Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 34 (December 1), 2005: pp. 8916-8917
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.0121

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altundag, K.
Right arrow Articles by Akyurek, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altundag, K.
Right arrow Articles by Akyurek, S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply

CORRESPONDENCE

Heparanase Activity and Bone Loss in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

Kadri Altundag

Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Ankara, Turkey

Ozden Altundag

Houston, TX

Mauricio Z. Baptista

Department of Clinical Oncology, Hospital Maternidade De Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil

Serap Akyurek

Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the study by Lønning et al1 regarding the effects of 2 years of exemestane administration on bone mineral density, bone biomarkers, plasma lipids, coagulation factors, and homocysteine in postmenopausal women with low-risk, surgically treated early breast cancer (n = 129) or ductal carcinoma-in-situ (n = 18). They found modestly increased bone loss from the femoral neck and a nonsignificant increase in bone loss from the vertebrae in patients treated with exemestane comparing to placebo group. Although the patients in treatment and placebo groups were comparable in terms of patients' and tumor characteristics, heparanase activity in these women might alter the interpretation of results in this study. Heparanase is an enzyme that cleaves heparan sulfate and through this activity promotes tumor growth, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis in several tumor types. In human breast cancer patients, heparanase expression is associated with sentinel lymph node metastases. Recently, Kelly et al2 revealed a novel role for heparanase in skeletal complications that accompany breast cancer. They discovered that breast tumors having elevated levels of heparanase and growing in the mammary fat pads promote bone remodeling before metastases or even microscopic tumor foci can be detected in the bone marrow. In contrast, animals injected with control cells that express low levels of heparanase activity exhibit no systemic increase in bone resorption even when the primary tumor burden is large. The mechanism underlying the heparanase-mediated increase in bone resorption is the stimulation of osteoclastogenesis.

Women with breast cancer might have a predilection to develop osteoporosis affecting bone turnover thorough increased heparanase secretion by breast cancer cells even without developing bone metastases. Therefore, stratification of the patients according to their heparanase activity may further strengthen the results of this study.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Lønning PE, Geisler J, Krag LE, et al: Effects of exemestane administered for 2 years versus placebo on bone mineral density, bone biomarkers, and plasma lipids in patients with surgically resected early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5126-5137, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Kelly T, Suva LJ, Huang Y, et al: Expression of heparanase by primary breast tumors promotes bone resorption in the absence of detectable bone metastases. Cancer Res 65:5778-5784, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Related Reply

  • In Reply:
    Per Eystein Lønning and Jurgen Geisler
    JCO 2005 23: 8917-8918 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Altundag, K.
Right arrow Articles by Akyurek, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Altundag, K.
Right arrow Articles by Akyurek, S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online