Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 28 (October 1), 2006: pp. 4667
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.0267

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aelony, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aelony, Y.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

Raltitrexed and Pemetrexed Studies in Mesothelioma Have Not Shown Improved Quality of Life nor Prolonged Survival Compared With Effective Pleurodesis With Thoracoscopic Talc Poudrage

Yossef Aelony

Los Angeles County Harbor–UCLA Medical Center, Rancho Palos Verdes, CA

To the Editor:

The recent publication by Bottomley et al1 is an ambitious attempt to define possible therapeutic benefits in an otherwise dismal disease with a short life expectancy—malignant pleural mesothelioma. The study had already been shown to demonstrate an increased life expectancy of 2.6 months in those patients treated with raltitrexed plus cisplatin compared with cisplatin alone. The Bottomley et al article1 deals primarily with the health related quality of life (QOL) scales. The authors correctly conclude that adding raltitrexed to cisplatin treatment improves the QOL as well as the life expectancy. However, this QOL study does not indicate that raltitrexed plus cisplatin is associated with a better QOL in mesothelioma patients treated with an alternate therapy—thoracoscopic talc poudrage.

A significant percentage of the chemotherapy patients in both groups suffered nausea and vomiting, which progressively worsened with each treatment.1 Nausea and vomiting would not occur in a true control group, with no chemotherapy. More importantly, pain was unaffected by chemotherapy while dyspnea subjectively improved with treatment. Because most dyspnea early in this disease is relieved by thoracentesis and subsequent pleurodesis,2 we know the breathlessness is due to the collection of fluid in the pleural cavity. In this study, therefore, one can only conclude that the patients were not successfully pleurodesed before entry into the study. So the positive effect of the two-drug chemotherapy may merely reflect greater control of pleural fluid with two drugs instead of one.

We published a series of 26 consecutive mesotheliomatous pleural effusions treated with thoracoscopic talc poudrage, in which there were no significant ancillary treatments.2 The average survival was 24 months (median, 19 months). Although our extended longevity compared with all other unselected studies could be fortuitous in a small series, it certainly raises the issue as to the survival benefit of effective pleurodesis. Another recent study, on indwelling pleural catheters, provides further suggestive evidence for pleurodesis as a survival benefit: those malignant pleural effusion patients who spontaneously pleurodesed after catheter placement lived for 254 days while those who failed to pleurodese lived only 71 days.3 These studies2,3 provide further evidence for the need of a talc poudrage control arm in future mesothelioma studies: a control arm that has a zero incidence of nausea and vomiting, no associated (cisplatin) fatigue with the treatment, and provides immediate relief of dyspnea in a 3-day hospital stay, with no known decline of QOL for the first 3 months of treatment, as seen in the pemetrexed plus cisplatin study.4

It is time for the mesothelioma research community to admit that innovative surgical and nonsurgical treatments all have a negative morbidity, QOL, and mortality potential, which can only be quantified with a true control group. Thoracoscopic talc poudrage is currently the least morbid, least expensive, most effective (in long-term relief of dyspnea), and most readily available control modality of care.

Although this study1 seeks to fairly quantitate QOL on a two-drug treatment versus one drug, we still do not know if the two drugs prolong life—on the average—compared with talc poudrage; nor if the QOL, number of quality lifetime days, number of hospital days, number of clinic visits/year of life compare favorably or unfavorably with nondrug treatment. The unstated cost of the chemotherapy and its adverse effects are an additional item which has been studiously unmentioned in the publications on what remain unproven benefits to the patient.

Author's Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The author indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Bottomley A, Gaafa R, Manegold C, et al: Short-term treatment-related symptoms and quality of life: Results from an international randomized phase III study of cisplatin with or without raltitrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: An EORTC Lung-Cancer Group and National Cancer Institute, Canada, Intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 24:1435-1442, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Aelony Y, Yao J: Prolonged survival after talc poudrage for malignant pleural mesothelioma: Case series. Respirology 10:649-655, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

3. Tremblay A, Michaud G: Single-center experience with 250 tunnelled pleural catheter insertions for malignant pleural effusion. Chest 129:362-368, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Boyer MJ, Nassem J, Liepa AM, et al: Symptom and quality of life advantages for pemetrexed + cisplatin versus cisplatin in treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Lung Cancer 41:S19, 2003 (suppl 2)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Reply

  • In Reply
    Jan P. van Meerbeeck and Andrew Bottomley
    JCO 2006 24: 4667-4668 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aelony, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aelony, Y.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online