Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 34 (December 1), 2006: pp. 5472-5473
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.4319

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Büchner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hiddemann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Büchner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hiddemann, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Thomas Büchner, Wolfgang E. Berdel

Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany

Claudia Schoch, Torsten Haferlach

Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany

Hubert L. Serve, Joachim Kienast

Department of Medicine, Hematology, and Oncology, University of Münster, Germany

Susanne Schnittger, Wolfgang Kern

Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, Germany

Joelle Tchinda

Department of Human Genetics, University of Münster, Germany

Albrecht Reichle

Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Regensburg, Germany

Eva Lengfelder

Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany

Peter Staib

Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Cologne, Germany

Wolf-Dieter Ludwig

Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Berlin, Germany

Carlo Aul

Department of Hematology and Oncology, St Johannes Hospital, Duisburg, Germany

Hartmut Eimermacher

Catholic Hospital, Hagen, Germany

Leopold Balleisen

Evangelian Hospital, Hamm, Germany

Maria Cristina Sauerland, Achim Heinecke

Department of Medical Informatics and Biomathematics, University of Münster, Germany

Bernhard J. Wörmann

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Municipal Medical Centre, Braunschweig, Germany

Wolfgang Hiddemann

Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Munich, and the GSF National Center for Environment and Health, Munich, Germany

Up-front randomization in acute myeloid leukemia (AML; Fig 1) is a method for strictly prospective comparison of complete treatment strategies according to intention-to-treat, avoiding patient withdrawals and selection by later randomization.1


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 1. Design of the Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) CG 1999 trial using up-front randomization (R) for the two different intensity induction regimens thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) –high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone (HAM) versus HAM-HAM and for the two postremission treatments maintenance versus autologous stem-cell transplantation (Auto Transplant). Patients with family donors preferentially undergo allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (Allo Transplant). Randomizations are balanced against each other and balanced for prognostic groups defined by age, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), de novo AML/secondary AML plus high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and cytogenetics.

 
It is important to show that patient outcomes are not improved by escalating cytotoxicity both in induction using high-dose cytarabine and postremission using autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT). Autologous SCT versus maintenance chemotherapy did not affect outcome overall or in complete remission (CR) patients. The rates of relapses (36% v 39%) and death in CR (8% v 8%) were similar. The patients having received thioguanine, cytarabine, and daunorubicin (TAD) consolidation show 37% versus 38% relapses and 7% versus 6% death in CR, respectively, in the autologous SCT and maintenance arm. Beyond the intention-to-treat analysis we also explored the effects of autologous SCT and maintenance in the assigned pa-tients who did receive the treatments and again confirmed no difference in the relapse-free survival and remission duration.

General problems lie in the small numbers of patients eventually undergoing autologous SCT. Among the patients assigned up-front to autologous SCT versus maintenance and achieving CR only 51% started maintenance and 24% underwent autologous SCT. Wheatley et al in their AML 10 trial (Hann et al2; Burnett et al3) used late randomization for autologous SCT versus no further treatment (Hann et al2) or for one more consolidation course followed by autologous SCT versus consolidation and no further treatment (Burnett et al3). Their compliance rates of randomization (37% of patients chose nonrandomly assigned treatment) was 25% of the primary CR patients and their proportion of autologous SCT received was 17%. Thus, autologous SCT patients whether assigned up-front or randomly assigned late are a small highly selected and poorly defined population where the therapeutic effects are hard to translate into treatment standards.

Regarding the fundamental controversy with Drs Hills and Wheatley, we also refer to three sequential publications (Büchner et al4; Hills et al5; Büchner et al6) discussing up-front randomization in the context of cross-trial networking.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Supported by Grants No. M17/92/Bü1 and 70-2839-Bü4 from Deutsche Krebshilfe; Grant No. 01 GI 9976 from Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Competence Network Acute and Chronic Leukemias; Grant No. LSH-2002-2.2.0-3 European LeukemiaNet from European Commission; and an unrestricted grant from AMGEN (Munich, Germany).

REFERENCES

1. Büchner T, Berdel WE, Schoch C, et al: Double induction containing either two courses or one course of high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone and postremission therapy by either autologous stem-cell transplantation or by prolonged maintenance for acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol 24:2480-2489, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Hann IM, Stevens RF, Goldstone AH, et al: Randomized comparison of DAT versus ADE as induction chemotherapy in children and younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia: Results of Medical Research Council's 10th AML trial (MRC AML 10). Blood 89:2311-2318, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Burnett AK, Goldstone AH, Stevens RMF, et al: Randomised comparison of addition of autologous bone-marrow transplantation to intensive chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: Results of MRC AML 10 trial. Lancet 351:700-708, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Büchner T, Döhner H, Ehninger G, et al: Up-front randomization and common standard arm: A proposal for comparing AML treatment strategies between different studies. Leuk Res 26:1073-1075, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

5. Hills RK, Richards SM, Wheatley K: Corner cutting compromises clinical trials: The inherent problems with up-front randomization and a common standard arm. Leuk Res 27:1071-1073, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Büchner T, Döhner H, Ehninger G, et al: Cross-trial networking in AML: A step forward rather than corner cutting. Leuk Res 28:649-650, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Büchner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hiddemann, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Büchner, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hiddemann, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online