Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.12.172 on December 14 2004

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 23, No 5 (February 10), 2005: pp. 953-964
© 2005 American Society of Clinical Oncology.

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, P.-C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, J. J.W.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, P.-C.

Tumor-Associated Macrophages: The Double-Edged Sword in Cancer Progression

Jeremy J.W. Chen, Yi-Chen Lin, Pei-Li Yao, Ang Yuan, Hsang-Yu Chen, Chia-Tung Shun, Meng-Feng Tsai, Chun-Houh Chen, Pan-Chyr Yang

From the Institutes of Biomedical Sciences and Molecular Biology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung; Center for Genomic Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine; Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine; Graduate Institute of Epidemiology, National Taiwan University, Taipei; Department of Forensic Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine; Institute of Statistical Science and Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica; and National Health Research Institute, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

Address reprint requests to Pan-Chyr Yang, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan S Rd, Taipei, Taiwan 100, R.O.C.; e-mail: pcyang{at}ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: Inflammation plays a critical role in cancer progression. In this study we investigate the pro-tumorigenic activities and gene expression profiles of lung cancer cells after interaction with macrophages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured intratumoral microvessel counts and macrophage density in 41 lung cancer tumor specimens and correlated these with the patients' clinical outcome. The interaction between macrophages and cancer cell lines was assessed using a transwell coculture system. The invasive potential was evaluated by in vitro invasion assay. The matrix-degrading activity was assayed by gelatin zymography. The microarray was applied to a large-scale analysis of the genes involved in the interaction, as well as to monitor the gene expression profiles of lung cancer cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs in cocultures.

RESULTS: The macrophage density positively correlated with microvessel counts and negatively correlated with patient relapse-free survival (P < .05). After coculture with macrophages, lung cancer cell lines exhibited higher invasive potentials and matrix-degrading activities. We identified 50 genes by microarray that were upregulated more than two-fold in cancer cells after coculture. Northern blot analyses confirmed some gene expression such as interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and matrix metalloproteinase 9. The two-dimensional hierarchical clustering also demonstrated that the gene expression profiles of lung cancer cells responding to various anti-inflammatory drugs in cocultures are distinct.

CONCLUSION: The interaction of lung cancer cells and macrophages can promote the invasiveness and matrix-degrading activity of cancer cells. Our results also suggest that a great diversity of gene expression occurs in this interaction, which may assist us in understanding the process of cancer metastasis.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
It is now becoming clear that the inflammatory cells that exist in the tumor microenvironment play an indispensable role in cancer progression. This may explain why many cancers arise from sites of chronic irritation and inflammation.1 Angiogenesis plays an important role in tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis.2,3 This process is meticulously regulated by the local increase of the activity of a variety of angiogenic factors, such as interleukin (IL) -8, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF-{alpha}).3-5

Substantial evidence suggests that stroma cells adjacent to the cancer cells, including fibroblasts, inflammatory cells such as macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes, can interact with cancer cells and express angiogenic factors.6-8 The interaction of lung cancer cells and stroma fibroblasts can promote the expression of angiogenic factor IL-8 both in cancer cells as well as in stroma fibroblasts.9 The macrophage is the pivotal member of inflammatory cells within the tumor stroma. Upon activation, the tumor-associated macrophages can release a vast diversity of growth factors, proteolytic enzymes, cytokines, and inflammatory mediators. Many of these factors are key agents in angiogenesis.

We demonstrated that following cancer cell/macrophage coculture, marked IL-8 mRNA expression could be induced in macrophages as well as in lung cancer cells that were controlled via the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-{kappa}B) pathway.10 The increased IL-8 expression seen in macrophages after coculture with cancer cells strongly suggests that cancer cells can stimulate inflammatory cells to express angiogenic factors and promote tumor growth.11

Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (TIMs) have recently been shown to correlate with vessel density in ovarian,12 breast,13 and other malignancies,14 and have been associated with the expression of VEGF and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in cancer cells.15 Our previous report also indicated that TIM density was positively correlated with tumoral IL-8 mRNA expression and intratumoral microvessel counts, and negatively correlated with patient survival.10 However, little is known about the global pro-tumorigenic gene expression profile in the cancer cells interacting with TIMs.

In this study, by using the cDNA microarray,16 we were able to perform a large-scale analysis of the genes involved in the interaction between cancer cells and the infiltrating macrophages. This information may assist us in exploring complex interactions between cancer cells and stroma that orchestrate the process of tumor progression and metastasis. Furthermore, in our previous study,10 we found that several anti-inflammatory drugs can effectively inhibit the expression of angiogenic factor IL-8 in a similar fashion. Therefore, to understand whether the suppression of gene expression profiles of cancer cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs are similar or not, we also applied microarray analysis to monitor the gene expression profiles of lung cancer cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs in cancer cell/macrophage cocultures, which can help us to interpret the diversity of different functional mechanisms of the various anti-inflammatory drugs.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines
Human monocyte cell line THP-1 (ATCC TIB 202; ATCC, Manassas, VA), human non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell line A549 (ATCC CCL-185), lung adenocarcinoma cell lines CL1-5, CL1-0,17,18 and PC14 were grown with RPMI 1640 media (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) supplemented with 1.5g/L Na2HCO3, 4.5g/L glucose, and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; GIBCO-BRL). All cell lines were incubated at 37°C with 20% O2 and 5% CO2. PMA (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, MO) 3.2 x 10–7 M was applied to monocyte cultures. After incubating with PMA for 24 hours, monocytes were differentiated to macrophages. Macrophages were washed three times with RPMI medium containing 10% FBS and incubated for another 24 hours to eliminate the effect of PMA, then were incubated in serum-free media for 24 hours. The culture supernatants were collected as conditioned medium.

