Advertisement
Journal of Clinical Oncology  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Subject or Issue
Home Search or Browse JCO My JCO Subscriptions Customer Service Site Map

Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 25, No 4 (February 1), 2007: pp. 376-383
© 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0696

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pezzolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pistoia, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pezzolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pistoia, V.

Tumor Origin of Endothelial Cells in Human Neuroblastoma

Annalisa Pezzolo, Federica Parodi, Maria Valeria Corrias, Roberta Cinti, Claudio Gambini, Vito Pistoia

From the Laboratories of Oncology and Pathology, G. Gaslini Institute, Genova, Italy

Address reprint requests to Annalisa Pezzolo, PhD, Laboratorio di Oncologia, Istituto Giannina Gaslini 5, 16147 Genova-Quarto, Italy; e-mail: annalisapezzolo{at}ospedale-gaslini.ge.it


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Purpose: Malignant cells are genetically unstable and prone to develop chemotherapy resistance, whereas tumor vasculature is usually of host origin and genetically stable. Tumor endothelial microvessels attract interest as therapeutic targets, but their genetic instability would curtail such approach. Here, we have investigated the tumor origin of endothelial microvessels in human neuroblastoma (NB).

Materials and Methods: Paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 10 MYCN-amplified tumors (six stage 4, three stage 3, and one stage 1) were studied. Endothelial cells (ECs) were detected by immunofluorescent staining for CD31 or CD105, and MYCN amplification was detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In xenografts of the HTLA-230 human NB cell line, human ECs were detected by CD31 staining, mouse ECs were detected by CD34 staining, and MYCN amplification and murine DNA were detected using FISH.

Results: MYCN-amplified ECs formed approximately 70% of tumor endothelial microvessels in two stage 4 tumors and 20% in one stage 3 tumor. Similar results were obtained after EC labeling with CD31 or CD105. Staining for alpha-smooth muscle actin in combination with MYCN FISH demonstrated that tumor-derived ECs were coated with pericytes. These vessels were functional because they contained RBCs. Approximately 70% of endothelial vessels from HTLA-230 xenografts stained for human CD31, but not murine CD34, and displayed MYCN amplification, thus proving their tumor origin.

Conclusion: NB-associated endothelial microvessels can originate from tumor cells, and this finding challenges the tenet that tumor vasculature is genetically stable. The possibility that NB-derived ECs are chemotherapy resistant warrants further investigation.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Neuroblastoma (NB), a tumor originating from the sympathetic nervous system, is the most common extracranial malignancy in childhood.1 Although stage 1 or 2 tumors are localized and well differentiated and can usually be cured by surgical resection only, patients with stage 3 or 4 tumors present with regional or disseminated disease, respectively, that is often characterized by relapse after response to conventional treatments and poor prognosis.1

The growth of solid tumors is strictly dependent on the development of an adequate blood supply through neoangiogenesis.2,3 Numerous studies have demonstrated that the degree of tumor angiogenesis has prognostic impact in different malignancies.4

In NB, high tumor vascularity was found to correlate with MYCN amplification, advanced-stage disease, and poor outcome. Conversely, excellent survival was observed in the subset of patients who had tumors with low vascular density.5,6 These observations suggest that agents capable of interfering with the process of angiogenesis may inhibit NB growth7-11 and prove to provide effective treatment for patients with clinically aggressive disease.12

Tumors induce the sprouting of new blood microvessels from pre-existing capillaries in a process similar to physiologic angiogenesis.13 Moreover, tumor cells from some aggressive cancers can mimic the activities of endothelial cells (ECs) by forming vascular-like networks.14-18 Evidence for the direct involvement of tumor cells in tumor vessel formation has been provided in human xenograft models.19-21

An important concept in tumor angiogenesis is that tumor blood vessels contain genetically normal and stable ECs unlike tumors cells, which typically display genetic instability. The aforementioned studies challenge this concept because tumor-derived ECs share the same genetic abnormalities with the malignant cells from which they originate, including increased resistance to apoptosis and chemotherapy resistance.22,23

