Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 19 (July 1), 2006: pp. 3142-3149
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.3373

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barredo, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchey, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barredo, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchey, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Isolated CNS Relapse of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Intensive Systemic Chemotherapy and Delayed CNS Radiation: A Pediatric Oncology Group Study

Julio C. Barredo, Meenakshi Devidas, Stephen J. Lauer, Amy Billett, MaryAnne Marymont, Jeanette Pullen, Bruce Camitta, Naomi Winick, William Carroll, A. Kim Ritchey

From the Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; Children's Oncology Group Statistics & Data Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA; Department of Pediatrics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Radiation/Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS; Midwest Children's Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Pediatrics, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY; and the Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

Address reprint requests to Julio C. Barredo, MD, Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, MUSC Children's Hospital, 135 Rutledge Ave, Charleston, SC 29425; e-mail: barredjc{at}musc.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: Prognosis and outcome of children with isolated CNS relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has depended on duration of first complete remission (CR1). This study intensified systemic therapy by delaying CNS radiation for 12 months and tailored CNS radiation by CR1 duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six children with first isolated CNS relapse of ALL were treated with systemic chemotherapy that effectively penetrates into the CSF and intrathecal chemotherapy for 12 months. Patients with CR1 of less than 18 months received craniospinal radiation (24 Gy cranial/15 Gy spinal), whereas those with CR1 of 18 months or more received cranial radiation only (18 Gy), followed by maintenance chemotherapy. Additionally, asymptomatic patients were enrolled in a thiotepa up-front therapeutic window.

RESULTS: Seventy-four (97.4%) of 76 eligible patients achieved a second remission. Overall 4-year event-free survival (EFS) for the 71 precursor B-cell patients was 70.1% ± 5.8%. CR1 duration and National Cancer Institute (NCI; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) risk group at initial diagnosis predicted outcome. Patients with CR1 of less than 18 months and 18 months or more had a 4-year EFS of 51.6% ± 11.3% and 77.7% ± 6.4% (P = .027), respectively. NCI high- versus standard-risk 4-year EFS was 51.4% ± 10.8% and 80.2% ± 6.3% (P = .0018), respectively. A significant difference in EFS between standard risk/CR1 of at least 18 months and both high risk/CR1 of less than 18 months and high risk/CR1 of at least 18 months groups was detected (P = .0068 and .0314, respectively). Response rate to thiotepa was 78%. Most relapses involved the bone marrow, and three second malignancies were reported.

CONCLUSION: Twelve months of intensive systemic chemotherapy with reduced dose cranial radiation (18 Gy) is highly effective for children with isolated CNS relapse and CR1 of 18 months or more. Novel strategies are needed for patients with CR1 of less than 18 months.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
The outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) continues to improve, with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates approaching 80%. These advances, together with effective CNS prophylaxis, have led to significant decreases in incidence of meningeal leukemia.1,2 However, the outlook, until recently, for children with isolated CNS relapses had been poor.3-5 An improved outcome for these patients was recently reported by the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) study 9061 (71% 4-year EFS).1 This was achieved by delaying craniospinal radiation for 6 months to allow initial intensification of systemic chemotherapy with drugs known to have effective CNS penetration.

In POG 9061, duration of initial remission (CR1) was an important prognostic factor for children with isolated CNS leukemia,1 resulting in 4-year EFS for patients with CR1 of at least 18 months of 83% ± 5% versus 46% ± 10% for those with CR1 of less than 18 months (P = .0002).1 The Children's Cancer Group experience showed a 2.8 times higher relative risk of death for patients relapsing early (≤18 months v ≥ 3 years).6 Although overall EFS improved in POG 9061, most failures still occurred in the bone marrow. In addition, craniospinal radiation (24 Gy cranial/15 Gy spinal) exposed patients to potential risks of long-term neurocognitive deficits, and two patients developed secondary brain tumors.1

We now report the results of POG's more recent regimen for isolated CNS relapse of ALL, POG 9412. Our hypothesis was that 6 additional months of intensive systemic chemotherapy (delaying CNS radiation until 1 year) would improve survival by decreasing subsequent systemic relapses while still eradicating meningeal leukemia. We included systemic antileukemic drugs with effective CSF penetration. To minimize long-term neurocognitive sequelae, and because duration of CR1 had predicted outcome, patients with CR1 of at least 18 months received 18 Gy of cranial radiation only, whereas those with CR1 of less than 18 months received conventional craniospinal radiation (24 Gy cranial/15 Gy spinal).

