Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 33 (November 20), 2006: pp. 5336-5337
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.7396

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Wolff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Montag, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Wolff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Montag, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Vitro Maturation Is an Efficient Technique to Generate Oocytes and Should Be Considered in Combination With Cryopreservation of Ovarian Tissue for Preservation of Fertility in Women

Michael von Wolff

Coordinator of the German Network on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients, and Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Thomas Strowitzki

Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

Hans van der Ven

Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany

Markus Montag

German Network on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients, and Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Women's Hospital Bonn, University of Bonn, Germany

To the Editor:

We read with interest the article by Lee et al1 concerning the recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology on fertility preservation in cancer patients. Lee and colleagues should be congratulated for their systematic analysis and for the recommendations of therapeutic options to preserve fertility in cancer patients. The recommendations of the German Network on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients are basically in line with the recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

There is no doubt that the collection of mature oocytes (IVF) and the cryopreservation of embryos or oocytes is still the option with the best chance to achieve pregnancy. However, as this procedure requires approximately 14 days for ovarian stimulation and oocyte collection, this option often cannot be performed. Furthermore, the high dosage of gonadotrophins needed for ovarian stimulation carries the risk of developing an ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which might result in further delay of chemotherapy.

We have therefore successfully integrated the in vitro maturation (IVM) technique in our catalogue of fertility-preserving techniques in cancer patients. Those patients who cannot perform a regular IVF are offered the combination of the collection and maturation of immature oocytes (IVM), the laparoscopic removal of ovarian tissue, and the treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists. As IVM requires only a few days of ovarian stimulation, the chemotherapy can frequently be started within 1 week after the diagnosis has been made. The transvaginal collection of the oocytes is combined with the simultaneous laparoscopic removal and cryopreservation of ovarian cortex tissue. After the removal of oocytes and ovarian tissue, the patients receive GnRH agonists, which are initially combined with GnRH antagonists to reduce the endogenous flare up of follicle-stimulating hormone.

This procedure combines the collection and cryopreservation of oocytes with the still experimental cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and GnRH analog treatment. It therefore offers a realistic chance to achieve pregnancy after chemotherapy to those patients who can not perform a regular ovarian stimulation to collect mature oocytes (IVF). We are fully aware that the cumulative pregnancy rates after IVM are lower than after regular IVF. IVM will result in two fertilized eggs on average,2,3 whereas IVF can generate approximately six fertilized eggs.4 However, as the collection of immature eggs can be combined with laparoscopic removal of ovarian tissue, this procedure offers an important additional chance for patients to achieve pregnancy after chemotherapy.

Currently, the German Network on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients systematically trains all German Women's University Hospitals in IVM and organizes the centralized cryopreservation of ovarian tissue under optimized conditions. We therefore strongly recommend adding the IVM procedure to the list of fertility preservation options, and to offer this procedure to all patients who cannot receive regular IVF treatment, but who can have chemotherapy postponed for 1 week.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24 : 2917 -2931, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Soderstrom-Anttila V, Makinen S, Tuuri T, et al: Favourable pregnancy results with insemination of in vitro matured oocytes from unstimulated patients. Hum Reprod 20 : 1534 -1540, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. von Wolff M, Eberhardt I, Strowitzki T: In vitro maturation: Indications, risks and chances of a new assisted reproductive technique. Zentralbl Gynacol (in press)

4. German IVF register. http://www.deutsches-ivf-register.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Wolff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Montag, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Wolff, M.
Right arrow Articles by Montag, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online