Immunohistochemical Staining for Microvessels and Macrophages
To explore the relationships between macrophage density, microvessel counts, and patients' prognosis, tumor specimens from 41 patients who underwent surgical resection of their primary NSCLC at our institute between September 1994 and September 1996 were examined by immunohistochemical staining for TIMs and intratumoral microvessels. This investigation was performed after approval by the institutional review board of National Taiwan University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The clinicopathologic features of the patients and tissues are shown in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of Clinicopathologic Features of Patients and Tumors

 
Immunohistochemical staining was carried out using a modified avidin-biotin peroxidase complex method.4,19 Microvessel counts and TIM counts were determined as described in our previous reports.10,20

In Vitro Invasion Assay
Appropriate Matrigel (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) was added into the upper chamber of the transwell apparatus with 8-µm pore size membrane (Costar, Cambridge, MA). After the Matrigel solidified at 37°C, 1 x 105 cancer cells that had been previously cocultured with macrophages were seeded onto the Matrigel and incubated at 37°C overnight. Membranes coated with Matrigel were swabbed with a cotton swab and fixed with 100% methanol for 10 minutes. The membrane with cells were soaked in Giemza stain (Sigma Chemical Co) for 3 hours and then washed with distilled water. The number of cells attached to the lower surface of the polycarbonate filter was counted at 400x magnification under a light microscope. Each type of cell was assayed in triplicate.

Lung Cancer CL1-5 Cells/Macrophages Coculture
For microarray experiments, CL1-5 cells were cultured for 24 hours in a medium conditioned with and without macrophages, respectively. Total RNA was extracted with RNAzolB (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX), and mRNA was purified with Oligotex mRNA Midi Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). For zymographic experiments, the transwell apparatus with a 0.4-µm pore membrane (six-well plate; Costar) was applied to cancer cell/macrophage cocultures. After incubating overnight, the cocultured mediums were collected and centrifuged to remove cellular debris, and the supernatants were frozen at –80°C until assayed for gelatinolytic activity. The details of conditioned medium preparation and cocultures with the transwell apparatus have been described previously.10

Human cDNA Microarray Analysis
For the first microarray experiment, 9,600 human expressed sequence tag (EST) clones with putative gene names were obtained from the IMAGE consortium libraries through its distributor (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL). These gene clones were derived from various tissues and in different library constructs. Of the mRNAs isolated from non-cocultured and cocultured CL1-5 cells, 0.5 µg were labeled with biotin during reverse transcription as described in our previous report.16 All experiments were performed in triplicate individually. The replicates were used to calculate the mean of gene expression for regression analysis and the coefficient of variation (CV) as the measurement of reproducibility.

For the second microarray experiment, four copies of each differentially expressed gene identified from the procedures above were re-arrayed per microarray membrane. The copies were used to calculate the CV as the measurement of reproducibility. The details of target preparation, hybridization, color development, image analysis, and spot quantification have been described previously.16,18,21

Northern Blot Analysis
To confirm the results derived from microarray, 12 differentially expressed clones were selected from the microarray analysis for Northern blot analysis. One µg mRNA of non-cocultured and cocultured CL1-5 cells were subjected to 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis and then transferred to nylon membrane with a positive charge. The amplified cDNA fragments were labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP by random primed labeling as in our previous reports.16 Glyceraldehye-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a loading control.

Gelatin Zymography
Gelatinolytic activity was assayed by gelatin zymography by the method described previously, but with some modification.17 Briefly, aliquots of non-cocultured and cocultured medium were mixed with sample buffer and applied directly, without prior heating or reduction, to 10.5% acrylamide gels containing 1 mg/mL gelatin (Sigma Chemical Co). After electrophoresis, the sodium dodecyl sulfate was removed from the gel by incubating in 2.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma Chemical Co) for 30 minutes. The gels were then incubated at 37°C overnight in development buffer (50 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, containing 0.2 M NaCl, 5 mmol/L CaCl2), and stained with 40% methanol/10% glacial EDTA containing 0.5% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (Sigma Chemical Co) for 20 minutes.

Gene Expression Profiles of Cancer Cells Responding to Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
The differentially expressed genes identified from the above microarray carrying 9,600 EST clones were pooled to fabricate quick screening arrays for drug-responding gene expression profiles. Three anti-inflammatory drugs, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC), aspirin, and dexamethasone, were purchased from the Sigma Chemical Company. Another anti-inflammatory drug, celecoxib, was provided by Searle (Caguas, Puerto Rico). Thalidomide was provided by Taiwan Tung Yang (TTY Biopharm Co Ltd, Taiwan). Four designated concentrations of each anti-inflammatory drug were used for this experiment: 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 µmol/L of PDTC; 0, 0.1, 1, and 10 µmol/L of aspirin; 0, 0.01, 0.1, and 10 µmol/L of dexamethasone; 0, 0.01, 0.1, and 10 µmol/L of celecoxib; and 0, 5, 25, and 50 µmol/L of thalidomide.10 The designated concentrations of anti-inflammatory drugs were added to the macrophage/cancer cell cocultures. After incubation for 24 hours, cells were harvested with RNAzol B and followed by microarray experiments.

