Erratum for Monk et al., J Clin Oncol 23 (21) 4617-4625.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

ERRATA

In the Results section, under the heading "Relationship Between QOL and Missing Assessments," the second to last sentence read:

Figure 1 showed that patients with better QOL (relative to the FACT-G and Cx subscale) and worse adverse effects (relative to the NTX subscale and BPI) were more likely to complete subsequent QOL assessments.

Whereas it should have read:

Figure 1 showed that patients with better QOL (relative to the FACT-G and Cx subscale) and less adverse effects (relative to the NTX subscale and BPI) were more likely to complete subsequent QOL assessments.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Save to my personal folders Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?