Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 1 (January 1), 2007: pp. 43-49
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.0805

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v25,p1635)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heidenreich, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heidenreich, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Screening for Coronary Artery Disease After Mediastinal Irradiation for Hodgkin's Disease

Paul A. Heidenreich, Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, Byron K. Lee, Carol S. Mariscal, David J. Tate, Sandra J. Horning, Richard T. Hoppe, Steven L. Hancock

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology; Division of Medical Oncology; Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine; and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA

Address reprint requests to Paul A. Heidenreich, MD, 111C Cardiology, Palo Alto VAMC, 3801 Miranda Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94034; e-mail: heiden{at}stanford.edu


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose Incidental cardiac irradiation during treatment of thoracic neoplasms has increased risks for subsequent acute myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death. Identifying patients who have a high risk for a coronary event may decrease morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether stress imaging can identify severe, unsuspected coronary stenoses in patients who had prior mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease.

Patients and Methods We enrolled 294 outpatients observed at a tertiary care cancer treatment center after mediastinal irradiation doses ≥ 35 Gy for Hodgkin's disease who had no known ischemic cardiac disease. Patients underwent stress echocardiography and radionuclide perfusion imaging at one stress session. Coronary angiography was performed at the discretion of the physician.

Results Among the 294 participants, 63 (21.4%) had abnormal ventricular images at rest, suggesting prior myocardial injury. During stress testing, 42 patients (14%) developed perfusion defects (n = 26), impaired wall motion (n = 8), or both abnormalities (n = 8). Coronary angiography showed stenosis ≥ 50% in 22 patients (55%), less than 50% in nine patients (22.5%), and no stenosis in nine patients (22.5%). Screening led to bypass graft surgery in seven patients. Twenty-three patients developed coronary events during a median of 6.5 years of follow-up, with 10 acute myocardial infarctions (two fatal).

Conclusion Stress-induced signs of ischemia and significant coronary artery disease are highly prevalent after mediastinal irradiation in young patients. Stress testing identifies asymptomatic individuals at high risk for acute myocardial infarction or sudden cardiac death.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Mediastinal irradiation has contributed to cure and improved survival in Hodgkin's disease and other mediastinal neoplasms.1-9 However, incidental irradiation of the heart during the treatment of mediastinal tumors has been associated with increased risks for subsequent death from ischemic and other heart diseases.10-25 Radiation of the left breast or chest wall during breast cancer therapy using techniques that included underlying myocardium also increased risks for death due to cardiac disease.26-32 Because of prolonged survival after treatment of these malignancies, substantial populations of patients are at risk for radiation-induced coronary artery disease, acute myocardial infarction, or sudden cardiac death. Many irradiated patients who died suddenly as a result of acute myocardial infarction lacked conventional risk factors for coronary artery disease and reported no symptoms of coronary disease during clinical evaluations shortly before a fatal event.15 If patients with severe coronary artery disease could be identified, their survival might improve with revascularization or other interventions.33 We prospectively performed stress echocardiography and nuclear scintigraphy to determine whether these screening tests could identify individuals with unsuspected, severe coronary disease, and to estimate the prevalence of significant coronary disease after the moderately high doses of irradiation used to treat Hodgkin's disease.


    PATIENTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Population
The study included Hodgkin's disease patients who received ≥ 35 Gy to the mediastinum because prior analyses identified an excess risk for death from myocardial infarction confined to those who received higher radiation doses.15 These criteria identified 972 patients from a computerized database of 2,294 patients treated for Hodgkin's disease at Stanford University between 1960 and 1995. In this cohort, 345 patients were known to have died. Their causes of death were established by review of clinical records, autopsy or coroner's reports, death certificates, and information from physicians or family members. Six hundred twenty-seven patients were alive at last contact. We contacted 473 (75%) of these patients during routine appointments or by mail regarding participation in a cardiac screening study. We offered to screen patients after informing them about health risks identified in survivors of Hodgkin's disease. We excluded from screening patients who reported a history of coronary artery disease or cardiac interventions, and confirmed their cardiac diagnoses from discharge summaries or procedure reports. Patients were enrolled from October 1994 through November 1998. The Human Subjects Committee at Stanford University Medical Center (Stanford, CA) reviewed and approved the study annually.