Statistical Analysis
Relationships between microvessel counts and macrophage density were analyzed by linear regression. Relapse-free survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the difference in survival in subgroups was analyzed using a log-rank test (SPSS software; SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). The effect of predictors (TIM, histology, grade, stage, tumor status, and node status) was evaluated by Cox regression mode. All statistical tests were two sided. The P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. In an attempt to reduce the variation arising from the experimental results derived from different microarrays, the intensity values of spots from each microarray were rescaled using a global-scale method22 for the first microarray experiment, and a housekeeping gene, GAPDH, for the second microarray experiment. Only the signal value of spots exceeding a figure of 3,000 was considered meaningful in the membrane format microarray system (ie, the intensity of a spot less than 3,000 was hardly distinguishable from background "noise," such that any occasion where the spot intensity value was below 3,000, the value was replaced by a figure of 3,000). Therefore, if the intensity of a gene is below 3,000 in all three replicates, the CV will be set to zero (standard deviation ÷ mean x 100% = 0 ÷ 3,000 x100% = 0). To analyze the first microarray experiment, we regressed the means of the three replicates of each of the 9,600 genes in the non-cocultured group against those in the cocultured group. Genes were selected if (1) they fell outside the 95% CI for the fitted regression line, and (2) there was at least a two-fold change in the means of the two groups. For the directed microarray analysis, the rescaled and replaced signals of each chip were transformed by a logarithm with base 2 and then normalized by the standard normal distribution. The gene expression profiles were shown by a simple two-dimensional hierarchical clustering analysis using an average linkage method with a Pearson correlation coefficient proximity matrix.23 To give the readers a better feeling for the significance of the differences among the treatments, the multiple scatter plot of correlation was created. For each treatment of drug dosage, a point for the correlation with the untreated cocultured group, and a second point for the untreated non-cocultured group, was plotted. The correlation was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient and 95% CI was included as error bar on each point. Where appropriate, the data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
TIMs Are Significantly Correlated With Microvessel Counts and Patients' Relapse-Free Survival
The immunohistochemical staining showed that the cytoplasm of TIMs was stained brown by anti-CD68 antibodies (Fig 1A), while the microvessels appeared as brown linear fragments, with or without an internal lumen (Fig 1B). Significant correlations were found between the macrophage density and intratumoral microvessel count (linear regression, r = 0.743; P = 2.68 x 10–8; Fig 1C).



View larger version (87K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Tumor-infiltrating macrophages and microvessel counts in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples and their inter-relationships and correlation with relapse-free survival. Immunohistochemical staining of (A) macrophages and (B) microvessels. (C) Correlation of macrophage density with microvessel counts. (D) Kaplan-Meier survival plots for NSCLC patients grouped according to tumor-infiltrating macrophage density.

 
We used a median value of 163 (infiltrating macrophage density per x 200 field) as the cutoff to separate tumors into those with high (n = 21) and low (n = 20) infiltrating macrophage counts. The median relapse-free survival for patients with tumors with a high density of TIMs (7.0 months; 95% CI, 1.02 to 12.91 months) was also significantly shorter than that for patients whose tumors had a low density of TIMs (26.0 months; 95% CI, 9.25 to 42.75; P = .0181, log-rank test; Fig 1D). Taking histologic type into consideration, the results showed that the density of TIMs was higher in adenocarcinoma than in squamous cell carcinoma (P = .001, Fisher's exact test). Interestingly, after stratification by histologic type of tumor, the relapse-free survival of patients with high TIM density was significantly shorter than for patients with low TIM density in squamous cell carcinoma (median ± SE, 5.0 ± 4.90 months v 24.0 ± 4.67 months; P = .0093, log-rank test), and had a trend to be shorter in adenocarcinoma (median ± SE, 7.0 ± 2.58 months v 20.0 ± 5.99 months; P = .35, log-rank test). The results of the multivariate analysis with Cox regression modeling (including sex, age, stage, histologic types, tumor status, lymph-node metastasis, TIM, microvessel count, and other clinicopathologic variables) also showed that the effect of tumor type on relapse-free survival was not significant (P = .4). Due to the sample size, the well- and moderately differentiated samples were merged as one group (more differentiated, n = 31), and the poorly differentiated samples were identified separately (less differentiated, n = 10). The results of survival analysis with stratification by the grade of tumor differentiation showed that TIM density had a trend to correlate with relapse-free survival in the more differentiated subgroup (P = .078, log-rank test), but was less correlated with relapse-free survival in the poorly differentiated group (P = .346, log-rank test).

Macrophage/Cancer Cell Coculture Increases Cancer Cell Invasive Ability
Four lung cancer cell lines, CL1-0, CL1-5, A549, and PC14 (in the lower chamber of the transwell), were cocultured with macrophages (in the upper chamber) for 24 hours. After discarding the macrophages, the harvested cancer cells were analyzed for invasive activity in a 24-well transwell. Cells transmigrating through the coated membrane were stained by Geimza staining dye (Sigma Chemical Co) and counted under a microscope. All cell lines, except for CL1-0 cocultured with macrophages, revealed significant enhancement in cell invasiveness (Fig 2). CL1-0 cells cocultured with macrophages showed a 1.87-fold increase in comparison to those non-cocultured (cell number 276 ± 79 v 516 ± 128; P = .169, analysis of variance). CL1-5 cells treated in the same way also had a 2.43-fold increase (cell number 1,237 ± 272 v 3,006 ± 147; P = .000586). Similar results were observed in A549 and PC14 cell/macrophage cocultures (cell number 818 ± 40 v 1,711 ± 175; 507 ± 26 v 2,950 ± 845; P = .000993 and P = .007456, respectively).



