Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 27 (September 20), 2007: pp. 4326
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.0419

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sizer, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sizer, K. C.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

Heat Shock Protein 70, Erythropoietin, and Cancer

Kurt C. Sizer

The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

To the Editor:

Henke et al1 recently reported that erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) tumor status correlated with progression-free survival outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer scheduled for radiotherapy, who were randomly assigned to receive erythropoietin or placebo. A primary criticism of this study has been the controversy regarding the specificity of the EpoR antibody (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA) used for immunohistochemical staining.2-7 Interestingly, C-20 has been reported to recognize heat shock protein 70 (HSP-70) almost exclusively,7 due to cross-reactivity of the EpoR immunizing peptide.2,7 The significance of HSP-70 staining in the study by Henke et al1 should be re-examined, in light of recent data.

Although overexpression of HSPs, and HSP-70 in particular, in a wide variety of human tumors and their potential associations with clinical outcomes have been reported,8 a direct link between HSP-70 and erythropoietin exposure had not been previously established. However, Ribeil et al, recently reported that in the presence of erythropoietin, HSP-70 protects nuclear transcription factor GATA-1 from caspase-mediated proteolysis, resulting in erythroid differentiation. In contrast, in the absence of erythropoietin, HSP-70 is exported out of the nucleus, GATA-1 is cleaved, and erythroid precursors undergo apoptosis.9

These results evoke several relevant questions, including: what is the relationship between HSP-70 and erythropoietin in tumor cells? In particular, does erythropoietin differentially promote tumor cell survival based on HSP-70 expression? With regard to tumor biopsy study by Henke et al,1 was the C-20 antibody used in this study actually distinguishing HSP-70–positive and –negative tumors (rather than, or in addition to EpoR)? Was it HSP-70 expression that correlated with progression-free survival outcomes for patients exposed to eryth-ropoietin or placebo? Re-examining these tumors with an HSP-70–specific antibody would address this issue directly.

Future prospective and retrospective studies designed to further examine the relationship between erythropoietin exposure and tumor progression and survival, should consider HSP-70 tumor expression status in those trials that include tumor biopsies. Such studies, coupled with emerging biologic data, such as the study by Ribeil et al,9 will guide rational treatment recommendations for the use of erythroid stimulating agents in patients with cancer.

AUTHOR'S DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Henke M, Mattern D, Pepe M, et al: Do erythropoietin receptors on cancer cells explain unexpected clinical findings? J Clin Oncol 24:4708-4713, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Elliott S, Busse L, Bass MB, et al: Anti-Epo receptor antibodies do not predict Epo receptor expression. Blood 107:1892-1895, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Verdier F, Gomez S, Lacombe C, et al: Selected anti-Epo receptor antibodies predict Epo receptor expression. Blood 108:1106, 2006[Free Full Text]

4. Elliott S, Sinclair AM, Begley CG: Anti-Epo receptor antibodies do not predict Epo receptor expression. Blood 108:1107, 2006[Free Full Text]

5. Henke M, Verma A, Acs G: Erythropoietin receptors on cancer cells: Exciting perspectives, difficult to appreciate. Blood 108:1107-1108, 2006[Free Full Text]

6. Elliott S, Busse L, Spahr C, et al: Anti-EpoR antibodies detect a 59-kDa protein. Blood 108:1108-1109, 2006

7. Ragione FD, Cucciolla V, Borriello A, et al: Erythropoietin receptors on cancer cells: A still open question. J Clin Oncol 25:1812-1813, 2007[Free Full Text]

8. Ciocca DR, Calderwood SK: Heat shock proteins in cancer: Diagnostic, prognostic, predictive, and treatment implications. Cell Stress Chaperones 10:86-103, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Ribeil J-A, Zermati Y, Vandekerckhove J, et al: Hsp70 regulates erythropoiesis by preventing caspase-3-mediated cleavage of GATA-1. Nature 445:102-105, 2007[CrossRef][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Reply

  • In Reply
    Michael Henke and Frank Pajonk
    JCO 2007 25: 4326-4327 [Full Text]

Related Article

  • Do Erythropoietin Receptors on Cancer Cells Explain Unexpected Clinical Findings?
    Michael Henke, Dominik Mattern, Margaret Pepe, Christina Bézay, Christian Weissenberger, Martin Werner, and Frank Pajonk
    JCO 2006 24: 4708-4713 [Abstract] [Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. A. May and F. R. Khuri
Unraveling the Mystery of Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Cancer Promotion
Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4013 - 4017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
J. Fandrey
Erythropoietin Receptors on Tumor Cells: What Do They Mean?
Oncologist, May 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 16 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sizer, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sizer, K. C.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Reply
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online