The study design also allowed asymptomatic patients to be enrolled in a single-dose thiotepa (TT) up-front therapeutic window evaluating CSF blast clearance. The rationale for evaluating TT included reported short-term remissions in children with leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,7-9 plus favorable CSF pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients.10


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Between January 1996 and August 2000, POG 9412 enrolled 78 patients. All had ALL in first bone marrow remission with isolated CNS relapse. Criteria for relapse were more than 5 WBC/µL in CSF with blasts, or any number of WBC in CSF with immunophenotypic proof of leukemic relapse (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase [TdT] or CD-10 for B lineage; TdT and/or CD-7 for T lineage) on two consecutive CSF samples 3 weeks apart. Eligibility age was 6 months to 21 years at relapse, and prior brain radiation was permitted. Institutional review board–approved informed consent was obtained before enrollment. Two patients were ineligible; one had started therapy before signing informed consent, and a second had negative CSF on central review. Therefore, analysis was limited to 76 eligible patients. Nineteen of these were also enrolled in the TT window. The follow-up period was until April 2005.

Initial treatment for B-lineage ALL patients varied. Most had received POG front-line protocols consisting primarily of antimetabolite-based therapy with extended triple intrathecal therapy (TIT) for CNS prophylaxis.11-13 All five enrolled T-cell ALL patients were treated with POG 9404, using a Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) ALL Consortium treatment schema with added random assignments to high-dose methotrexate and dexrazoxane,14 plus cranial radiation as CNS prophylaxis.

Treatment
Treatment consisted of 12 months of intensive systemic chemotherapy and TIT with delayed radiation therapy tailored to CR1 duration. Table 1 summarizes the treatment schema. Asymptomatic patients were enrolled on the TT up-front window before induction therapy. Two dose levels, 50mg/m2 (level 1) and 65 mg/m2 (level 2) administered intravenously on week 1 were studied. Complete remission (CR) was defined as complete CSF blasts' clearance, partial remission (PR) was more than 50% clearance, and nonresponse was less than 50% clearance. CSF blasts' clearance was assessed 1 week after a single intravenous (IV) dose of TT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Protocol Design: Pediatric Oncology Group 9412

 
The initial 6-month therapy consisted of induction, consolidation, and intensification I, as per POG 9061.1 Induction of CNS remission included age-adjusted weekly TIT with methotrexate, hydrocortisone, and cytarabine. Therapy intensification during the subsequent 6 months consisted of sequentially administered drug pairs with effective CNS penetration (reinduction and intensification II; Table 1).

Radiation was administered with concomitant chemotherapy at week 51 and was tailored according to duration of CR1 (Table 1). Patients with CR1 of less than 18 months received craniospinal radiation (24 Gy cranial/15 Gy spinal), whereas those with CR1 of 18 months or more received 18 Gy to the cranium only (1.5 Gy daily dose). The Quality Assurance Review Center (Providence, RI) reviewed radiation therapy delivery. Finally, maintenance chemotherapy continued through week 104 (Table 1).

Study Design
This was a feasibility pilot to determine efficacy and toxicity of 12 months of intensified systemic chemotherapy with delayed CNS radiation. The primary objective was estimation of 3-year EFS for patients with isolated CNS relapse. EFS was also to be compared with historical controls (POG 9061).