In view of the clinical relevance of this topic, we have investigated the origin of the microvascular ECs in 10 tumor samples of MYCN-amplified NB using a fluorescence-based technique that makes use of simultaneous interphase cytogenetics and immunophenotyping.24 In three tumors, a varying proportion of the microvascular ECs exhibited MYCN amplification, thus proving their tumor origin. Subsequent in vivo studies were performed by injecting the MYCN-amplified HTLA-230 NB cell line in NOD/scid mice and investigating the origin of tumor-associated endothelium.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Tissues
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections (2 to 4 µm) from 10 NB tumors carrying MYCN amplification (one stage 1, three stage 3, and six stage 4 tumors according to the International Neuroblastoma Staging System classification25; Table 1) and from HTLA tumor xenografts (see HTLA-230 Tumor Xenografts in NOD/scid Mice) were incubated at 60°C overnight and deparaffinized twice using xylene. The slides were subsequently hydrated in a series of ethanol solution and washed with phosphate-buffered saline. Studies with human tissues were performed after approval by a local human investigations committee.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Immunofluorescence and FISH Analysis of Tissue Samples From Ten Neuroblastoma Tumors

 
Antibodies
Mouse antihuman CD31 (Clone JC70A; Dako Cytomation, Hamburg, Germany), antihuman endoglin (CD105; Dako), antihuman CD45 (Clone PD7/26 e 2B11; Dako), antihuman alpha-smooth muscle actin ({alpha}-SMA; Clone 1A4; Dako), and antihuman vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGF-R2; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were used. A rat antimouse CD34 (Clone MEC14.7; Dako) was also used. R-phycoerythrin –conjugated rabbit antimouse immunoglobulin (Dako) and fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated goat antirat immunoglobulin (Southern Biotechnology Inc, Birmingham, AL) were used as second reagents.

Probes
The following probes were used: MYCN-specific DNA probe (Q-BIOgene Inc, Hamburg, Germany) and mouse pancentromeric probe (Star FISH; Cambio, Cambridge, United Kingdom), which were direct labeled with rhodamine and Cy3, respectively; and mouse Cot-1 DNA probe (Life Technologies Gibco BRL, Paisley, Scotland), which was labeled with Spectrum Red by a commercial nick translation kit following the recommendations of the manufacturer (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL).

Immunofluorescence and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization
Briefly, slides were immunostained with primary monoclonal antibody (mAb) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Fluorochrome-conjugated antimouse or rat immunoglobulin antibodies were added as secondary reagents. After immunostaining, slides were washed three times for 5 minutes each in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% Tween-20 (Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, MO). Only sections of high morphologic quality were used for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Slides were dehydrated through a series of ethanol washes, denatured in the presence of the specific probes at 75°C for 90 seconds, and incubated overnight in a humid chamber at 37°C. A rapid wash was performed, and the slides were mounted in antifade solution with DAPI (Vector, Burlingame, CA). Slides were analyzed using a Nikon E-1000 fluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with appropriate filter sets and the Genikon imaging system software (Nikon Instruments).

HTLA-230 Tumor Xenografts in NOD/scid Mice
NOD/scid mice (NOD.CB17-Prkdcscid/J) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). The animals were housed in specific pathogen-free colony and fed with sterile food and water. The experiments, performed according to the National Regulation on Animal Research Resources, were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Istituto Nazionale per la Ricerca sul Cancro in Genova, Italy. Three 6-week-old animals were injected intravenously in the tail vein with 1 x 106 viable HTLA-230 cells.26 Mice were monitored for disease symptoms and terminated by carbon dioxide asphyxiation. Abdominal tumors were removed, fixed in formalin, and paraffin embedded. Immunofluorescence in combination with FISH was then performed as described for primary tumors. Preliminarily to these studies, we performed a series of experiments with the aim of checking the species specificity of the anti-EC mAbs (human CD31 and mouse CD34) and probes (human MYCN and mouse Cot-1) used throughout. These experiments, which are shown in Appendix Figure A1 (online only), showed unambiguously that each reagent was absolutely species specific.

