Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 33 (November 20), 2006: pp. 49e-50
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.6504

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herrinton, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herrinton, L. J.

CORRESPONDENCE

Recent Declines in Hormone Therapy Utilization and Breast Cancer Incidence: Clinical and Population-Based Evidence

Christina A. Clarke, Sally L. Glaser

Surveillance Research, Northern California Cancer Center, Fremont CA, and Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Connie S. Uratsu, Joseph V. Selby, Larry H. Kushi, Lisa J. Herrinton

Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland CA

To the Editor:

Long-term use of estrogen- or progestin-containing hormone therapies (HT) is well recognized to be associated with increased risk of breast cancer both in observational studies and the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized trial.1 After the early termination of the trial in July 2002 and the subsequent media coverage, reports from clinical series indicated immediate declines of 28% to 46% in prevalences of HT and estrogen-only (ET) use.2,3 The population-level impact of these declines on breast cancer are uncertain given the 2- to 3-year lag time between diagnosis and data availability in cancer registries.

To better understand the possible impact from changes in HT on breast cancer in larger populations, we compared recent secular trends in HT use and breast cancer incidence in available clinical and population-based data resources, including recently released cancer registry data for the year 2004. We calculated the annual prevalence of HT use and the annual incidence of invasive breast cancer for the period from 1994 to 2003 for women ages 50 to 74 years in Kaiser Permanente's (Oakland, CA) Northern California region (KPNC), a large integrated health-delivery system from which computerized pharmacy, membership, and hospital cancer registry data were obtained. Women filling at least two prescriptions (generally constituting 90 days per prescription) of HT or ET in any calendar year were considered users for that year. First primary invasive breast cancer (International Classification of Disease–Oncology, 3rd edition [ICD-O-3]4 site 50.0-50.9) diagnoses were identified, with histologic subtypes defined as ductal (ICD-O-3 codes 8500), or "with lobular component" (ICD-O-3 codes 8520, 8522, 8524). Yearly denominators included women who were KPNC members for at least 11 months of the year, and excluded those with unknown age or county of residence. Population-based breast cancer incidence rates for the 13-county catchment area for KPNC and for the state of California were obtained from the California Cancer Registry for the same ICD-O-3 specifications and age group, but for the time period including 2004, which was the most recent year for which data were available. All rates were age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard.

Figure 1 illustrates that between 2001 and 2003, the calendar years before and after the WHI announcement, age-adjusted rates of HT and ET use in KPNC members declined 68% and 36%, respectively. For the same time period, breast cancer incidence declined 10% in KPNC members, 11% in the catchment population, and 11% in the state. For 2004, breast cancer incidence rates in the catchment population and the state were lower than the rates for 2003. Comparable patterns of decline were observed for both the ductal and lobular histologic subtypes (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 1. Yearly rates of prevalence of estrogen-only and estrogen/progestin–containing hormone therapy use and incidence of invasive first primary breast cancer in Kaiser Permanente–Northern California (KPNC) members, the 13-county KPNC catchment area, and the state of California, from 1994 to 2004.

 
These recent decreases in breast cancer incidence, evident in both clinical and population-based groups, are temporally consistent with substantial changes in HT and ET use. Furthermore, these patterns are consistent with (1) reports from observational studies of sharp reductions in breast cancer risk observed after HT cessation5 and (2) proposed biologic mechanisms for the role of HT in breast carcinogenesis whereby HT acts as a promoter of already initiated breast tumors.6 In California, breast cancer incidence rates have been declining since 1999, but more substantial reductions in 2003 and 2004 may reflect declines in the numbers of hormone therapy users and, if so, could provide further evidence of a short latency between HT discontinuance and reduced risk. While the ecologic nature of the KPNC HT and breast cancer data prohibit a causal interpretation of these associations, and the breast cancer incidence rate declines may have other explanations, population-level breast cancer incidence trends should continue to be monitored closely in light of hormone-use patterns.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following author or immediate family members indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.
Authors Employment Leadership Consultant Stock Honoraria Research Funds Testimony Other

