Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 20 (July 10), 2006: pp. e38
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.8502

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chatal, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chatal, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Jean François Chatal

University of Nantes, Nantes, France

In their letter to the editor, Machens and Dralle comment on our recent article on medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) patients treated with radioimmunotherapy.1 They question the practicality of calcitonin doubling time (DT) measurements as a prognostic marker. All MTC patients have calcitonin measurements before and after surgery, and some show persistent calcitonin levels after surgery, sometimes rising with time. In practice, probably because there is no established therapeutic option when surgery has failed, serial calcitonin measurements are performed before a treatment is proposed. Then, in most cases, assessing calcitonin DT with a reasonable precision is not a problem. If the DT is short (poor prognosis), a series of measurements over a couple of months may suffice; if it is long, then more time is required, but the prognosis is good in the absence of treatment.

In an article not cited by Machens and Dralle, which offers more information on a group of 65 MTC patients monitored for years and not given any treatment because none was available, we investigated both calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as potential prognostic serum markers.2 Although CEA and calcitonin DT were reasonably well correlated, and despite CEA measurements showing less fluctuation, CEA was found to be slightly less predictive than calcitoinin as a prognostic serum marker in a group of 46 patients in whom both CEA and calcitonin DT were available. However, identical conclusions could be reached by examining CEA or calcitonin: patients with DT shorter than 2 years are high-risk patients. The actual reason why calcitonin was chosen as the primary marker in our current study was because among the 65 MTC patients, 12 patients had normal CEA levels over the entire history of their disease (and thus no DT could be calculated), including 4 patients in the poor prognostic group (DT < 2 years), of whom two died of MTC.

As to the expression of CEA by MTC cells, many studies with radiolabeled anti-CEA antibodies, diagnostic or therapeutic, have shown that it is quite consistent, and that a normal circulating CEA level does not mean that tumor cells do not express CEA at their membrane.3 More likely, small tumor mass and slow CEA secretion rates result in serum CEA levels that are considered normal because low circulating CEA is present in the normal population.

Machens et al cite their work in press that preoperative CEA levels predict the chance that surgery will be successful in eradicating the disease.4 For all patients we have studied, whether in the untreated controls or in the treated group, surgery failed when postoperative calcitonin levels remained elevated. For a large number of these patients, preoperative data were scarce and in most cases only preoperative calcitonin was available. Thus, unfortunately, we cannot answer their question, but agree that preoperative CEA levels should be documented in future studies. The fact that patients with high postoperative CEA levels, thus presumably high preoperative CEA levels, may have a variable prognosis in accordance with the biomarkers DT indicates that both markers should be monitored for a global management of MTC.

Author's Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The author indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Chatal JF, Campion L, Kraeber-Bodéré F, et al: Survival improvement in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma who undergo pretargeted anti-carcinoembryonic-antigen radioimmunotherapy: A collaborative study with the French Endocrine Tumor Group. J Clin Oncol 24:1705-1711, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Barbet J, Campion L, Kraeber-Bodere F, Chatal JF, et al: Prognostic impact of serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen doubling-times in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:6077-6084, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Barbet J, Peltier P, Bardet S, et al: Radioimmunodetection of medullary thyroid carcinoma using indium-111 bivalent hapten and anti-CEA x anti-DTPA-indium bispecific antibody. J Nucl Med 39:1172-1178, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Machens A, Ukkat J, Hauptmann S, et al: Abnormal carcinoembryonnic antigen levels and medullary thyroid progression: A multivariate analysis. Arch Surg (in press)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chatal, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chatal, J. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online