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. The invasion activity of non–small-cell lung cancer cell lines (CL1-0, CL1-5, A549, and PC14) cocultured with macrophages. The yellow bars represent invasive cell number of non-cocultured cancer cells, and the blue bars represent those for cocultured cancer cells. {alpha} = .05; (*), P < .01; (**), P < .001.

 
Microarray-Identified, Differentially Expressed Genes of CL1-5 Cells After Coculture With Macrophages
Since the CL1-5 cells showed higher response to macrophage stimulation in terms of in vitro invasion ability and IL-8 expression,10 this cell line was chosen to carry out microarray experiments. Biotin-labeled probes derived from mRNAs of CL1-5 cells stimulated with and without macrophage-conditioned medium were hybridized to microarrays with 9,600 putative genes to profile the gene expression patterns (Fig 3A). Figure 3B reveals a collection of cropped microarray images (4 x 4 spots) showing the gene expression patterns of cancer cells before and after coculture with macrophages. The results of microarray analyses indicated that 3,577 out of 9,600 EST clones were identified according to whether the expression level either in the cocultured or in the non-cocultured group was larger than the background (> 3,000 intensity units). The CV for the three replicates of each gene was 10.15%, averaged over the 9,600 genes and the two groups.



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Profiling of differentially expressed gene pattern in CL1-5 cells before and after coculturing with macrophages. (A) The digital images of non-cocultured and cocultured CL1-5 cells are illustrated. (B) Close-up views of the microarray images showing different gene expression patterns of non-cocultured and cocultured CL1-5 cells. (C) Distribution of gene expression intensities between non-coculture and coculture. The solid curves were the 95% predicted regression lines.

 
By regression analysis, 482 genes that had expression levels beyond a 95% CI of the regression line were considered as differentially expressed genes (Fig 3C). Among these genes, 50 genes displaying more than a two-fold expression level as well as two genes, VEGF-A (1.58-fold) and VEGF-C (1.88-fold), on the borderline of a two-fold change in cocultures compared to the control, were grouped into seven categories by their putative functions (Table 2). All of these genes were verified by sequencing. Genes with multiple roles were included in more than one category. A full list of genes and data related to cancer cell/macrophage cocultures are posted at our Web site (http://w3.mc.ntu.edu.tw/department/genechip/supplement.htm).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Categories of Induced Genes in CL1-5 Cells Cocultured With Macrophages

 
Northern Blot Analyses Substantiate the Results of Microarray Studies
In this study, we focused on the inducible genes' expression that caused us the most interest. Therefore, 10 gene expressions that showed more than a two-fold change were randomly selected to carry out Northern blot analyses. These clones were sequenced retrospectively after differential expressions were found, to assure that they indeed represented the true transcript. Based on our previous study10 and the zymographic analysis, IL-8 and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) were specifically selected for Northern blot. Otherwise, the other genes were randomly selected, including IL-6, IL-6 signal transducer, IL-7 receptor, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta, NF-{kappa}B inhibitor alpha, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, MMP-1, and stanniocalcin-1. In addition, two genes, VEGF-A and VEGF-C, in which the expression levels are on the borderline of a two-fold change, were also selected. Figure 4 shows that the results of Northern blot analyses were consistent with those from the microarray studies (Table 2). GAPDH was used as an internal control.



View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Northern blot analyses of genes identified by microarray study. Twelve genes selected from Table 2 were used to demonstrate the validity of the microarray results. Those mRNAs were collected from lung cancer cell line CL1-5 cocultured without (N) and with (C) macrophages.

 
Zymography Reveals Higher Gelatinase Activity in Lung Cancer Cells After Coculture With Macrophages
Lung cancer cell lines CL1-0, CL1-5, A549, and PC14, were cocultured with macrophages for 24 hours. The medium derived from non-cocultured and macrophage-cocultured cancer cell lines were harvested and subjected to native gel electrophoresis and zymographic analysis. Higher gelatinase activity was observed in all four of these lung cancer cells after coculture with macrophages (Fig 5). Among these cell lines, CL1-0 had the lowest invasive ability (Fig 2) and showed the least increase in gelatinase activity after coculture with macrophages.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Gelatinase activity in non–small-cell lung cancer cell/macrophage cocultured media. The media were collected from lung cancer cell lines (CL1-0, CL1-5, A549, and PC14) cocultured without (N) and with (C) macrophages. The white bands were decomposed gelatin by gelatinase.