Study Protocol
All patients had fractionated serum cholesterol testing, a resting ECG, and a stress echocardiogram. Echocardiograms were performed using commercially available ultrasound scanners (HP Sonos 1500 and 2500; Hewlett Packard, Mountain View, CA), and were recorded on 0.5-in. super video casette recorder tape. Standard parasternal long axis, short axis, and apical four-chamber images were obtained before and after cardiac stress. After baseline echocardiography, 97% of subjects underwent treadmill testing using a Bruce protocol that limited exercise duration by symptoms. Patients who reported impaired walking ability or medications that blocked beta-adrenergic activity (3%) underwent dobutamine cardiac stress using a standardized protocol.16 Standard treadmill or dobutamine stress protocols and imaging techniques were used.34 ECG abnormalities were quantified using the Duke Treadmill Score.35 Myocardial perfusion imaging was performed during the same stress session starting with the 16th patient. Approximately 2 minutes before peak stress, a radioactive tracer (technetium-99m–labeled tetrofosmin, 12 to 25 mCi) was injected intravenously. Echocardiography was repeated immediately after peak stress. Single-photon emission computed tomography scans of radionuclide distribution during stress were obtained within 60 minutes of injection after completion of the stress echocardiogram. Rest imaging was performed with 3.5 mCi of thallium-201 either before the exercise test or on the day after exercise testing.

Any stress-induced wall motion abnormality, stress-induced perfusion defect, or horizontal or down-sloping ST depression ≥ 1 mm on ECG tracings was considered a positive test for ischemia. Patients with a positive stress test were advised to undergo coronary angiography but performance of the procedure was at the discretion of the patient's physician. The results of coronary angiography performed after screening without an intervening event were used to determine the predictive value of noninvasive imaging.

Statistical Analyses
Descriptive data are given as percentages or means ± standard deviation. Differences in mean values were evaluated using the t test and analysis of variance. Differences in proportions were evaluated using the {chi}2 test. To estimate radiation dose intensity, biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated from each patient's mediastinal radiation doses using the formula described by Fowler and an estimated {alpha}/ß ratio of 3 for a late-reacting tissue.36 The volume of myocardium irradiated varied according to radiation blocking techniques, use of chemotherapy before irradiation, and the proximity of mediastinal Hodgkin's disease. This could not be quantified usefully from available records. Relative and absolute risks for heart disease were calculated using the subject-year method, with general population rates from the United States Decennial Life Tables.37,38 Multivariate analysis was performed using standard least-squares regression if the dependent variable was continuous or logistic regression if the dependent variable was categoric. Multivariate models initially included the following independent variables: age, sex, hypertension (yes/no), diabetes (yes/no), low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, smoking history (yes/no), chemotherapy (yes/no), irradiation dose in BED, and time after irradiation. Variables were removed from the model sequentially, until only those variables that were predictors (P < .05) of the dependent variable remained. All analyses were performed using JMP statistical software (SAS institute, Cary, NC). A two-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Prior Coronary Disease and Patients Excluded From Screening
Among the 473 patients evaluated for study, 42 (9%) reported a history of established coronary artery disease with prior myocardial infarction (n = 12), coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n = 16), percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (n = 4), or coronary stenosis verified by angiography and managed medically (n = 10). Seven others reported a history of valvular heart surgery (n = 3), prior pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis (n = 1), or congestive heart failure without documented coronary artery disease (n = 3) and did not undergo screening. Of the remaining 424 patients, 308 (73%) agreed to participate and completed testing. Fourteen patients were excluded after testing for mediastinal radiation doses less than 35 Gy (n = 11) or identification of a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma histology (n = 3) on review of records.

