|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9501 on August 8 2006 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. Lactate Dehydrogenase 5 Expression in Operable Colorectal Cancer: Strong Association With Survival and Activated Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Pathway—A Report of the Tumour Angiogenesis Research Group
From the Departments of Pathology, and Radiotherapy/Oncology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece; Department of Pathology, Nuffield Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, John Radcliffe Hospital; Cancer Research UK, Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom Address reprint requests to Michael I. Koukourakis, MD, Tumor and Angiogenesis Research Group, PO BOX 12, Alexandroupolis 68100, Greece; e-mail: targ{at}her.forthnet.gr
Purpose: Lactate dehydrogenase 5 (LDH-5) regulates, under hypoxic conditions, the anaerobic transformation of pyruvate to lactate for energy acquisition. Several studies have shown that serum LDH may be an ominous prognostic marker in malignant tumors. The clinical significance of tissue LDH-5, however, remains largely unexplored.
Patients and Methods: We investigated the immunohistochemical expression of LDH-5 in a series of 128 stage II/III colorectal adenocarcinomas treated with surgery alone. In addition, markers of tumor hypoxia (hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha [HIF1
Results: The expression of LDH-5, together with that of HIF1 Conclusion: The immunohistochemical assessment of tissue LDH-5 and pKDR provides important prognostic information in operable colorectal cancer. The strong association between LDH-5 and pKDR expression would justify their use as surrogate markers to screen patients for tyrosin kinase inhibitor therapy.
Colorectal cancer is a common malignant disease.1 Patients with operable nonmetastatic disease are effectively treated with surgery, whereas adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy confer a small, still important, benefit in terms of local control and overall survival.2,3 The presence of positive lymph nodes is certainly one of the most important features defining prognosis and is the only indisputable criterion indicating the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy.4 It is, however, disappointing that, despite chemotherapy, 40% of patients with stage III and approximately 20% of those with stage II disease will eventually relapse.5,6 It is therefore imperative to evaluate biologic targets that would identify (i) patients curable by local therapy alone, and (ii) patients who would benefit from combining cytotoxic therapy with novel targeted therapies. The achieved prolongation of survival by the addition of bevacizumab, an anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody, to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer7 reinforced our hopes for a similarly successful application of antiangiogenic policies to the earlier stages of disease. The important benefit conferred by bevacizumab resulted in approval of the antibody for first-line chemotherapy without demanding the signature of an active VEGF pathway in tumors. This phenomenon, however, should not discourage research to identify reliable predictors for the administration of targeted therapies, because such therapies should always be addressed to tumors bearing the target, just as in the case of antiher-2 monoclonal antibodies.8,9 Nevertheless, the identification of the appropriate target becomes cumbersome especially when dealing with pharmaceutical inhibitors of growth factor receptors recognizing multiple targets on the same cell. The recent failure of two large randomized trials to show a clear overall benefit with the multi-VEGF tyrosine-kinase receptor inhibitor PTK787/ZK222584 (PTK/ZK),10 when added to fluorouracil/oxaliplatin chemotherapy, stressed the importance of such biomarkers suitable for identifying patients who would benefit from antiangiogenic therapies. In this later case, analysis of a subgroup with high levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed that PTK/ZK administration led to a significant 40% reduction in the risk of disease progression (unpublished data), bringing forward an eventual role of LDH in angiogenesis-dependent tumor growth and progression. In this study, we investigate the expression and prognostic relevance of LDH-5, a tumor-related LDH isoenzyme, in a series of patients with operable colorectal cancer, and we provide evidence of a link between tumor LDH, hypoxia and activated VEGF pathway.
