Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO Subscriptions PDA Services My JCO Customer Service

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 24, No 9 (March 20), 2006: pp. 1482
© 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1623

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowsett, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buzdar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dowsett, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buzdar, A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply:

Mitch Dowsett

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Jack Cuzick, Chris Wale

Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, United Kingdom

Tony Howell

Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

Joan Houghton, Michael Baum

University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Aman Buzdar

The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

We read with interest the data and comments of Ponzone et al regarding our hypothesis-generating article1 on the possible differential sensitivity of anastrozole and tamoxifen to breast cancer based on progesterone receptor (PgR) status. Their focus is on the possible explanation of our results by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status being higher in PgR– tumors and HER-2–positive tumors being possibly more sensitive to aromatase inhibitors than to tamoxifen. Although the HER-2 positivity rates in their ER+ patients are higher than we generally find, we concur with their view that it is unlikely that this correlation with HER-2 fully explains our data. In a separate series of 617 ER+ patients, we found 19.5% of the PgR– tumors were HER-2+ compared with just 7.3% in the PgR+ group.2 It seems implausible that an effect in only about one fifth of the PgR– patients could explain the profound effects on the outcome seen. We are currently collecting the archival tumors blocks from the Anastrozole or Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial to allow systematic centralized analysis of these key parameters. However, we would like to take this opportunity to emphasize that the data that we presented were an unplanned retrospective subgroup analysis and that the extent to which the observations are generalizable depends on their reproducibility in independent studies.

Authors' Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest

Although all authors completed the disclosure declaration, the following authors or their immediate family members indicated a financial interest. No conflict exists for drugs or devices used in a study if they are not being evaluated as part of the investigation. For a detailed description of the disclosure categories, or for more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to the Author Disclosure Declaration and the Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest section in Information for Contributors.
Authors Employment Leadership Consultant Stock Honoraria Research Funds Testimony Other

Mitch Dowsett AstraZeneca (A); Novartis (B) AstraZeneca (A); Novartis (A); Pfizer (A) AstraZeneca (C); Novartis (C)
Jack Cuzick AstraZeneca (B); Eli Lilly (A); Novartis (A)
Tony Howell AstraZeneca (B); Eli Lilly (A); Novartis (A) AstraZeneca (B); Novartis (A); Pfizer (A)
Joan Houghton AstraZeneca (C) AstraZeneca (B)
Michael Baum AstraZeneca (B) AstraZeneca (B)
Aman Buzdar AstraZeneca (A); Pfizer (A); Genentech (A) AstraZeneca (C); Pfizer (C); Genentech (C)

Dollar Amount Codes (A) < $10,000 (B) $10,000-99,999 (C) > $100,000 (N/R) Not Required

REFERENCES

1. Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Wale C, et al: Retrospective analysis of time to recurrence in the ATAC trial according to hormone receptor status: An hypothesis-generating study. J Clin Oncol 23:7512-7517, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Dowsett M, Houghton J, Iden C, et al: Benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in primary breast cancer patients according to oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, EGF receptor and HER2 status. Ann Oncol (in press)


Related Correspondence

  • Progesterone Receptor and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status: An Independent Influence on the Efficacy of Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer?
    Riccardo Ponzone, Furio Maggiorotto, Claudio Robba, Luca Fuso, and Piero Sismondi
    JCO 2006 24: 1481-1482 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowsett, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buzdar, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dowsett, M.
Right arrow Articles by Buzdar, A.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online