|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 24 (August 20), 2007: pp. 3596-3602 © 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.0908 Combination of Polymorphisms From Genes Related to Estrogen Metabolism and Risk of Prostate Cancers: The Hidden Face of Estrogens
From the Centre de Recherche pour les Pathologies Prostatiques; Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Urology, Tenon Hospital, Groupement Hospitalier Universitaire Est, University Paris VI, Paris; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, EMI0337; Université Paris 12, Faculté de Médecine, IFR10, Créteil; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) d'Angers, Department of Urology, Angers; CHU La Miletrie, Department of Pathology, University of Poitiers, Poitiers; CHU Brabois, Department of Urology, Nancy; Hopital de la Cavale Blanche, Departments of Urology and Breast; and Caisse Nationale d'Assurance Maladie, France Institute for Cancer Studies and Académic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom Address reprint requests to Olivier Cussenot, MD, PhD, Hôpital Tenon, Service d'Urologie–Batiment Gabriel, 4 rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France; e-mail: olivier.cussenot{at}tnn.aphp.fr
Purpose The association between common functional polymorphisms from the CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT genes involved in the estrogen metabolism and the risk of prostate carcinoma was evaluated. Patients and Methods The study investigated 1,983 white French men (1,101 patients with prostate cancer and 882 healthy controls) aged between 40 and 98 years. The different alleles and genotypes were analyzed according to case-control status, aggressiveness pattern of the tumors, age at onset, and family history of cancers. Results The VV (high activity) genotype of the V432L polymorphism from CYP1B1 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.79; P = .031), and the long allele (> 175 bp) of the TTTA repeat from CYP19 (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.47; P = .003) were significantly associated with the risk of prostate cancer. An additive effect was observed when we combined the two at-risk alleles (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.13; P < .001). The association was stronger for the CYP1B1 VV genotype (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.13; P = .007) among the group of patients with highly aggressive disease. Stratification by age at onset showed that the associations of CYP1B1 and CYP19 variants were largely confined to the younger prostate cancer patients. Conclusion This association between polymorphisms from genes related to estrogen metabolism and prostate cancer risk suggest new clinical considerations in the management of prostate cancer: the development of new prevention trials based on genetic profiling and the evaluation of specific inhibitors involving the estrogen pathways.
Prostate cancer killed 9,789 French men in 2002.1 Its specific mortality is directly related to the stage at diagnosis and age at onset.2 An association between the risk of prostate cancer and variations in blood levels of androgens and estrogens has been examined and was found to be controversial in many studies.3 However, evidence supports the hypothesis that exposure to endogenous variations in androgens and estrogens across a man's life span contributes to or may be a causal factor in prostate cancer.4 Although androgen deprivation and administration of estrogens are a recognized therapy for prostate cancer, it is suspected that early exposure to estrogens initiates carcinogenesis among different tissues, including the prostate gland,5 and that decrease of the androgen/estrogen ratio with aging could be responsible in part for prostate carcinogenesis.6,7 Moreover, recent studies in rodents have demonstrated that estrogens, through their receptors or their catechol metabolites, are potential carcinogens in various tissues, including the prostate, kidneys, liver, uterus, and mammary glands.5,8,9
From these hypotheses, polymorphisms from genes related to estrogens metabolism pathways have been proposed as candidates for association studies on prostate cancer risk. The CYP17 (17-alpha hydroxylase) enzyme participates in the biosynthesis of testosterone and estrogen. For this enzyme, the main studied polymorphism for prostate cancer risk is a sequence variation located in the 5'-promoter region. This variant corresponds to a T
The study reported herein involves for the first time a large and homogeneous population of white French men. It sought to determine whether common polymorphisms, –34T
Study Population This case-control study is based on the data and DNA samples selected among the Centre de Recherche pour les Pathologies Prostatiques bioresources. Eligible patients (1,101) and controls (882) are white French residents, age 40 to 98 years. All participants provided written informed consent to participate in the study. The Institutional Review Board from Saint-Louis Hospital approved the study protocol. Patients were recruited in the department of urology from three hospitals located in Nancy, Brest, and Paris. The patients have incident disease with a histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The aggressiveness of the cancer was defined using an aggressiveness scale based on the clinical patterns of Gleason score, TNM classification, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (Table 1). Controls were selected from men invited to a systematic health screening performed in the same geographic areas as the hospitals where the sample patients were enrolled, as described previously.20 Controls were defined by a blood test for PSA less than 4 ng/mL, no prostatic symptoms, and normal digital rectal examination.
