examination, thoracic and abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. Because of limited positron emission tomography scan availability in France at the beginning of the study, this procedure was encouraged but not required.

Surgery
During laparotomy, all patients underwent complete visual and manual abdominal exploration before resection of metastases. The extent of metastatic liver involvement was assessed by means of bimanual palpation and intraoperative ultrasonography to confirm the number and size of metastases, to determine their relationship with vascular and biliary structures, and to look for occult metastases. Anatomic and nonanatomic resections were used to achieve complete resection of all detected lesions, in a single procedure, including a margin of uninvolved parenchyma and with maximal preservation of uninvolved liver. Resectable extrahepatic intra-abdominal limited tumorous deposits (localized carcinomatosis) were resected as appropriate and pulmonary metastases were removed by wedge resection.

Treatment Schedule
The MIROX strategy consisted of six cycles of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 given as a 2-hour infusion in 250 mL of 5% dextrose, concurrently with LV 400 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion, then a 46-hour infusion of FU 2,400 mg/m2 (the FOLFOX-7 regimen), followed by six cycles of irinotecan 180 mg/m2 given as a 90-minute infusion, concurrently with LV 400 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion, followed by bolus FU 400 mg/m2 and a 46-hour infusion of FU 2,400 mg/m2 (the FOLFIRI regimen), as previously described18,19 (Fig 1). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks if the neutrophil count was more than 1.5 x 109/L and the platelet count more than 100 x 109/L. Treatment was discontinued because of disease progression, repeated grade 3 to 4 toxicity, or patient refusal.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. The metastatic irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (MIROX) strategy. (A) Adjuvant setting; (B) neoadjuvant setting. LV, leucovorin; FU, fluorouracil; FOLFOX-7, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 in a 120-minute infusion, and FU 2,400 mg/m2 in a 46-hour infusion, every 2 weeks; FOLFIRI, leucovorin 400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2 in a 90-minute infusion, bolus FU 400 mg/m2, and FU 2,400 mg/m2 as a 46-hour infusion, every 2 weeks.

 
Surgery was performed either before chemotherapy was started (Fig 1A, adjuvant setting) or after the six cycles of FOLFOX-7 (Fig 1B, neoadjuvant setting) according to the clinical findings and the decision of the multidisciplinary team. Pragmatically, synchronous metastases that could be resected during primary tumor surgery were removed, and the entire chemotherapy schedule was administered after surgery. When metastases were not resectable during primary tumor surgery because of technical reasons related to the surgical procedure (ie, left colon cancer and right hepatic metastases cannot be resected during the same surgical procedure in most cases), primary tumor was removed, neoadjuvant FOLFOX-7 was administered for six cycles, then the metastases were resected, and finally the six cycles of FOLFIRI were administered. Metachronous metastases were usually resected before chemotherapy.

Assessment of Response
The treatment response was evaluated in patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting after four cycles of FOLFOX-7 by CT. WHO criteria20 were used to define responses and their duration: a complete response (CR) was defined as a complete disappearance of all assessable disease; a partial response was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in the sum of the products of the two largest perpendicular diameters of measurable lesions, lasting at least 4 weeks; stable disease was defined as a decrease in tumor size of less than 50% or an increase of less than 25%; and progressive disease was defined as a greater than 25% increase in the sum of the products of two perpendicular diameters of at least one tumor, or the appearance of a new lesion. Objective responses were confirmed by a second evaluation 4 weeks later.

Measurement of Efficacy
Patients were examined during and after therapy; patient history was recorded and a physical examination was performed. To diagnose recurrence, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, and plasma CEA assay were performed every 3 months after surgery. Recurrence was diagnosed if new lesions appeared on CT. Positron emission tomography scan or repeat CT was performed if the CEA value increased to more than 10 ng/mL.

Toxicity Evaluation and Dose Modifications
Toxicity was recorded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC). Physical examination and a CBC were performed within 48 hours before each cycle. Patients were questioned specifically about nausea and vomiting, mucositis, diarrhea, malaise, appetite, and neurotoxicity. All patients who received at least one course of chemotherapy were evaluated for toxicity.