Study Patients
Characteristics of the 294 participants are summarized in Table 1 according to the time interval after irradiation. The patients were irradiated between 1964 and 1994 (median, 1982) with 35.0 to 54.6 Gy to the mediastinum (minimum, 35 Gy; 25%, 43.2 Gy; median, 44 Gy; 75%, 44.5 Gy; maximum, 54.6 Gy). At the time of testing, patients irradiated earlier were older, had slightly higher total cholesterol levels, received higher radiation doses to the mediastinum at a higher dose per fraction, and received chemotherapy less often than patients treated more recently. Standard risk factors for coronary artery disease including diabetes, hypertension, elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and smoking were uncommon.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Patient Characteristics at the Time of Stress Testing

 
Exercise Testing
All 294 patients underwent stress echocardiography (97% exercise, 3% dobutamine), and 292 (99%) had interpretable images at stress and rest. In 274 patients radionuclide perfusion imaging was performed at the same stress session and was interpretable in all patients. The stress ECG was interpretable in 282 patients. Table 2 lists the results of exercise testing. Signs of possible stress-induced ischemia (ST change, wall motion, or perfusion abnormality) were identified in 18.4% of patients (54 of 294). Stress-induced perfusion abnormalities were more common (12%) than stress-induced wall motion abnormalities (5%) or changes in the ST segment on the ECG (7%). In resting studies, 46 patients had abnormal wall motion, seven had radionuclide perfusion defects, and 10 had corresponding abnormalities on both studies. Exercise-induced changes suggesting ischemia were seen in 15 of those with segmental resting wall motion abnormalities (33%), five of those with resting perfusion defects (71%), and five of those with abnormalities on both resting studies (50%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Stress Testing Results

 
Coronary Angiography
Based on the imaging results, 40 patients (14%) underwent coronary angiography (Tables 3 and 4). This included 90% (38 of 42) of all patients with abnormal stress echocardiography or perfusion imaging, and two patients who reported exertional dyspnea and had abnormal wall motion and perfusion at rest. Twelve patients with ST segment change during exercise (1.0 to 2.0 mm) without symptoms or signs suggesting ischemia on imaging were not advised to undergo coronary angiography.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Angiography Results

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Comparison of Screening Stress Tests With Coronary Angiography Results

 
Coronary artery stenosis exceeded 50% in 22 patients (7.4% of screened patients; 55% of those examined with angiography), and narrowing exceeded 70% in 16 of these. Eight patients (2.7% of screened patients) had severe coronary disease with ≥ 50% stenosis of the left main coronary artery or three-vessel coronary artery disease with at least one stenosis ≥ 70%. Seven patients had one- or two-vessel disease. One of these patients underwent immediate angioplasty with stent placement. Seven patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting solely on the basis of screening. An eighth patient underwent bypass grafting for two-vessel coronary disease and an unreported acute myocardial infarction after screening that was diagnosed during coronary angiography. Eighteen patients (45%) with abnormal stress tests had less than 50% stenosis on angiography, including seven patients with 30% to 50% maximum stenosis, four patients with 10% to 20% proximal or ostial narrowing and normal distal coronary arteries, and seven patients with normal angiography. All 11 patients with minimal proximal stenosis or normal coronary arteries had radionuclide perfusion defects involving the inferior or inferoapical regions during exercise as their only sign of ischemia. However, four of the 22 patients (18.2%) with this isolated sign of ischemia had single-vessel stenosis greater than 50% and two (9.1%) had two-vessel disease with stenosis greater than 70%.

A positive stress test was more common in older patients (mean ± standard deviation: 48 ± 10 v 41 ± 9 years; P < .0001), males (28% v 13% for females; P = .002), those who had not received doxorubicin (7% doxorubicin v 21% no doxorubicin; P = .02), and those who had received irradiation earlier (means ± standard deviations: positive, 21 ± 6 v negative, 15 ± 7 years earlier; P = .002). No other clinical variables including radiation dose were predictive of a true-positive test. The test characteristics are summarized in Table 5.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Predictive Value of Stress Testing for Coronary Disease After Hodgkin's Disease

 
Events During Follow-Up
During a median 6.5 years (interquartile range, 4.0 to 8.4 years) of follow-up after screening, 23 patients developed symptomatic coronary artery disease, including 10 who sustained an acute myocardial infarction (two fatal). The median time to a cardiac event was 4.6 years (interquartile range, 1.7 to 7.3 years), with six events occurring within 2 years of screening. A total of 69 cardiac events or deaths (n = 41) occurred including new-onset heart failure in 12 patients.

