|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Originally published as JCO Early Release 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.5194 on September 11 2006 © 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology. MicroRNA Expression Abnormalities in Pancreatic Endocrine and Acinar Tumors Are Associated With Distinctive Pathologic Features and Clinical Behavior
From the Departments of Molecular Virology, Immunology and Medical Genetics and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Departments of Pathology and Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, Università di Verona, Verona; and the Department of Morphology and Embryology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy Address reprint requests in the United States to Carlo M. Croce, MD, Ohio State University, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wiseman Hall Room 385K, 410 W 12th Ave, Columbus, OH; e-mail: Carlo.Croce{at}osumc.edu; and in Europe to Aldo Scarpa, MD, Verona University, strada Le grazie 8, 37134 Verona, Italy; e-mail: aldo.scarpa{at}univr.it
PURPOSE: We investigated the global microRNA expression patterns in normal pancreas, pancreatic endocrine tumors and acinar carcinomas to evaluate their involvement in transformation and malignant progression of these tumor types. MicroRNAs are small noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression by targeting specific mRNAs for degradation or translation inhibition. Recent evidence indicates that microRNAs can contribute to tumor development and progression and may have diagnostic and prognostic value in several human malignancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a custom microarray, we studied the global microRNA expression in 12 nontumor pancreas and 44 pancreatic primary tumors, including 12 insulinomas, 28 nonfunctioning endocrine tumors, and four acinar carcinomas. RESULTS: Our data showed that a common pattern of microRNA expression distinguishes any tumor type from normal pancreas, suggesting that this set of microRNAs might be involved in pancreatic tumorigenesis; the expression of miR-103 and miR-107, associated with lack of expression of miR-155, discriminates tumors from normal; a set of 10 microRNAs distinguishes endocrine from acinar tumors and is possibly associated with either normal endocrine differentiation or endocrine tumorigenesis; miR-204 is primarily expressed in insulinomas and correlates with immunohistochemical expression of insulin; and the overexpression of miR-21 is strongly associated with both a high Ki67 proliferation index and presence of liver metastasis. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that alteration in microRNA expression is related to endocrine and acinar neoplastic transformation and progression of malignancy, and might prove useful in distinguishing tumors with different clinical behavior.
Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) may occur sporadically or as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome.1 These neoplasms are clinically classified as functioning (F-PET) or nonfunctioning (NF-PET), according to the presence of symptoms due to hormone hypersecretion. F-PETs are mainly represented by insulinomas. At diagnosis, metastatic disease is observed in only 10% of insulinomas but in up to 60% of NF-PETs, and most PET-related deaths are caused by liver metastasis.1 The malignant potential among PETs varies greatly and cannot be predicted on the basis of histologic appearance. In fact, the vast majority of PETs are well-differentiated endocrine tumors (WDETs) and are defined as carcinoma (WDEC) only when invasion or metastases are identified.1 Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (PACC) is an extremely rare tumor type distinct from ductal adenocarcinoma and PET, although some overlap with PET is testified by both the expression of neuroendocrine markers in one third of the cases and the existence of mixed acinar-endocrine carcinomas.2 PACC is always malignant with a median survival of 18 months, which lies between that of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and endocrine neoplasms (6 months and 40 months, respectively3). Little is known about the molecular pathogenesis of PETs.4 Inactivation of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene is the most frequent genetic event identified in sporadic PET,5 whereas mutations in genes typically involved in pancreatic adenocarcinoma are uncommon.5 Even less is known regarding the molecular anomalies of PACC.6 No gene expression profile data are available for PACC, and our understanding of gene expression changes that occur in PET is still at an initial phase.7 MicroRNAs are small (20 to 24 nucleotides) noncoding RNA gene products that serve critical roles in cell proliferation, apoptosis and developmental timing by negatively regulating the stability or translational efficiency of their target mRNAs.8 Currently, 462 unique mature human microRNAs are known (http://microrna.sanger.ac.uk). Aberrant expression of microRNAs has been linked to cancers,9,10 and diagnostic/prognostic characteristics of specific cancer types can be distinguished based on their microRNA profiles.11-19 Functional studies also have linked aberrant microRNA expression to carcinogenesis.20-23 We investigated the global microRNA expression patterns in normal pancreas, primary pancreatic endocrine tumors and acinar carcinomas to evaluate their involvement in transformation and malignant progression of these tumor types.