Cytogenetic Analysis
For karyotypic analysis, HTLA-230 cells were grown and mechanically detached 48 hours after plating, suspended in KCl 0.075 mol, and fixed in methanol:acetic acid (3:1). Slides of metaphase spreads were air dried and then stained with Quinacrine (Sigma). In some experiments, metaphase spreads were hybridized to the MYCN probe as detailed earlier. Cytocentrifuged HTLA-230 cell preparations were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and subjected to FISH using the MYCN probe.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor Endothelial Vessels Can Originate From Primary NB Cells
To identify microvascular ECs on paraffin sections from primary NB tumors, we selected CD31, CD105,27,28 and CD309 (anti–VEGF-R2)29 mAbs. Amplification of the MYCN oncogene, which was present in at least 50% of tumor cells in all specimens studied (Table 1), was chosen as the tumor-specific genetic marker.

As shown in Figures 1A and 1B, both CD31 and CD105 mAbs stained ECs but not tumor cells. In contrast, a large proportion of cells present in the sections reacted with the CD309 mAb (Fig 1C). Because the latter observation suggested that tumor cells expressed VEGF-R2, tissue sections were stained with CD309 mAb and then subjected to MYCN FISH. Indeed, as shown in Figure 1D, most MYCN-amplified NB cells stained for CD309, providing the first demonstration that VEGF-R2 is expressed at the protein level by primary NB cells. Because of the lack of specificity for EC, the CD309 mAb was omitted from further studies.


Figure 1
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 1. Detection of endothelial cells in neuroblastoma tissue sections. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). (A) CD31 staining (green) of an endothelial vessel (x125). (B) CD105 staining (green) of an endothelial vessel (x125). (C) Diffuse staining (green) with CD309/anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 monoclonal antibody (x125). (D) CD309 staining (green) combined with MYCN fluorescent in situ hybridization (red) (x125).

 
ECs carrying MYCN amplification were identified in three of 10 NB tumors (Table 1, samples 2, 3, and 5). The results listed in Table 1 refer to ECs staining with CD31 mAb, but superimposable results were obtained after staining with CD105 mAb (data not shown). Tumor-derived ECs formed 70% and 78% of blood microvessels in two stage 4 tumors (Table 1, samples 2 and 3) and 20% in one stage 3 tumor (Table 1, sample 5).

In these cases, the following two types of green staining (CD31+ or CD105+) ECs were detected: cells with multiple red hybridization signals indicative of MYCN amplification as double minutes (Figs 2A and 2B) and cells with two red signals and hence MYCN gene single copy (Fig 2C, arrows). Thus, the former ECs were of tumor origin because they showed the same genetic abnormality as malignant cells, whereas the latter ECs were derived from normal progenitors.


Figure 2
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 2. Neuroblastoma-derived endothelial microvessels. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). (A) CD31+ endothelial microvessel (green) carrying MYCN amplification (multiple red signals; x100). (B) CD105+ endothelial microvessel (green) carrying MYCN amplification (multiple red signals). Three RBCs are in the open lumen of the endothelial microvessel (x125). (C) CD31+ endothelial cells (green) with single-copy MYCN gene (red, arrows; x100). (D) Pericytes (green, alpha-smooth muscle actin staining) cover an MYCN-amplified microvessel (red). Pericytes have single-copy MYCN gene (arrow) and surround three MYCN-amplified endothelial cells (ECs; arrowheads; x125). (E) Pericytes (green) cover a microvessel with single-copy MYCN gene (red) and interact with two ECs bearing single-copy MYCN (arrows; x125). (F) Two pericytes (green) with single-copy MYCN gene (red, arrows) cover an endothelial microvessel lined by MYCN-amplified ECs (arrowheads) and containing RBCs (yellow arrows). Three extravasated erythrocytes are detected in the lower right quadrant of the figure (yellow arrow; x125).