If grade 3 characteristic cumulative sensory peripheral neuropathy occurred, oxaliplatin was discontinued and LV plus FU alone were administered according to the above-described schedule. If non-neurologic grade 3 to 4 NCI-CTC toxicity occurred, the subsequent cycle was postponed until recovery, and the oxaliplatin dose was reduced to 100 mg/m2 (FOLFOX-7 regimen) or the FU bolus was omitted (FOLFIRI regimen). If specific irinotecan-induced grade 3 to 4 toxicities occurred, the irinotecan dose was reduced to 140 mg/m2; if subsequent grade 3 to 4 toxicities occurred, irinotecan was then discontinued, and LV plus FU alone were administered according to the above-described schedule.

Statistical Analysis
This was a phase II study of intensive systemic adjuvant chemotherapy after (or before and after) resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. The primary objective was to determine efficacy in terms of overall survival and recurrence. Results are expressed as means ± standard deviation or range, as appropriate. Follow-up started from the outset of chemotherapy. The censoring event for relapse was the date of diagnosis of disease progression. The censoring event for survival was the date of death. Survival curves were plotted with NCSS software (Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, UT), using the Kaplan-Meier method.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
Between September 1999 and October 2001, 47 patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer were referred to our institution for treatment, and were prospectively enrolled onto the study. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patients' Baseline Characteristics

 
Chemotherapy
Twenty-five patients underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months. Twenty-two patients underwent surgery after six cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX-7 and then received six cycles of the FOLFIRI regimen, beginning 4 to 5 weeks after surgery. Metastases were synchronous in 28 patients and metachronous (diagnosed > 6 months after the primary tumor) in 19 patients. The median time to diagnosis of metachronous metastasis did not differ between the neoadjuvant and adjuvant groups (21 and 22 months, respectively). Responses were evaluated after 4 cycles of FOLFOX-7 in all the patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting. Objective responses were observed in 17 patients (77%; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.86), and included three CRs. Stable disease was observed in four patients. No occurrences of disease progression were observed by CT in this setting, but one occurrence was observed during surgery (see below). One patient in the adjuvant group experienced disease progression. This patient had previously had surgery for a solitary liver metastasis, and developed a right adrenal relapse after four cycles of FOLFOX-7; chemotherapy was switched to FOLFIRI and was followed by new surgery. Two patients refused the FOLFIRI regimen: one because of asthenia and the other because of the risk of hair loss.

Surgery
R0 resection was possible in 45 patients, and R1 resection was possible in one patient. One patient was not resected because multiple liver metastases were found during surgery. The surgical procedures are listed in Table 2. Only one patient had two distinct metastatic sites (liver and lung), both of which were resected during a single procedure.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Surgical Procedures

 
Two of the patients who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had pathologically confirmed CRs, which appeared as one CR and one partial response on CT. Two other CRs were observed by CT, but neither was pathologically confirmed. Six patients had peritoneal involvement, which was discovered and resected during primary tumor surgery. No surgery-related deaths occurred.

Toxicity
Toxicity data were available for all 47 patients treated with FOLFOX-7 and all 44 patients treated with FOLFIRI (Tables 3 and 4). A total of 273 cycles (97%) of FOLFOX-7 and 257 cycles (97%) of FOLFIRI were administered, for planned totals of 282 and 264 cycles, respectively. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 14 patients (30%) during the FOLFOX-7 regimen. Ten patients (21%) had grade 2 peripheral neuropathy, whereas none had grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. Hematologic toxicity was the most common severe adverse effect, followed by gastrointestinal disorders. Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was observed in six patients (13%); there were no occurrences of febrile neutropenia. There were five occurrences (11%) of grade 3 thrombocytopenia, but none was associated with bleeding events. Grade 3 diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, and nausea or vomiting occurred in five, one, and one patient, respectively. Dose reduction of oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) and FU (2,000 mg/m2) was necessary in 12 and five patients, respectively; no further hematologic or gastrointestinal adverse effects occurred, and there was no increase in the severity of neuropathies. Five occurrences of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia were observed during the FOLFIRI regimen; there were no occurrences of febrile neutropenia. Other grade 3 toxicities comprised diarrhea in two patients, and hand-foot syndrome in one patient. Grade 2 alopecia occurred in eight patients (17%). An irinotecan dose reduction (150 mg/m2) was necessary in five patients, and the FU bolus was omitted in six patients; no additional severe hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity occurred.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Treatment-Related Toxicity With the FOLFOX-7 Regimen