Patient Data, Neoplastic-Cell Enrichment, and RNA Extraction All samples were from frozen primary tumors collected at the Department of Pathology, Verona University, Verona, Italy. All tumors were sporadic, as assessed by personal and family histories. PET were diagnosed and classified according to WHO criteria.1 They included 28 nonfunctional and 12 functional tumors. The 28 NF-PET included 11 WDETs and 17 WDECs. The 12 F-PET were insulinomas, comprising 11 WDETs and one WDEC. Diagnosis of PACC was confirmed by immunohistochemical expression of lipase, amylase, and trypsin. As a control, normal pancreas was taken in 12 corresponding patient specimens. A neoplastic cellularity higher than 90% was obtained by cryostat enrichment. RNA was extracted with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from 10 20-µm thick cryostat sections, checking the cell composition of the sample every five sections. RNA integrity was confirmed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA).
MicroRNA Microarray Hybridization and Quantification
Computational Analysis of microRNA Microarray Data Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using the aggregate values of replicate spots obtained applying Tukey's median polish algorithm. The analysis was done using the 200 probes containing the mature microRNA sequences with the highest interquartile range. The distance metrics used to cluster samples and genes were Pearson correlation and Euclidean distance, respectively. The agglomerative method was the complete-linkage. The output was visualized using Maple Tree (version 0.2.3.2, http://mapletree.sourceforge.net/). All data were submitted using MIAMExpress to the Array Express database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/).
Northern Blotting
MicroRNA expression profiles were determined for 12 nontumor pancreas and 44 primary pancreatic tumors, including 40 PETs and four PACCs, using a custom microarray platform that was proven to give robust results, as validated by several studies.12,17,19,24 The unsupervised hierarchical clustering, using the 200 most variable microRNAs, showed a common microRNA expression pattern distinguishing PET and PACC from normal pancreas (Fig 1). Notably, PACCs fell into a unique cluster that was part of the wider cluster including all PETs, whereas there was no distinctive pattern between insulinomas and NF-PET.
We then searched for microRNAs showing differential expression between classes of samples. Class comparison analysis showed the differential expression of several microRNAs between normal tissue and either PACC or PET, while a smaller number of microRNAs were found to be differentially expressed between PET and PACC (Fig 2). In detail, class comparison analysis identified 87 up- and eight downregulated microRNAs in PET versus normal pancreas, while PACC had 30 microRNAs upregulated and seven downregulated when compared with the healthy tissue. Only 10 microRNAs were differentially expressed between PET and PACC, and four were unique to WDEC with respect to PACC.
Common microRNA Expression Pattern Distinguishes Pancreatic Endocrine and Acinar Tumors From Normal Pancreas The vast majority of the differentially expressed microRNAs found in PACC versus healthy tissue were also found in PET versus healthy tissue. In fact, 28 of the 30 (93%) microRNAs overexpressed in PACC were also found upregulated in PET. Similarly, five (71%) of seven underexpressed microRNAs were downregulated in both tumor types (Fig 2). This overlap, together with the fact that only a limited set of microRNAs were differentially expressed between PET and PACC or among PET subtypes, is suggestive of a pattern of microRNA expression common to acinar and insular derived tumors. Among the upregulated microRNAs in PET that are also common to PACC, seven were validated by Northern analysis. MiR-103 was the best discriminator for all pairwise comparisons of normal pancreas, acinar carcinomas, and endocrine tumors (Fig 3). The expression of miR-107 paralleled that of its highly homologous miR-103, and the significant overexpression in tumors versus normal of miR-23a, miR-26b, miR-192, and miR-342 was also confirmed (online only Fig 1).