 
Endothelial microvessels formed by tumor cells displayed an open lumen and consistently contained RBCs, indicating that these vessels were functional. A representative experiment is shown in Figure 2B, where an endothelial microvessel lined by MYCN-amplified CD105+ ECs contains three clearly visible erythrocytes.

Pericytes are fibroblastic/smooth muscle–like cells that establish close contact with ECs in small blood vessels and capillaries, serving as regulators of their development and function.29 Therefore, in subsequent experiments, we investigated pericyte coating of endothelial microvessels formed by NB cells using immunofluorescence with an anti–{alpha}-SMA mAb in combination with MYCN FISH. As shown in Figure 2, both MYCN-amplified (Fig 2D) and single-copy (Fig 2E) endothelial microvessels were completely covered with a layer of {alpha}-SMA–positive pericytes. The structural similarities of the two kinds of tumor microvessels provide further support to the functional nature of MYCN-amplified endothelium.

Next, we addressed the question of whether pericytes were of tumor or host origin using immunofluorescence with an anti–{alpha}-SMA mAb in combination with MYCN FISH. Pericytes were found to always carry single-copy MYCN, indicating that they originated from the host and not from the tumor (Fig 2F).

The possibility that the reported observations with primary tumor samples represented artifacts as a result of overlapping of tumor cells and ECs is contradicted by the following: only thin tissue sections were used throughout this study, and focusing during microscopic examination allowed for selection of fields in which tumor cells and ECs were consistently on the same plane; the present results were obtained on analysis of both cross and longitudinal tumor sections; and when serial sections of a microscopic area where MYCN-amplified ECs had been detected were stained with a CD45 mAb (panhematopoietic cell marker), the scanty CD45+ infiltrating lymphoid cells always displayed MYCN single-copy gene (data not shown).

Human NB Xenograft Contains Tumor-Derived Endothelial Microvessels
Our results demonstrated that primary NB tumor cells could directly generate microvascular ECs. To investigate this issue in an in vivo model, we injected the MYCN-amplified HTLA-230 human NB cell line in immunodeficient mice, which gives rise to a pseudometastatic disease mimicking human stage 4 NB.26 In HTLA-230 xenografts, human ECs were detected by CD31 staining, mouse ECs were detected by CD34 staining, and MYCN amplification and murine DNA were detected by FISH.

Preliminarily to these experiments, we performed FISH analysis of in vitro cultured HTLA-230 cells using the MYCN probe to identify the hybridization pattern characteristic of these cells (ie, double minutes or homogeneously staining regions [HSR]). An HSR on the short arm of chromosome 4 was detected in HTLA-230 cells by FISH (Figs 3A and 3B) and classical cytogenetic analysis (Figs 3C and 3D, white arrows). In addition, the latter assay demonstrated a derivative chromosome der(11)t(11;Y) (yellow arrow), the balanced translocation t(1;17)(p36;q21) (red arrows), and dup(11p) (blue arrows).


Figure 3
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 3. Cytogenetic analysis of HTLA-230 cell line. (A) Clustering of MYCN signals (red) representing the homogeneously staining region (HSR; arrows). (B) HSR region (red) on the short arm of chromosome 4 (white arrow) identified by DAPI banding. (C and D) The same region is detected by Q-banded karyotype (white arrows), together with derivative chromosome der(11)t(11;Y) (yellow arrows), balanced translocation t(1;17)(p36;q21) (red arrows), and dup(11p) (blue arrows).

 
In accordance with these results, tumors formed by HTLA-230 cells in NOD/scid mice displayed MYCN amplification in the form of HSR. Thus, the FISH pattern was characterized by clustering of red hybridization signals representing the HSR region (Fig 4A, long arrow) and a normal signal corresponding to the nonamplified allele (Fig 4A, short arrow).


