Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 24 (August 20), 2006: pp. 3852-3857
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.5409

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Recklitis, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diller, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Recklitis, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diller, L. R.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

Suicidal Ideation and Attempts in Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer

Christopher J. Recklitis, Rebecca A. Lockwood, Monica A. Rothwell, Lisa R. Diller

From the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School; and Suffolk University, Boston, MA

Address reprint requests to Christopher J. Recklitis, PhD, MPH, Perini Family Survivors' Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, SW320B, Boston, MA 02115-6084; e-mail: christopher_recklitis{at}dfci.harvard.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
PURPOSE: This study examined the prevalence of suicidal ideation and past suicide attempt in adult survivors of childhood cancer and investigated the relationship of suicidal symptoms to cancer treatment and current health. The hypothesis that poor physical health would be significantly associated with suicidality after adjusting for mental health variables was specifically tested.

METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six adult survivors of childhood cancer (mean age, 28 years) seen in a survivor clinic completed the Short Form-36 and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), as well as suicide items from the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised, and Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation. Participants reporting current suicide ideation or any past suicide attempt were classified as suicidal.

RESULTS: Twenty-nine participants (12.83%) reported suicidality, although only 11 of these were significantly depressed by BDI criteria. Univariate analyses found suicidality unrelated to age or sex but positively associated with younger age at diagnosis, longer time since diagnosis, cranial radiation treatment, leukemia diagnosis, depression, hopelessness, pain, and physical appearance concern. A hierarchical logistic regression showed that current physical functioning, including pain, was significantly associated with suicidality even after adjusting for treatment and depression variables.

CONCLUSION: Suicidal symptoms, which are reported by a significant minority of adult survivors of childhood cancer, are related to cancer treatments and post-treatment mental and physical health. Association of suicidal symptoms with physical health problems is important because these represent treatable conditions for which survivors may seek follow-up care. The relationship of physical well-being to suicidality underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to survivor care.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
Suicidal thoughts and behaviors are known to be associated with extreme emotional and physical suffering.1-3 Despite significant advances, cancer and cancer treatments can result in significant physical and emotional morbidity, and several epidemiologic studies indicate that the risk of suicide is elevated in cancer patients compared with the general population.4-8 Recent Scandinavian registry studies have reported standardized mortality ratios for suicide deaths in cancer patients from 1.55 to 2.5 for males and from 1.35 to 2.9 for females compared with the general population.5-7 In a US study of deaths in a single county, Llorente et al8 recently reported that risk of suicide among prostate cancer patients was 4.24 compared with the nondiseased population.

Literature reviews on suicide in cancer patients4,9 have identified a large number of factors associated with increased risk of suicide. These include older age and male sex, certain sites of disease (eg, esophageal, pancreatic, and head and neck), higher stage disease, poor prognosis, poor physical functioning, depression, alcoholism, other psychiatric disease, hopelessness, fatigue, pain, loss of function, prior history or family history of suicide attempt, and lack of social support.4,9 Despite the substantial literature describing suicidality in patients undergoing cancer therapy, few studies have examined suicidal symptoms in the years after treatment. Studies of suicide ideation and attempt in psychiatrically referred samples suggest that risk is highest in the first few months after diagnosis,10 but these studies may have a strong selection bias because patients needing psychiatric care years after completion of therapy would be less likely to seek treatment at cancer centers where these studies are often conducted. Epidemiologic studies of completed suicides also indicate risk is greatest in the first 3 to 6 months after cancer diagnosis5,7 and declines over time, but these studies may also have limited follow-up beyond 1 or 2 years after diagnosis.6,8

Although a detailed understanding of the natural history of suicide risk after cancer requires more extensive studies of long-term survivors, current data indicate that risk persists for many years after diagnosis. For example, even in studies showing decline in risk over time, excess risk of suicide in cancer patients extends to 5 years or more after diagnosis.5,7 In a retrospective study of 60 cancer patient suicides identified in a Finnish registry,11 25 of these suicides (40%) were in patients in remission, indicating they were not associated with recent diagnosis or terminal illness. The study authors concluded that suicide in cancer patients may differ qualitatively depending on phase of treatment, with different risk and protective factors operating in long-term survivors than in patients with incurable disease. Specifically, they suggest that suicide during remission is associated with a history of mental illness, familial suicides, and comorbidity from other diseases.