Among the downregulated microRNAs in PET, Northern blot of miR-155 showed the lack of detectable expression in both PET and PACC (Fig 3). Although miR-155 was not among the top listed downregulated genes in PACC, its low expression in this tumor type was also detected by microarray, as shown in the box-and-whiskers plot of Figure 2.
Limited Set of microRNA Distinguishes Pancreatic Endocrine From Acinar Tumors
Overexpression of miR-204 Is Specific to Insulinomas and Correlates With Immunohistochemical Expression of Insulin
Because miR-375 was suggested to be specifically expressed in mouse pancreatic islets and to function as a negative regulator of insulin exocytosis,27 we investigated its expression in a panel of nontumor human adult tissues and our samples by Northern blot. MiR-375 was detected in only healthy pancreas (online only Fig 2), and its expression level was higher in tumors versus nontumor pancreas, but showed no difference between insulinomas and nonfunctioning tumors.
Expression of miR-21 Is Strongly Associated With the Proliferation Index and Presence of Liver Metastasis
Identification of Putative mRNA Targets for Differentially Expressed microRNAs Three programs (miRanda, TargetScan, PicTar, respectively available at http://www.microrna.org/mammalian/index.html, http://genes.mit.edu/targetscan/, http://pictar.bio.nyu.edu/) were used to identify predicted targets of selected microRNAs, namely miR-103/miR-107, miR-155, miR-204/miR-211, and miR-21. To increase the stringency of the analysis, we considered only target genes that were found from all three algorithms. Because the same tumor samples and five nontumor pancreas analyzed for microRNA expression have also been evaluated for gene expression profiles with a custom oligonucleotide microarray (Missiaglia et al, manuscript in preparation), we assessed the status of predicted mRNA targets in PET and normal tissue as well as among PET with different clinicopathologic characteristics. A two-sample t-test analysis identified several putative target genes that were either up- or downregulated, namely 28 up- and seven downregulated for miR-103/107, two up- and two downregulated for either miR-155 or miR-204/211, and one up- and one downregulated for miR-21. Notably, the mRNA expression of PDCD4 gene, a putative target of miR-21, was downregulated in liver metastatic PET and in tumors with high proliferation index, showing an inverse correlation with the expression of miR-21 (Fig 6).
The results of our survey of microRNA expression profiles in normal pancreas, pancreatic endocrine tumors and acinar carcinomas may be summarized as follows: a common microRNA expression profile distinguishes both endocrine and acinar tumors from normal pancreas; the expression of miR-103 and miR-107 associated with lack of expression of miR-155 discriminates tumors from normal; a limited set of microRNAs is specific to endocrine tumors and is possibly associated with the endocrine differentiation or tumorigenesis; miR-204 expression occurs primarily in insulinomas and correlates with immunohistochemical expression of insulin; and expression of miR-21 is strongly associated with proliferation index and liver metastasis. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the expression profiles showed that both tumor types were separated from normal pancreas. Although PACCs fell into a unique cluster, this was part of the wider cluster including all PETs. Although we identified many more differentially expressed microRNAs in PET versus healthy than between PACC versus healthy, the vast majority of differentially expressed microRNAs in PACC were similarly altered in PET. It is worth noting that healthy pancreas is largely formed by acini and therefore represents the ideal normal counterpart for the analysis of acinar cell carcinomas, whereas pancreatic islet cells would represent the healthy counterpart for pancreatic endocrine tumors. Unfortunately, we had no preparations of these cells available. Nonetheless, the finding of a largely concordant pattern of differentially expressed microRNAs between acinar and insular tumors, including 28 upregulated and five downregulated genes, suggests that this set common to both tumor types might be related to pancreatic neoplastic transformation. Providing additional support for this assertion, several microRNAs differentially expressed in both our tumor types have been found differentially expressed also in breast,17 colon11 and B-cell leukemia.12 In addition, at least 20 of the differentially expressed microRNAs in our tumors have been identified as having either growth related or apoptotic effects in the lung A549 or cervical HeLa carcinoma cell lines.28 Furthermore, both PACC and PET showed the coordinate overexpression of miR-17, miR-20 and miR-92-1, which are contained in a polycistronic cluster. This miR-17-92 cluster has been described to