Sample-size calculations were originally based on detecting a difference in 3-year EFS irrespective of CR1 duration (CR1 < 18 months, early relapse; CR1 ≥ 18 months, late relapse), compared with POG 9061. A total of 156 patients were to be accrued, but because of lower than projected accrual rates, accrual goals were amended in June 1998. Additionally, although EFS in the POG 9061 historical cohort remained stable, the SE of the estimate decreased considerably with longer follow-up, thus improving power (3-year EFS, 71.1% ± 5.3%). The modified accrual target was 77 patients. These small numbers would allow detection of only large differences in EFS compared with historical controls. The EFS for patients with CR1 of less than 18 and CR1 of 18 months or more were estimated, and 95% CIs are provided. The log-rank test was used for all survival comparisons. Cox proportional hazards regression was used for the prognostic factor analyses.

Up-Front Window
The objective of the up-front window was to determine the toxicity and efficacy of TT by assessing clearance of CSF blasts. Close monitoring for toxicity and appropriate stopping rules were included. A CSF WBC of 10 or more was required at window entry to allow evaluation of blasts' clearance. Ten patients would have to be entered at any TT level to obtain three patients with a CSF WBC of 10 or more. If at least a 50% decrease in CSF WBC was not found in three patients at dose level 1, subsequent patients were to be enrolled at dose level 2. The therapeutic window would close after at least 10 assessable patients (including three with a CSF WBC ≥ 10) were entered at dose level 2.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Characteristics
Table 2 presents the patient characteristics. Of 76 eligible patients, 19 asymptomatic patients (25%) were also enrolled onto the TT window. Five of 76 eligible patients exhibited T-cell immunophenotype and were the only ones who had received previous CNS radiation. The median age at study entry was 7.4 years. Sixty-one percent of patients were white, whereas the breakdown of nonwhite patients was Hispanic, 19; African American, five; Native American, one; Hawaiian, one; Asian, one; and other, three. Patient distribution according to CR1 duration was similar to that of POG 9061. The median CSF WBC at study entry was 39.5/µL (1 to 8,400/µL). Most patients had at least 5 WBC/µL in CSF plus blasts, whereas only three patients had less than 5 WBC/µL in CSF plus immunophenotypic proof of meningeal leukemia. All three patients had precursor B-cell with one, three, and three CSF blasts, respectively, at enrollment. One was an early death on therapy (41 days; CR1 < 18 months). The other two (CR1 ≥ 18 months) have not experienced treatment failure (1,611 and 1,879 days of follow-up, respectively). Twenty-nine percent of patients presented with CNS signs/symptoms. Of these, only three patients had neurologic findings (papilledema or cranial nerve palsy), whereas all remainder had headache and/or vomiting.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Patient Characteristics: Pediatric Oncology Group 9412

 
Response to Therapy
Nineteen asymptomatic patients were enrolled on the TT up-front window. Table 3 summarizes the response by CR1 duration, per dose level. The only T-cell patient enrolled (level 1) was not assessable. The patients' characteristics of this group were similar to the entire cohort. Table 4 summarizes the CSF WBC and blasts before and after TT. Response was evaluated 1 week after a single 5-minute intravenous injection of TT. At 65 mg/m2 (level 2), there were three CR and four PR, for an overall response rate of 78%. There were no delays in starting induction therapy, and only two patients at dose level 2 experienced a 2-week delay in commencing consolidation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Thiotepa Therapeutic Window

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Summary of WBC and Blasts in CSF Before and After TT Window (B-precursor ALL patients)

 
Seventy-four (97.4%) of 76 patients achieved a complete response after induction chemotherapy. One patient who did not achieve a CR had persistence of CSF blasts and cranial nerve palsy, and one was an early death on therapy.