All participants provided a suitable whole blood sample for DNA extraction. DNA for genotype assays was extracted from leukocytes using a standardized protocol.
Choice of Genetic Variants and Genotyping Analysis For the tetranucleotide repeat from CYP19, primers (5'-TTATGAAAGGTAAGCAGGTACTTAG-3' and 5'-GTCGTGAGCCAAGGTCACT-3') were used. One primer was fluorescently labeled. PCR was carried out in a final volume of 20 µL, containing 50 ng of genomic DNA, 250 µmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1 µmol/L each primer, 2.5 U Taq Gold (ABI/PE Biosciences), 2.5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 5% dimethylsulfoxide, in the following cycling conditions: 11 minutes at 95°C, then 35 cycles of 40 seconds at 94°C, 30 seconds at 55°C, 30 seconds at 72°C; followed by a final extension step of 10 minutes at 72°C. PCR products were loaded on 5% denaturing polyacrylamide gel and detected with an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer. Genotypes were determined with Genescan Analysis 3.1 (ABI/PE Biosciences).
Statistical Analysis
Distribution of the genotypes and alleles from the CYP17, CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT polymorphisms in controls and prostate cancer patients are shown in Table 2. All genotype frequencies for healthy controls follow the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. No association between CYP17 variant and prostate carcinoma risk was observed. The long allele ( 175 bp) from CYP19 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.47; P = .003) and V allele from CYP1B1 (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.33; P = .02) were associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer. A higher frequency of GG genotype from COMT was observed in patients (28%) compared with controls (25%) but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .08).
To evaluate possible additive effect between at-risk alleles of the three genes (CYP19, CYP1B1, and COMT), we combined the at-risk alleles for each of the possible pairs or the combination of the three genes, and compared them with all other allele combinations (Table 3). The association of the three at-risk alleles (long allele of CYP19, L allele of CYP1B1, and G allele of COMT) showed a significant association with prostate cancer risk (OR = 1.79; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.62; P = .003). All combinations of at-risk allele pairs were associated with a higher risk of prostate cancer. The most significant association was found when we considered the long allele from CYP19 and the V allele from CYP1B1, with an OR of 1.63 (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.13; P < .001).
We then examined the association between the different genetic polymorphisms and the risk of prostate cancer according to aggressiveness pattern of the tumor. Patients were stratified according to our classification of low (Gleason score 2 to 6, stage T1-T2-N0-M0, and PSA < 30 ng/mL) or high (Gleason score 7 to 10, T3-T4 or N+ or M+, or PSA > 30 ng/mL) aggressive potential (Table 1). No significant association was observed for CYP17 and CYP19 (data not shown). For the genotype VV and the V allele from CYP1B1, the association increased among the patients with a highly aggressive disease (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.13; P = .007 and OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.46; P = .004, respectively; Table 4). Again, a borderline significant association was observed among the group of patients with highly aggressive disease for the GG genotype from COMT (OR = 1.35; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.85; P = .056).
We also analyzed the association between the different genetic polymorphisms and the risk of prostate carcinoma according to early onset (age 64 years) or late onset (age > 64 years). This threshold was chosen because it is expected that individuals with an age at onset older than 64 years will die as a result of another cause rather than prostate cancer. No significant association was observed for CYP17 and COMT (data not shown). For both the long allele from CYP19 and V allele from CYP1B1 polymorphisms, we found that this association was confined to the early-onset prostate cancer patients (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.63; P = .004 and OR = 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.42; P = .039, respectively; Table 5).
Finally, we looked for an association between the different polymorphisms and the risk of prostate cancer according to family history of cancers (prostate, breast, or other). A positive family history was recorded when the index case confirmed the diagnosis of prostate, breast, or other cancer in a first-degree relative defined as father, mother, brother, sister, son, or daughter. We observed no significant association with the CYP1B1, CYP19, COMT, and CYP17 variants (data not shown).