act as an oncogene in association with MYC gene.22 Notably, overexpression of MYC has been reported in PET and also in hyperplastic islets, suggesting its involvement in the early phases of insular tumorigenesis.29 In addition, induction of MYC in islet or acinar cells of mouse in vitro or in vivo models produces endocrine tumors30,31 or mixed acinar/ductal adenocarcinomas,32 respectively, while suppression of MYC-induced apoptosis leads to islet cell carcinoma.33 The expression of the two highly homologous miR-103 and miR-107 together with the lack of expression of miR-155 was distinctive of tumors versus nontumor tissue. Interestingly, miR-103/107 have been found to be overexpressed in several tumor types.34 The finding that miR-155 was expressed in healthy pancreas and lacking in both PET and PACC is rather interesting as overexpression of miR-155 has been observed in lymphomas16,35,36 and breast cancer,17 finding that have led to the speculation that miR-155 may be an oncogenic microRNA.10 This may not be unexpected, as microRNAs expressed in adults are tissue specific37 and the consequences of microRNA misexpression is highly dependent on the cell-specific expression pattern of mRNAs that are microRNA regulated.28 Ten microRNAs were peculiarly overexpressed in PET and differentiated this tumor from both PACC and normal pancreas. These included miR-99a, 99b, 100, 125a, 125b-1, 125b-2, 129-2, 130a, 132, and 342. These microRNAs may be characteristic of either normal pancreatic endocrine differentiation or endocrine tumorigenesis. Conversely, no microRNA was found to be specifically up- or downregulated in PACC, though the limited number of PACC samples may have affected the power of the analysis. Although the microRNA profiles were almost indistinguishable between insulinomas and nonfunctioning endocrine tumors, the overexpression of the two closely related miR-204 and miR-211 was restricted to insulinomas. Notably, miR-204 expression correlated with the immunohistochemical expression of insulin. In this respect, miR-375 has been recently reported to be specifically expressed in mouse pancreatic islets and to function as a negative regulator of insulin exocytosis.27 Our data showed that this microRNA is expressed in human normal pancreas as well as in acinar and endocrine tumors. However, no difference was found in its expression level between insulinomas and nonfunctioning endocrine tumors. We also determined whether microRNA expression was correlated with the clinical characteristics of PETs. Our results showed that miR-21 overexpression is associated with both enhanced Ki67 proliferation index and liver metastasis. MiR-21 overexpression has been observed in several cancers, including glioblastoma, breast, lung and colon cancers.9,10,15,17 A cancer-related function of miR-21 is also supported by knockdown experiments in glioblastoma cells showing that this microRNA has an antiapoptotic function.20 In this respect, the programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) gene, putatively targeted by miR-21, was found significantly downregulated in our metastatic and high proliferative PET, and showed an inverse correlation with the expression of miR-21. This gene has been reported to act as a tumor suppressor implied in cellular invasion and metastasis.38 Furthermore, PDCD4 expression is lost in progressed carcinomas of lung, breast, colon, and prostate,39 and a tumor suppressor role for PDCD4 has been also reported in neuroendocrine tumor cells.40 MicroRNAs exert their biologic effects by targeting specific mRNAs for degradation or translational inhibition. To get insights into the biologic implications of the most interesting microRNAs showing altered expression in pancreatic tumors (ie, miR-103/miR-107, miR-155, miR-204/miR-211, and miR-21), we searched predicted targets that were in common among those identified by three different algorithms, discussed in Results. Then, to evaluate whether there was a correlation between the expression of microRNAs and that of their predicted targets, we took advantage of the microarry expression profiles of the same tumor and normal samples (Missiaglia et al, manuscript in preparation). Among the selected targets that were contained in our microarray, we found several up- and downregulated genes. Interestingly, the predicted target genes of miR-103/107 were overexpressed more frequently than expected. This finding parallels that of Babak et al, 37 who reported a low correlation between microRNA expression and their predicted mRNA targets in a set of 17 different mouse tissues. This supports the currently favored model that most microRNAs act more likely through translational inhibition without mRNA degradation.41 In conclusion, our study suggests that alteration in microRNA expression is related to endocrine and acinar neoplastic transformation and progression of malignancy.