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from 128 consecutive patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated with surgery alone were retrieved from the files of the Nuffield Department of Pathology (Oxford, United Kingdom). Sixty-three cases were staged as IIA (T3N0) and 65 as III (T3-N1,2) according to the TNM, American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer staging system. None of the cases examined had direct extension of adjacent organs (T4 cases were excluded). Fifty of 128 cases had tumors with rectal location. Fifty-six of the cases were female and 72 male. The median age was 67 years (range, 41 to 88 years). In addition, paraffin blocks from 20 patients with available preoperative LDH serum levels were drawn from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Democritus University of Thrace (Alexandroupolis, Greece). These were immunostained for LDH-5 to compare serum versus tissue LDH levels.
Immunohistochemistry
A modified streptavidin technique was used for immunohistochemistry, as previously reported.16,17 Sections were deparaffinized, and peroxidase was quenched with methanol and H2O2 3% for 15 minutes. Microwaving for antigen retrieval was used (3 x 5 minutes). The primary antibody was applied overnight. After washing with triethanolamine-buffered saline (TBS), sections were incubated with a secondary antibody (Kwik Kit, Cat. No. 404050, Thermo Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA) for 15 minutes and washed in TBS. Kwik Streptavidin peroxidase reagent was applied for 15 minutes, and sections were again washed in TBS. The color was developed by 15 minutes incubation with diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution and sections were weakly counterstained with hematoxylin. Appropriate positive and negative controls were used. The anti-CD31 immunohistochemistry was performed using the alkaline-phosphatase antialkaline phosphatase technique, as previously reported.18
Scoring the Cases
For assessing sVD and activated pKDR expressing VD (aVD), the sections were first scanned at low power, and three areas of highest vascularization were chosen along the invading tumor front (adjacent to the normal colon) for vessel counting at x200 fields. The final VD was the mean of the vessel counts obtained in these fields. The median value of the VD recorded in tumors was used as a cutoff point to define groups of high versus low VD. All staining scoring was perfomed separately by two independent observers who were blinded to the clinical outcome of patients. Any discrepancies were resolved on the conference microscope.
Assessment of Vascular Invasion
Assessment of Necrosis
Statistical Analysis
Results of Immunohistochemistry The nuclear expression of LDH-5 ranged from 0% to 80% (median, 5%), whereas strong cytoplasmic expression was noted in 0% to 100% (median, 50%) of cells. The distribution of cases, according to the scoring system used is shown in Table 2. Ninty-nine (77.3%) of 128 of cases exhibited high LDH-5 reactivity. Typical immunohistochemical images reflecting the different patterns of LDH-5 expression are shown in Figure 1.
The HIF1 nuclear expression ranged from 0% to 40% (median, 0%) and the strong cytoplasmic from 0% to 100% (median, 60%). Using the grading system, 84 (65%) of 128 had high HIF1 reactivity. The pKDR nuclear expression ranged from 0% to 60% (median, 0%), and the cytoplasmic from 0% to 100% (median, 50%). According to the grading system 82 (64%) of 128 of cases were grouped in the high-pKDR category. Cytoplasmic VEGF expression ranged from 0% to 100% (median, 45%). Using this cutoff point, 64 (50%) of 128 cases showed high VEGF reactivity. The sVD assessed with the anti-CD31 monoclonal antibody at the invading tumor edge ranged from 10 to 117 vessels per x200 optical field (median, 45 vessels). Using the median sVD, 62 (48.4%) of 128 of cases showed high sVD. The median density of vessels reactive to the anti-pKDR antibody at the invading tumor edge (aVD) ranged from three to 30 (median, 11.5). Using this cutoff point, 64 (50%) of 128 of cases had high aVD. Interobserver variability assessed by Kappa statistics showed no important variation between observers for all the markers used (kappa coefficients between 0.79 to 0.89 and agreement range of 0.90 to 0.95).
Association of LDH-5 With Histopathologic Features
Association of LDH-5 With Molecular and Vascular Features Table 4 shows the immunohistochemical expression of LDH-5 in connection with hypoxia- and angiogenesis-related molecular features. There was a significant association between LDH-5 expression and HIF1 (P = .01). A striking direct association of LDH-5 with pKDR expression in cancer cells (P < .0001) and in intratumoral vessels (aVD; P = .001) was also confirmed. No association between LDH-5 and VEGF or sVD was noted.