This study sought to determine whether polymorphisms –34T C (CYP17), TTTA repeat (CYP19), V432L (CYP1B1), and V158M (COMT) in genes involved in estrogen metabolism pathways were associated with an elevated risk of prostate cancer or an aggressive disease pattern. Inherent difficulties in studies involving various ethnicities, heterogeneous reproducibility of phenotype assignment related to anatomic features, and clinical definition in patients and controls may explain the conflicting results obtained from polymorphisms in candidate genes in previously published studies. Knowing these limitations, we performed this study on a large and homogeneous French population. We have shown that genes related to estrogen metabolism through specific polymorphisms can significantly increase the risk of prostate cancer, affect the risk of aggressive tumors, and have an additive effect.
CYP17 and CYP19 are two genes that encode enzymes that can potentially modulate blood levels of androgens or estrogens.22 CYP17 is expressed constitutively in gonads and adrenal glands. Polymorphism in the promoter region of this gene (CYP17A1 –34T
Aromatase is expressed constitutively in the testis, adipose tissue, and fibromuscular stroma of the prostate. In 2001, our group11 and then Modugno et al12 were the first to suggest that the CYP19 tetranucleotide (TTTA) repeat polymorphism located in intron 4 may be associated with prostate cancer risk. The longer TTTA repeat ( The CYP1B1 and COMT genes encode enzymes that are involved in the metabolism of estrogens in various tissues and potentially are involved in local production of carcinogenic estrogen metabolites. CYP1B1 and COMT are expressed constitutively in the prostate, breast, and uterus, as well as in several other tissues.31 The estrogen 3,4-quinone resulting from CYP1B1 transformation can form unstable adducts with adenine and guanine in DNA, leading to depurination and mutation. Reduction of estrogen quinones back to hydroquinones and catechols induces reactive oxygen species and probably accounts for the oxidative damage to DNA, leading to carcinogenic events. Moreover, catechol estrogen metabolites may also participate in the regulation of pathways of gene expression, signaling, or both through the estrogen receptors. The 4-hydroxycatechol estrogens have high binding affinities to the human estrogen receptor (150% compared with that of estradiol) and induce estrogen-receptor–dependent gene expression. In the prostate, CYP1B1 and COMT are expressed essentially in the peripheral zone,32,33 the main localization for prostate cancers. COMT acts as a phase II metabolism enzyme leading to increased protective conjugation of reactive catechol estrogens produced by CYP1B1 activity. It is supposed that high activity of CYP1B1 and low activity of COMT determined by genetic polymorphisms can increase locally the levels of catechol estrogens and determine an increased risk of local carcinogenesis. The V432L CYP1B1 and the V158M COMT polymorphisms are the main variants studied for their involvement in carcinogenesis (first for breast cancer risk).34,35 Studies suggesting association between those CYP1B1 and COMT variants and prostate cancer or their potential involvement in its aggressiveness have been conducted in Japanese populations15,16,36,37 and on small panels (< 500) of white patients and controls.19,38-40 In a large population of white French men, we showed that the CYP1B1 V432L variant is associated significantly with the risk of prostate cancer, and notably among the patients with highly aggressive prostate cancer. Interestingly, the association with the risk of prostate cancer was stronger when this variant was combined with the G allele from the COMT M158V polymorphism (Table 3). Additional studies to confirm these results in other study populations will be of benefit. In conclusion, estrogens have been suspected to be involved in prostate carcinogenesis for more than two decades, but have been overshadowed by androgens. Recent evidence supports this hypothesis in rodent models and in studies on specific allelic variants in estrogen-related genes. Our results indicate that estrogen-related genes could increase significantly the risk of prostate cancer through specific polymorphisms, and may have affected the risk of tumor aggressiveness in a white French population. Notably, an additive effect on the risk of prostate cancer was found when the at-risk alleles from those polymorphisms were combined. The process through which estrogens and androgens contribute to each phase of the carcinogenic or therapeutic mechanisms in prostate cancer is complex at the molecular level. However, there is accumulating evidence suggesting a central role for estrogens in prostate cancer. This may pave the way for the development of new prevention strategies in addition to approaches targeting the androgen pathways in the management of prostate cancer.
The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.
