|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0855 on July 5 2006 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Physical Activity and Survival After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis
From the Division of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Harvard School of Public Health; Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA Address reprint requests to Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, MD, MPH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: jmeyerhardt{at}partners.org
PURPOSE: Physically active individuals have a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer but the influence of exercise on cancer survival is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: By a prospective, observational study of 573 women with stage I to III colorectal cancer, we studied colorectal cancerspecific and overall mortality according to predefined physical activity categories before and after diagnosis and by change in activity after diagnosis. To minimize bias by occult recurrences, we excluded women who died within 6 months of their postdiagnosis physical activity assessment. RESULTS: Increasing levels of exercise after diagnosis of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer reduced cancer-specific mortality (P for trend = .008) and overall mortality (P for trend = .003). Compared with women who engaged in less than 3 metabolic equivalent task [MET] -hours per week of physical activity, those engaging in at least 18 MET-hours per week had an adjusted hazard ratio for colorectal cancerspecific mortality of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.82) and an adjusted hazard ratio for overall mortality of 0.43 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74). These results remained unchanged even after excluding women who died within 12 and 24 months of activity assessment. Prediagnosis physical activity was not predictive of mortality. Women who increased their activity (when comparing prediagnosis to postdiagnosis values) had a hazard ratio of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.97) for colorectal cancer deaths and a hazard ratio of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.85) for any-cause death, compared with those with no change in activity. CONCLUSION: Recreational physical activity after the diagnosis of stages I to III colorectal cancer may reduce the risk of colorectal cancerspecific and overall mortality.
In both prospective1-11 and retrospective12-20 studies, physical activity is associated with a significant likelihood of developing colorectal cancer. The International Agency for Research on Cancer concluded that the evidence supports a causal relation between inactivity and colorectal cancer risk.21 However, it is largely unknown whether exercise influences survival of patients with established cancer.22,23 Cancer patients often inquire about the utility of lifestyle changes beyond standard therapies.24 Recent data suggest that physically active breast cancer survivors experience a superior survival compared with those who are more sedentary.25 In a recent study of stage III colon cancer patients participating in an adjuvant chemotherapy trial, increasing postdiagnosis physical activity was associated with significant reductions in cancer recurrence and mortality.22 In the latter study, because data on activity before diagnosis were not available, the relative influence of prediagnosis and postdiagnosis exercise or change in activity could not be assessed. We studied the impact of recreational physical activity among women with local and regional colorectal cancer who were participating in a large, prospective cohort study that was initiated before cancer diagnosis (the Nurses' Health Study).
Study Population In 1976, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) cohort was established when 121,700 female registered nurses answered a mailed questionnaire on risk factors for cancer and cardiovascular disease.26,27 Every 2 years, participants receive follow-up questionnaires to update information on potential risk factors and report new cancer and disease diagnoses. This study was approved by the Human Subjects Committee at Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Measurement of Colon Cancer
Measurement of Mortality
Exclusions
Exposure Assessment Although we only included women with stage I to III cancer, we presumed that those who eventually died as a result of colorectal cancer had metastatic disease before death. To avoid bias due to declining activity immediately before and after diagnosis of metastatic cancer, physical activity was not updated (thereby a single prediagnosis and single postdiagnosis measurement was determined). Each activity on the questionnaire was assigned a MET score.31 One MET is the energy expenditure for sitting quietly. MET scores are defined as the ratio of the metabolic rate associated with specific activities divided by the resting metabolic rate. The values from the individual activities were summed for a total MET-hours per week score. Categories of MET-hours per week were predefined as less than 3, 3 to 8.9, 9 to 17.9, 18 or more, to correspond to the equivalent of less than 1, 1 to less than 3, 3 to less than 6, 6 or more hours per week of walking at an average pace, consistent with prior analyses.32 Our activity questionnaire has been validated previously against activity diaries.33,34 For analyses of prediagnosis physical activity, the response from the immediate prior survey was used (median, 6 months before diagnosis). If a response were missing, one previous assessment would be carried forward; otherwise, the patient was not included in those analyses. For postdiagnosis analyses, the first physical activity assessment collected at least 1 year but no more than 4 years after diagnosis (median, 22 months) was used to avoid assessment during the period of active treatment. For change in activity, patients who changed from a higher to lower category before and after diagnosis, respectively, were categorized as decreasing activity, patients who changed from a lower to higher category were categorized as increasing activity, and patients who remained in the same category were categorized as no change.