 
Gene Expression Profiles of CL1-5 Cells After Coculture With Macrophages and the Response to Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Because the CL1-5 cells revealed a stronger response to macrophage cocultures regardless of the amplification of IL-8 expression or invasive potential, we attempted to use CL1-5 cells to profile the gene expression in cancer cells after coculture with macrophages. The 52 genes identified from microarray were upregulated and were found to have pro-tumorgenic activity. We then examined whether the anti-inflammatory agents could suppress these upregulated gene expressions of cancer cells and return to their basal state. Therefore, those genes that are categorized in Table 2 were used to re-array and profile the gene expression patterns of cancer cells responding to five anti-inflammatory drugs in four different concentrations. Figure 6 shows the gene expression profiles of 52 genes by a two-dimensional hierarchical clustering. The CV for the four copies of each gene was 10.83%, averaged over the 52 genes and the treatment groups. Extracting the data from these 52 genes from the first microarray experiment, the CV for the three replicates of each gene was 9.92%, averaged over the 52 genes and the two groups. The result indicated that there was no significant difference for the CV of these genes between the first and second microarray experiment. Furthermore, the ratio of the gene intensity of untreated cells (coculture without drug) to control (non-coculture) cells is also used to compare to the results of the first microarray experiment. The average of fold-change over the 52 genes for the first microarray was 3.6 ± 2.09, and for the second microarray, 3.2 ± 2.42. The results indicated that the expression patterns of these genes in the second microarray are consistent with those in the first microarray experiment. The gene expression patterns of cells treated with PDTC and dexamethasone are the most similar to that of non-cocultured cells, whereas the gene expression pattern of cells treated with thalidomide is the most dissimilar to that of non-cocultured cells but is the most similar to that of cocultured cells. The anti-inflammatory agents, except for the thalidomide used in this study, revealed the capacity to recover, at least in part, the switched stage. As compared with Figure 6, the multiple scatter plots clearly showed the significance of the differences among the treatments (Fig 7). The results also showed that the inhibitory mechanisms of five anti-inflammatory agents in cancer cell/macrophage cocultures are quite different and can be discriminated from each other by gene expression profiles.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. The two-dimensional hierarchical clustering analysis of gene expression profiles of CL1-5 cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs. The five drugs were as follows: celecoxib (cele); dexamethasone (dexa); pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC); aspirin; and thalidomide (thali). The three different concentrations are designated on the top of the figures. The scale value of normalization, from –3.0 to 3.0 (arbitrary unit), represented the levels of gene expression from green (low) to red (high).

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. The multiple scatter plots of correlation among drug treatments. There were two points for each treatment of drug dosage that was described below the figure, a point for the correlation with the untreated cocultured group (solid rectangle) and a second point for the untreated non-cocultured group (solid circle). The correlation was evaluated by Pearson correlation coefficient and 95% CI was included as error bar on each point. PDTC, pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate; Dexa, dexamethasone; Cele, celecoxib; Thali, thalidomide.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
Macrophages perform a multitude of functions essential for tissue remodeling, inflammation, and immune responses against cancer.24 In this study, we demonstrated that TIMs have pro-tumorgenic activity. The TIM density correlated with tumor microvessel density and was related to cancer progression. Coculture of cancer cells with macrophages can enhance cancer cell invasive potential and matrix-degrading activity. Furthermore, the microarray analysis revealed that 52 genes with pro-tumorgenic properties were upregulated and could be partially suppressed by various anti-inflammatory drugs.

Previous reports indicate that angiogenic factors, such as IL-8 and VEGF, correlate with tumor angiogenesis and metastasis,20,25,26 and cancer cell-macrophage coculture can promote the expressions of these factors in NSCLC.10,11 The IL-8 expressed by human melanoma cells can also upregulate MMP-2 activity and enhance tumor growth and metastasis.27 In this study, the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-9 is significantly increased in the media of lung cancer cells after coculture with macrophages. It is worth noting that the lung cancer cell lines CL1-0 and CL1-5, derived from the same parental cells, possessed different invasive/metastatic potential in vitro and in vivo, CL1-5 having a greater potential than CL1-0.18 Our results therefore showed that invasive capabilities and matrix-degrading activities increased to a lesser degree in cancer cells with low invasive capacity (CL1-0) than in cancer cells with a higher invasive capacity (CL1-5; Fig 5).

We previously demonstrated that TIMs can upregulate tumor-associated IL-8 mRNA expression through NF-{kappa}B pathway.10 However, how many other genes involved in these regulatory processes are still unknown. By using cDNA microarray, 50 genes with a more than two-fold change, as well as beyond a 95% CI of predicted regression line, were identified and grouped into seven categories. Six categories were based on reported cellular functions, and one was based on anonymous genes that correlated positively (Table 2). Most of the genes identified by microarray were previously unknown or unpublished in cancer cell/macrophage cocultures.

However, many genes have been previously reported to be associated with angiogenesis and metastasis, including the association of IL-6 with a poor prognosis in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Also, many genes have been correlated with the extent of disease28: IL-8 expression was highly associated with distant lymph node metastasis of NSCLC17; urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor expressed more in tumor tissues of NSCLC patients, as compared with adjacent normal tissues29; STC-1 mRNA level significantly correlated with primary tumor size, number of lymph nodes, and TNM stages in early-stage breast cancer patients30; plasma ICAM-1 was higher in metastatic patients with renal cell carcinoma compared with nonmetastatic patients31; and MMP-1 immunoreactivity of colorectal adenocarcinomas significantly correlated with the presence of lymph node and hepatic metastasis.32 Many genes identified in this study have been confirmed to play a role in metastasis throughout the literature. Further characterization of genes identified in this study is currently in progress.