The risk of a cardiac event or death after screening was related to patient age, the latent period, dose of radiation received, the presence of wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography, and ischemia on stress testing (wall motion or perfusion). Patients with events tended to be older (46 ± 10 v 41 ± 9 years; P < .0001), had received irradiation earlier (19 ± 7 v 14 ± 7 years; P < .0001), had received higher doses of mediastinal irradiation (BED, 73 ± 6 v 70 ± 7 units; P = .008), were more likely to have abnormal wall motion (34% v 15%; P = .001), and more likely to have ischemia on stress imaging (23% v 12%; P = .02) than those without events. In a proportional hazards model the latency period (hazard ratio [HR], 2.73; 95% CI, 1.81 to 4.11 per 10 years), age (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.76 per 10 years), dose of irradiation (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.09 per BED unit), and presence of wall motion abnormalities (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.72) were associated with event-free survival.

In the cohort of 972 Hodgkin's disease patients who received ≥ 35 Gy to the mediastinum and resided in northern California, 53 of 345 deaths were attributed to heart disease (5.5% overall; relative risk, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.4 to 5.9; absolute risk, 33.4 excess death per 104 person-years). Table 6 summarizes the risks for death attributed to acute myocardial infarction, confirms increased risks at all intervals after irradiation, and shows a higher risk among males than females. Nine of the 33 deaths from acute myocardial infarction (27%) occurred before 40 years of age; 14 (42%) occurred within 10 years of treatment for Hodgkin's disease.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Mortality From Acute Myocardial Infarction Among 972 Patients Treated for Hodgkin's Disease

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
By screening with stress echocardiography and nuclear scintigraphy, we found a 2.7% prevalence of severe, three-vessel, or left main coronary artery disease, and a 7.5% prevalence of coronary stenosis greater than 50% in patients treated with mediastinal irradiation in doses of ≥ 35 Gy for Hodgkin's disease at a mean of 15 years following irradiation. This is an underestimation of the prevalence of coronary disease, given that patients were not required to undergo angiography and were excluded if they had known coronary disease. In previous screening studies, 5.3% (two of 38) and 4% (five of 144) of Hodgkin's disease patients had signs of stress-induced ischemia on perfusion scintigraphy or electrocardiography.18,20 Myocardial perfusion was considered abnormal on scintigraphy in 14 (61%) of 23 Hodgkin's disease patients studied in Sweden.39 Among 25 patients studied in France, 21 (84%) had abnormal perfusion scintigraphy, and most patients had myocardial sectors that had significantly lower thallium uptake than corresponding sectors measured in unirradiated individuals considered at low risk for coronary disease.40 The authors of the latter study considered the patterns of impaired perfusion atypical for major coronary artery obstruction. They attributed exercise-induced defects to disease in small coronary arteries and attributed fixed perfusion defects to myocardial fibrosis. However, none of these studies used routine coronary angiography to evaluate abnormalities identified on screening studies.

The rates for coronary disease that we observed are higher than reported in studies that have screened general populations for coronary disease. Screening identified three-vessel disease in 1.1% of asymptomatic men in the United States military of similar age to our cohort.41 Sequential screening tests of male government workers in Italy identified 0.5% with ≥ 50% coronary stenosis.42 Our screened cohort included women and fewer patients with conventional coronary risk factors than the cohorts in those studies. Glanzmann et al20 found that increased risks for ischemic heart disease were confined to irradiated individuals who had conventional cardiac risk factors. In our study population, conventional risk factors for coronary artery disease, such as older age, tobacco use, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, were uncommon and were insensitive indications of coronary risk after mediastinal irradiation.

The severity of coronary disease identified in our patients by screening was similar to that observed among men with definite angina pectoris in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) study.43 More than half of those with identified coronary disease had at least one stenosis ≥ 70% or left main stenosis ≥ 50%. The high rates of significant ostial stenosis in our patients (15% left main, 13% right main) parallels the 16% rate of left main ostial stenosis observed in men with definite angina pectoris in the CASS registry. Ostial stenosis was notably common in a small study of irradiated patients but affected 0.13% to 2.6% of patients in published series of consecutive patients undergoing angiography.10,44 The high rate of proximal coronary artery disease may account for the increased risks of fatal myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death documented in this and previous reports.

The true prevalence of severe coronary stenosis may be higher than we documented. Four patients with abnormal stress imaging refused coronary angiography. Among the screened cohort, 24% developed symptomatic heart disease, including 8% with documented coronary insufficiency or death. In a prior study using our cohort we found a high rate of diastolic dysfunction on resting echocardiography, suggesting an increased rate of ischemic heart disease, although the relationship with coronary artery disease was not investigated.25 Additional studies are needed to determine if diastolic function can be used as screening for coronary disease after irradiation.