Covariates
Statistical Analyses
Baseline Characteristics by Physical Activity Category Among the 573 eligible participants with stage I, II, or III colorectal cancer, there were 132 deaths, of which 80 were classified as colorectal cancerspecific deaths. The median time of follow-up from date of diagnosis of women who are alive was 9.6 years (with 95% observed for 5 or more years). Baseline characteristics of the 573 patients are shown according to categories of both prediagnosis and postdiagnosis physical activity (Table 1). In general, women who were more active had a lower BMI and were less likely to have smoked cigarettes.
Physical Activity After Diagnosis We assessed the influence of physical activity after the diagnosis of colorectal cancer on patient survival (Table 2). Higher postdiagnosis physical activity was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of colorectal cancerspecific and overall mortality, even after adjusting for other predictors of recurrence. Compared with patients who reported less than 3 total MET-hours per week of activity, those reporting 18 or more MET-hours per week had an adjusted HR for cancer-specific mortality of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.82; P for trend = .008). Similarly, the adjusted HR for overall mortality was 0.43 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.74; P for trend = .003).
Given that lower levels of physical activity among patients at risk for cancer recurrence could reflect occult cancer recurrence or impending death, we excluded patients who developed cancer recurrence or died within 6 months of completing the physical activity assessment in our primary analyses (n = 8). To address this issue further, we repeated our analyses with a restriction of 12 months. Although statistical power was somewhat diminished, women in the highest category had an HR of 0.54 (95% CI, 0.25 to 1.19) for colorectal cancerspecific mortality (P for trend = .08) and an HR of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.91) for overall mortality (P for trend = .02), compared with the least active women. If we extend this restriction period further to 2 years, the relationship continued to be evident, with an HR of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.12 to 1.13) for colorectal cancerspecific mortality (P for trend = .05) and an HR of 0.39 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.78) for overall mortality (P for trend = .01).
For the analysis of 5-year survival, activity levels were collapsed into three categories (< 3, 3 to 17.9, and
We examined the influence of postdiagnosis physical activity across strata of other predictors of cancer recurrence and mortality (Table 3). The inverse relation between postdiagnosis physical activity and cancer-specific mortality remained largely unchanged across strata of BMI, age, pathologic stage, site of disease, or year of diagnosis.
Physical Activity Before Diagnosis In contrast to postdiagnosis physical activity, physical activity before diagnosis (Table 4) was not significantly associated with either cancer-specific or overall mortality. When we adjusted for prediagnosis physical activity as well as other predictors of cancer survival, increasing postdiagnosis physical activity was still associated with a significant reduction in both colorectal cancerspecific mortality (P for trend = .02) as well as overall mortality (P for trend = .002).
Change in Physical Activity For participants with a prediagnosis and postdiagnosis activity measurement, we calculated change in physical activity based on the difference in exercise categories at those two time points (Fig 3). Compared with women who did not materially change their activity level (n = 203), women who increased their activity (n = 144) had an adjusted HR of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.24 to 0.97) for colorectal cancerspecific mortality and an adjusted HR of 0.51 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.85) for overall mortality. In contrast, women who decreased their activity level (n = 176) experienced a modest, though nonsignificant, increase in both cancer-specific (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.74 to 2.34) and overall mortality (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.91).
To better characterize this relationship, we subdivided the categories of steady level of activity and increased activity. For patients with no change in activity, we divided participants into those engaging in less than 9 MET-hours per week (152 of 523 participants) and greater than 9 MET-hours per week (51 of 523 participants). For women who increased their activity levels, we defined two populations, those who started with less than 9 MET-hours per week and increased at least one category (102 of 523 participants) and those who started with at least 9 MET-hours per week and increased activity (42 of 523 participants). Compared with relatively sedentary patients with no change in activity, patients who increased their activity (irregardless of prediagnosis) and patients who were consistently active (at least 9 MET-hours per week) had improvements in colorectal cancerspecific mortality and overall mortality (Table 5).