EFS
The EFS analysis excluded the five previously irradiated T-cell patients and therefore was restricted to 71 eligible precursor B-cell patients. Median time to treatment failure was 19.05 months (1.35 to 77.73 months). Median follow-up for censored patients was 63.5 months (26.38 to 102.99 months). The overall 4-year EFS rate was 70.1% (95% CI, 58.6% to 81.6%; Fig 1). EFS for patients with CR1 of less than 18 months was significantly lower (log-rank P = .027) compared with that of patients with CR1 ≥ 18 months: 4-year EFS of 51.6% (95% CI, 29.4% to 73.8%) versus 77.7% (95% CI, 65.2% of 90.2%; Fig 1). The 4- and 5-year EFS rates (both overall and by CR1 duration) were identical on this study. The SEs of the estimates at 5 years were higher than that at 4 years. Hence 4-year estimates were used in this report. No significant difference in EFS was seen between participants in the TT window versus nonparticipants. EFS for early- and late-relapsing patients on the current study were compared with that on POG 9061. No significant differences were found, although the small sample sizes limited the power to detect differences. There were 22 events (10 and 12 in CR1 < 18 and CR ≥ 18 months, respectively) among 71 patients. These included 11 relapses, nine deaths, and two second malignancies. Four-year overall survival for precursor B-cell patients was 77.2% (95% CI, 66.8% to 87.6%). The 4-year overall survival rates by CR1 duration were 56.7% ± 11.2% versus 85.8% ± 5.3% (P = .0129); and rates by National Cancer Institute (NCI; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) risk group were 55.1% ± 10.7% versus 89.1% ± 4.9% (P = .0069).


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Event-free survival (EFS) of precursor B-cell (pre-B) patients enrolled on Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) 9412 (n = 71) overall and by duration of first remission. The 4-year overall EFS was 70.1% ± 5.8%. The 4-year EFS for patients with initial remission (CR1) duration less than 18 months was 51.6% ± 11.3%, and for those with CR1 duration of at least 18 months, it was 77.7% ± 6.4% (P = .0267).

 
Cox regression analysis was conducted on the 71 precursor B-cell patients to study the prognostic effect of race, sex, WBC at diagnosis, age at diagnosis, NCI risk group at initial diagnosis, CSF blasts at diagnosis, CR1 duration, and WBC in CSF at relapse (Table 5). NCI risk group at initial diagnosis was the most significant prognostic factor, with a four-fold higher risk of failure for NCI high-risk patients (proportional hazards ratio, 4.57; 95% CI, 1.34 to 15.53). In the presence of NCI risk, CR1 duration was no longer significant. Figure 2 gives the EFS by NCI risk (4-year EFS, 51.4% ± 10.8% v 80.2% ± 6.3%; P = .0018). Figure 3 gives the four curves for the combination of NCI risk and CR1 duration. Pair-wise comparisons showed that there was a significant difference between standard risk/CR1 of at least 18 months group and both high risk/CR1 of less than 18 months and also high risk/CR1 of at least 18 months groups (P = .0068 and .0314, respectively). Note that the small sample sizes in each subgroup and the significant correlation between NCI risk and CR1 duration limits the interpretation of this analysis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Prognostic Factor Analysis

 

Figure 2
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Event-free survival (EFS) of precursor B-cell (pre-B) patients enrolled on Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) 9412 by National Cancer Institute (NCI; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) risk group at diagnosis. The 4-year EFS for high-risk patients was 51.4% ± 10.8% versus 80.2% ± 6.3% for standard risk (P = .0018).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Event-free survival (EFS) of precursor B-cell (pre-B) patients enrolled on Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) 9412 by National Cancer Institute (NCI; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) risk and duration of first remission. Four-year EFS: 44.9% ± 14.9%, high risk/CR1 of less than 18 months; 58.3% ± 15.4%, high risk/CR1 of at least 18 months; 62.5% ± 17.1%, standard risk/CR1 of less than 18 months; 83.9% ± 6.5%, standard risk/CR1 of at least 18 months.

 
All relapses occurred within 36 months of study enrollment. Table 6 gives the breakdown of sites of relapse by CR1 duration B-precursor ALL (Bp-ALL). There were 11 relapses: five in the CNS alone and six involving the marrow (three in the marrow alone; two in the marrow and CNS; and one in the marrow, testes, and kidney). Only one of the CNS relapses (at 3 months) occurred before CNS radiation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Relapses on Pediatric Oncology Group 9412 (B-precursor ALL Patients)

 
Two patients developed second malignancies as the first event on study (myelodysplastic syndrome and eosinophilic leukemia 3.6 and 6.5 years, respectively, from study enrollment). A third patient was diagnosed with acute monocytic leukemia after relapsing in the marrow, testes, and kidney.