To better understand the specific factors associated with suicidality in cancer survivors, this study examined suicidal ideation and attempts in a sample of adult survivors of childhood cancer. Childhood cancer survivors are of particular interest for this investigation because they often receive intensive treatments, many of which can interfere with physical,12-15 psychosocial,16,17 and neurocognitive18 development. In addition, because the majority of pediatric patients are cured of their initial cancer,19 they represent a group of patients who may be at risk for a variety of late effects later in life.20 Suicide ideation and past attempts were chosen for study because of the difficulty collecting detailed and unbiased data after a completed suicide. Epidemiologic studies of completed suicide are often limited to demographic and treatment data available from registries, and case report data generally rely on retrospective data from family and caregiver informants who may not be reliable reporters. In addition, suicide ideation and prior attempt are significant risk factors for later suicide and are themselves indicators of serious emotional suffering, even when they are not associated with suicidal death.21-23

Previous studies at our center have suggested that suicidal symptoms may be a significant problem in childhood cancer survivors. A case series of 10 pediatric patients who completed or attempted suicide found that six of these events occurred after therapy completion.24 In a study of routine psychological screening in a childhood cancer survivor clinic,25 we reported the unexpected result that 14 survivors (13.9%) reported at least one suicidal symptom. To follow-up on these previous findings, the present study examined the prevalence of suicidal ideation and attempts in an expanded sample of adult survivors of childhood cancer and attempted to identify risk factors associated with these symptoms. Specifically, the study tested the hypothesis that physical functioning, including general health and pain, are associated with increased risk for suicidal symptoms even after adjusting for demographic variables, treatment-related variables, and depression.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
Participants
Participants were 226 survivors of childhood cancer (100 men and 126 women) ages 18 to 64 years old (mean age, 28.38 years; standard deviation [SD], 7.91 years) with a mean age at diagnosis of 10.08 years (SD, 5.47 years; Table 1). The mean time since diagnosis was 18.30 years (SD, 7.90 years). Childhood cancer diagnoses included lymphomas (32.7%), leukemias (32.3%), sarcomas (14.2%), Wilms' tumor (7.5%), and other solid tumors such as neuroblastoma and germ cell tumors (13.3%). For clinical reasons, brain tumor survivors are observed in a specialized neuro-oncology clinic and were not included in this study. Ethnicity was not collected on these specific participants, but participants were drawn from a cancer survivor clinic that serves a predominantly (93%) white, non-Hispanic population.25


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Adults on Disease and Treatment Variables

 
Procedure
Measures were administered during routine psychological screening at scheduled visits to a multidisciplinary cancer survivor clinic. Consenting participants completed measures before their scheduled appointments. Only information from participants' initial visit to this clinic was included. Procedures were approved by the hospital internal review board. During the first 18 months of the study period, 122 consecutive adult patients were seen in the clinic. Of these 122 patients, four refused psychological services, making them ineligible for the study. All 117 eligible survivors agreed to participate, and 101 (86%) completed at least one scorable measure, with the majority of noncompletion being a result of time constraints. For the remaining study period, recruitment methods remained the same, but participation rates were not recorded.

Measures
Demographic data. Participants provided demographic information such as age and sex. Cancer-related variables, such as diagnosis, age at diagnosis, time since diagnosis, and cranial radiation treatment, were accessed through medical records. Cranial radiation, which was defined as any radiation that included any part of the brain in the treatment field, was treated as a binary variable.

Symptom Checklist-90 Revised. One item from the Symptom Checklist-90 Revised (SCL-90-R)26 (question 15) was included as a measure of suicidal ideation. This item asks participants to rate the amount of distress in the last 7 days caused by thoughts of ending their lives. Any response other than "Not at all" was considered to be an indicator of suicidality.