In our analyses, women who were physically active after the diagnosis of nonmetastatic colorectal cancer experienced a significantly decreased risk of colorectal cancerspecific death as well as death from any cause. Interestingly, level of activity before diagnosis did not influence cancer-specific or overall survival. Colorectal cancer patients who increased their activity from their levels before diagnosis had an approximately 50% reduction in both colorectal cancerspecific and all-cause mortality. Physical activity has been shown consistently to reduce colon cancer incidence.1-20 Although the mechanism is unclear, the association with sedentary lifestyle and hyperinsulinemia is a potential etiology.35-37 Insulin and the insulinlike growth factor family have been associated with enhanced tumor growth and antiapoptosis,35 and colon cancer risk is elevated in individuals with higher circulating levels of insulin or C-peptide (a marker of insulin secretion) and insulinlike growth factor-1.38-43 Colon cancer recurrences are believed to be growth of micrometastases. Thus, an environment that allows such microscopic tumors to proliferate could be detrimental. Whether insulinlike factors or other mechanisms potentially linked to physical activity would affect this environment is unknown. In a separate cohort of men and women with stage III colon cancer, we reported a similar reduction in disease-free survival among patients physically active after diagnosis.22 The NHS provide provides several complementary advantages. First, given that patients who are more physical active after cancer diagnosis may have been active before diagnosis, we considered the possibility that physically active individuals who do develop colon cancer simply acquire tumors that are biologically less aggressive. However, physical activity levels before diagnosis were not predictive of cancer survival. Second, the NHS cohort provided a unique opportunity to explore the relationship of change in activity before and after diagnosis. It should be noted that greater than 50% of women changed levels of physical activity appreciably after diagnosis. Although a decrease in activity was not significantly associated with survival, increases in activity did seem to confer a significantly improved survival. The magnitude of benefit of increasing activity seemed similar in women who were both relatively inactive and more active before diagnosis. These analyses also demonstrate that women who were at a relatively higher level of activity before diagnosis should at least maintain such activity, but do not necessarily need to increase beyond that level. Nonetheless, because we do not know the reasons why these women increased their activity levels, these findings need to be confirmed. Beyond cause of mortality, data on cancer recurrences were not available in this cohort. Nonetheless, given that median survival for metastatic colorectal cancer was approximately 10 to 12 months during much of the time period of this study,44 colorectal cancerspecific mortality should be a reasonable surrogate for cancer-specific outcomes. Our cohort was restricted to women; it is possible that these findings might not apply to male patients with colorectal cancer. However, we did not observe a sex interaction in our prior study of postdiagnosis activity.22 In this cohort, data on the treatment are limited. Two thirds of the women had stage I or II disease, in which surgery alone generally would be standard of care. Furthermore, although there are differences in the likelihood of use of adjuvant chemotherapy based on factors such as socioeconomic class, the fairly homogenous nature of this cohort (professional nurses) would likely increase the probability of at least standard therapy.45,46 Moreover, as shown in Table 1, chemotherapy use (based on the available data) did not differ according to postdiagnosis physical activity levels. Comorbidities and access to health care may also confound these findings. Given the population studied (professional nurses), we would expect the latter to be relatively diminished. Although comorbidities have been shown to affect mortality in colorectal cancer survivors,47-49 such diseases are less likely to affect disease recurrence and thereby colorectal cancerspecific mortality. We cannot completely exclude the possibility that lower levels of physical activity may be reflective of other occult predictors for poor prognosis. However, we did not observe any significant associations between physical activity and other predictors of cancer outcome. Our findings remained unchanged after adjusting for potential risk factors for colorectal cancer mortality. Moreover, we found a consistent benefit for physical activity among patients with either stage I/II or stage III disease. Furthermore, we considered the possibility that sick patients (with cancer recurrences and limited survival) will exercise less. To minimize the bias by occult cancer recurrence, we excluded recurrences or deaths within 6 months of the activity assessment in the primary analysis and continued to observe a positive impact of exercise even when extending this restriction to 12 and 24 months. Finally, we would expect few patients to have undetected recurrences over extended periods of time, given the relatively brief natural history of recurrent colon cancer. Patients who underwent treatment for colorectal cancer may be considered limited in their ability to exercise. However, Arndt et al50 reported that 1 year after surgery of the primary tumor, patients with colorectal cancer reported their physical functioning and global quality of life nearly identical to those of a noncancer population. Furthermore, the distribution of levels of exercise in our study does not vary significantly by stage and is similar to that in other reports from the NHS in women without cancer.2 Our results suggest that physical activity after a colorectal cancer diagnosis may lower the risk of death from that disease. This benefit was seen regardless of age, BMI, stage, or site of disease. Along with our prior findings,22 these data suggest that, in addition to surgery and chemotherapy, increasing physical activity may confer additional benefit to patients with colorectal cancer.
