Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 21 (July 20), 2006: pp. 3512
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0375

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verheijen, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verheijen, R. H.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

René H. Verheijen

VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Leon F. Massuger

Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Benedict B. Benigno

Southeastern Gynecologic Oncology, Atlanta, GA

Alberto Lopes

Northern Gynaecological Oncology Center, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Tyne & Wear, United Kingdom

Michael V. Seiden

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

The SMART Study Group

We appreciate and acknowledge that the Nicholson et al abstract presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology in New Orleans, LA, May 20-23, 20001 indeed accurately predicted the outcome of our large, well-powered study.2 We could and would, however, not refer to their predictive results as these had not been fully published in a peer-reviewed journal, due to the lack of completeness which Nicholson claims. Unfortunately, both their study and our study have been unable to show a survival benefit for females with ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy. However, with transparent and complete disclosure of all the information, we still hope to benefit patients in the longer term.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest


Authors Employment Leadership Consultant Stock Honoraria Research Funds Testimony Other

René H. Verheijen Antisoma (B)
Leon F. Massuger Antisoma (B)
Benedict B. Benigno Antisoma (B)
Alberto Lopes Antisoma (B)
Michael V. Seiden Antisoma (A)

Dollar Amount Codes (A) < $10,000 (B) $10,000-99,999 (C) ≥ $100,000 (N/R) Not Required

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by Antisoma Ltd, London, United Kingdom, and Hoffmann-La Roche Inc, Basel, Switzerland. The authors represented the SMART study group in this trial.

REFERENCES

1. Nicholson S, Bell SJ, McCormack M, et al: A randomised phase III trial of adjuvant intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy in ovarian cancer. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19:1514, 2000 (abstr 1514)

2. Verheijen RH, Massuger LF, Benigno BB, et al: Phase III trial of intraperitoneal therapy with Yttrium-90-labeled HMFGI1 murine monoclonal antibody in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after a surgically defined complete remission. J Clin Oncol 24:571-578, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Not So "SMART"
    Steve Nicholson
    JCO 2006 24: 3511-3512 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. Benson III
New Approaches to Assessing and Treating Early-Stage Colon and Rectal Cancers: Cooperative Group Strategies for Assessing Optimal Approaches in Early-Stage Disease
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6913s - 6920s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Verheijen, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Verheijen, R. H.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online