Christina A. Clarke Williams Love O'Leary Craine & Powers, PC

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by the SEER Rapid Response Surveillance Study program by a supplement to contract N01-CN-35136 with the National Cancer Institute. The collection of cancer incidence data used in this study was supported by the California Department of Health Services as part of the statewide cancer reporting program mandated by California Health and Safety Code Section 103885; the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program under contract N01-PC-35136 awarded to the Northern California Cancer Center, contract N01-PC-35139 awarded to the University of Southern California, and contract N02-PC-15105 awarded to the Public Health Institute; and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Program of Cancer Registries, under Agreement No. U55/CCR921930-02 awarded to the Public Health Institute.

REFERENCES

1. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators: Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: Principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288 : 321 -333, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Buist DS, Newton KM, Miglioretti DL, et al: Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 104 : 1042 -1050, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Wei F, Miglioretti DL, Connelly MT, et al: Changes in women's use of hormones after the Women's Health Initiative estrogen and progestin trial by race, education, and income. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 106 -112, (No. 35)

4. Fritz A, Percy C, Jack A, et al: International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ed 3). Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization, 2000

5. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: Collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer: Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Lancet 350 : 1047 -1059, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Dietel M, Lewis MA, Shapiro S: Hormone replacement therapy: Pathobiological aspects of hormone-sensitive cancers in women relevant to epidemiological studies on HRT—A mini-review. Hum Reprod 20 : 2052 -2060, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. A. T. Granados
The Health of Populations: General Theories and Particular Realities. First Edition: By Stephen J. Kunitz
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2008; 168(1): 115 - 118.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
B. L. Sprague, A. Trentham-Dietz, K. M. Egan, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. M. Hampton, and P. A. Newcomb
Proportion of Invasive Breast Cancer Attributable to Risk Factors Modifiable after Menopause
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 13, 2008; (2008) kwn143v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
C. Hery, J. Ferlay, M. Boniol, and P. Autier
Quantification of changes in breast cancer incidence and mortality since 1990 in 35 countries with Caucasian-majority populations
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2008; 19(6): 1187 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
N. Krieger
Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections
Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2008; 37(3): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Caan, L. Habel, C. Quesenberry, L. Kushi, and L. Herrinton
Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 16, 2008; 100(8): 597 - 598.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. I. Li, K. E. Malone, P. L. Porter, T. J. Lawton, L. F. Voigt, K. L. Cushing-Haugen, M. G. Lin, X. Yuan, and J. R. Daling
Relationship between Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Risk of Ductal, Lobular, and Ductal-Lobular Breast Carcinomas
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 43 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. I. Li and J. R. Daling
Changes in Breast Cancer Incidence Rates in the United States by Histologic Subtype and Race/Ethnicity, 1995 to 2004
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2773 - 2780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. A. Clarke and A. S. Robbins
In Reply
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2007; 25(31): 5039 - 5040.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Wacholder
Untangling Differences in Cancer Mortality Rates: A Closer Look at Race and Education
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 19, 2007; 99(18): 1356 - 1357.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. F. Anderson, A. S. Reiner, R. K. Matsuno, and R. M. Pfeiffer
Shifting Breast Cancer Trends in the United States
J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3923 - 3929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. S. Robbins and C. A. Clarke
Regional Changes in Hormone Therapy Use and Breast Cancer Incidence in California From 2001 to 2004
J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2007; 25(23): 3437 - 3439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. G. Glass, J. V. Lacey Jr, J. D. Carreon, and R. N. Hoover
Breast Cancer Incidence, 1980 2006: Combined Roles of Menopausal Hormone Therapy, Screening Mammography, and Estrogen Receptor Status
J Natl Cancer Inst, August 1, 2007; 99(15): 1152 - 1161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. M. Ravdin, K. A. Cronin, N. Howlader, C. D. Berg, R. T. Chlebowski, E. J. Feuer, B. K. Edwards, and D. A. Berry
The Decrease in Breast-Cancer Incidence in 2003 in the United States
N. Engl. J. Med., April 19, 2007; 356(16): 1670 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herrinton, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Herrinton, L. J.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online