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
We thank Stefano Barbi, PhD, for critically reviewing the bioinformatic sections.
published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on September 11, 2006. Supported by Program Project Grants No. P01CA76259 and P01CA81534 from the National Cancer Institute (C.M.C.), by a Kimmel Scholar award (G.A.C.), Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC; A.S.), Milan, Italy; Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Verona (Bando 2005), Italy; Ministeri Università e Salute, Rome, Italy; European Community Grant No. PL018771; and Fondazione Giorgio Zanotto, Verona, Italy. C.R. and E.M. contributed equally to this work. A.S. and C.M.C. contributed equally to this work. Terms in blue are defined in the glossary, found at the end of this article and online at www.jco.org. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
1. Kloppel G, Perren A, Heitz PU: The gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine cell system and its tumors: The WHO classification. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1014:13-27, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 2. Ohike N, Kosmahl M, Kloppel G: Mixed acinar-endocrine carcinoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathological study and comparison with acinar-cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch 445:231-235, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 3. Holen KD, Klimstra DS, Hummer A, et al: Clinical characteristics and outcomes from an institutional series of acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas and related tumors. J Clin Oncol 20:4673-4678, 2002 4. Zikusoka MN, Kidd M, Eick G, et al: The molecular genetics of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer 104:2292-2309, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 5. Perren A, Komminoth P, Heitz PU: Molecular genetics of gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1014:199-208, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 6. Abraham SC, Wu TT, Hruban RH, et al: Genetic and immunohistochemical analysis of pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma: Frequent allelic loss on chromosome 11p and alterations in the APC/beta-catenin pathway. Am J Pathol 160:953-962, 2002 7. Hansel DE, Rahman A, House M, et al: Met proto-oncogene and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 overexpression correlates with metastatic ability in well-differentiated pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Clin Cancer Res 10:6152-6158, 2004 8. Ambros V: The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 431:350-355, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 9. Caldas C, Brenton JD: Sizing up miRNAs as cancer genes. Nat Med 11:712-714, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 10. Croce CM, Calin GA: MiRNAs, cancer, and stem cell division. Cell 122:6-7, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 11. Michael MZ, OConnor SM, van Holst Pellekaan NG, et al: Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia. Mol Cancer Res 1:882-891, 2003 12. Calin GA, Liu CG, Sevignani C, et al: MicroRNA profiling reveals distinct signatures in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:11755-11760, 2004 13. Ota A, Tagawa H, Karnan S, et al: Identification and characterization of a novel gene, C13orf25, as a target for 13q31-q32 amplification in malignant lymphoma. Cancer Res 64:3087-3095, 2004 14. Takamizawa J, Konishi H, Yanagisawa K, et al: Reduced expression of the let-7 microRNAs in human lung cancers in association with shortened postoperative survival. Cancer Res 64:3753-3756, 2004 15. Ciafre SA, Galardi S, Mangiola A, et al: Extensive modulation of a set of microRNAs in primary glioblastoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 334:1351-1358, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 16. Eis PS, Tam W, Sun L, et al: Accumulation of miR-155 and BIC RNA in human B cell lymphomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:3627-3632, 2005 17. Iorio MV, Ferracin M, Liu CG, et al: MicroRNA gene expression deregulation in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 65:7065-7070, 2005 18. Lu J, Getz G, Miska EA, et al: MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435:834-838, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 