|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 15 (May 20), 2007: pp. 1974-1978 Published by the American Society of Clinical Oncology DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9873 Randomized Trial of Adjuvant 13-cis-Retinoic Acid and Interferon Alfa for Patients With Aggressive Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma
From the Departments of Clinical Cancer Prevention, Biostatistic and Applied Mathematics, Head and Neck Surgery, Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Epidemiology and Neuro-oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center and Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA Address reprint requests to Scott M. Lippman, MD, Department of Thoracic and Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Unit 432, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77230-1439; e-mail: slippman{at}mdanderson.org
Purpose: To conduct a phase III trial of adjuvant 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) plus interferon alfa (IFN- ) for preventing tumor recurrence and second primary tumors (SPTs) of skin squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) among patients with aggressive skin SCC.
Patients and Methods: Sixty-six patients with aggressive skin SCC were randomly assigned to receive either 6 months of combined 13cRA (1 mg/kg/d orally) and IFN-
Results: At 21.5 months median follow-up, treatment did not improve the time to tumor recurrence and SPT versus control (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.53 to 2.41), time to tumor recurrence (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.43 to 2.72), or time to SPT (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.27 to 2.93). Adjuvant 13cRA and IFN-
Conclusion: Results of this phase III trial do not support 13cRA plus IFN-
Squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the skin is the second most common cancer in the United States, with approximately 200,000 patients diagnosed annually.1 Although the overall prognosis of skin SCC is excellent, there are certain clinical pathologic features that are associated with more aggressive disease and reduced disease-specific survival.2 These features include invasion beyond subcutaneous tissue, perineural invasion, large tumor size, increased depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and origin in the lip or ear.3-6 The overall 5-year rate of recurrence of primary skin SCC is 8%, whereas aggressive skin SCC has far higher (20% to 25%) rates of recurrence and metastasis.3,4 In addition, there is an increased risk of developing skin SCC second primary tumors (SPTs) that worsen patient morbidity. Despite the high mortality and morbidity associated with aggressive skin SCC after definitive surgical and/or radiation therapy, adjuvant systemic therapy has not been evaluated previously in this setting.
Adjuvant treatment of microscopic residual disease has substantial clinical relevance to patients with aggressive skin SCC, whose morbidity stems primarily from local and regional disease progression. The rationale behind combined 13-cis-retinoic acid (13cRA) and interferon alfa (IFN-
The substantial burden of aggressive skin SCC and promise of combined 13cRA and IFN-
Patient Eligibility We enrolled patients for this study from a cohort of nonmelanoma skin cancer patients who were recruited consecutively and observed prospectively at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) from 1996 to 2002.3 Eligible patients were required to have pathologically confirmed skin SCC that exhibited one of the following characteristics: size 2 cm in greatest diameter; perineural invasion; pathologic or radiologic evidence of deep invasion defined as invasion of muscle, cartilage, or bone, or clinical evidence of fixation to these structures; or pathologically or cytologically proven regional metastasis. Patients could have more than one eligible skin SCC lesion. They could have no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease after surgery. Radiotherapy treatment was administered for tumors with perineural invasion, more than two positive nodes, extracapsular nodal disease, or microscopic positive margins. The following eligibility criteria also were required: age 18 years, Zubrod performance status 0 to 2, adequate liver function (bilirubin 2.0 mg/100 mL; AST < 46 UL), adequate renal function (creatinine 1.5 mg/100 mL), normal hematologic parameters (WBC 3,000 K/UL; platelets 100,000 K/UL), and signed informed consent. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center institutional review board.
Clinical Trial Design Before surgery, all eligible patients were presented at the interdisciplinary head and neck oncology planning conference. A head and neck surgeon performed a comprehensive evaluation of each patient's skin SCC. This evaluation included bidimensional measurements, assessment of depth of invasion, perineural involvement, lymphatic or vascular involvement, extracapsular spread, nodal involvement, and imaging and pathology assessments. A pretreatment photograph of the sun-exposed areas of the skin and any lesion suggestive of keratosis or superficial skin SCC was evaluated. Patients also underwent a baseline neuropsychological evaluation. Postbaseline (after random assignment) clinical assessments were scheduled as follows: complete physical and skin examinations at months 3, 6, 18, and 24; a neuropsychological evaluation at month 3. Clinical pathologic evaluations were performed only as indicated for new or recurrent cancers.
Statistical Analysis
The study end point was time to tumor recurrence or development of SPT. Secondary end points were qualitative and quantitative toxicity during 6 months of 13cRA and IFN- Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the relative hazard of the study end point for the treatment compared with the control group. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time-to-event end points in the treatment and control groups.10 The nonparametric estimate of HR and its 95% bootstrap CI was used to assess the treatment effect on time to tumor recurrence or SPT.11 Statistical analyses were performed using the muhaz package in S-PLUS 6.2 and STATA statistical software 8.0 (STATA Corp, College Station, TX) All tests of statistical significance were performed using a two-sided 5% type 1 error rate.