Figure 4
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 4. Immunofluorescence and fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of HTLA xenograft. Nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). (A) CD31+ endothelial cells (green, arrowheads) and CD31 tumor cells show an MYCN-amplified allele (red, long arrows) and a normal allele (red, short arrows). (B and C) Murine CD34+ endothelial vessels (green) show red hybridization signals with mouse Cot-1 DNA probe (arrows; x125). (D) CD34 human HTLA-230 cells, but not CD34+ endothelial vessels (green), show MYCN amplification (x125). (E) CD31+ human endothelial cells (green) do not hybridize to mouse Cot-1 DNA probe. The inset shows a CD31 murine cell hybridizing to mouse Cot-1 DNA (red) together with a human tumor cell not reactive with the same probe (x125). (F) Staining of HTLA-230 tumor xenograft with human CD31 (green) and mouse CD34 (red) monoclonal antibodies (x40).

 
The following two distinct populations of ECs contributing to tumor vasculature formation were detected: green staining human CD31+ ECs, which showed the same pattern of MYCN amplification as the HTLA-230 cell line (Fig 4A, arrowheads); and green staining murine CD34+ cells, which showed several red signals generated by hybridization of the mouse Cot-1 probe to repetitive sequences in murine DNA (Figs 4B and 4C, arrows). Mouse Cot-1 probe never hybridized to human tumor DNA (Figs 4B and 4C). In these experiments, mouse Cot-1 probe was preferred to the pancentromeric mouse probe because of the better performance of the former probe.

Control experiments showed the following. First, green staining CD34+ murine ECs did not hybridize to the MYCN probe. Thus, in Figure 4D, MYCN amplification is observed in CD34 HTLA-230 cells but not in CD34+ murine ECs. Second, green staining CD31+ human ECs did not hybridize to mouse Cot-1 DNA (Fig 4E). The inset in Figure 4E shows a CD31 murine non-EC hybridizing to mouse Cot-1 DNA, together with a human tumor cell not reactive with the same probe.

Double staining with human CD31 (green) and murine CD34 (red) mAbs demonstrated that, in three different experiments, CD31+ human ECs represented approximately 80% of HTLA-230 xenograft microvessels, with CD34+ murine ECs accounting for the residual 20%. One representative experiment is shown in Figure 4F. No chimeric human-murine endothelial microvessels were detected, suggesting that differentiation of human and murine ECs occurred through unrelated pathways. Taken together, these results demonstrated unambiguously that the majority of tumor-associated endothelial vessels in the HTLA-230 xenograft model originated directly from human malignant cells.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
This study shows for the first time that a subset of human MYCN-amplified NB tumors contains endothelial microvessels formed by the malignant cells themselves, as demonstrated by detection of MYCN amplification in CD31+ or CD105+ ECs. In three of 10 NB tumors investigated, the proportion of tumor-derived microvessels ranged from 20% to 78%.

A detailed characterization of such vessels showed that they were completely covered with pericytes, similarly to endothelial microvessels bearing single-copy MYCN gene; that pericytes were of host and not tumor origin because they never showed MYCN amplification; and that endothelial microvessels lined by MYCN-amplified ECs displayed open lumen and contained erythrocytes, indicating that they were functional.

VEGF is a specific EC growth factor that stimulates angiogenesis and can directly promote proliferation and survival of tumor cells.29 The functional activities of VEGF are mediated by three different receptors. VEGF-R1 is required for the recruitment of hematopoietic precursors and migration of monocytes and macrophages, whereas VEGF-R2 and VEGF-R3 are essential for the functions of vascular ECs and lymphoendothelial cells, respectively.29 In this study, we tested VEGF-R2/CD309 as human vascular EC marker in addition to CD31 and CD105. In contrast to the latter markers that were expressed selectively by ECs, VEGF-R2/CD309 was detected also on most NB cells. This finding provides the first demonstration that the VEGF-R2/CD309 protein is expressed in MYCN-amplified primary NB and supports previous studies showing that such a receptor is involved in paracrine/autocrine regulation of NB cell line growth.10,30

Consistent with the results with primary NB, the MYCN-amplified HTLA-230 NB cell line formed in NOD/scid mice tumors and contained a major proportion of human, tumor-derived endothelial vessels. In this study, the latter cells were detected by expression of human CD31 in combination with MYCN amplification, but we have recently obtained similar results on injection of the MYCN-nonamplified ACN NB cell line in NOD/scid mice.31

MYCN amplification has been associated with enhanced angiogenic activity of primary NB tumors.32 Because in this study only MYCN-amplified NBs were tested, the possibility that formation of tumor-derived ECs is a distinctive feature of this NB subset cannot be ruled out. Nonetheless, the aforementioned results with NB cell line xenografts are in support of the concept that the ability of tumor cells to generate tumor vessels is independent of MYCN amplification.