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
Supported in part by a K07 award from the National Cancer Institute (Grant No. K07CA097992-01A1) and an American Society of Clinical Oncology Career Development Award (J.A.M.). The Nurses' Health Study is supported in part by Grant No. P01CA087969 from the National Cancer Institute. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
1. Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hsieh C: Physical activity and risk of developing colorectal cancer among college alumni. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1324-1329, 1991 2. Martinez ME, Giovannucci E, Spiegelman D, et al: Leisure-time physical activity, body size, and colon cancer in women: Nurses' Health Study Research Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:948-955, 1997 3. Gerhardsson M, Floderus B, Norell SE: Physical activity and colon cancer risk. Int J Epidemiol 17:743-746, 1988 4. Wu AH, Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, et al: Alcohol, physical activity and other risk factors for colorectal cancer: A prospective study. Br J Cancer 55:687-694, 1987[Medline] 5. Thun MJ, Calle EE, Namboodiri MM, et al: Risk factors for fatal colon cancer in a large prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1491-1500, 1992 6. Ballard-Barbash R, Schatzkin A, Albanes D, et al: Physical activity and risk of large bowel cancer in the Framingham Study. Cancer Res 50:3610-3613, 1990 7. Albanes D, Blair A, Taylor PR: Physical activity and risk of cancer in the NHANES I population. Am J Public Health 79:744-750, 1989 8. Severson RK, Nomura AM, Grove JS, et al: A prospective analysis of physical activity and cancer. Am J Epidemiol 130:522-529, 1989 9. Lynge E, Thygesen L: Use of surveillance systems for occupational cancer: Data from the Danish National system. Int J Epidemiol 17:493-500, 1988 10. Paffenbarger RS Jr, Hyde RT, Wing AL: Physical activity and incidence of cancer in diverse populations: A preliminary report. Am J Clin Nutr 45:312-317, 1987 11. Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, et al: Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med 122:327-334, 1995 12. Fraser G, Pearce N: Occupational physical activity and risk of cancer of the colon and rectum in New Zealand males. Cancer Causes Control 4:45-50, 1993[CrossRef][Medline] 13. Longnecker MP, Gerhardsson le Verdier M, Frumkin H, et al: A case-control study of physical activity in relation to risk of cancer of the right colon and rectum in men. Int J Epidemiol 24:42-50, 1995 14. Whittemore AS, Wu-Williams AH, Lee M, et al: Diet, physical activity, and colorectal cancer among Chinese in North America and China. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:915-926, 1990 15. Kune GA, Kune S, Watson LF: Body weight and physical activity as predictors of colorectal cancer risk. Nutr Cancer 13:9-17, 1990[Medline] 16. Markowitz S, Morabia A, Garibaldi K, et al: Effect of occupational and recreational activity on the risk of colorectal cancer among males: A case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 21:1057-1062, 1992 17. Peters RK, Garabrant DH, Yu MC, et al: A case-control study of occupational and dietary factors in colorectal cancer in young men by subsite. Cancer Res 49:5459-5468, 1989 18. Brownson RC, Zahm SH, Chang JC, et al: Occupational risk of colon cancer: An analysis by anatomic subsite. Am J Epidemiol 130:675-687, 1989 19. Kato I, Tominaga S, Matsuura A, et al: A comparative case-control study of colorectal cancer and adenoma. Jpn J Cancer Res 81:1101-1108, 1990[CrossRef] 20. Fredriksson M, Bengtsson NO, Hardell L, et al: Colon cancer, physical activity, and occupational exposures: A case-control study. Cancer 63:1838-1842, 1989[Medline] 21. Vainio H, Kaaks R, Bianchini F: Weight control and physical activity in cancer prevention: International evaluation of the evidence. Eur J Cancer Prev 11:S94-S100, 2002 (suppl 2) 22. Meyerhardt JA, Heseltine D, Niedzwiecki D, et al: Impact of physical activity on cancer recurrence and survival in patients with stage III colon cancer: Findings from CALGB 89803. J Clin Oncol 24:3535-3541, 2006 23. Haydon AM, Macinnis R, English D, et al: The effect of physical activity and body size on survival after diagnosis with colorectal cancer. Gut 55:62-67, 2006 24. Brown JK, Byers T, Doyle C, et al: Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: An American Cancer Society guide for informed choices. CA Cancer J Clin 53:268-291, 2003 25. Holmes MD, Chen WY, Feskanich D, et al: Physical activity and survival after breast cancer diagnosis. JAMA 293:2479-2486, 2005 26. Belanger CF, Hennekens CH, Rosner B, et al: The nurses' health study. Am J Nurs 78:1039-1040, 1978[Medline] 27. Colditz GA, Manson JE, Hankinson SE: The Nurses' Health Study: 20-year contribution to the understanding of health among women. J Womens Health 6:49-62, 1997[Medline] 28. Giovannucci E, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al: A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of colorectal adenoma and colorectal cancer in U.S. women. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:192-199, 1994 29. Sathiakumar N, Delzell E, Abdalla O: Using the National Death Index to obtain underlying cause of death codes. J Occup Environ Med 40:808-813, 1998[CrossRef][Medline] 30. Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Speizer FE, et al: Test of the National Death Index. Am J Epidemiol 119:837-839, 1984 31. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Leon AS, et al: Compendium of physical activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:71-80, 1993 32. Colditz GA, Feskanich D, Chen WY, et al: Physical activity and risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer 89:847-851, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 33. Wolf AM, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al: Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol 23:991-999, 1994 34. Chasan-Taber S, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, et al: Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire for male health professionals. Epidemiology 7:81-86, 1996[Medline] 35. Sandhu MS, Dunger DB, Giovannucci EL: Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF binding proteins, their biologic interactions, and colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:972-980, 2002 36. Kaaks R, Lukanova A: Energy balance and cancer: The role of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Proc Nutr Soc 60:91-106, 2001[Medline] 37. Giovannucci E: Insulin, insulin-like growth factors and colon cancer: A review of the evidence. J Nutr 131:3109S-3120S, 2001 38. Schoen RE, Tangen CM, Kuller LH, et al: Increased blood glucose and insulin, body size, and incident colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:1147-1154, 1999 39. Kaaks R, Toniolo P, Akhmedkhanov A, et al: Serum C-peptide, insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF-binding proteins, and colorectal cancer risk in women. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1592-1600, 2000 40. Palmqvist R, Stattin P, Rinaldi S, et al: Plasma insulin, IGF-binding proteins-1 and -2 and risk of colorectal cancer: A prospective study in northern Sweden. Int J Cancer 107:89-93, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 41. Palmqvist R, Hallmans G, Rinaldi S, et al: Plasma insulin-like growth factor 1, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3, and risk of colorectal cancer: A prospective study in northern Sweden. Gut 50:642-646, 2002 42. Ma J, Pollak MN, Giovannucci E, et al: Prospective study of colorectal cancer risk in men and plasma levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF-binding protein-3. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:620-625, 1999 43. Manousos O, Souglakos J, Bosetti C, et al: IGF-I and IGF-II in relation to colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 83:15-17, 1999[CrossRef][Medline] 44. Meyerhardt JA, Mayer RJ: Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 352:476-487, 2005 45. VanEenwyk J, Campo JS, Ossiander EM: Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in treatment for carcinomas of the colon and rectum. Cancer 95:39-46, 2002[CrossRef][Medline] 46. Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, et al: Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 284:3028-3035, 2000 47. Payne JE, Meyer HJ: The influence of other diseases upon the outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Aust N Z J Surg 65:398-402, 1995[Medline] 48. Yancik R, Wesley MN, Ries LA, et al: Comorbidity and age as predictors of risk for early mortality of male and female colon carcinoma patients: A population-based study. Cancer 82:2123-2134, 1998[CrossRef][Medline] 49. Piccirillo JF, Tierney RM, Costas I, et al: Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry. JAMA 291:2441-2447, 2004 50. Arndt V, Merx H, Stegmaier C, et al: Quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer 1 year after diagnosis compared with the general population: A population-based study. J Clin Oncol 22:4829-4836, 2004 Submitted February 8, 2006; accepted March 23, 2006.
Related Editorial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|