Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Erratum for Stephenson et al., J Clin Oncol 25 (15) 2035-2041.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 26 (September 10), 2007: pp. 4153
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6291

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

ERRATUM

The May 20, 2007, article by Stephenson et al entitled, "Predicting the Outcome of Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy" (J Clin Oncol 25:2035-2041, 2007) contained an error. In Figure 3A, the neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy scale should have shown that this therapy is associated with improved prostate-specific antigen control, as indicated in the text. The corrected Figure 3 is reprinted below in its entirety.


Figure 1
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 3. (A) Pretreatment nomogram predicting 6-year progression-free probability after salvage radiotherapy for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence after radical prostatectomy. (B) Calibration of the nomogram. Dashed line indicates reference line where an ideal nomogram would lie. Solid line indicates the performance of the current nomogram. Dots are quartiles of our data set. Instructions: Locate the patient's Gleason score on the respective axis. Draw a straight line up to the Points axis to determine how many points toward disease recurrence that the patient receives for his or her Gleason score. Repeat this process for the other 10 disease and treatment parameters. Sum the points and locate this number on the Total Points axis. Draw a straight line down to find the patient's probability of remaining free of disease progression at 6 years after salvage radiotherapy, provided the patient does not die of another cause first.

 


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online