Tumor cells can give rise to tumor-associated endothelial microvessels in malignancies other than NB, such as human B-cell lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and malignant melanoma.14-18 In the case of tumors of hematopoietic origin, it has been postulated that a common progenitor targeted by neoplastic transformation can differentiate in tumor cells or ECs sharing the same genetic abnormalities.15 This fascinating hypothesis is not applicable to solid tumors of nonhematopoietic origin.

An alternative hypothesis deals with formation of hybrid vessels by fusion of malignant elements and normal ECs.15 The results of our experiments in the HTLA-230 xenograft model mitigate this hypothesis because murine ECs hybridizing to the MYCN probe or human ECs hybridizing to the mouse Cot-1 DNA probe were never detected.

Another hypothesis entails uptake of apoptotic tumor cell bodies by normal ECs as the potential mechanism for formation of apparently tumor-derived endothelial microvessels.15 This hypothesis seems unlikely because the clear visualization of MYCN amplification in tumor-derived ECs obtained in our study would have been conceivably hampered by apoptotic DNA degradation.

A final possibility is that neoplastic cells or tumor stem cells receive signals in the tumor microenvironment triggering their transdifferentiation into ECs. This phenomenon would occur in some but not all NB tumors through mechanisms that are as yet unknown and warrant further investigation.

Pericytes are solitary cells with characteristic morphology (Fig 2F) embedded in the basement membrane of microvessels.33 Pericytes extend along and wrap the endothelial tube through long cytoplasmic processes that allow establishment of close interactions with ECs. A major function of pericytes is the stabilization of endothelial microvessels.33

Endothelial microvessels formed by NB cells were covered with a layer of host-derived pericytes, as demonstrated by the consistent lack of MYCN amplification in the latter cells. These findings allow us to propose a model summarizing the sequence of events involved in tumor-derived endothelial microvessel formation, which is depicted in Figure 5.


Figure 5
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig 5. MYCN-amplified, tumor-derived CD31+ endothelial cells (ECs) recruit pericytes with single-copy MYCN gene along growing vessels. Pericytes cover and stabilize these vessels, which are chimeric in the sense that their EC component is of tumor origin, whereas their pericyte component is of host origin. Erythrocytes flow through such chimeric endothelial microvessels.

 
Whatever the mechanism underlying their formation, MYCN-amplified ECs recruit pericytes with single-copy MYCN gene along growing vessels, likely through release of platelet-derived growth factor beta.33 Pericytes stabilize these endothelial microvessels that are chimeric in the sense that their EC component is of tumor origin, whereas their pericyte component is of host origin.

Human breast tumor–derived ECs exhibited increased resistance to vincristine and doxorubicin–induced apoptosis compared with normal micro-ECs,23 suggesting by analogy that NB-derived ECs may be chemotherapy resistant. This hypothesis, which is being addressed in ongoing studies, points to the need for a careful characterization of tumor-associated endothelium in high-risk NB patients.

Finally, although the number of NB tumors investigated was too limited to allow any statistical analysis, our results raise the question of whether the presence of tumor-derived microvessels represents an unfavorable prognostic parameter. A final answer will come from the investigation of a large series of MYCN-amplified NB tumors.


    AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
The authors indicated no potential conflicts of interest.