Screening for coronary disease is useful only if treatment is available that will improve outcome. Few of our patients had conventional, modifiable risk factors for coronary disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting was used to treat eight of 15 patients with coronary disease documented by angiography in our study. Although physicians identified symptoms of ischemia in several patients after abnormal screening tests, most patients were truly asymptomatic, and all patients were judged to be free of cardiac symptoms during clinic evaluations before screening. Although most trials of coronary artery bypass surgery have documented a benefit only in symptomatic patients, surgery yielded a similar survival benefit for asymptomatic or symptomatic patients with left main coronary disease in the CASS study.33

Our study compared several screening tests that were recorded during a single stress session. As reported in prior studies of nuclear scintigraphy,41,45 stress-induced perfusion defects proved a less specific sign of significant coronary disease than other tests: 55% of patients with positive studies had no coronary stenoses exceeding 50% on angiography. Such findings may be due to actual perfusion defects caused by small-vessel obstructive disease, endothelial dysfunction, or vascular spasm, or due to false positive tests, where perfusion is actually normal.

We were unable to delineate the importance of radiation dose and dose-intensity due to the limited variation in total mediastinal radiation dose (70% of the patients received mediastinal radiation doses of 43 to 45 Gy). The use of the BED may not completely control for differences in irradiation practices over time. The lower probability of identifying coronary disease on screening within 10 years of therapy may relate to decreased total radiation dose, volume, and dose-intensity in more recently treated patients.

In summary, we found high prevalence rates for stress-induced radionuclide perfusion defects or wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography that led to identification of severe three-vessel or left main coronary disease and prompted revascularization in asymptomatic patients after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. Conventional risk factors for coronary disease were uncommon and did not predict coronary disease. These findings suggest that screening for coronary artery disease should be considered during follow-up care for asymptomatic patients who have received mediastinal irradiation to doses of 35 Gy or more. Although the diagnostic yield will be greater for patients more than 10 years beyond irradiation, we recommend initiating screening 5 years after treatment, given increased risks for cardiac death and myocardial infarction within 5 to 10 years of initial therapy.


    AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
Conception and design: Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, Carol S. Mariscal, David J. Tate, Steven L. Hancock

Financial support: Steven L. Hancock

Administrative support: Steven L. Hancock

Provision of study materials or patients: Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, David J. Tate, Steven L. Hancock

Collection and assembly of data: Paul A. Heidenreich, Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, Byron K. Lee, Carol S. Mariscal, David J. Tate, Steven L. Hancock

Data analysis and interpretation: Paul A. Heidenreich, Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, Byron K. Lee, Carol S. Mariscal, David J. Tate, Sandra J. Horning, Richard T. Hoppe, Steven L. Hancock

Manuscript writing: Paul A. Heidenreich, Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, Byron K. Lee, Steven L. Hancock

Final approval of manuscript: Paul A. Heidenreich, Ingela Schnittger, H. William Strauss, Randall H. Vagelos, Byron K. Lee, Carol S. Mariscal, David J. Tate, Sandra J. Horning, Richard T. Hoppe, Steven L. Hancock


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Saul A. Rosenberg, MD, for contributions to the care of these patients and for strategies to decrease adverse sequelae of Hodgkin's disease therapy, and Anna Varghese for data management.


    NOTES
 
Supported by Grant No. 1 RO1 CA63001 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health. P.A.H. was supported by a Career Development Award from the Veterans' Affairs Health Services Research Development Office.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 PATIENTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 REFERENCES
 
1. Mauch PM, Connors JM, Pavlovsky S, et al: Treatment of favorable prognosis, stage I-II Hodgkin's disease, in Mauch PM, Armitage JO, Diehl V, et al (eds): Hodgkin's Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, pp 435-458

2. Hoppe RT, Cosset JM, Santoro A, et al: Treatment of unfavorable prognosis, stage I-II Hodgkin's disease, in Mauch PM, Armitage JO, Diehl V, et al (eds): Hodgkin's Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, pp 459-481