We previously demonstrated that the interaction between macrophages and cancer cells can upregulate IL-8 expression. This process is mediated, in part, through the NF-{kappa}B pathway.10 In this study, the results of microarray analysis further augmented the idea that, for example, IL-6, IL-8, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, MMPs, and ICAM-1 are also involved in NF-{kappa}B pathway,33,34 The finding that TIM density is correlated with tumoral IL-8 mRNA expression and intratumoral microvessel counts initiated the idea that inflammatory cells may be involved in regulating the production of angiogenic factors by cancer cells. The anti-inflammatory agents should have the potential to impede the pathway of IL-8 induction, as well as the possible suppression of angiogenesis initiated by inflammatory cells. Previous reports in the literature have also revealed that some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as aspirin, can reduce the risk of developing colorectal and breast cancers.35,36 On the other hand, the inflammation in the tumorigenic site plays an important role in cancer progression.1 Therefore, three drugs, celecoxib, dexamethasone, and aspirin, that are commonly used clinically to suppress inflammation were selected. We also included PDTC, an NF-{kappa}B specific inhibitor, to assess the role of NF-{kappa}B pathway involved in cancer cell/macrophage interaction. Thalidomide is an effective anticancer drug and also has a potent antiangiogenic property.37 These drugs cover nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (celecoxib, PDTC, aspirin, and thalidomide), steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (dexamethasone) and inflammatory pathway NF-{kappa}B. Thus, these five drugs were used to evaluate the suppression of gene expression profiles of cancer cells that were activated by macrophage coculture.

Previous studies have also shown that the tested anti-inflammatory agents significantly inhibit IL-8 mRNA expression in CL1-5 cells cocultured with macrophages in a dose-dependent manner.10 To understand whether the gene expression profiles of cancer cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs are also dose-dependent, the designated concentrations of drugs were applied to microarray experiments. The concentrations of each anti-inflammatory drug are based on the least effect on cell viability analyses described previously.10 The averages of the cell viability at all of the designated concentrations are as follows: 94.5% for celecoxib (0.01 to 10 µM), 98% for dexamethasone (0.01 to 10 µM), 96.5% for PDTC (0.1 to 10 µM), 93% for aspirin (0.1 to 10 µM), and 98.4% for thalidomide (5 to 50 µM, unpublished data). The concentrations of thalidomide used in microarray experiments were higher than for other drugs, which is due to the lesser effect on suppressing IL-8 induction.38,39 Although the suppressive effects of these drugs on IL-8 mRNA induction were very similar, their possible mechanisms of action are quite different.39-44 Nevertheless, the inhibitory effect of these anti-inflammatory drugs is, for the most part, finally mediated through the NF-{kappa}B pathway.

To explore and interpret the differentially functional mechanisms of these five anti-inflammatory drugs, we applied microarray analysis to monitor the gene expression profiles of lung cancer cells responding to drugs in macrophage/cancer cell cocultures. It was evident that the gene expression profile of non-cocultured cells was switched to a novel one after macrophage stimulation. Interestingly, the anti-inflammatory agents tested in this study, except for thalidomide, revealed the capacity to recover, at least in part, the switched stage (Fig 6). Some of the differentially expressed genes in treatment with thalidomide as compared with the other anti-inflammatory drugs are well known to be involved in cancer progression. For example, spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) is induced by hepatotoxins and liver tumor promoters45 and is found specifically in the tumor tissue, not in normal lung tissue.46 Furthermore, SSAT induced by cytokines, IL-1ß, and hepatocyte growth factor controls tumor metabolism and growth, as well as tumor-host interaction.45 Human platelet-derived growth factor beta (PDGF-ß) chain is closely involved in cell growth, oncogenicity, and blood vessel maturation.47,48 Interestingly, the transcription factor NF-{kappa}B also plays an important role in PDGF-ß chain transformation of mouse fibroblast cells and is sensitive to treatment with aspirin.49 STC-1 mRNA is enhanced in hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer compared to cancer-free tissues, and might be a useful molecular marker.50 All these three gene expressions were dramatically suppressed by celecoxib, dexamethasone, and PDTC, which were probably related to the inhibition of the NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway. Interestingly, thalidomide had little effect on these gene expressions, which was distinctly different from the other four anti-inflammatory drugs. In addition, urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor and C/EBPB also revealed the similar results.

In dose-dependent experiments, the results indicated that there is no dose-dependent effect of gene expression patterns on cancer cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs. Although some drugs, such as celecoxib, dexamethasone, and PDTC, showed a dose-dependent effect in inhibiting IL-8 expression in lung cancer cell/macrophage cocultures in a previous study,10 it was just the result derived from one gene and a different approach. The gene expression profile consisted of many genes, therefore it might not have been suitable to perform a dose-dependent experiment.

Taken together, the interaction of lung cancer cells/macrophages can promote the invasiveness and matrix-degrading activity of lung cancer cells. By using microarray technology, we have identified several genes involved in the interaction between cancer cells and macrophages, which may assist us in exploring complex interactions between cancer cells and stroma that orchestrate the process of cancer metastasis. Our results also confirmed the bipolar roles of tumor-associated macrophages more clearly in cancer progression. Furthermore, the gene expression profiles of lung cancer cells responding to anti-inflammatory drugs in cancer cell/macrophage cocultures provide hints in interpreting the differentially functional mechanisms of drugs, as well as for evaluating the potential for new drug discovery in pharmacogenomics by microarray.


    Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    NOTES
 
Supported by the National Science Council (NSC 91-3112-P-005-008–Y; NSC91-3112-P-002-017-Y) and National Health Research Institutes of the Republic of China through the National Research Program for Genomic Medicine Grant (NHRI92A1-NSCLC09-5).

Presented in part at the 94th Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, Washington, DC, July 11-14, 2003.

Drs Chen, Lin, Yao, and Yuan contributed equally to this work.

Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this issue and online at www.jco.org.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 REFERENCES
 
1. Coussens LM, Werb Z: Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420:860-867, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Folkman J: Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med 333:1757-1763, 1995[Free Full Text]

3. Folkman J, Sning Y: Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem 267:10931-10934, 1992[Free Full Text]

4. Friesel RE, Maciag T: Molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis: Fibroblast growth factor signal. FASEB J 9:919-925, 1995[Abstract]

5. Olofsson B, Pajusola K, Kaipainen A, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor B, a novel growth factor for endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:2576-2581, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Kelly CP, Keates S, Siegenberg D, et al: IL-8 secretion and neutrophil activation by HT-29 colonic epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 267:G991-G997, 1994

7. Connolly DT, Stoddard BL, Harakas NK, et al: Human fibroblast-derived growth factor is a mitogen and chemoattractant for endothelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 144:705-712, 1987

8. Fukumura D, Xavier R, Sugiura T, et al: Tumor induction of VEGF promoter activity in stromal cells. Cell 94:715-725, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Anderson JC, Mari SE, Broderick RJ, et al: The angiogenic factor interleukin 8 is induced in non-small cell lung cancer/pulmonary fibroblast cocultures. Cancer Res 60:269-272, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Chen JJW, Yao PL, Yuan A, et al: Up-regulation of tumoral interleukin-8 expression by infiltrating macrophages: Its correlation with tumor angiogenesis and patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:729-737, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. White ES, Strom SRB, Wys NL, et al: Non-small cell lung cancer cells induce monocytes to increase expression of angiogenic activity. J Immunol 166:7549-7555, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Orre M, Rogers PA: Macrophages and microvessel density in tumors of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 73:47-50, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Leek RD, Landers RJ, Harris AL, et al: Necrosis correlates with high vascular density and focal macrophage infiltration in invasive carcinoma of the breast. Br J Cancer 79:991-995, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Nishie A, Ono M, Shono T, et al: Macrophage infiltration and heme oxygenase-1 expression correlate with angiogenesis in human gliomas. Clin Cancer Res 5:1107-1113, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Leek RD, Hunt NC, Landers RJ, et al: Macrophage infiltration is associated with VEGF and EGFR expression in breast cancer. J Pathol 190:430-436, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Chen JJW, Wu R, Yang PC, et al: Profiling expression patterns and isolating differentially expressed genes by cDNA microarray system with colorimetry detection. Genomics 51:313-324, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Chu YW, Yang PC, Yang SC, et al: Selection of invasive and metastatic subpopulations from a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 17:353-360, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Chen JJW, Peck K, Hong TM, et al: Global analysis of gene expression in invasion by a lung cancer model. Cancer Res 61:5223-5230, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Ueno T, Toi M, Saji H, et al: Significance of macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 in macrophage recruitment, angiogenesis, and survival in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:3282-3289, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Yuan A, Yang PC, Yu CJ, et al: Interleukin-8 messenger ribonucleic acid expression correlates with tumor progression, tumor angiogenesis, patients survival, and timing of relapse in non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:1957-1963, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Hong TM, Yang PC, Peck K, et al: Profiling the down stream genes of tumor suppressor PTEN in lung cancer cells by cDNA microarray. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 23:355-363, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Ball CA, Chen Y, Panavally S, et al: An introduction to microarray bioinformatics, in Bowtell D and Sambrook J (eds): DNA microarray-A molecular cloning manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2002, pp 536-543

23. Sturn A: Cluster analysis for large scale gene expression studies. Master thesis. Maryland, 2001, pp24-27, http://genome.tugraz.at

24. Bingle L, Brown NJ, Lewis CE: The role of tumour-associated macrophages in tumour progression: Implications for new anticancer therapies. J Pathol 196:254-265, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Tokunaga T, Oshika Y, Abe Y, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA isoform expression pattern is correlated with liver metastasis and poor prognosis in colon cancer. Br J Cancer 77:998-1002, 1998[Medline]

26. Yuan A, Yu CJ, Kuo SH, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor 189 mRNA isoform expression specifically correlates with tumor angiogenesis, patient survival, and postoperative relapse in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:432-441, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Luca M, Huang S, Gershenwald JE, et al: Expression of interleukin-8 by human melanoma cells up-regulates MMP-2 activity and increases tumor growth and metastasis. Am J Pathol 151:1105-1113, 1997[Abstract]

28. Salgado R, Junius S, Benoy I, et al: Circulating interleukin-6 predicts survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Int J Cancer 103:642-646, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