    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Conception and design: Annalisa Pezzolo, Vito Pistoia

Financial support: Vito Pistoia

Provision of study materials or patients: Maria Valeria Corrias, Roberta Cinti, Claudio Gambini

Collection and assembly of data: Annalisa Pezzolo, Federica Parodi, Maria Valeria Corrias, Roberta Cinti

Data analysis and interpretation: Annalisa Pezzolo, Federica Parodi, Maria Valeria Corrias, Roberta Cinti, Vito Pistoia

Manuscript writing: Annalisa Pezzolo, Vito Pistoia

Final approval of manuscript: Annalisa Pezzolo, Federica Parodi, Maria Valeria Corrias, Roberta Cinti, Claudio Gambini, Vito Pistoia


    Appendix
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
Go


Figure 6
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[PowerPoint Slide for Teaching]
 
Fig A1. Specificity controls for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and probes used in the HTLA-230 xenograft experiments. In all panels, nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). (A) Human placental tissue section stained with human CD31 (green) and mouse CD34 (red) mAbs. Only green staining human endothelial cells (ECs) are detected, indicating that the CD34 mouse mAb does not cross react with human tissue (original magnification, x40). (B) Mouse liver tissue section stained with human CD31 (red) and mouse CD34 (green) mAbs. Only green staining mouse ECs are detected, indicating that the CD31 human mAb does not cross react with mouse tissue (original magnification, x40). (C) Human metaphase after fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with human MYCN probe (red). Arrows point to two hybridization signals on each chromosome 2. In the upper part of the panel, two hybridization signals are also detected in a nucleus (arrowheads). The inset shows a mouse metaphase that does not hybridize to the human MYCN probe, indicating the species specificity of this reagent (original magnification, x125). (D) Mouse metaphase after FISH with mouse Cot-1 DNA probe (red). Because this probe detects repetitive DNA sequences, all chromosomes are painted. The inset shows a human metaphase that does not hybridize to the mouse Cot-1 probe, indicating the species specificity of this reagent (original magnification, x125).

 


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank John Maris, Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, PA; Kate Matthay, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA; and Bob Seeger, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA for critically reviewing the manuscript and providing criticism and helpful suggestions. We also thank Chiara Bernardini for excellent secretarial assistance.


    NOTES
 
Supported by grants from the Italian Ministry of Health and Compagnia di San Paolo, Torino, Italy.

Presented in part at the Advances in Neuroblastoma Research Meeting, May 17-20, 2006, Los Angeles, CA.

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF...
 AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
 Appendix
 REFERENCES
 
1. Brodeur GM: Neuroblastoma: Biological insights into a clinical enigma. Nat Rev Cancer 3:203-216, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]

2. Folkman J: What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 82:4-6, 1990[Free Full Text]

3. Folkman J: Angiogenesis in cancer, vascular, rheumatoid and other disease. Nat Med 1:27-31, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]

4. Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F: Tumor angiogenesis: A new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1875-1887, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Meitar D, Crawford SE, Rademaker AW, et al: Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastatic disease, MYCN amplification, and poor outcome in human neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol 14:405-414, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Eggert A, Ikegaki N, Kwiatkowski J, et al: High-level expression of angiogenic factors is associated with advanced tumor stage in human neuroblastomas. Clin Cancer Res 6:1900-1908, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Kim ES, Serur A, Huang J, et al: Potent VEGF blockade causes regression of coopted vessels in a model of neuroblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:11399-11404, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Pastorino F, Brignole C, Marimpietri D, et al: Vascular damage and anti-angiogenic effects of tumor vessel-targeted liposomal chemotherapy. Cancer Res 63:7400-7409, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Shusterman S, Grupp SA, Barr R, et al: The angiogenesis inhibitor tup-470 effectively inhibits human neuroblastoma xenograft growth, especially in the setting of subclinical disease. Clin Cancer Res 7:977-984, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Beppu K, Nakamura K, Linehan WM, et al: Topotecan blocks hypoxia-inducible factor-1-alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor expression induced by insulin-like growth factor-I in neuroblastoma cells. Cancer Res 65:4775-4781, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Marimpietri D, Nico B, Vacca A, et al: Synergistic inhibition of human neuroblastoma-related angiogenesis by vinblastine and rapamycin. Oncogene 24:6785-6795, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Shusterman S, Maris JM: Prospects for therapeutic inhibition of neuroblastoma angiogenesis. Cancer Lett 228:171-179, 2005[CrossRef][Medline]