Patient Characteristics Sixty-six patients were enrolled and randomly assigned at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Sixty-five patients were included in this intent-to-treat analysis because one patient withdrew consent for study participation immediately after random assignment. The scheduled interim analysis was not performed because the 5 years needed to complete accrual was longer than planned. The study was concluded after all randomly assigned patients were observed for up to 2 years per protocol. Table 1 lists the patient demographic and tumor characteristics. The majority of patients were white males older than age 60 years. The skin SCC lesions that met study eligibility criteria numbered 32 in the treatment group and 39 in the control group (some patients had multiple eligible lesions). Tumors in the majority of patients in both groups were 2 cm, and treatment-arm patients had slightly higher rates of perineural invasion and lymph node involvement than did control-arm patients. There were no statistically significant demographic, tumor eligibility, or prior treatment differences between the two groups.
Recurrence and SPTs Among the 65 randomly assigned, eligible, and assessable patients, the median duration of follow-up from the date of random assignment was 21.5 months (range, 0.4 to 26 months). Fifty-five of these patients (83%) either reached the primary study end point or completed 24 months of follow-up. In the 10 patients who had less than 24 months of follow-up, six had less than 12 months, two had 12 to 18 months, and two had at least 18 months of follow-up. Table 2 summarizes the results of the univariate analysis. Tumor size 2 cm, lymph node involvement, and perineural invasion were not statistically significantly associated with either tumor recurrence, SPT, or the combined study end point. The only statistically significant finding was that the surgery-alone group had a lower risk for the study end point (recurrence or SPT) compared with the group receiving surgery with radiation (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.95). Sixteen (of the 65 eligible) patients had surgery alone, three of whom experienced disease recurrence or developed an SPT. Forty-nine patients had surgery and radiation, and there was a total of 24 recurrences or SPT events. The majority (89%) of patients who had a tumor recurrence were treated initially with surgery followed by radiation therapy.
The HRs of the study treatment and control groups for tumor recurrence and SPT are listed in Table 3. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups for time to tumor recurrence or SPT (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.53 to 2.41) or for developing a tumor recurrence (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.43 to 2.72) or SPT (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.27 to 2.93) alone. Eighteen patients (28%) developed a tumor recurrence, and 11 patients (17%) developed a skin SPT. Of the 18 patients with a tumor recurrence, seven developed distant metastatic disease and 11 had a local or regional recurrence. Two patients with a tumor recurrence were diagnosed simultaneously with a skin SPT. Three patients (one in the treatment group, two in the control group) developed a second primary nonskin cancer (prostate carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, and lung cancer). These nonskin SPTs were not included in the primary end point data.
Kaplan-Meier estimates for tumor recurrence or SPT-free survival were compared between the treatment and control groups (Fig 1). The 1-year cumulative recurrence- and SPT-free survival rates were 70% for treatment and control groups and the 2-year cumulative rates were 51.6% (treatment) and 62.4% (control). Figure 2 shows the treatment effect over time; the 95% CI band for the HR covers 1, indicating that there was no statistically significant difference.
Compliance and Toxicity Seven patients discontinued the study prematurely: one withdrew consent immediately after random assignment, three were lost to follow-up (at 7, 12, and 18 months of follow-up, respectively), two died as a result of a cardiac arrest (one cardiac arrest occurred 5 months after completing treatment and one cardiac arrest occurred in a patient assigned to the observation group), and one patient dropped out because of adverse events (after 1 week of IFN- and 13cRA). The incidence of selected toxicities related to IFN- and 13cRA is summarized in Table 4. Thirty-one patients in the treatment group were available for the toxicity analysis of the combined IFN- and 13cRA regimen. Patients received IFN- and 13cRA for a median duration of 4.9 months (range, 0.3 to 6.0 months). The combination regimen caused no treatment-related deaths. The most frequent adverse effects associated with the combined regimen were dry skin, fatigue, and generalized eye and lip reactions. Nine patients underwent dose reductions for grade 3 and 4 toxicities as dictated by prespecified protocol guidelines.
This is the first randomized trial of adjuvant systemic treatment for patients with aggressive skin SCC after surgery and/or radiation. Despite preclinical and clinical data that support 13cRA and IFN- for the treatment of advanced skin SCC, the combination regimen did not improve the time to recurrence or time to an SPT in this trial.