19. Calin G, Ferracin M, Cimmino A, et al: A unique microRNA signature associated with prognostic factors and disease progression in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 353:1793-1801, 2005 20. Chan JA, Krichevsky AM, Kosik KS: MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Res 65:6029-6033, 2005 21. Cimmino A, Calin G, Fabbri M, et al: MiR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:13944-13949, 2005 [erratum in Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2464, 2006] 22. He L, Thomson JM, Hemann MT, et al: A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene. Nature 435:828-833, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 23. Johnson SM, Grosshans H, Shingara J, et al: RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell 120:635-647, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 24. Liu CG, Calin GA, Meloon B, et al: An oligonucleotide microchip for genome-wide microRNA profiling in human and mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:9740-9744, 2004 25. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, et al: Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 5:R80, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 26. Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sultmann H, et al: Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics 18:S96-S104, 2002 (suppl 1)[Abstract] 27. Poy MN, Eliasson L, Krutzfeldt J, et al: A pancreatic islet-specific microRNA regulates insulin secretion. Nature 432:226-230, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 28. Cheng AM, Byrom MW, Shelton J, et al: Antisense inhibition of human miRNAs and indications for an involvement of miRNA in cell growth and apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res 33:1290-1297, 2005 29. Pavelic K, Hrascan R, Kapitanovic S, et al: Molecular genetics of malignant insulinoma. Anticancer Res 16:1707-1717, 1996[Medline] 30. Katic M, Hadzija M, Wrischer M, et al: An in vitro model of the early genetic events in multistage carcinogenesis of malignant insulinoma. Carcinogenesis 20:1521-1527, 1999 31. Lewis BC, Klimstra DS, Varmus HE: The c-myc and PyMT oncogenes induce different tumor types in a somatic mouse model for pancreatic cancer. Genes Dev 17:3127-3138, 2003 32. Sandgren EP, Quaife CJ, Paulovich AG, et al: Pancreatic tumor pathogenesis reflects the causative genetic lesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:93-97, 1991 33. Pelengaris S, Khan M, Evan GI: Suppression of Myc-induced apoptosis in beta cells exposes multiple oncogenic properties of Myc and triggers carcinogenic progression. Cell 109:321-334, 2002[CrossRef][Medline] 34. Volinia S, Calin GA, Liu CG, et al: A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2257-2261, 2006 35. Metzler M, Wilda M, Busch K, et al: High expression of precursor microRNA-155/BIC RNA in children with Burkitt lymphoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 39:167-169, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 36. Kluiver J, Poppema S, de Jong D, et al: BIC and miR-155 are highly expressed in Hodgkin, primary mediastinal and diffuse large B cell lymphomas. J Pathol 207:243-249, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 37. Babak T, Zhang W, Morris Q, et al: Probing microRNAs with microarrays: Tissue specificity and functional inference. RNA 10:1813-1819, 2004 38. Jansen AP, Camalier CE, Stark C, et al: Characterization of programmed cell death 4 in multiple human cancers reveals a novel enhancer of drug sensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther 3:103-110, 2004 39. Goke R, Barth P, Schmidt A, et al: Programmed cell death protein 4 suppresses CDK1/cdc2 via induction of p21(Waf1/Cip1). Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287:C1541-C1546, 2004 40. Goke R, Gregel C, Goke A, et al: Programmed cell death protein 4 (PDCD4) acts as a tumor suppressor in neuroendocrine tumor cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1014:220-221, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 41. Bartel DP: MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116:281-297, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] Submitted December 28, 2005; accepted June 29, 2006.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|