|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 16 (June 1), 2006: pp. 2599-2600 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0665
The Sword of Damocles and the Treatment of Stage I SeminomaSt Barts and the London Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom To the Editor: While we support Drs Loehrer and Bosl's view that a physician's prime responsibility is In Primum non Noce (ie, above all do no harm), we are less supportive of what they say in their editorial.1 We would certainly agree that patients treated with adjuvant carboplatin have not, as of yet, been observed for the 30 years that was necessary to demonstrate the 18% excess risk after standard radiation therapy (ie, 25 to 30 Gy dog leg field) of dying from a cardiovascular or nongerm cell malignant event.2 However, neither have patients being treated with the newer less intense radiotherapy schedules that Loeher and Bosl recommend uncritically, such as 20 Gy to para-aortics (PA) only,3,4 and recent reports have raised some concern about an increased incidence of late recurrences in these patients.4,5 It is certainly untrue to say that no randomized trials comparing carboplatin with radiotherapy have been performed. The definitive Medical Research Council (MRC) trial TE 19/European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer 30982 trial reported to the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2004, and published in full in 20056 randomly assigned 1,477 patients between radiation and one course carboplatin and demonstrated the clinical equivalence of these two approaches. This, the largest randomized trial ever conducted in testicular cancer, seems to have escaped Loehrer and Bosl's notice. Carboplatin has also clearly established itself in the MRC TE19 trial as less toxic than even the new schedules of radiation in the short term. It was also shown in that trial to have the added advantage of a 72% reduction in the risk of second germ cell cancers in the contralateral testis at 5 years6 compared with radiation. The latest reports from follow-up of carboplatin phase II studies in stage I seminoma7 that we reported to the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2005 plus the data from the MRC TE19 trial6 are summarized in Table 1. This Table presents in an analysis of 1,654 patients that only one patient observed for more than 36 months after treatment has relapsed and 415 have been observed for 5 years and 82 observed for 10 years.
There are now three standards of care for stage 1 seminoma that have proven themselves better in the short term than standard radiation therapy (ie, surveillance, 20 Gy PA strip, and one course of carboplatin). Long-term follow-up for late events are needed for all, but currently they should be available to any patient with stage I seminoma on the basis of informed preference.8 Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Loehrer PJ, Bosl GJ: Carboplatin for stage I seminoma and the sword of Damocles. J Clin Oncol 23:8566-8569, 2005 2. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Lee AK, et al: Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol 22:640-647, 2004 3. Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM, et al: Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I testicular seminoma: A report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328). J Clin Oncol 23:1200-1208, 2005 4. Logue JP, Harris MA, Livsey JE, et al: Short course para-aortic radiation for stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:1304-1309, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 5. Oliver RTD: One-dose carboplatin in seminoma. Lancet 366:1526, 2005 6. Oliver T, Mason MD, Mead GM, et al: Radiotherapy versus singe-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage 1 seminoma: A randomised trial. Lancet 366:293-300, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 7. Oliver TD, Steiner K, Skoneczna H, et al: Pooled analysis of phase II reports of 2 vs. 1 course of carboplatin as adjuvant for stage 1 seminoma. J Clin Oncol 23:395s, 2005 (suppl; abstr 4572) 8. Oliver RTD: Risking less treatment in cancer patients: Lessons from germ-cell tumours. Lancet 2:430-431, 1988[CrossRef][Medline]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|