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Treatment-Related Toxicity With the FOLFIRI Regimen

 
Recurrence and Survival
Thirty (64%) of the 47 patients had a recurrence during a median follow-up of 38 months. Nineteen (65%) of these recurrences involved the liver, seven (23%) involved the peritoneum, six (21%) involved the lungs, two (6%) involved the abdominal lymph nodes, and one (3%) involved an adrenal gland. Five patients had recurrences at more than one site. Ten patients underwent second resections, and four other patients had thermoablation. Ten of these 14 patients are disease free, with a median follow-up of 12 months. Nineteen patients received additional chemotherapy (FOLFOX reintroduction, n = 7; intensified FU-LV plus irinotecan, n = 6; capecitabine, n = 3; and other drugs, n = 3).

The median overall survival time has not been reached in the entire group of 47 patients. The median disease-free survival time is 21 months. The 2- and 3-year recurrence-free rates are 47% and 33%, respectively. The median time to recurrence was 17 months (3 to 28 months). The 2- and 3-year overall survival rates are 89% and 61%, respectively. In the subgroup of patients who experienced relapse, the 2-year overall survival rate is 77%.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
Two years after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer, approximately 65% of patients are alive and 25% are free of detectable disease.21-23 New approaches are needed to improve these outcomes. We evaluated a new strategy based on sequential systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, including the most effective drugs currently available, in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.

In unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, the debate currently focuses on how best to combine the most active agents.24 Many studies suggest that more active initial treatment, using irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with FU-LV, is more effective in these patients.13-17 The tritherapies combining FU-LV, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan has given interesting results in terms of survival and the response rate.25,26 However, these schedules are highly toxic, with grade 3 to 4 neutropenia in 45% to 80% of patients (febrile neutropenia in 6% to 14% of patients), grade 3 to 4 diarrhea in 20% to 32% of patients, and grade 2 alopecia in 40% of patients.25,26 Sequential regimens based on FU-LV plus oxaliplatin and FU-LV plus irinotecan, used in the palliative setting, seem to be far less toxic while offering similar efficacy.16,27 In our study, the patients had limited disease or were tumor free at the time of chemotherapy, and this might partly explain the good toxicity profile relative to patients treated palliatively. However, tolerability was excellent, with no grade 3 to 4 toxicities in 70% of patients. Considering both therapeutic sequences, severe hematologic toxicities (ie, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia) occurred in 12 patients (25%), without any febrile neutropenia. No grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed after 3 months of FOLFOX-7 treatment, and grade 3 diarrhea occurred in only 6% of patients during FOLFIRI treatment. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Two large studies have included experimental arms combining intra-arterial and intravenous (IV) chemotherapy, in comparison with IV therapy alone10 or surgery alone.11 Our MIROX strategy compares well with these latter treatments. In the study by Kemeny et al,10 three deaths caused by toxicity (4%) occurred in the group receiving both IV and intra-arterial chemotherapy. Although the latter authors did not assess toxicity with NCI-CTC criteria, significantly more patients in the combined-treatment group than in the systemic treatment group had toxic diarrhea or required hospitalization for adverse effects. Moreover, complications related to the pump and catheter used for hepatic arterial infusion occurred in 22% of patients. In the second study by Kemeny et al,11 no deaths caused by toxicity occurred, but grade 3 to 4 toxicities were observed in 32% of patients, including nine patients (20%) who had severe hepatic toxicity. Moreover, in these two studies, only two thirds of the patients received the planned number of hepatic arterial infusions because of toxicity or progression. Thus, although hepatic arterial infusion seems to reduce the risk of hepatic recurrence and showed a survival benefit in one randomized study (in combination with systemic chemotherapy), this procedure requires a high level of expertise and carries a risk of specific complications. The toxicity results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized controlled trial, comparing adjuvant FOLFOX to surgery alone in patients with resectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, will not be available before the middle of 2005.