The Short Form-36. The Short Form-3627 is a 36-item measure assessing health-related quality of life. Scores are generated on eight subscales and two summary scales. The Physical Health Summary score was used to measure overall physical health, and the Bodily Pain Scale measured physical pain. Higher scores on the Short Form-36 scales indicate better functioning.

Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)28 is a 21-item self-report of depressive symptoms over a 7-day period, with total scores ranging from 0 to 63. The total BDI score was used as a continuous measure of depressive symptoms, and three individual items were used to assess suicidality, hopelessness, and appearance dissatisfaction. Responses to these three items were recoded to create three binary variables contrasting participants who reported no symptoms in these areas with participants who reported presence of symptoms regardless of intensity. On the basis of previous research, participants with total scores of 16 or greater were considered depressed.29,30

Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation. One Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation31,32 item asking participants to report on lifetime history of suicide attempts was included. Participants who reported any attempts were considered suicide attempters.

Statistical Analyses
Participants reporting suicidal ideation on the BDI or SCL-90-R or a past suicide attempt on the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation item were classified as suicidal participant cases. Participant cases and noncases were compared on potential risk factors using two-tailed, independent sample t tests for continuous variables and odds ratios and Fisher's exact test for discrete variables. When the number of participants in an analysis differed from the total sample because of missing data, the number of participants is noted in the tables.

Because the risk factors are not independent, logistic regression was used to examine which factors were independently associated with suicidality. Twenty-six participants were eliminated because of missing data, leaving 200 participants (including 26 suicidal participants) in the regression. Hierarchical regression was selected to assess whether physical functioning and pain would be significantly associated with suicidal symptoms after adjusting for other variables. In this sample, cranial radiation treatment had a strong positive association with leukemia diagnosis; 87.5% of leukemia patients received cranial radiation treatment, and all 17 leukemia survivors who reported suicidality had been treated with cranial radiation at total doses of 18 Gy (n = 1), 24 Gy (n = 13), or greater than 24 Gy (n = 3). With cranial radiation and diagnosis so highly correlated, they could not both be included in the multivariate analysis, so diagnosis was excluded. Similarly, time since diagnosis was eliminated because it is highly correlated with age and age at diagnosis.

Variables were entered into the regression in conceptually organized blocks. Block 1 included demographic variables previously reported to be suicide correlates (age and sex). Block 2 included cancer-related variables (age at diagnosis and cranial radiation). Block 3 included the mental health variables (depression and hopelessness), and block 4 included the physical variables (bodily pain, Physical Health Summary score, and appearance concern). At each step, –2 log likelihood (–2LL); Nagelkerke R2, indicating proportion of explained variance; and the {chi}2 value associated with change in –2LL measuring improved model fit were reported. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was calculated for the final model. The fit of the model was further investigated by testing alternative models with two-way interaction terms and different combinations of the independent variables. No interaction terms were statistically significant, and no alternative models had superior fit.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
Self-Reported Suicidal Symptoms
Twenty-nine (12.83%; 95% CI, 8.90% to 18.07%) of 226 participants reported suicidality. Nineteen participants (8.41%; 95% CI, 5.27% to 13.02%) reported suicidal ideation alone; one participant (0.44%; 95% CI, 0.02% to 2.82%) reported past attempts without current ideation, and nine participants (3.98%; 95% CI, 1.95% to 7.67%) reported both current ideation and past attempts. Fifteen participants reported suicidal ideation on both the SCL-90-R and the BDI. Nine participants reported suicidality on the BDI only, and five reported suicidality on the SCL-90-R only.