Twenty-eight patients were removed from protocol therapy because of relapse (n = 11), toxicity (n = 5), death on study (n = 3), second malignancy (n=1), BMT in remission (n = 2), other (n = 4), lost to follow-up (n=1), and refusal of further therapy (n = 1).

All five T-cell patients had received prior cranial radiation and hence were excluded from the primary analysis. Table 7 summarizes these data. Among the early relapses, one patient experienced failure in the CNS (retinal and optic nerve) within 2.76 months of enrollment and died 7 months later, and was the only T-cell patient who received TT (50 mg/m2). Of the remaining two early relapses, one died as a result of infection (12.25 months), and the other remains in remission (66.23 months). Of the two late relapses, one remains in remission (64.39 months) and the second had a CNS relapse (21.98 months from study entry) and died 8 months later.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. T-Cell Patients Summary

 
Toxicity
Toxicity was acceptable despite 12 months of intensive systemic chemotherapy. By study design, a maximum 8-week delay for commencement of radiation (week 50) was allowed. Most patients commenced radiation between weeks 51 and 53, and only 11 (15%) were delayed beyond 2 weeks. Therefore, the safety and feasibility of administering 12 months of intensive systemic chemotherapy and delayed CNS radiation was demonstrated.

The most common toxicity was myelosuppression, with 70 and 66 episodes of grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. Induction toxicity was not significantly different between patients receiving TT and the remaining cohort. There were four septic deaths, three from bacterial sepsis (Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter species, and multiple organisms, respectively), and one from cytomegalovirus pneumonitis. Myelotoxicity was most severe after high-dose cytarabine. Nevertheless, overall treatment was delivered on schedule as attested by on-time delivery of radiation in 85% of patients. Four patients developed uncomplicated seizures, and four patients developed grade 3/4 soft tissue reactions after L-asparaginase injection, two requiring surgical debridment. Once switched to Erwinia, most patients were able to complete all doses of L-asparaginase.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
This report describes 76 children with first isolated CNS relapse of ALL treated with a regimen of intensive chemotherapy for 12 months and delayed CNS radiation. The 4-year EFS of 77.7% ± 6.4% for patients with CR1 of at least 18 months was similar to that in the predecessor study POG 9061, despite reduced dose of cranial radiation (18 Gy) and elimination of spinal radiation. For patients with CR1 of less than 18 months, the EFS of 49.4% ± 11.1% was also comparable.1 The 4-year overall survival rate for the entire group was 77.2% ± 5.3%. Therefore, intensive systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy for 12 months with delayed, and reduced-dose CNS radiation for late relapses, followed by maintenance therapy, is a highly efficacious retrieval regimen for this cohort.

The treatment philosophy of intensive systemic therapy with antileukemic drugs that penetrate the CNS plus delayed CNS radiation used by POG, has resulted in significant improvements in outcome for patients with isolated CNS relapse of ALL. Previously, most studies had reported EFS rates below 50%,3,4,15,16 whereas more recently, two small studies reported 4-year EFS of approximately 70%.5,17 This shift in treatment philosophy resulted from the realization that most failures after isolated CNS relapse occurred in the bone marrow. Therefore, we designed a regimen that intensified systemic therapy for 12 months while delaying radiation. Although our results proved the feasibility of delaying CNS radiation for 12 months, this regimen did not offer better systemic disease control.1 This pattern of failure supports our hypothesis that extramedullary relapse of ALL constitutes an early manifestation of systemic relapse. Indeed, three studies reported molecular evidence of bone marrow involvement at the time of CNS relapse.18-20 Available data would suggest that hematologic relapse after CNS relapse arises through persistence of refractory bone marrow disease, rather than reseeding from the CNS. It is tempting to speculate that intrinsic molecular differences within leukemic clones or differences in host somatic gene polymorphisms may influence the site of relapse. These questions are being addressed in the ongoing Children’s Oncology Group trial for extramedullary relapse of ALL (AALL02P2).