29. Montuori N, Mattiello A, Mancini A, et al: Urokinase-mediated posttranscriptional regulation of urokinase-receptor expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Int J Cancer 105:353-360, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Wascher RA, Huynh KT, Giuliano AE, et al: Stanniocalcin-1: A novel molecular blood and bone marrow marker for human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9:1427-1435, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Dosquet C, Coudert MC, Lepage E, et al: Are angiogenic factors, cytokines, and soluble adhesion molecules prognostic factors in patients with renal cell carcinoma? Clin Cancer Res 3:2451-2458, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Shiozawa J, Ito M, Nakayama T, et al: Expression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 in human colorectal carcinoma. Mod Pathol 13:925-933, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Baltathakis I, Alcantara O, Boldt DH: Expression of different NF-{kappa}B pathway genes in dendritic cells (DCs) or macrophages assessed by gene expression profiling. J Cell Biochem 83:281-290, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

34. Kelly RW, King AE, Critchley HOD: Cytokine control in human endometrium. Reproduction 121:3-19, 2001[Abstract]

35. Giovannucci E, Egan KM, Hunter DJ, et al: Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in women. N Engl J Med 333:609-614, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Harris RE, Namboodiri KK, Farrar WB: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and breast cancer. Epidemiology 7:203-205, 1996[Medline]

37. Richardson P, Hideshima T, Anderson K: Thalidomide: Emerging role in cancer medicine. Annu Rev Med 53:629-657, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

38. Dunzendorfer S, Herold M, Wiedermann CJ: Inducer-specific bi-directional regulation of endothelial interleukin-8 production by thalidomide. Immunopharmacology 43:59-64, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Keifer JA, Guttridge DC, Ashburner BP, et al: Inhibition of NF-kB activity by thalidomide through suppression of IkB kinase activity. J Biol Chem 276:22382-22387, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Liu SF, Ye X, Malik AB: Inhibition of NF{kappa}B activation by pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate prevents in vivo expression of proinflammatory genes. Circulation 100:1330-1337, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Yoo CG, Lee S, Lee CT, et al: Effect of acetylsalicylic acid on endogenous I{kappa}B kinase activity in lung epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 280:L3-L9, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Mukaida N, Morita M, Ishikawa Y, et al: Novel mechanism of glucocorticoid-mediated gene repression. Nuclear factor-kappa B is target for glucocorticoid-mediated interleukin 8 gene repression. J Biol Chem 269:13289-13295, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43. Chang MMJ, Juarez M, Hyde DM, et al: Mechanism of dexamethasone-mediated interleukin-8 gene suppression in cultured airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 280:L107-L115, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Hsu AL, Ching TT, Wang DS, et al: The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib induces apoptosis by blocking Akt activation in human prostate cancer cells independently of Bcl-2. J Biol Chem 275:11397-11403, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Desiderio MA, Pogliaghi G, Dansi P: Regulation of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase expression by cytokines and polyamines in human hepatocarcinoma cells (HepG2). J Cell Physiol 174:125-134, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

46. Gabrielson EW, Pegg AE, Casero RA, Jr.: The induction of spermidine/spermine N1-acetyltransferase (SSAT) is a common event in the response of human primary non-small cell lung carcinomas to exposure to the new antitumor polyamine analogue N1, N11-bis(ethyl)norspermine. Clin Cancer Res 5:1638-1641, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Takimoto Y, Kuramoto A: Regulation of the human platelet-derived growth factor B-chain gene. Hiroshima J Med Sci 42:137-142, 1993[Medline]

48. Jain RK, Booth MF: What brings pericytes to tumor vessels? J Clin Invest 112:1134-1136, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

49. Shimamura T, Hsu TC, Colburn NH, et al: Activation of NF-kappaB is required for PDGF-B chain to transform NIH3T3 cells. Exp Cell Res 274:157-167, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

50. Fujiwara Y, Sugita Y, Nakamori S, et al: Assessment of stanniocalcin-1 mRNA as a molecular marker for micrometastases of various human cancers. Int J Oncol 16:799-804, 2000[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Skrzypski, E. Jassem, M. Taron, J. J. Sanchez, P. Mendez, W. Rzyman, G. Gulida, D. Raz, D. Jablons, M. Provencio, et al.
Three-Gene Expression Signature Predicts Survival in Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 14(15): 4794 - 4799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
S. Arnold, E. Mira, S. Muneer, G. Korpanty, A. W. Beck, S. E. Holloway, S. Manes, and R. A. Brekken
Forced Expression of MMP9 Rescues the Loss of Angiogenesis and Abrogates Metastasis of Pancreatic Tumors Triggered by the Absence of Host SPARC
Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2008; 233(7): 860 - 873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. S. Dave
Follicular lymphoma and the microenvironment
Blood, May 1, 2008; 111(9): 4427 - 4428.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
C.-C. Ho, W.-Y. Liao, C.-Y. Wang, Y.-H. Lu, H.-Y. Huang, H.-Y. Chen, W.-K. Chan, H.-W. Chen, and P.-C. Yang
TREM-1 Expression in Tumor-associated Macrophages and Clinical Outcome in Lung Cancer
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2008; 177(7): 763 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. S. Stearman, L. Dwyer-Nield, M. C. Grady, A. M. Malkinson, and M. W. Geraci
A Macrophage Gene Expression Signature Defines a Field Effect in the Lung Tumor Microenvironment
Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 34 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. D. DuSell, M. Umetani, P. W. Shaul, D. J. Mangelsdorf, and D. P. McDonnell
27-Hydroxycholesterol Is an Endogenous Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 22(1): 65 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]