Risk Factors
Independent sample t tests comparing participant cases and noncases yielded several significant findings. Of the cancer-related variables, younger age at diagnosis (P < .001), longer time since diagnosis (P = .003), and cranial radiation treatment (P < .001) were significantly associated with suicidality (Table 1). Leukemia survivors were also more likely to report suicidal symptoms than lymphoma or sarcoma survivors. Of the self-reported functioning variables, depression (P < .001), hopelessness (P < .001), pain (P = .01), and appearance concern (P < .001) were also associated with suicidality (Table 2). There was a trend toward lower physical functioning scores among suicidal participants, but this did not reach conventional levels of significance (t = 1.85, P = .075). Of the 29 suicidal participants, only 11 had BDI scores ≥ 16, signifying clinically significant depression.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Comparison of Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Adults on Self-Report of Current Functioning

 
To explore which variables were independently associated with suicidality, a hierarchical logistic regression was computed (Table 3). Entry of demographic variables in block 1 did not improve model fit, but entry of each subsequent block did significantly improve the model. Even after accounting for the demographic, treatment-related, and mental health variables, the introduction of the physical health variables in the last step contributed significantly to the fit of the model (P = .007). The final model accounted for 66.2% of the total variability in suicidal participant status (R2 = .662), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was nonsignificant ({chi}2 = 1.42, P = .99), indicating good model fit.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Hierarchical Logistic Regression Analysis for Risk Factors Associated With Suicidality (n = 200)

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
A significant proportion of the adult survivors of childhood cancer studied (12.8%) reported suicidal symptoms. Although no national statistics on suicide ideation and attempts are available, epidemiologic studies indicate that rates of suicidal symptoms are considerably lower in the general population.21,33,34Among 6,041 general medical patients interviewed in the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiological Catchment Area Survey, 2.65% reported suicidal ideation within the prior year.34 A 2005 report from the National Comorbidity Replication Study, which administered psychiatric interviews to 4,320 adults, found that the 12-month prevalence of suicidal symptoms ranged from 3.3% for ideation to 0.6% for attempts.21 In the context of these population-based studies, the present findings strongly support the hypothesis that adult survivors of childhood cancer have elevated risk for suicidality even many years after successful completion of therapy.

As expected, physical health variables, including pain, were significant risk factors for suicidal symptoms. A relationship between pain and suicidality has been reported previously in cancer patients,35,36 but these results extend those findings by indicating that the relationship persists into the survivorship period. Poor physical functioning was also associated with suicidality in this study, and it is noteworthy that both physical functioning and pain are significantly associated with suicidality even after adjustment for depression. This has important implications for developing programs to identify those cancer survivors at risk for suicidal symptoms because it implies that screening for depression alone may not be adequate. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of suicidal symptoms in these survivors and assess them accordingly.

Risk factors identified in the study include those consistently reported for cancer patients and the general population, such as feelings of hopelessness and depression.34,37,38 In addition, younger age at diagnosis and cranial radiation treatment were associated with greater likelihood of reporting suicidal symptoms. Younger children may be more vulnerable to the toxic effects of treatment and the related long-term effects. Cranial radiation has been associated with neuropsychological problems18,39 and physical disfigurement,40 which suggests that the effect of cranial radiation on suicidal symptoms may be mediated by these physical sequelae of treatment. It should be noted that both young age at diagnosis and cranial radiation are strongly associated with an acute lymphoblastic leukemia diagnosis, raising the possibility that they may be the markers for diagnosis, rather than having direct associations with suicidal symptoms. At the time participants in this study were treated, cranial radiation was widely used in treating leukemia. More recently, a growing proportion of leukemia patients are treated without cranial radiation.41 As these patients mature into adulthood, future studies of survivors will be able to differentiate between the effects of leukemia diagnosis and cranial radiation. Appearance concern and hopelessness were identified as risk factors in the univariate analyses but were not significant in the regression model. To the extent that appearance concern may be a measure of treatment intensity, its relationship with suicidality may be captured by physical functioning and cranial radiation variables. Appearance concern and hopelessness may have been overshadowed by the depression variable because the two constructs are closely tied to depression.