Linear regression analysis of the nuclear and cytoplasmic LDH5 expression versus the corresponding pKDR expression patterns revealed a direct association between the two variables (Fig 2; P < .0001, r = 0.49 and P < .0001, r = 0.50, respectively).
Serum LDH Versus Tissue LDH-5 Low LDH-5 expression in tumor specimens was persistently accompanied by low (< 450 U/L) LDH serum levels (Fig 3). However, only four of 14 cases with high LDH-5 expression in cancer cells had high (> 450 U/L) serum LDH levels. There was a trend of cases with high LDH-5 serum levels to have higher LDH serum levels (P = .08), when serum LDH was taken into account as a continuous variable.
Survival Analysis The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed a strong prognostic impact of LDH-5 expression on survival (Fig 4). Patients with high LDH-5 expression were associated with a significantly poorer overall survival compared with those having low LDH-5 reactivity (P = .0003; hazard ratio, 15.1); the projected 5-year survival was 52% versus 96%. This was also confirmed for stage B and stage C cases separately (P = .05; hazard ratio, undefined; and P = .001; hazard ratio, 11.9, respectively). The 5-year survival in stage B cases was 100% in the group of low LDH-5 patients versus 67% in that of high. The 5-year survival in stage C cases was 92% in the low LDH-5 versus 39% in the high LDH5 group.
In multivariate analysis (Table 5) considering all histologic and molecular features together, LDH-5 was the most important prognostic factor (P = .0009; t ratio, 3.4) followed by vascular invasion (P = .007; t ratio, 2.7) and VEGF expression (P = .004; t ratio, 2.9). Nodal involvement, HIF1 , pKDR, sVD, and aVD were also independent prognostic variables. In a model comprising only the histopathologic features, LDH-5 was again the most important independent prognostic variable (P = .0006; t ratio, 3.5).
LDH is an enzyme that, under anaerobic conditions, catalyzes the reversible transformation of pyruvate to lactate.20 Upregulation of LDH ensures an efficient anaerobic/glycolytic metabolism for tumor cells and reduced dependence on oxygen. There are five LDH isoenzymes. The LDH-1 is composed of four H-subunits, and the LDH-5 of four M-subunits. As the number of the M- over H-chains increases, the LDH isoenzyme becomes more efficient in catalyzing the conversion of pyruvate to lactate (LDH-5), whereas an increase of H- over M-chains (LDH-1) favors the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA that enters into the citric acid (Krebs) cycle.
In an immunohistochemical study, we showed that LDH-1 is expressed consistently in normal and carcinomatous tissues.21 In contrast, LDH-5 is absent from normal epithelia but is extensively expressed in cancer cells.22,23 LDH-5 is, therefore, the enzyme linked to tumor phenotype and the increased LDH serum levels noted in our cancer patients should probably reflect LDH-5 isoenzyme release, although direct clinical confirmation is lacking. In a study of non–small-cell lung cancer, the immunohistochemical expression of LDH-5 was directly linked with high total LDH serum levels,24 although 50% of tumors with high tissue LDH-5 expression had normal serum levels. In fact, the exact mechanism of LDH release from cells is obscure, because lysis (necrosis) or stress-induced increased membrane permeability are the only known pathways.25,26 In any case, removal of the primary tumor results in a rapid drop of the LDH serum levels within 1 week from surgery, suggesting that any excess in serum LDH is a tumor product in cancer patients.24 High serum LDH has been linked with poor postoperative outcome and failure of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in sarcomas, lymphomas and carcinomas,27-40 including colorectal cancer.41-43 Indeed, in the large PTK/ZK randomized trials, serum LDH together with performance status was the most important prognostic feature in a control group of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving chemotherapy (G. Meinhardt, personal communication, October 2005). Unlike serum LDH, the analysis of isoenzyme LDH expression by specific monoclonal antibodies in tumor tissues has been studied only recently.21,24 It was thus shown that LDH-5 expression by cancer cells is associated with poor survival in operable non–small-cell lung carcinomas and is directly linked to the expression of HIF1
Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following authors or their immediate family members indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCOs conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.