13. Carmeliet P: Mechanisms of angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Nat Med 6:389-395, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

14. Maniotis AJ, Folberg R, Hess A, et al: Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: Vasculogenic mimicry. Am J Pathol 155:739-752, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Streubel B, Chott A, Huber D, et al: Lymphoma-specific genetic aberrations in microvascular endothelial cells in B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med 351:250-259, 2004[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Gunsilius E, Duba HC, Petzer AL, et al: Evidence from a leukaemia model for maintenance of vascular endothelium by bone-marrow-derived endothelial cells. Lancet 355:1688-1691, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]

17. Rigolin GM, Fraulini C, Ciccone M, et al: Neoplastic circulating endothelial cells in multiple myeloma with 13q14 deletion. Blood 107:2531-2535, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Fonsato V, Buttiglieri S, Deregibus MC, et al: Expression of Pax2 in human renal tumor-derived endothelial cells sustains apoptosis resistance and angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 168:706-713, 2006[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Hammersen F, Endrich B, Messmer K: The fine structure of tumor blood vessels: I. Participation of non-endothelial cells in tumor angiogenesis. Int J Microcirc Clin Exp 4:31-43, 1985[Medline]

20. Chang YS, di Tomaso E, McDonald DM, et al: Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: Frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:14608-14613, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. di Tomaso E, Capen D, Haskell A, et al: Mosaic tumor vessels: Cellular basis and ultrastructure of focal regions lacking endothelial cell markers. Cancer Res 65:5740-5749, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Bussolati B, Deambrosis I, Rosso S, et al: Altered angiogenesis and survival in human tumor-derived endothelial cells. FASEB J 17:1159-1161, 2003[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Grange C, Bussolati B, Bruno S, et al: Isolation and characterization of human breast tumor-derived endothelial cells. Oncol Rep 15:381-386, 2006[Medline]

24. Martinez-Ramirez A, Cigudosa JC, Maestre L, et al: Simultaneous detection of the immunophenotypic markers and genetic aberrations on routinely processed paraffin section of lymphoma samples by means of the FICTION technique. Leukemia 18:348-353, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]

25. Brodeur GM, Pritchard J, Berthold F, et al: Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 11:1466-1477, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Bogenmann E: A metastatic neuroblastoma model in SCID mice. Int J Cancer 67:379-385, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]

27. Burrows FJ, Derbyshire EJ, Tazzari PL, et al: Up-regulation of endoglin on vascular endothelial cells in human solid tumors: Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Clin Cancer Res 1:1623-1634, 1995[Abstract]

28. Kumar S, Ghellal A, Li C, et al: Breast carcinoma: Vascular density determined using CD105 antibody correlates with tumor prognosis. Cancer Res 59:856-861, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Olsson AK, Dimberg A, Kreuger J, et al: VEGF receptor signalling in control vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:359-371, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

30. Das B, Yeger H, Tsuchida R, et al: A hypoxia-driven vascular endothelial growth factor/Flt1 autocrine loop interacts with hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha through mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase [1/2] pathway in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 65:7267-7275, 2005[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Ribatti D, Nico B, Pezzolo A, et al: Angiogenesis in human neuroblastoma xenograft model: Mechanism and inhibition by tumor-derived interferon-{gamma}. Br J Cancer 94:1845-1852, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

32. Ribatti D, Raffaghello L, Pastorino F, et al: In vivo angiogenic activity of neuroblastoma correlates with MYCN oncogene overexpression. Int J Cancer 102:351-354, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]

33. von Tell D, Armulik A, Betsholtz C: Pericytes and vascular stability. Exp Cell Res 312:623-629, 2006[CrossRef][Medline]

Submitted September 6, 2006; accepted November 14, 2006.





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Save to my personal folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pezzolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pistoia, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pezzolo, A.
Right arrow Articles by Pistoia, V.

About
JCO
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 PDA Services

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1527-7755. Print ISSN: 0732-183X
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JCO Online