Inconsistencies were found between the two measures of suicidal ideation. Subtle differences in phrasing may account for different reports on the two measures. For example, the BDI gives respondents experiencing suicidal thoughts the option of explicitly stating they would never act on them. This disclaimer may allow participants to feel more comfortable admitting suicidal ideation on the BDI than on the SCL-90-R, where there is no ability to specify lack of intent. Differences in participant responses to these items support the view of clinical experts that adequate assessment of suicidal ideation requires multiple questions reflecting a range of intensity and symptoms.42,43

Several limitations of the study should be considered. Participants were a convenience sample and not representative of all childhood cancer survivors, and generalizability to survivors from other institutions or sociodemographic backgrounds is not certain. Survivor clinic patients may have more physical and emotional problems than survivors in general, although this clinic sample may be representative of survivors seeking follow-up care and, in that way, be informative to clinicians serving these groups. Survivors in the study reported higher rates of suicidal symptoms than expected based on normative population reports, but reports of suicidal symptoms can differ with different assessments. For those reasons, future studies should include a control group to which survivors can be directly compared. A study in progress using data from the large cohort Childhood Cancer Survivor Study44 should help to address this issue, as well as the limitations caused by the selection bias noted. This study combined suicidal thoughts and past attempts into a single suicidal variable based, in part, on research indicating that ideation is a strong predictor of suicide attempt and completion. Nevertheless, the questions of how suicidal ideation is related to self-destructive behavior in this population and whether it differs from the relationship seen in psychiatric groups warrant further investigation. Future studies will also benefit from including more extensive data on treatments and specific outcomes like pain duration and intensity.

This study demonstrated that suicidal symptoms are meaningfully related to cancer treatments and post-treatment health, even many years after completion of therapy. Although the vast majority of survivors reported no suicidality, the significant minority of survivors with thoughts of ending their lives is a serious concern. The association with physical health and pain is important because these represent potentially treatable conditions for which survivors may seek follow-up care. The relationship of physical well-being to suicidality also underscores the need for a multidisciplinary approach to survivor care. Complex relationships are unlikely to be clarified unless research moves beyond a mind/body dualism and integrates physical and emotional factors into a comprehensive view of survivors' health. Similarly, in clinical care, providers from different disciplines can independently assess different domains of physical and psychological well-being, but only by integrating these perspectives can they develop an accurate understanding of the survivor's health and quality of life.


    Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    Author Contributions
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 

Conception and design: Christopher J. Recklitis, Lisa R. Diller

Administrative support: Christopher J. Recklitis, Monica A. Rothwell, Lisa R. Diller

Provision of study materials or patients: Christopher J. Recklitis, Lisa R. Diller

Collection and assembly of data: Christopher J. Recklitis, Rebecca A. Lockwood

Data analysis and interpretation: Christopher J. Recklitis, Rebecca A. Lockwood, Monica A. Rothwell, Lisa R. Diller

Manuscript writing: Christopher J. Recklitis, Rebecca A. Lockwood, Monica A. Rothwell, Lisa R. Diller

Final approval of manuscript: Christopher J. Recklitis, Rebecca A. Lockwood

 


    NOTES
 
Supported by a Survivorship Research Grant from the Lance Armstrong Foundation.

Presented at the 2nd Annual Conference of the American Psychosocial Oncology Society, Phoenix, AZ, January 27-29, 2005.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 Authors' Disclosures of...
 Author Contributions
 REFERENCES
 
1. Shneidman E: Definition of Suicide. New York, NY, Wiley, 1985

2. Shneidman ES: Suicide as psychache. J Nerv Ment Dis 181: 145-147, 1993[Medline]

3. Maris RW, Berman AL, Maltsberger JT: Summary and conclusions: What have we learned about suicide assessment and prediction?, in Maris RW, Berman AL, Maltsberger JT, et al (eds): Assessment and Prediction of Suicide. New York, NY, Guilford Press, 1992, pp 640-672

4. Filiberti A, Ripamonti C: Suicide and suicidal thoughts in cancer patients. Tumori 88: 193-199, 2002[Medline]

5. Yousaf U, Christensen ML, Engholm G, et al: Suicides among Danish cancer patients 1971-1999. Br J Cancer 92: 995-1000, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Bjorkenstam C, Edberg A, Ayoubi S, et al: Are cancer patients at higher suicide risk than the general population? Scand J Public Health 33: 208-214, 2005[Medline]