Combined 13cRA (1 mg/kg/d) and IFN (3 million U/d) administered for at least 2 months had modest clinical activity as primary therapy for advanced skin SCC in a previous phase II trial we conducted.7 However, the response rate was statistically significantly associated with extent of disease (23% in patients with distant metastatic disease v 90% in patients with locally advanced disease). We then tried to improve the response rate of metastatic skin SCC by testing cisplatin added to IFN-
Treatment-arm patients in this present study received IFN-
The expressions of specific retinoid receptors, such as the ß isoform of the retinoic acid receptor, and of one or more of the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF3) proteins (Stat1 There currently is no recommended adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with aggressive SCC after definitive surgical and radiation treatment. With 2-year incidences of approximately 28% for tumor recurrence and 18% for SPT, these patients have an unmet medical need. A major hurdle facing new trials designed to meet this need is the problem of accruing a sufficiently large sample size to achieve adequate study power. Our study's long period (5 years) to accrue only 65 assessable patients illustrates how difficult it can be to accrue patients with aggressive skin SCC even at a tertiary cancer center with a major skin cancer program. Therefore, to accrue sufficiently large populations to detect a clinically meaningful treatment effect, multiple cancer centers will have to collaborate on future trials of new adjuvant approaches with the potential to improve disease-free and overall survival of skin SCC patients at a well-defined high risk of recurrence or SPT.
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
Conception and design: Gary L. Clayman, Sara S. Strom, Christina A. Meyers, Scott M. Lippman Administrative support: Gary L. Clayman Provision of study materials or patients: Mary Jo T. Necesito Reyes, Anita L. Sabichi, Sara S. Strom, Robert Collins, Scott M. Lippman Collection and assembly of data: Abenaa M. Brewster, Gary L. Clayman, Mary Jo T. Necesito Reyes, Anita L. Sabichi, Sara S. Strom, Robert Collins, Christina A. Meyers Data analysis and interpretation: Abenaa M. Brewster, J. Jack Lee, Gary L. Clayman, John L. Clifford, Xian Zhou, Scott M. Lippman Manuscript writing: Abenaa M. Brewster, J. Jack Lee, John L. Clifford, Scott M. Lippman Final approval of manuscript: Abenaa M. Brewster, J. Jack Lee, Gary L. Clayman, John L. Clifford, Mary Jo T. Necesito Reyes, Xian Zhou, Anita L. Sabichi, Sara S. Strom, Robert Collins, Christina A. Meyers, Scott M. Lippman Other: Mary Jo T. Necesito Reyes [General protocol operation and patient management]
Supported by Grants No. P01-5P01CA68233 and CA16672 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 10-30, 2005 2. Alam M, Ratner D: Cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 344: 975-983, 2001 3. Clayman GL, Lee JJ, Holsinger FC, et al: Mortality risk from squamous cell skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 759-765, 2005 4. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL Jr: Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip: Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 26: 976-990, 1992[Medline] 5. Veness MJ, Palme CE, Smith M, et al: Cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes (nonparotid): A better outcome with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Laryngoscope 113: 1827-1833, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 6. Garcia-Serra A, Hinerman RW, Mendenhall WM, et al: Carcinoma of the skin with perineural invasion. Head Neck 25: 1027-1033, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 7. Lippman SM, Parkinson DR, Itri LM, et al: 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alpha-2a: Effective combination therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 235-241, 1992 8. Lippman SM, Kavanagh JJ, Paredes-Espinoza M, et al: 13-cis-retinoic acid plus interferon-alpha 2a in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 499-500, 1993 9. Weber R, Lippman SM, McNeese M: Advanced basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin of the head and neck, in Jacobs C (ed): Carcinomas of the Head and Neck: Evaluation and Management. Boston, MA, Kluwer Academic, 1990 10. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457-481, 1958[CrossRef] 11. Hess KR, Serachitopol DM, Brown BW: Hazard function estimators: A simulation study. Stat Med 18: 3075-3088, 1999[CrossRef][Medline] 12. Shin DM, Glisson BS, Khuri FR, et al: Phase II and biologic study of interferon alfa, retinoic acid, and cisplatin in advanced squamous skin cancer. J Clin Oncol 20: 364-370, 2002 13. Sun SY, Lotan R: Retinoids and their receptors in cancer development and chemoprevention. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 41: 41-55, 2002[Medline] 14. Clifford JL, Walch E, Yang X, et al: Suppression of type I interferon signaling proteins is an early event in squamous skin carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 8: 2067-2072, 2002 15. Yaar M, Karassik RL, Schnipper LE, et al: Effects of alpha and beta interferons on cultured human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 85: 70-74, 1985[CrossRef][Medline] 16. Rodriguez-Villanueva J, McDonnell TJ: Induction of apoptotic cell death in non-melanoma skin cancer by interferon-alpha. Int J Cancer 61: 110-114, 1995[Medline] 17. Clifford JL, Yang X, Walch E, et al: Dominant negative signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) protein: Stable expression blocks interferon alpha action in skin squamous cell carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2: 453-459, 2003 18. Parmar S, Platanias LC: Interferons: Mechanisms of action and clinical applications. Curr Opin Oncol 15: 431-439, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 19. Kalvakolanu DV, Borden EC: An overview of the interferon system: Signal transduction and mechanisms of action. Cancer Invest 14: 25-53, 1996[Medline] Submitted February 9, 2006; accepted September 11, 2006. Related Editorial
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|