Conception and design: Olivier Cussenot, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin Provision of study materials or patients: Olivier Cussenot, Gaelle Fromont, Philippe Mangin, Luc Cormier, Georges Fournier, Antoine Valeri, Frederic Thibault, Jean-Pierre Giordenella, Michel Pouchard, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin Collection and assembly of data: Olivier Cussenot, Abdel Rhamene Azzouzi, Stephane Larre, Frederic Thibault, Yan Zheng, Angela Cox, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin Data analysis and interpretation: Olivier Cussenot, Abdel Rhamene Azzouzi, Nathalie Nicolaiew, Freddie C. Hamdy, Angela Cox, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin Manuscript writing: Olivier Cussenot, Nathalie Nicolaiew, Freddie C. Hamdy, Angela Cox, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin Final approval of manuscript: Olivier Cussenot, Geraldine Cancel-Tassin
We thank Beatrice Legrand and Cecile Gaffory for excellent technical assistance.
Supported by Association pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs de la Prostate and Sheffield Hospitals Charitable Trust. The study sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or in the writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all of the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit the article for publication. Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
1. International Agency for Research on Cancer: CANCERMondial. http://www-dep.iarc.fr 2. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al: Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 352:1977-1984, 2005 3. Severi G, Morris HA, MacInnis RJ, et al: Circulating steroid hormones and the risk of prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:86-91, 2006 4. Bosland MC: The role of steroid hormones in prostate carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 39-66, 2000 5. Yuen MT, Leung LK, Wang J, et al: Enhanced induction of prostatic dysplasia and carcinoma in Noble rat model by combination of neonatal estrogen exposure and hormonal treatments at adulthood. Int J Oncol 27:1685-1695, 2005[Medline] 6. Algarté-Génin M, Cussenot O, Costa P: Prevention of prostate cancer by androgens: Experimental paradox or clinical reality. Eur Urol 46:285-294, 2004; discussion 294-295[CrossRef][Medline] 7. Ho SM: Estrogens and anti-estrogens: Key mediators of prostate carcinogenesis and new therapeutic candidates. J Cell Biochem 91:491-503, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 8. Rogan EG, Cavalieri EL: Estrogen metabolites, conjugates, and DNA adducts: Possible biomarkers for risk of breast, prostate, and other human cancers. Adv Clin Chem 38:135-149, 2004[Medline] 9. Cavalieri EL, Rogan EG: A unified mechanism in the initiation of cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci 959:341-354, 2002[Medline] 10. Sharp L, Cardy AH, Cotton SC, et al: CYP17 gene polymorphisms: Prevalence and associations with hormone levels and related factors: A HuGE review. Am J Epidemiol 160:729-740, 2004 11. Latil AG, Azzouzi R, Cancel GS, et al: Prostate carcinoma risk and allelic variants of genes involved in androgen biosynthesis and metabolism pathways. Cancer 92:1130-1137, 2001[CrossRef][Medline] 12. Modugno F, Weissfeld JL, Trump DL, et al: Allelic variants of aromatase and the androgen and estrogen receptors: Toward a multigenic model of prostate cancer risk. Clin Cancer Res 7:3092-3096, 2001 13. Li L, Cicek MS, Casey G, et al: No association between a tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism of CYP19 and prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:2280-2281, 2004 14. Suzuki K, Nakazato H, Matsui H, et al: Association of the genetic polymorphism of the CYP19 intron 4[TTTA]n repeat with familial prostate cancer risk in a Japanese population. Anticancer Res 23:4941-4946, 2003[Medline] 15. Suzuki K, Nakazato H, Matsui H, et al: Genetic polymorphisms of estrogen receptor alpha, CYP19, catechol-O-methyltransferase are associated with familial prostate carcinoma risk in a Japanese population. Cancer 98:1411-1416, 2003[CrossRef][Medline] 16. Fukatsu T, Hirokawa Y, Araki T, et al: Genetic polymorphisms of hormone-related genes and prostate cancer risk in the Japanese population. Anticancer Res 24:2431-2437, 2004 17. Douglas JA, Zuhlke KA, Beebe-Dimmer J, et al: Identifying susceptibility genes for prostate cancer–a family-based association study of polymorphisms in CYP17, CYP19, CYP11A1, and LH-beta. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2035-2039, 2005 18. Mononen N, Seppala EH, Duggal P, et al: Profiling genetic variation along the androgen biosynthesis and metabolism pathways implicates several single nucleotide polymorphisms and their combinations as prostate cancer risk factors. Cancer Res 66:743-747, 2006 19. Nock NL, Cicek MS, Li L, et al: Polymorphisms in estrogen bioactivation, detoxification and oxidative DNA base excision repair genes and prostate cancer risk. Carcinogenesis 27:1842-1848, 2006 20. Yeager M, Orr N, Hayes RB, et al: Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer identifies a second risk locus at 8q24. Nat Genet 39:645-649, 2007[CrossRef][Medline] 21. Tsuchiya N, Wang L, Suzuki H, et al: Impact of IGF-I and CYP19 gene polymorphisms on the survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:1982-1989, 2006 22. Low YL, Taylor JI, Grace PB, et al: Polymorphisms in the CYP19 gene may affect the positive correlations between serum and urine phytoestrogen metabolites and plasma androgen concentrations in men. J Nutr 135:2680-2686, 2005 23. Feigelson HS, Ross RK, Yu MC, et al: Genetic susceptibility to cancer from exogenous and endogenous exposures. J Cell Biochem Suppl 25:15-22, 1996[Medline] 24. Ntais C, Polycarpou A, Ioannidis JP: Association of the CYP17 gene polymorphism with the risk of prostate cancer: A meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:120-126, 2003 25. Vesovic Z, Herkommer K, Vogel W, et al: Role of a CYP17 promoter polymorphism for familial prostate cancer risk in Germany. Anticancer Res 25:1303-1307, 2005 26. Forrest MS, Edwards SM, Houlston R, et al: Association between hormonal genetic polymorphisms and early-onset prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 8:95-102, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 27. Gennari L, Masi L, Merlotti D, et al: A polymorphic CYP19 TTTA repeat influences aromatase activity and estrogen levels in elderly men: Effects on bone metabolism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:2803-2810, 2004 28. Siddiqui SA, Inman BA, Sengupta S, et al: Obesity and survival after radical prostatectomy: A 10-year prospective cohort study. Cancer 107:521-529, 2006[CrossRef][Medline] 29. Freedland SJ, Terris MK, Platz EA, et al: Body mass index as a predictor of prostate cancer: Development versus detection on biopsy. Urology 66:108-113, 2005[Medline] 30. Amling CL, Riffenburgh RH, Sun L, et al: Pathologic variables and recurrence rates as related to obesity and race in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 22:439-445, 2004 31. Sissung TM, Price DK, Sparreboom A, et al: Pharmacogenetics and regulation of human cytochrome P450 1B1: Implications in hormone-mediated tumor metabolism and a novel target for therapeutic intervention. Mol Cancer Res 4:135-150, 2006 32. Ragavan N, Hewitt R, Cooper LJ, et al: CYP1B1 expression in prostate is higher in the peripheral than in the transition zone. Cancer Lett 215:69-78, 2004[CrossRef][Medline] 33. Ragavan N, Hewitt R, Hindley AC, et al: Expression of hormone-carcinogen-metabolising enzymes in the prostate: Clues into peripheral-zone susceptibility? Eur Urol 5:165, 2006 (suppl) 34. Zheng W, Xie DW, Jin F, et al: Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450-1B1 and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:147-150, 2000 35. Lavigne JA, Helzlsouer KJ, Huang HY, et al: An association between the allele coding for a low activity variant of catechol-O-methyltransferase and the risk for breast cancer. Cancer Res 57:5493-5497, 1997 36. Suzuki M, Mamun MR, Hara K, et al: The Val158Met polymorphism of the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene is associated with the PSA-progression-free survival in prostate cancer patients treated with estramustine phosphate. Eur Urol 48:752-759, 2005[CrossRef][Medline] 37. Tanaka Y, Sasaki M, Shiina H, et al: Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphisms in benign prostatic hyperplasia and sporadic prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15:238-244, 2006 38. Tang YM, Green BL, Chen GF, et al: Human CYP1B1 Leu432Val gene polymorphism: Ethnic distribution in African-Americans, Caucasians and Chinese; oestradiol hydroxylase activity; and distribution in prostate cancer cases and controls. Pharmacogenetics 10:761-766, 2000[CrossRef][Medline] 39. Cicek MS, Liu X, Casey G, et al: Role of androgen metabolism genes CYP1B1, PSA/KLK3, and CYP11alpha in prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2173-2177, 2005 40. Sobti RC, Onsory K, Al-Badran AI, et al: CYP17, SRD5A2, CYP1B1, and CYP2D6 gene polymorphisms with prostate cancer risk in North Indian population. DNA Cell Biol 25:287-294, 2006[CrossRef][Medline] Submitted February 1, 2007; accepted May 21, 2007.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
|