7. Hem E, Loge JH, Haldorsen T, et al: Suicide risk in cancer patients from 1960 to 1999. J Clin Oncol 22: 4209-4216, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Llorente MD, Burke M, Gregory GR, et al: Prostate cancer: A significant risk factor for late-life suicide. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13: 195-201, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Breitbart W, Krivo S: Suicide, in Holland JC (ed): Psycho-Oncology. New York, NY, Oxford University Press, 1998, pp 541-547

10. Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Pessin H, et al: Depression, hopelessness, and desire for hastened death in terminally ill patients with cancer. JAMA 284: 2907-2911, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Hietanen P, Lonnqvist J: Cancer and suicide. Ann Oncol 2: 19-23, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Kenney LB, Laufer MR, Grant FD, et al: High risk of infertility and long term gonadal damage in males treated with high dose cyclophosphamide for sarcoma during childhood. Cancer 91: 613-621, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Adams MJ, Lipshultz SE: Pathophysiology of anthracycline- and radiation-associated cardiomyopathies: Implications for screening and prevention. Pediatr Blood Cancer 44: 600-606, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Hudson MM, Mertens AC, Yasui Y, et al: Health status of adult long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. JAMA 290: 1583-1592, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Dreyer ZE, Blatt J, Bleyer A: Late effects of childhood cancer and its treatment., in Pizzo PA, Poplack DG (eds): Principles and Practice of Pediatric Oncology (ed 4). Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2002, pp 1431-1461

16. Barrera M, Shaw AK, Speechley KN, et al: Educational and social late effects of childhood cancer and related clinical, personal, and familial characteristics. Cancer 104: 1751-1760, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Mitby PA, Robison LL, Whitton JA, et al: Utilization of special education services and educational attainment among long-term survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 97: 1115-1126, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Waber DP, Carpentieri SC, Klar N, et al: Cognitive sequelae in children treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia with dexamethasone or prednisone. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 22: 206-213, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Gatta G, Capocaccia R, Stiller C, et al: Childhood cancer survival trends in Europe: A EUROCARE Working Group study. J Clin Oncol 23: 3742-3751, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Mertens AC, Yasui Y, Neglia JP, et al: Late mortality experience in five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: The Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol 19: 3163-3172, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Borges G, et al: Trends in suicide ideation, plans, gestures, and attempts in the United States, 1990-1992 to 2001-2003. JAMA 293: 2487-2495, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Joiner TE Jr, Steer RA, Brown G, et al: Worst-point suicidal plans: A dimension of suicidality predictive of past suicide attempts and eventual death by suicide. Behav Res Ther 41: 1469-1480, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR: Psychosocial risk factors for future adolescent suicide attempts. J Consult Clin Psychol 62: 297-305, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]

24. Kunin HM, Patenaude AF, Grier HE: Suicide risk in pediatric cancer patients: An exploratory study. Psycho-Oncology 4: 149-155, 1995

25. Recklitis C, O'Leary T, Diller L: Utility of routine psychological screening in the childhood cancer survivor clinic. J Clin Oncol 21: 787-792, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Derogatis LR: SCL-90-R: Symptom Checklist-90-R—Administration, Scoring and Procedures Manual (3rd ed). Minneapolis, MN, National Computer Systems, Inc, 1994

27. Ware JE, Kosinski M: SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: A Manual for Users of Version 1 (2nd ed). Lincoln, RI, Quality Metrics, Inc, 2001

28. Beck AT, Steer RA: Beck Depression Inventory Manual. New York, NY, Psychological Corporation, 1987

29. Kendall PC, Hollon SD, Beck AT, et al: Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory. Cognitive Ther Res 11: 289-299, 1987[CrossRef]

30. Gorenstein C, Andrade L, Zanolo E, et al: Expression of depressive symptoms in a nonclinical Brazilian adolescent sample. Can J Psychiatry 50: 129-136, 2005[Medline]

31. Beck AT, Steer RA, Ranieri WF: Scale for Suicide Ideation: Psychometric properties of a self-report version. J Clin Psychol 44: 499-505, 1988[Medline]