NCI risk group was an independent prognostic factor on this study. When both NCI risk and CR1 duration were combined, patients with standard risk/CR1 of at least 18 months group did significantly better than both the high risk/CR1 of less than 18 months and high risk/CR1 of at least 18 months groups (P = .0068 and .0314, respectively). All other factors analyzed did not predict outcome. CR1 duration has been reported as independently prognostic on most other relapse studies. Therefore, the two major contributions of POG 9412 are the demonstration of the predictive value of NCI risk group in isolated CNS relapse and the achievement of a 4-year EFS of 83.9% ± 6.5% (P = .0085) for patients with standard risk/CR1 of at least 18 months. The small number of patients in each subgroup and the fact that NCI risk at initial diagnosis and CR1 duration are highly correlated limits the interpretation of the prognostic factor analysis. Additionally, patients with CR1 of at least 18 months likely benefit from exposure to lower doses of CNS radiation.

Data from the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program indicate that by 2010, one in 250 adults will likely be childhood cancer survivors.21 Therefore, efficacious therapeutic strategies aimed at ameliorating long-term adverse effects are essential. The development of progressive neurocognitive deficits and second neopalsms in children receiving whole-brain radiotherapy is well documented.22-29 Spinal axis radiation also contributes to long-term cardiopulmonary, renal, and growth impairment in cancer survivors.30-32 Consequently, it is significant that our regimen maintained efficacy despite reduction of radiation therapy for patients with CR1 of at least 18 months. Our data suggest that further reduction in dose or elimination of CNS radiation is feasible in patients with CR1 of at least 18 months and should be considered to decrease long-term disabilities in childhood cancer survivors.

A secondary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of systemic intravenous TT in clearing CSF blasts. An in vitro 50% inhibitory concentration of 1.5 to 8 µmol/L was reported for leukemia,7,8,33,34 and more importantly, a pediatric phase I study demonstrated CSF plasma area-under-the-concentration-time-curve ratios for the two active metabolites, TT and Tepa (TP), of 1.02 and 0.96 respectively.10 TT at 65 mg/m2 exhibited and overall response rate of 78% and may be useful in future regimens for CNS relapse.

In conclusion, our data demonstrate that reduced cranial radiation (18 Gy) without spinal radiation is the treatment of choice for Bp-ALL patients with isolated CNS relapse and CR1 of at least 18 months. In contrast, the added risk of chemotherapy-induced toxicities associated with 6 additional months of intensive chemotherapy without improvement in EFS does not warrant this approach for patients with CR1 of less than 18 months. Therefore, new strategies need to be explored for early-relapse patients.35,36


    Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    Author Contributions
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 

Conception and design: Julio C. Barredo, A. Kim Ritchey

Provision of study materials or patients: Julio C. Barredo, Stephen J. Lauer, Amy Billett, Jeanette Pullen, Bruce Camitta, Naomi Winick, William Carroll, A. Kim Ritchey

Collection and assembly of data: Julio C. Barredo, Meenakshi Devidas

Data analysis and interpretation: Julio C. Barredo, Meenakshi Devidas, Stephen J. Lauer, Amy Billett, MaryAnne Marymont, Jeanette Pullen, Bruce Camitta, Naomi Winick, William Carroll, A. Kim Ritchey

Manuscript writing: Julio C. Barredo, Meenakshi Devidas, Stephen J. Lauer, Amy Billett, MaryAnne Marymont, Jeanette Pullen, Bruce Camitta, Naomi Winick, William Carroll, A. Kim Ritchey

Final approval of manuscript: Julio C. Barredo, Stephen J. Lauer, Amy Billett, Jeanette Pullen, Bruce Camitta, Naomi Winick, William Carroll, A. Kim Ritchey

 


    NOTES
 
Presented in part at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, IL, May 31-June 3, 2003.

