Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 29 (October 10), 2007: pp. 4698-4699
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1425

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S. S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

CORRESPONDENCE

In Reply

Sankha S. Mitra

Sussex Cancer Centre, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom

The Letter to the Editor by Dr Gerber et al is very interesting, as although their patient had an epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)–induced skin rash, and this had spared the previously irradiated field, the sparing appeared to be transient. This is the first documented case of the development of an EGFRI-induced rash in an initially spared preirradiated field. However, I think it is premature and incorrect to conclude that radiation-induced prevention of erlotinib-induced skin rash is transient. A careful study of the photograph of their patient reveals that the central sparing of the rash is still very marked over a significant area. The area of progression of the rash in the irradiated area surrounds the edge of the radiotherapy field, which is in the penumbra of the beam. We know that the radiation dose falls off significantly in the penumbra of the beam at the edge of the field, and with slight variations in the position of the patient during radiotherapy treatment. It is conceivable that the edge of the radiotherapy field had a lesser dose that the central part of the field. Experimental data suggest that erlotinib rash is due to inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in basal epidermal keratinocytes and the outer root sheath of the hair follicle, leading to growth arrest and subsequent inflammation.1 One can hypothesize that a certain threshold dose of radiotherapy is required to cause sufficient depletion of basal-layer stem cells to block the subsequent development of the pathological process of inflammation on erlotinib, and consequent rash. I can confirm that in the patient discussed in my original article,2 the absence of the rash appears to be permanent, because he has since been rechallenged with erlotinib after a long break due to toxicity, and redeveloped the rash with the characteristic sparing (Fig 1). Since then, I have documented the absence of the rash in the irradiated field in several patients on different tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and in all of these patients, the absence of the rash appears to be permanent. The second photograph is of a patient with HER-2–positive breast cancer who had a left mastectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy to the left chest wall several years ago and developed the characteristic papulopustular rash on lapatinib, on the right anterior chest wall and right breast. The left chest wall skin was completely and permanently spared (Fig 2).


Figure 1
View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 1. Photograph of the back of a patient with lung cancer who was rechallenged with erlotinib and developed the rash with characteristic sparing, which appears to be permanent.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 2. Photograph of the left chest wall of a patient with HER-2–positive breast cancer showing permanent sparing of the rash that developed during treatment of lapatinib. The patient had adjuvant radiotherapy several years ago.

 
Therefore, I disagree with Gerber et al that the absence of the rash in previously irradiated skin can be explained by a transient immunosuppression due to loss of Langerhans and other immunocompetent cells. The hypothesis by Lacouture et al1 not only offers an explanation for EGFRI-induced rash and sparing in the irradiated field, but also gives us an insight into the radiosensitization of concurrent EGFRIs.

We know that EGFRI rash is exacerbated in the radiotherapy field if the EGFRI and radiotherapy are given concurrently.3 It is also known that radiotherapy upregulates EGFR.4 It is logical to hypothesize that increased EGFR-expressing stem cells during radiotherapy and their inhibition by an EGFRI, concurrently gives rise to more growth arrest and more inflammation. However, Gerber et al have offered no explanation for the mechanism for radiosensitization based on their hypothesis. In fact, their hypothesis is fundamentally incompatible with the concept of radiosensitization. Lastly, I do not discount their suggestion that immunological processes may have played a part in the progression of the rash at the edge of the radiotherapy field in their patient, where possibly, a subthreshold dose of radiotherapy was delivered. We agree that further studies are needed to investigate these aspects at the molecular and cellular level.

AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Lacouture ME: Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 6:803-812, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Mitra SS, Simcock R: Erlotinib induced skin rash spares skin in previous radiotherapy field. J Clin Oncol 24:e28-e29, 2006[Free Full Text]

3. Lacouture ME, Hwang C, Marymont MH, et al: Temporal dependence of the effect of radiation on erlotinib-induced skin rash. J Clin Oncol 25:2140,2007[Free Full Text]

4. Huang SM, Li J, Armstrong EA, et al: Modulation of radiation response and tumor-induced angiogenesis after epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition by ZD1839 (Iressa). Cancer Res 62:4300-4306, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Correspondence

  • Radiation-Induced Prevention of Erlotinib-Induced Skin Rash Is Transient: A New Aspect Toward the Understanding of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor–Associated Cutaneous Adverse Effects
    Peter Arne Gerber, Elaine Enderlein, Bernhard Homey, Anja Muller, Edwin Boelke, and Wilfried Budach
    JCO 2007 25: 4697-4698 [Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mitra, S. S.
Related Articles
Right arrowRelated Correspondence
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online