32. Beck AT, Brown GK, Steer RA: Psychometric characteristics of the Scale for Suicide Ideation with psychiatric outpatients. Behav Res Ther 35: 1039-1046, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Crosby AE, Cheltenham MP, Sacks JJ: Incidence of suicidal ideation and behavior in the United States, 1994. Suicide Life Threat Behav 29: 131-140, 1999[Medline]

34. Cooper-Patrick L, Crum RM, Ford DE: Identifying suicidal ideation in general medical patients. JAMA 272: 1757-1762, 1994[Abstract]

35. Akechi T, Okamura H, Nishiwaki Y, et al: Predictive factors for suicidal ideation in patients with unresectable lung carcinoma. Cancer 95: 1085-1093, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

36. Filiberti A, Ripamonti C, Totis A, et al: Characteristics of terminal cancer patients who committed suicide during a home palliative care program. J Pain Symptom Manage 22: 544-553, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

37. Ciaramella A, Poli P: Assessment of depression among cancer patients: The role of pain, cancer type and treatment. Psychooncology 10: 156-165, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]

38. Quan H, Arboleda-Florez J, Fick GH, et al: Association between physical illness and suicide among the elderly. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 37: 190-197, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

39. Waber DP, Tarbell NJ: Toxicity of CNS prophylaxis for childhood leukemia. Oncology (Williston Park) 11: 259-264, 1997[Medline]

40. Vickery LE, Latchford G, Hewison J, et al: The impact of head and neck cancer and facial disfigurement on the quality of life of patients and their partners. Head Neck 25: 289-296, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

41. Gaynon PS, Trigg ME, Heerema NA, et al: Children's Cancer Group trials in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: 1983-1995. Leukemia 14: 2223-2233, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

42. Jacobs DG: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Suicide Assessment and Intervention. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Inc, 1999

43. Shea SC: The Practical Art of Suicide Assessment: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals and Substance Abuse Counselors. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002

44. Robison LL, Mertens AC, Boice JD, et al: Study design and cohort characteristics of the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study: A multi-institutional collaborative project. Med Pediatr Oncol 38: 229-239, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted March 10, 2006; accepted June 16, 2006.


Related Correspondence

  • Suicide After Childhood Cancer
    Regan A. Howard, Peter D. Inskip, and Lois B. Travis
    JCO 2007 25: 731 [Full Text]
  • Suicide Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer
    Mike M. Hawkins, Ann C. Mertens, Torgil R. Möller, and Stanislaw Garwicz
    JCO 2007 25: 731-732 [Full Text]
  • Suicide Risk in Childhood Cancer Survivors
    Brad J. Zebrack, Kathleen Ell, and Wendy B. Smith
    JCO 2007 25: 732-733 [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Social PsychiatryHome page
N. Mofidi, M. Ghazinour, M. Araste, L. Jacobsson, and J. Richter
General Mental Health, Quality of Life and Suicide-Related Attitudes Among Kurdish People in Iran
International Journal of Social Psychiatry, September 1, 2008; 54(5): 457 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
L. C. M. Kremer, M. C. Cardous-Ubbink, M. M. Geenen, F. E. van Leeuwen, and H. N. Caron
Health Outcomes in Long-term Survivors of Childhood Cancer Reply
JAMA, October 10, 2007; 298(14): 1635 - 1636.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Pediatr PsycholHome page
C. Eiser
Beyond Survival: Quality of Life and Follow-up After Childhood Cancer
J. Pediatr. Psychol., October 1, 2007; 32(9): 1140 - 1150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. D. Dickerman
The Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Therapy
Pediatrics, March 1, 2007; 119(3): 554 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. A. Howard, P. D. Inskip, and L. B. Travis
Suicide After Childhood Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 731 - 731.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. J. Zebrack, K. Ell, and W. B. Smith
Suicide Risk in Childhood Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 732 - 733.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. J. Recklitis, M. A. Rothwell, L. R. Diller, and R. A. Lockwood
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 733 - 734.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. M. Hawkins, A. C. Mertens, T. R. Moller, and S. Garwicz
Suicide Among Survivors of Childhood Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2007; 25(6): 731 - 732.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Recklitis, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diller, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Recklitis, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Diller, L. R.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online