Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 20 (July 10), 2006: pp. 3310
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.3255

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markman, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

Normal CA-125 and the Risk of Progression in Ovarian Cancer

Maurie Markman

The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

To the Editor:

In a recent article in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Santillan et al1 provide provocative data suggesting that even within the normal range, a persistently rising serum cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) provides strong evidence for progressive ovarian cancer. Despite this observation, which is supported by the analyses of others,2,3 the investigators appropriately conclude: "increasing within the normal range serum CA-125 levels should not be used as the sole indicator for starting potentially toxic therapy."1

Thus, it is rather surprising that Santillan et al complete their discussion with the following statement: "For selected patients with localized ovarian cancer recurrence that may benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery, a comprehensive radiographic imaging survey (PET-CT) at the time of minimal CA-125 elevation may facilitate early detection and successful surgical resection."1 What existing phase III trial data support the clinical relevance associated with finding localized recurrent ovarian cancer or that a comprehensive imaging survey ("PET-CT") improves outcome in the setting of recurrent ovarian cancer?4 While a formal evaluation of the utility of early detection and surgical resection of recurrent ovarian cancer is a rational suggestion, this must be done through the conduct of a well-designed randomized phase III study.

Further, in the complete absence of evidence-based (phase III trial) data supporting this general management philosophy, it is difficult to accept the statement that this approach is appropriate for "selected patients" outside the setting of such a trial. The legitimate concern here is that the statement of Santillan et al, may (in fact) be used to justify an expensive, aggressive, potentially morbid, and unproven strategy in a "selected patient" with ovarian cancer who experiences a "rising serum CA-125 level with the normal range."

Author's Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The author indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Santillan A, Garg R, Zahurak ML, et al: Risk of epithelial ovarian recurrence in patients with rising serum CA-125 levels within the normal range. J Clin Oncol 23:9338-9343, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Crawford SM, Peace J: Does the nadir CA-125 concentration predict a long-term outcome after chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary? Ann Oncol 16:47-50, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Markman M, Liu PY, Rothenberg ML, et al: Relationship between pretreatment CA-125 and risk of relapse in advanced ovarian cancer patients achieving a clinical complete response who received maintenance therapy: A retrospective study of the Southwest Oncology Group and the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol (in press)[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Markman M: The use of PET scans in ovarian cancer: A diagnostic technique in search of an indication. J Clin Oncol 23:7385-7387[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Markman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Markman, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online