Authors' disclosures of potential con- flicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
1. Ritchey AK, Pollock BH, Lauer SJ, et al: Improved survival of children with isolated CNS relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A pediatric oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 17:3745-3752, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Silverman LB, Declerck L, Gelber RD, et al: Results of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium protocols for children with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1981-1995). Leukemia 14:2247-2256, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Winick NJ, Smith SD, Shuster J, et al: Treatment of CNS relapse in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 11:271-278, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Henze G, Fengler R, Hartmann R, et al: Six-year experience with a comprehensive approach to the treatment of recurrent childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL-REZ BFM 85): A relapse study of the BFM group. Blood 78:1166-1172, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Mandell LR, Steinherz P, Fuks Z: Delayed central nervous system (CNS) radiation in childhood CNS acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of a pilot trial. Cancer 66:447-450, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Gaynon PS, Trigg ME, Heerema NA, et al: Children's Cancer Group trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 1983-1995. Leukemia 14:2223-2233, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Shay H, Zarafonetis C, Smith N, et al: Treatment of leukemia with triethylene thiophosphoramide (thio-TEPA): Preliminary results in experimental and clinical leukemia. AMA Arch Intern Med 92:628-645, 1953[Medline]

8. Rundles RW, Barton WB: Triethylene melamine in the treatment of neoplastic disease. Blood 7:483-507, 1952[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Gutin PH, Weiss HD, Wiernik PH, et al: Intrathecal N, N', N'-triethylenethiophosphoramide [thio-TEPA (NSC 6396)] in the treatment of malignant meningeal disease: Phase I-II study. Cancer 38:1471-1475, 1976[CrossRef][Medline]

10. Heideman RL, Cole DE, Balis F, et al: Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of thiotepa in the cerebrospinal fluid and plasma of pediatric patients: Evidence for dose-dependent plasma clearance of thiotepa. Cancer Res 49:736-741, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Mahoney DH Jr, Shuster J, Nitschke R, et al: Intermediate-dose intravenous methotrexate with intravenous mercaptopurine is superior to repetitive low-dose oral methotrexate with intravenous mercaptopurine for children with lower-risk B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 16:246-254, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Pullen J, Boyett J, Shuster J, et al: Extended triple intrathecal chemotherapy trial for prevention of CNS relapse in good-risk and poor-risk patients with B-progenitor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 11:839-849, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Lauer SJ, Shuster JJ, Mahoney DH Jr, et al: A comparison of early intensive methotrexate/mercaptopurine with early intensive alternating combination chemotherapy for high-risk B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group phase III randomized trial. Leukemia 15:1038-1045, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Asselin B, Shuster J, Amylon M, et al: Improved event-free survival (EFS) with high dose methotrexate 9HDM) in T-cell lymphoblastic leuekmia 9T-ALL) and advanced lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-NHL): A Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) study. Proc Soc Clin Oncol 20:367a, 2001 (abstr 1464)

15. Gelber RD, Sallan SE, Cohen HJ, et al: Central nervous system treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Long-term follow-up of patients diagnosed between 1973 and 1985. Cancer 72:261-270, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]

16. Land VJ, Thomas PR, Boyett JM, et al: Comparison of maintenance treatment regimens for first central nervous system relapse in children with acute lymphocytic leukemia: A Pediatric Oncology Group study. Cancer 56:81-87, 1985[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Ribeiro RC, Rivera GK, Hudson M, et al: An intensive re-treatment protocol for children with an isolated CNS relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 13:333-338, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Neale GA, Pui CH, Mahmoud HH, et al: Molecular evidence for minimal residual bone marrow disease in children with ‘isolated’ extra-medullary relapse of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 8:768-775, 1994[Medline]

19. Goulden N, Langlands K, Steward C, et al: PCR assessment of bone marrow status in ‘isolated’ extramedullary relapse of childhood B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 87:282-285, 1994[Medline]

20. O'Reilly J, Meyer B, Baker D, et al: Correlation of bone marrow minimal residual disease and apparent isolated extramedullary relapse in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Leukemia 9:624-627, 1995[Medline]