With 2-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates of 89% and 47%, respectively, and a response rate of 77% (including two confirmed CRs) in patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFOX-7, our results compare favorably with those of previous trials of chemotherapy in this setting (Fig 2). In the two above-mentioned studies,10,11 and in a recent publication evaluating IV irinotecan combined with intra-arterial floxuridine in the same setting,28 the results were similar to those obtained here with the MIROX strategy. In the only two trials comparing systemic chemotherapy with surgery alone, survival rates at 4 and 5 years were 10% better with FU-LV than with surgery alone, although the differences were not statistically significant.29,30 The promising efficacy observed here cannot be attributed to patient selection.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Overall and recurrence-free survival rates.

 
Six factors of poor prognosis were identified in two large series of patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: more than three liver metastases, size of 5 cm or larger, a resection margin of less than 1 cm, age 60 years or older, invasion of the serosa by the primary tumor, and an interval of less than 2 years between diagnosis of the primary tumor and liver metastases.31,32 Patients with three or more of these poor prognostic characteristic had an overall survival rate of 60% or less at 2 years. In our study, 22% of the patients had extrahepatic metastasis, and 40% of the patients with disease restricted to the liver had three or more poor prognostic factors. The overall survival of these patients was 86%, with a median follow-up of 29 months. Among the 10 patients with extrahepatic disease, the median time to relapse was 20 months, and the disease-free and overall survival rates were 40% and 70%, respectively, at median follow-up of 27 months.

The MIROX strategy therefore appears to be well tolerated and offers good disease-free and overall survival. As such, it is an attractive alternative treatment for patients with resectable metastases of colorectal cancer. This strategy is currently being evaluated in a phase III trial, in comparison with a simplified LVFU2 regimen for 6 months, in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer.


    Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
The following authors or their immediate family members have indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. Consultant/Advisory Role: Christophe Louvet, Aventis, Sanofi-Synthelabo; Aimery de Gramont, Baxter, Sanofi-Synthelabo. Honoraria: Pascal Artru, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Synthelabo; Thierry Andre, Aventis, Baxter, Sanofi-Synthelabo. For a detailed description of these categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration form and the "Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest" section of Information for Contributors found in the front of every issue.


    NOTES
 
Both J.T. and P.A. contributed equally to this work.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
1. Black RJ, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al: Cancer incidence and mortality in the European Union: Cancer registry data and estimates of national incidence for 1990. Eur J Cancer 33:1075-1107, 1997

2. Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, et al: Cancer statistics, 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 49:8-31,1, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. August DA, Sugarbaker PH, Ottow RT, et al: Hepatic resection of colorectal metastases: Influence of clinical factors and adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil via Tenckhoff catheter on survival. Ann Surg 201:210-218, 1985[Medline]

4. Andre T, Bensmaine MA, Louvet C, et al: Multicenter phase II study of bimonthly high-dose leucovorin, fluorouracil infusion, and oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to the same leucovorin and fluorouracil regimen. J Clin Oncol 17:3560-3568, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Bleiberg H: Role of chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: New opportunities. Semin Oncol 23:42-50, 1996

6. Borner MM: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer: Too good to be true? Ann Oncol 10:623-626, 1999[Free Full Text]

7. Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, et al: Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 235:759-766, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Fong Y, Cohen AM, Fortner JG, et al: Liver resection for colorectal metastases. J Clin Oncol 15:938-946, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Jaeck D, Bachellier P, Guiguet M, et al: Long-term survival following resection of colorectal hepatic metastases: Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Br J Surg 84:977-980, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Kemeny N, Huang Y, Cohen AM, et al: Hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 341:2039-2048, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Kemeny MM, Adak S, Gray B, et al: Combined-modality treatment for resectable metastatic colorectal carcinoma to the liver: Surgical resection of hepatic metastases in combination with continuous infusion of chemotherapy—An Intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 20:1499-1505, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Lorenz M, Muller HH, Schramm H, et al: Randomized trial of surgery versus surgery followed by adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid for liver metastases of colorectal cancer: German Cooperative on Liver Metastases (Arbeitsgruppe Lebermetastasen). Ann Surg 228:756-762, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

13. de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M, et al: Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938-2947, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD, et al: Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355:1041-1047, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

15. Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al: Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer: Irinotecan Study Group. N Engl J Med 343:905-914, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, et al: FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 22:229-237, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, et al: A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23-30, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Andre T, Louvet C, Maindrault-Goebel F, et al: CPT-11 (irinotecan) addition to bimonthly, high-dose leucovorin and bolus and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (FOLFIRI) for pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: GERCOR. Eur J Cancer 35:1343-1347, 1999

19. Maindrault-Goebel F, Louvet C, Andre T, et al: Oxaliplatin added to the simplified bimonthly leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil regimen as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (FOLFOX6): GERCOR. Eur J Cancer 35:1338-1342, 1999

20. Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 47:207-214, 1981[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Doci R, Gennari L, Bignami P, et al: One hundred patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer treated by resection: Analysis of prognostic determinants. Br J Surg 78:797-801, 1991[Medline]

22. van Ooijen B, Wiggers T, Meijer S, et al: Hepatic resections for colorectal metastases in the Netherlands: A multiinstitutional 10-year study. Cancer 70:28-34, 1992[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Younes RN, Rogatko A, Brennan MF: The influence of intraoperative hypotension and perioperative blood transfusion on disease-free survival in patients with complete resection of colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 214:107-113, 1991[Medline]

24. Sobrero A, Kerr D, Glimelius B, et al: New directions in the treatment of colorectal cancer: A look to the future. Eur J Cancer 36:559-566, 2000

25. Souglakos J, Mavroudis D, Kakolyris S, et al: Triplet combination with irinotecan plus oxaliplatin plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 20:2651-2657, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Falcone A, Masi G, Allegrini G, et al: Biweekly chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, infusional fluorouracil, and leucovorin: A pilot study in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:4006-4014, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Hebbar M, Tournigand C, Lledo G, et al: Phase II evaluation of an alternated FOLFOX/FOLFIRI regimen in patients with resistant metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Eur J Cancer 37:S308, 2001 (abstr 1138)

28. Kemeny N, Jarnagin W, Gonen M, et al: Phase I/II study of hepatic arterial therapy with floxuridine and dexamethasone in combination with intravenous irinotecan as adjuvant treatment after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:3303-3309, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Langer B, Bleiberg H, Labianca R, et al: Fluorouracil (FU) plus l-leucovorin (l-LV) versus observation after potentially curative resection of liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC): Results of the ENG (EORTC/NCIC CTG/GIVIO) randomized trial. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:149a, 2002 (abstr 592)

30. Portier G, Rougier Ph, Milan C, et al: Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy (CT) using 5-fluorouracil (FU) and folinic acid (FA) after resection of liver metastases (LM) from colorectal (CRC) origin: Results of an intergroup phase III study (trial FFCD-ACHBTH-AURC 9002). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:133a, 2002 (abstr 528)

31. Fong Y, Fortner J, Sun RL, et al: Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 230:309-321, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Nordlinger B, Guiguet M, Vaillant JC, et al: Surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma metastases to the liver: A prognostic scoring system to improve case selection, based on 1568 patients—Association Francaise de Chirurgie. Cancer 77:1254-1262, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted May 13, 2004; accepted October 16, 2004.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Pencreach, E. Guerin, C. Nicolet, I. Lelong-Rebel, A.-C. Voegeli, P. Oudet, A. K. Larsen, M.-P. Gaub, and D. Guenot
Marked Activity of Irinotecan and Rapamycin Combination toward Colon Cancer Cells In vivo and In vitro Is Mediated through Cooperative Modulation of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin/Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha} Axis
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1297 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
S. R. Alberts and L. D. Wagman
Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Oncologist, October 1, 2008; 13(10): 1063 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
T. Liersch, J. Meller, M. Bittrich, B. Kulle, H. Becker, and D. M. Goldenberg
Update of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Radioimmunotherapy with 131I-Labetuzumab After Salvage Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Comparison of Outcome to a Contemporaneous Control Group
Ann. Surg. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 14(9): 2577 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
L. Bijelic, T. D. Yan, and P. H. Sugarbaker
Failure Analysis of Recurrent Disease Following Complete Cytoreduction and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Colorectal Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., August 1, 2007; 14(8): 2281 - 2288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. Pfannschmidt, H. Dienemann, and H. Hoffmann
Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Metastases From Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Published Series
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 324 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taïeb, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Gramont, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taïeb, J.
Right arrow Articles by de Gramont, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online