3. Horning SJ, Yahalom J, Tesch H, et al: Treatment of stage III-IV Hodgkin's disease, in Mauch PM, Armitage JO, Diehl V, et al (eds): Hodgkin's Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999, pp 483-506

4. Rosenberg SA: The management of Hodgkin's disease: Half a century of change—The Kaplan Memorial Lecture. Ann Oncol 7:555-560, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Mornex F, Resbeut M, Richaud P, et al: Radiotherapy and chemotherapy for invasive thymomas: A multicentric retrospective review of 90 cases—The FNCLCC trialists Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32:651-659, 1995 [Erratum: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33:545, 1995][CrossRef][Medline]

6. Myojin M, Choi NC, Wright CD, et al: Stage III thymoma: Pattern of failure after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy and its implication for future study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:927-933, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Aygun C, Slawson RG, Bajaj K, et al: Primary mediastinal seminoma. Urology 23:109-117, 1984[CrossRef][Medline]

8. Bush SE, Martinez A, Bagshaw MA: Primary mediastinal seminoma. Cancer 48:1877-1882, 1981[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Clamon GH: Management of primary mediastinal seminoma. Chest 83:263-267, 1983[Medline]

10. McEniery PT, Dorosti K, Schiavone WA, et al: Clinical and angiographic features of coronary artery disease after chest irradiation. Am J Cardiol 60:1020-1024, 1987[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Henry-Amar M, Hayat M, Meerwaldt JH, et al: Causes of death after therapy for early stage Hodgkin's disease entered on EORTC protocols: EORTC Lymphoma Cooperative Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19:1155-1157, 1990[Medline]

12. Cosset JM, Henry-Amar M, Pellae-Cosset B, et al: Pericarditis and myocardial infarctions after Hodgkin's disease therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:447-449, 1991[Medline]

13. Boivin JF: Coronary artery disease mortality in patients treated for Hodgkin's disease. Cancer 69:1241-1247, 1992[Medline]

14. Hancock SL, Donaldson SS, Hoppe RT: Cardiac disease following treatment of Hodgkin's disease in children and adolescents. J Clin Oncol 11:1208-1215, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Hancock SL, Tucker MA, Hoppe RT: Factors affecting late mortality from heart disease after treatment of Hodgkin's disease. JAMA 270:1949-1955, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Hancock SL, Hoppe RT: Long-term complications of treatment and causes of mortality after Hodgkin's disease. Semin Radiat Oncol 6:225-242, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

17. King V, Constine LS, Clark D, et al: Symptomatic coronary artery disease after mantle irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 36:881-889, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

18. Constine LS, Schwartz RG, Savage DE, et al: Cardiac function, perfusion, and morbidity in irradiated long-term survivors of Hodgkin's disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 39:897-906, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]

19. Glanzmann C, Huguenin P, Lutolf UM, et al: Cardiac lesions after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. Radiother Oncol 30:43-54, 1994[CrossRef][Medline]

20. Glanzmann C, Kaufmann P, Jenni R, et al: Cardiac risk after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease. Radiother Oncol 46:51-62, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

21. Reinders JG, Heijmen BJ, Olofsen-van Acht MJ, et al: Ischemic heart disease after mantlefield irradiation for Hodgkin's disease in long-term follow-up. Radiother Oncol 51:35-42, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Hanks GE, Peters T, Owen J: Seminoma of the testis: Long-term beneficial and deleterious results of radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 24:913-919, 1992[Medline]

23. Hull MC, Morris CG, Pepine CJ, et al: Valvular dysfunction and carotid, subclavian, and coronary artery disease in survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma treated with radiation therapy. JAMA 290:2831-2837, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Heidenreich PA, Hancock SL, Lee BK, et al: Asymptomatic cardiac disease following mediastinal irradiation. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:743-749, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Heidenreich PA, Hancock SL, Vagelos RH, et al: Diastolic dysfunction following mediastinal irradiation. Am Heart J 150:977-982, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

26. Rutqvist LE, Johansson H: Mortality by laterality of the primary tumour among 55,000 breast cancer patients from the Swedish Cancer Registry. Br J Cancer 61:866-868, 1990[Medline]