21. Bleyer WA: The impact of childhood cancer on the United States and the world. CA Cancer J Clin 40:355-367, 1990[Medline]

22. Kieffer-Renaux V, Bulteau C, Grill J, et al: Patterns of neuropsychological deficits in children with medulloblastoma according to craniospatial irradiation doses. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:741-745, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Gajjar A, Mulhern RK, Heideman RL, et al: Medulloblastoma in very young children: Outcome of definitive craniospinal irradiation following incomplete response to chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 12:1212-1216, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Steen RG, Spence D, Wu S, et al: Effect of therapeutic ionizing radiation on the human brain. Ann Neurol 50:787-795, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Waber DP, Tarbell NJ, Fairclough D, et al: Cognitive sequelae of treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Cranial radiation requires an accomplice. J Clin Oncol 13:2490-2496, 1995[Abstract]

26. Brown RT, Madan-Swain A, Walco GA, et al: Cognitive and academic late effects among children previously treated for acute lymphocytic leukemia receiving chemotherapy as CNS prophylaxis. J Pediatr Psychol 23:333-340, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Appleton RE, Farrell K, Zaide J, et al: Decline in head growth and cognitive impairment in survivors of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Arch Dis Child 65:530-534, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Jankovic M, Brouwers P, Valsecchi MG, et al: Association of 1800 cGy cranial irradiation with intellectual function in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: ISPACC—International Study Group on Psychosocial Aspects of Childhood Cancer. Lancet 344:224-227, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]

29. Pui CH, Cheng C, Leung W, et al: Extended follow-up of long-term survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 349:640-649, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Leung W, Hudson M, Zhu Y, et al: Late effects in survivors of infant leukemia. Leukemia 14:1185-1190, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Relander T, Cavallin-Stahl E, Garwicz S, et al: Gonadal and sexual function in men treated for childhood cancer. Med Pediatr Oncol 35:52-63, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Probert JC, Parker BR: The effects of radiation therapy on bone growth. Radiology 114:155-162, 1975[Abstract]

33. Egorin MJ, Snyder SW: Characterization of nonexchangeable radioactivity in L1210 cells incubated with [14C]thiotepa: Labeling of phosphatidylethanolamine. Cancer Res 50:4044-4049, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Miller B, Tenenholz T, Egorin MJ, et al: Cellular pharmacology of N,N',N''-triethylene thiophosphoramide. Cancer Lett 41:157-168, 1988[CrossRef][Medline]

35. Messina C, Cesaro S, Rondelli R, et al: Autologous bone marrow transplantation for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Italy. AIEOP/FONOP-TMO Group: Italian Association of Paediatric Haemato-Oncology. Bone Marrow Transplant 21:1015-1021, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

36. Nagatoshi Y, Kawano Y, Nagayama J, et al: Treatment of isolated central nervous system relapse in high-risk lymphoid malignancy with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation and extended intrathecal therapy. Br J Haematol 125:766-768, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted July 13, 2005; accepted April 26, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
C.-H. Pui, D. Campana, D. Pei, W. P. Bowman, J. T. Sandlund, S. C. Kaste, R. C. Ribeiro, J. E. Rubnitz, S. C. Raimondi, M. Onciu, et al.
Treating Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia without Cranial Irradiation
N. Engl. J. Med., June 25, 2009; 360(26): 2730 - 2741.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Malempati, P. S. Gaynon, H. Sather, M. K. La, and L. C. Stork
Outcome After Relapse Among Children With Standard-Risk Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Children's Oncology Group Study CCG-1952
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2007; 25(36): 5800 - 5807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
C. Urban, W. Schwinger, M. Benesch, P. Sovinz, G. Henze, and H. Greinix
Autologous Cord Blood Transplantation in a Child With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Central Nervous System Relapse
Pediatrics, May 1, 2007; 119(5): 1042 - 1043.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ASH Education BookHome page
C.-H. Pui
Central Nervous System Disease in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Prophylaxis and Treatment
Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 142 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barredo, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchey, A. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barredo, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ritchey, A. K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online