Dollar Amount Codes (A) < $10,000 (B) $10,000-$99,999 (C)
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on August 7, 2006. Supported by the Tumour and Angiogenesis Research Group and Cancer Research UK. Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
1. Garfinkel L, Mushinski M: US cancer incidence, mortality and survival: 1973-1996. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co 80:23-32, 1999[Medline] 2. Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, et al: Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: Who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol 22:1797-1806, 2004 3. Minsky BD: Adjuvant therapy of resectable rectal cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 28:181-188, 2002[CrossRef][Medline] 4. Benson AB III, Schrag D, Somerfield MR, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3408-3419, 2004 5. Willett C, Tepper JE, Cohen A, et al: Local failure following curative resection of colonic adenocarcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 10:645-651, 1984[Medline] 6. Pilipshen SJ, Heilweil M, Quan SH, et al: Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer. Cancer 53:1354-1362, 1984[CrossRef][Medline] 7. Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Novotny W, et al: Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2335-2342, 2004 8. Molina R, Barak V, van Dalen A, et al: Tumor markers in breast cancer—European Group on Tumor Markers recommendations. Tumour Biol 26:281-293, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 9. Mass RD, Press MF, Anderson S, et al: Evaluation of clinical outcomes according to HER2 detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization in women with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab. Clin Breast Cancer 6:240-246, 2005[Medline] 10. Hecht JR, Trarbach T, Jaeger E, et al: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in patients (Pts) with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum receiving first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and PTK787/ZK 222584 or placebo (CONFIRM-1). J Clin Oncol 23:XXX, 2005 (suppl; abstr LBA3) 11. Zaman K, Ryu H, Hall D, et al: Protection from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis in cortical neuronal culturesby iron chelators is associated with enhanced DNA binding of hypoxia-induciblefactor-1 and ATF-1/CREB and increased expression of glycolytic enzymes, p21(waf1/cip1), and erythropoietin. J Neurosci 19:9821-9830, 1999 12. Talks KL, Turley H, Gatter KC, et al: The expression and distribution of the hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha in normal human tissues, cancers, and tumor-associated macrophages. Am J Pathol 157:411-421, 2000 13. Turley H, Scott PA, Watts VM, et al: Expression of VEGF in routinely fixed material using a new monoclonal antibody VG1. J Pathol 186:313-318, 1998[CrossRef][Medline] 14. Stewart M, Turley H, Cook N, et al: The angiogenic receptor KDR is widely distributed in human tissues and tumours and relocates intracellularly on phosphorylation: An immunohistochemical study. Histopathology 43:33-39, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 15. Parums DV, Cordell JL, Micklem K, et al: JC70: A new monoclonal antibody that detects vascular endothelium associatednantigen on routinely processed tissue sections. J Clin Pathol 43:752-757, 1990 16. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Simopoulos C, et al: Lactate dehydrogenase 5 (LDH5) relates to up-regulated hypoxia inducible factor pathway and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 22:25-30, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 17. Sivridis E, Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis MI: Proliferating fibroblasts at the invading tumour edge of colorectal adenocarcinomas are associated with endogenous markers of hypoxia, acidity, and oxidative stress. J Clin Pathol 58:1033-1038, 2005 18. Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Minopoulos G, et al: Differential assessment of vascular survival ability and tumor angiogenic activity in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 8:1185-1191, 2002 19. Giatromanolaki A, Koukourakis MI, Simopoulos C, et al: C-erbB-2 related aggressiveness in breast cancer is hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha dependent. Clin Cancer Res 10:7972-7977, 2004 20. Holbrook JJ, Liljas A, Steindel SJ, et al: Lactate dehydrogenase, in Boyer PD (ed), The Enzymes, Vol XI (ed 3). Academic Press, NY, 1975, pp. 191-292 21. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E: Tumour and Angiogenesis Research Group: Lactate dehydrogenase isoenzymes 1 and 5—Differential expression by neoplastic and stromal cells in non-small cell lung cancer and other epithelial malignant tumors. Tumour Biol 24:199-202, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 22. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, et al: Tumor and Angiogenesis Research Group: Pyruvate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase expression in non small cell lung cancer and tumor-associated stroma. Neoplasia 7:1-6, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 23. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Harris AL, et al: Comparison of metabolic pathways between cancer cells and stromal cells in colorectal carcinomas: A metabolic survival role of tumor-associated stroma. Cancer Res 66:632-637, 2006 24. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, et al: Tumour and Angiogenesis Research Group: Lactate dehydrogenase-5 (LDH-5) overexpression in non-small-cell lung cancer tissues is linked to tumour hypoxia, angiogenic factor production and poor prognosis. Br J Cancer 89:877-885, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 25. Suarez-Kurtz G: Enzyme release from skeletal muscle. Braz J Med Biol Res 16:283-290, 1983[Medline] 26. Takami H, Matsuda H, Kuki S, et al: Leakage of cytoplasmic enzymes from rat heart by the stress of cardiac beating after increase in cell membrane fragility by anoxia. Pflugers Arch 416:144-150, 1990[CrossRef][Medline] 27. Bacci G, Longhi A, Ferrari S, et al: Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase in osteosarcoma of the extremity: Experience at Rizzoli on 1421 patients treated over the last 30 years. Tumori 90:478-484, 2004[Medline] 28. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Bacik J, et al: Survival and prognostic stratification of 670 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 17:2530-2540, 1999 29. Tas F, Aykan F, Alici S, et al: Prognostic factors in pancreatic carcinoma: Serum LDH levels predict survival in metastatic disease. Am J Clin Oncol 24:547-550, 2001[Medline] 30. van Dijk MR, Steyerberg EW, Stenning SP, et al: Survival of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: A review of the IGCC classification by Cox regression and recursive partitioning. Br J Cancer 90:1176-1183, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 31. Yuce K, Baykal C, Genc C, et al: Diagnostic and prognostic value of serum and peritoneal fluid lactate dehydrogenase in epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 22:228-232, 2001[Medline] 32. Brizel DM, Schroeder T, Scher RL, et al: Elevated tumor lactate concentrations predict for an increased risk of metastases in head-and-neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 51:349-353, 2001[Medline] 33. Cheng SH, Jian JJ, Tsai SY, et al: Prognostic features and treatment outcome in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma following concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:755-762, 1998[CrossRef][Medline] 34. Kushner BH, LaQuaglia MP, Modak S, et al: Tumor lysis syndrome, neuroblastoma, and correlation between serum lactate dehydrogenase levels and MYCN-amplification. Med Pediatr Oncol 41:80-82, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 35. Lutterbach J, Sauerbrei W, Guttenberger R: Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma. Strahlenther Onkol 179:8-15, 2003[Medline] 36. Bacci G, Ferrari S, Bertoni F, et al: Prognostic factors in nonmetastatic Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated with adjuvant chemotherapy: Analysis of 359 patients at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Clin Oncol 18:4-11, 2000 37. Hauschild A, Michaelsen J, Brenner W, et al: Prognostic significance of serum S100B detection compared with routine blood parameters in advanced metastatic melanoma patients. Melanoma Res 9:155-161, 1999[Medline] 38. Kondo E, Ogura M, Kagami Y, et al: Assessment of prognostic factors in follicular lymphoma patients. Int J Hematol 73:363-368, 2001[Medline] 39. Wilder RB, Rodriguez MA, Ha CS, et al: Bulky disease is an adverse prognostic factor in patients