27. Valagussa P, Zambetti M, Biasi S, et al: Cardiac effects following adjuvant chemotherapy and breast irradiation in operable breast cancer. Ann Oncol 5:209-216, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Paszat LF, Mackillop WJ, Groome PA, et al: Mortality from myocardial infarction after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results cancer registries. J Clin Oncol 16:2625-2631, 1998[Abstract]

29. Gyenes G, Rutqvist LE, Liedberg A, et al: Long-term cardiac morbidity and mortality in a randomized trial of pre- and postoperative radiation therapy versus surgery alone in primary breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 48:185-190, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Gyenes G: Radiation-induced ischemic heart disease in breast cancer: A review. Acta Oncol 37:241-246, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]

31. Hojris I, Overgaard M, Christensen JJ, et al: Morbidity and mortality of ischaemic heart disease in high-risk breast-cancer patients after adjuvant postmastectomy systemic treatment with or without radiotherapy: Analysis of DBCG 82b and 82c randomised trials—Radiotherapy Committee of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Lancet 354:1425-1430, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group: Favourable and unfavourable effects on long-term survival of radiotherapy for early breast cancer: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 355:1757-1770, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

33. Taylor HA, Deumite NJ, Chaitman BR, et al: Asymptomatic left main coronary artery disease in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Circulation 79:1171-1179, 1989[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Geleijnse ML, Fioretti PM, Roelandt JR: Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:595-606, 1997[Abstract]

35. Mark DB, Shaw L, Harrell FE, et al: Prognostic value of a treadmill exercise score in outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 325:849-853, 1991[Abstract]

36. Fowler J: A brief summary of radiobiological principles in fractionated radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2:16-21, 1992[CrossRef]

37. Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell Scientific, 1994, pp 488-491

38. Anderson R: United States Life Tables Eliminating Certain Cause of Death: U.S. Decennial Life Tables for 1998-1999—Vol 1. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1999, pp 111-114

39. Gustavsson A, Eskilsson J, Landberg T, et al: Late cardiac effects after mantle radiotherapy in patients with Hodgkin's disease. Ann Oncol 1:355-363, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Maunoury C, Pierga JY, Valette H, et al: Myocardial perfusion damage after mediastinal irradiation for Hodgkin's disease: A thallium-201 single photon emission tomography study. Eur J Nucl Med 19:871-873, 1992[CrossRef][Medline]

41. Schwartz RS, Jackson WG, Celio PV, et al: Accuracy of exercise 201Tl myocardial scintigraphy in asymptomatic young men. Circulation 87:165-172, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Fazzini PF, Prati PL, Rovelli F, et al: Epidemiology of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic middle-aged men (the ECCIS Project). Am J Cardiol 72:1383-1388, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]

43. Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Davis K, et al: Angiographic prevalence of high-risk coronary artery disease in patient subsets (CASS). Circulation 64:360-367, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Grollier G, Commeau P, Mercier V, et al: Post-radiotherapeutic left main coronary ostial stenosis: Clinical and histological study. Eur Heart J 9:567-570, 1988[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Fleischmann KE, Hunink MG, Kuntz KM, et al: Exercise echocardiography or exercise SPECT imaging? A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance. JAMA 280:913-920, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Submitted May 16, 2006; accepted August 15, 2006.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
P. A Heidenreich and J. R Kapoor
Radiation induced heart disease
Heart, February 1, 2009; 95(3): 252 - 258.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. Rademaker, H. Schoder, N. S. Ariaratnam, H. W. Strauss, J. Yahalom, R. Steingart, and K. C. Oeffinger
Coronary Artery Disease After Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Coronary CT Angiography Findings and Calcium Scores in Nine Asymptomatic Patients
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. M. Shankar, N. Marina, M. M. Hudson, D. C. Hodgson, M. J. Adams, W. Landier, S. Bhatia, K. Meeske, M. H. Chen, K. E. Kinahan, et al.
Monitoring for Cardiovascular Disease in Survivors of Childhood Cancer: Report From the Cardiovascular Disease Task Force of the Children's Oncology Group
Pediatrics, February 1, 2008; 121(2): e387 - e396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Dabaja, J. D. Cox, and T. A. Buchholz
Radiation Therapy Can Still Be Used Safely in Combined Modality Approaches in Patients With Hodgkin's Lymphoma
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2007; 25(1): 3 - 5.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Erratum (v25,p1635)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heidenreich, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heidenreich, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hancock, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online