Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 16 (June 1), 2006: pp. 2599-2600
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0665

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kratzik, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kratzik, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

The Sword of Damocles and the Treatment of Stage I Seminoma

Tim Oliver, Graham Mead, Malcolm Mason, Sally Stenning, Klaus Dieckmann, Hannes Steiner, Maria De Santis, Jorge Aparicio, Iwona Skoneczna, Christian Kratzik

St Barts and the London Hospital Medical School, London, United Kingdom

To the Editor:

While we support Drs Loehrer and Bosl's view that a physician's prime responsibility is In Primum non Noce (ie, above all do no harm), we are less supportive of what they say in their editorial.1 We would certainly agree that patients treated with adjuvant carboplatin have not, as of yet, been observed for the 30 years that was necessary to demonstrate the 18% excess risk after standard radiation therapy (ie, 25 to 30 Gy dog leg field) of dying from a cardiovascular or non–germ cell malignant event.2 However, neither have patients being treated with the newer less intense radiotherapy schedules that Loeher and Bosl recommend uncritically, such as 20 Gy to para-aortics (PA) only,3,4 and recent reports have raised some concern about an increased incidence of late recurrences in these patients.4,5

It is certainly untrue to say that no randomized trials comparing carboplatin with radiotherapy have been performed. The definitive Medical Research Council (MRC) trial TE 19/European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer 30982 trial reported to the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2004, and published in full in 20056 randomly assigned 1,477 patients between radiation and one course carboplatin and demonstrated the clinical equivalence of these two approaches. This, the largest randomized trial ever conducted in testicular cancer, seems to have escaped Loehrer and Bosl's notice.

Carboplatin has also clearly established itself in the MRC TE19 trial as less toxic than even the new schedules of radiation in the short term. It was also shown in that trial to have the added advantage of a 72% reduction in the risk of second germ cell cancers in the contralateral testis at 5 years6 compared with radiation. The latest reports from follow-up of carboplatin phase II studies in stage I seminoma7 that we reported to the American Society of Clinical Oncology in 2005 plus the data from the MRC TE19 trial6 are summarized in Table 1. This Table presents in an analysis of 1,654 patients that only one patient observed for more than 36 months after treatment has relapsed and 415 have been observed for 5 years and 82 observed for 10 years.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Overview of Late Events and Follow-Up of Carboplatin Studies in Stage I Seminoma

 
There are now three standards of care for stage 1 seminoma that have proven themselves better in the short term than standard radiation therapy (ie, surveillance, 20 Gy PA strip, and one course of carboplatin). Long-term follow-up for late events are needed for all, but currently they should be available to any patient with stage I seminoma on the basis of informed preference.8

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Loehrer PJ, Bosl GJ: Carboplatin for stage I seminoma and the sword of Damocles. J Clin Oncol 23:8566-8569, 2005[Free Full Text]

2. Zagars GK, Ballo MT, Lee AK, et al: Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma. J Clin Oncol 22:640-647, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Jones WG, Fossa SD, Mead GM, et al: Randomized trial of 30 versus 20 Gy in the adjuvant treatment of stage I testicular seminoma: A report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328). J Clin Oncol 23:1200-1208, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Logue JP, Harris MA, Livsey JE, et al: Short course para-aortic radiation for stage I seminoma of the testis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:1304-1309, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Oliver RTD: One-dose carboplatin in seminoma. Lancet 366:1526, 2005

6. Oliver T, Mason MD, Mead GM, et al: Radiotherapy versus singe-dose carboplatin in adjuvant treatment of stage 1 seminoma: A randomised trial. Lancet 366:293-300, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Oliver TD, Steiner K, Skoneczna H, et al: Pooled analysis of phase II reports of 2 vs. 1 course of carboplatin as adjuvant for stage 1 seminoma. J Clin Oncol 23:395s, 2005 (suppl; abstr 4572)

8. Oliver RTD: Risking less treatment in cancer patients: Lessons from germ-cell tumours. Lancet 2:430-431, 1988[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kratzik, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kratzik, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online