treated with chemotherapy comprised of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone with or without radiotherapy for aggressive lymphoma. Cancer 91:2440-2446, 2001[CrossRef][Medline] 40. Ryberg M, Nielsen D, Osterlind K, et al: Prognostic factors and long-term survival in 585 patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with epirubicin-based chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 12:81-87, 2001 41. Gupta D, Lammersfeld CA, Vashi PG, et al: Prognostic significance of subjective global assessment (SGA) in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 59:35-40, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 42. Lin JT, Wang WS, Yen CC, et al: Outcome of colorectal carcinoma in patients under 40 years of age. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20:900-905, 2005[Medline] 43. Diaz R, Aparicio J, Girones R, Molina J, et al: Analysis of prognostic factors and applicability of Kohne's prognostic groups in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line irinotecan or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Clin Colorectal Cancer 5:197-202, 2005[Medline] 44. Semenza G: Signal transduction to hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Biochem Pharmacol 64:993-998, 2002[CrossRef][Medline] 45. Semenza GL, Jiang BH, Leung SW, et al: Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem 271:32529-32537, 1996 46. Forsythe JA, Jiang BH, Iyer NV, et al: Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Mol Cell Biol 16:4604-4613, 1996[Abstract] 47. Martinez-Zaguilan R, Seftor EA, et al: Acidic pH enhances the invasive behavior of human melanoma cells. Clin Exp Metastasis 14:176-186, 1996[CrossRef][Medline] 48. Rozhin J, Sameni M, Ziegler G, et al: Pericellular pH affects distribution and secretion of cathepsin B in malignant cells. Cancer Res 54:6517-6525, 1994 49. Lu H, Dalgard CL, Mohyeldin A, et al: Reversible inactivation of HIF-1 prolyl hydroxylases allows cell metabolism to control basal HIF-1. J Biol Chem 280:41928-41939, 2005 50. Elstrom RL, Bauer DE, Buzzai M, et al: Akt stimulates aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Cancer Res 64:3892-3899, 2004 51. Pore N, Liu S, Shu HK, et al: Sp1 is involved in Akt-mediated induction of VEGF expression through an HIF-1-independent mechanism. Mol Biol Cell 15:4841-4853, 2004 52. Mizukami Y, Li J, Zhang X, et al: Hypoxia-inducible factor-1-independent regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by hypoxia in colon cancer. Cancer Res 64:1765-1772, 2004 53. Brekken RA, Huang X, King SW, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor as a marker of tumor endothelium. Cancer Res 58:1952-1959, 1998 54. Fox SB, Turley H, Cheale M, et al: Phosphorylated KDR is expressed in the neoplastic and stromal elements of human renal tumours and shuttles from cell membrane to nucleus. J Pathol 202:313-320, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 55. Weigand M, Hantel P, Kreienberg R, et al: Autocrine vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in breast cancer: Evidence from cell lines and primary breast cancer cultures in vitro. Angiogenesis 8:197-204, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 56. Siatskas C, Underwood J, Ramezani A, et al: Specific pharmacological dimerization of KDR in lentivirally transduced humanhematopoietic cells activates anti-apoptotic and proliferative mechanisms. FASEB J 19:1752-1754, 2005 57. Zhang H, Li Y, Li H, Bassi R, et al: Inhibition of both the autocrine and the paracrine growth of human leukaemia with a fully human antibody directed against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. Leuk Lymphoma 45:1887-1897, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 58. Giatromanolaki A, Sivridis E, Brekken R, et al: Tumour and Angiogenesis Research Group: The angiogenic "vascular endothelial growth factor/flk-1(KDR) receptor" pathway in patients with endometrial carcinoma: Prognostic and therapeutic implications. Cancer 92:2569-2577, 2001[CrossRef][Medline] 59. Koukourakis MI, Giatromanolaki A, Thorpe PE, et al: Vascular endothelial growth factor/KDR activated microvessel density versus CD31 standard microvessel density in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 60:3088-3095, 2000 Submitted January 30, 2006; accepted May 30, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|